Notebookcheck Logo

ATI Radeon HD 4100 vs ATI Radeon HD 4270

ATI Radeon HD 4100

► remove from comparison

The AMD ATI Mobility Radeon HD 4100 or just Radeon 4100 is an integrated graphics card (shared memory) for laptops. Compared to the HD 4200, the HD 4100 probably features a lower clock speed (and perhaps also some features are stripped down). According to differencebetween.net the clock rate is just 350MHz and therefore below the low power HD 4225.

ATI Radeon HD 4270

► remove from comparison

The AMD ATI Radeon HD 4270 (sometimes also ATI Mobility Radeon HD 4270 called) is an onboard (shared Memory) graphics chip in the RS880M chipset. It is based on the HD 3400 graphics core and features the UVD 2 video engine to decode HD videos (Avivo HD - can decode two HD streams simultaneously). Compared to the HD 4250, the 4270 is a higher clocked version.

Compared to the old HD 3200, the 4270 supports DirectX 10.1 and features the UVD2 video decoder.

The UVD 2 video engine is able to decode HD videos (H.264 and VC-1 in all stages, MPEG-2 only IDCT) and allows the fluent playback of HD videos (e.g. Blu-ray) with a relative low CPU utilization (called Avivo HD). The HD 3200 was the first onboard graphics card that allows the fluent playback of Blu-ray videos. The UVD 2 in the HD 4270 supports the decoding of two video stream and therefore got a full Blu-Ray support.

The graphics core of the HD 4270 stems from the Mobility Radeon HD 3400 series and is therefore DirectX 10.1 capable. Because of the missing graphics memory, the performance of the card is a bit lower than of the HD 34x0. Theroretically, dedicated memory chips can be directly added to the chip, making it a dedicated graphics card. Because of pricing it is unclear if any manufacturer will add memory to the chip.

Current (and less demanding games) like Starcraft 2 or Left4Dead are playable in low details in conjunction with a fast CPU. Furthermore older games like Doom 3 or Quake 4 should also be playable with slower processors. Compared to older onboad graphic chips (e.g., GMA 4500MHD), the HD 4270 is much faster. The new Intel HD Graphics in the Core ix Arrandale CPUs, offers a similar performance, but the driver support by AMD should be better.

ATI Radeon HD 4100ATI Radeon HD 4270
Radeon HD 4000 Series
Radeon HD 4270 40 @ 0.59 GHz
Radeon HD 4250 compare 40 @ 0.5 GHz
Radeon HD 4200 compare 40 @ 0.5 GHz
Radeon HD 4225 compare 40 @ 0.38 GHz
Radeon HD 4100 40 @ 0.35 GHz
Radeon HD 4270 40 @ 0.59 GHz
Radeon HD 4250 compare 40 @ 0.5 GHz
Radeon HD 4200 compare 40 @ 0.5 GHz
Radeon HD 4225 compare 40 @ 0.38 GHz
Radeon HD 4100 40 @ 0.35 GHz
ArchitectureRV6xxRV6xx
Pipelines40 - unified40 - unified
Core Speed350 MHz590 MHz
Max. Amount of Memory512 MB512 MB
Shared Memoryyesyes
APIDirectX 10.1, Shader 4.0DirectX 10.1, Shader 4.0
technology55 nm55 nm
Date of Announcement01.11.2009 01.05.2010
CodenameRS880M
FeaturesAvivo HD (UVD2), Hybrid Graphics Technology, PCI-E 2.0, Vari-Bright (Bildschirmhelligkeit automtisch anpassen), HDCP support, Display Cache

Benchmarks

3DMark Vantage
3DM Vant. Perf. total + ATI Radeon HD 4270
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. total
230 Points (0%)
3DM Vant. Perf. GPU no PhysX + ATI Radeon HD 4270
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. GPU no PhysX
179 Points (0%)
3DMark 03 - 3DMark 03 - Standard
3668 Points (2%)
3DMark 05 - 3DMark 05 - Standard
2926 Points (3%)
3DMark 06 3DMark 06 - Standard 1280x1024 + ATI Radeon HD 4270
3DMark 06
1402 Points (2%)
Windows 7 Experience Index - Win7 Gaming graphics
5.1 Points (65%)
5.3 Points (67%)
Windows 7 Experience Index - Win7 Graphics
4.2 Points (53%)
3.7 Points (47%)
Cinebench R10 Cinebench R10 Shading (32bit) + ATI Radeon HD 4270
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Shading (32bit)
2220 Points (2%)
Cinebench R11.5 Cinebench R11.5 OpenGL 64 Bit + ATI Radeon HD 4270
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 OpenGL 64 Bit
3.8 fps (1%)

Average Benchmarks ATI Radeon HD 4100 → 100% n=2

Average Benchmarks ATI Radeon HD 4270 → 96% n=2

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

For more games that might be playable and a list of all games and graphics cards visit our Gaming List

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:

show all (including archived), 2024, 2023
v1.26
log 19. 11:19:30

#0 checking url part for id 1555 +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 1823 +0s ... 0s

#2 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#3 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Fri, 19 Apr 2024 05:40:26 +0200 +0.001s ... 0.001s

#4 composed specs +0.118s ... 0.119s

#5 did output specs +0s ... 0.119s

#6 start showIntegratedCPUs +0s ... 0.119s

#7 getting avg benchmarks for device 1555 +0.045s ... 0.165s

#8 got single benchmarks 1555 +0.011s ... 0.176s

#9 getting avg benchmarks for device 1823 +0.002s ... 0.178s

#10 got single benchmarks 1823 +0.009s ... 0.187s

#11 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.187s

#12 min, max, avg, median took s +0.09s ... 0.277s

#13 before gaming benchmark output +0s ... 0.277s

#14 Got 0 rows for game benchmarks. +0.003s ... 0.279s

#15 return log +0.081s ... 0.36s

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Graphics Card Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)