Notebookcheck Logo

Rockchip RK3168 vs UNISOC Tiger T310

Rockchip RK3168

► remove from comparison

The Rockchip RK3168 is a low-end ARM SoC designed primarily for smartphones. It integrates two Cortex-A9 CPU cores with NEON extension, a PowerVR SGX 540 graphics card (400 MHz) and a memory controller for low-power (LP-) DDR2/DDR3. The performance should be comparable to other similarly clocked Cortex-A9 SoCs such as the Samsung Exynos 4210. Thanks to its 28nm manufacturing, the RK3168 is relatively power efficient and should enable longer battery life.

UNISOC Tiger T310

► remove from comparison  T310

The Unisoc Tiger T310 is a SoC for smartphones and tablets of the entry level. It was first announced in mid 2019 and integrates four CPU cores (quad core). One big Cortex-A75 core clocked at up to 2 GHz and three small A55 cores with up to 1.8 GHz.

Furthermore, the chip integrates an LTE modem (Cat 7, TDD-LTE, FDD-LTE, TDSCDMA, WCDMA, CDMA, GSM), Bluetooth 5.0 and WiFi b/g/n/ac. The integrated ISP supports up to two cameras (16 MPixel and 8 Mpixel, maximum 30 fps video capture) and the GNSS can use all current standards (GPS, Glonass, Beidou, Galileo).

The memory controller is able to drive LPDDR3 at 933 MHz and faster LPDDR4x at 1333 MHz.

The PowerVR GE8300 iGPU is from Imagination and clocked at up to 800 MHz.

The chip is produced in 12nm at TSMC and should offer a rather good power efficiency (for 2019).

ModelRockchip RK3168UNISOC Tiger T310
Series
Series:
HiSilicon Kirin 9000W compare1.53 - 2.49 GHz12 / 12 cores
UNISOC Tiger T3101.8 - 2 GHz4 / 4 cores
Rockchip RK3288 compare1.8 GHz4 / 4 cores
Apple A6x compare1.4 GHzcores
Apple A6 compare1 GHzcores
Apple S5 compare2 / 2 cores
HiSilicon k3v2 Hi3620 compare1.2 GHz4 / 4 cores
Rockchip RK3066 1.5 GHz compare1.5 GHz2 / 2 cores
Amlogic AML8726-MX compare1.5 GHz2 / 2 cores
Rockchip RK3168 « 1.2 GHz2 / 2 cores
Rockchip RK2918 1.2 GHz compare1.2 GHz1 / 1 cores
ARM Cortex A8 1.2 GHz compare1.2 GHz1 / 1 cores
Telechips TCC8803 1GHz compare1 GHz1 / 1 cores
Loongson 2F 900MHz compare0.9 GHz1 / 1 cores
CSR8670 compare0.08 GHzcores
ARM Cortex-M4 compare cores
HiSilicon Hi6262 compare cores
DK3.5+ST comparecores
unknown compare cores
HiSilicon Kirin 9000W compare1.53 - 2.49 GHz12 / 12 cores
UNISOC Tiger T310 « 1.8 - 2 GHz4 / 4 cores
Rockchip RK3288 compare1.8 GHz4 / 4 cores
Apple A6x compare1.4 GHzcores
Apple A6 compare1 GHzcores
Apple S5 compare2 / 2 cores
HiSilicon k3v2 Hi3620 compare1.2 GHz4 / 4 cores
Rockchip RK3066 1.5 GHz compare1.5 GHz2 / 2 cores
Amlogic AML8726-MX compare1.5 GHz2 / 2 cores
Rockchip RK31681.2 GHz2 / 2 cores
Rockchip RK2918 1.2 GHz compare1.2 GHz1 / 1 cores
ARM Cortex A8 1.2 GHz compare1.2 GHz1 / 1 cores
Telechips TCC8803 1GHz compare1 GHz1 / 1 cores
Loongson 2F 900MHz compare0.9 GHz1 / 1 cores
CSR8670 compare0.08 GHzcores
ARM Cortex-M4 compare cores
HiSilicon Hi6262 compare cores
DK3.5+ST comparecores
unknown compare cores
Clock1200 MHz1800 - 2000 MHz
Cores / Threads2 / 24 / 4
Technology28 nm12 nm
FeaturesPowerVR SGX 540 (400 MHz), DDR2/DDR3 Memory ControllerLTE Cat.7, BT 5.0, WiFi ac, GNSS, eMMC 5.1, LPDDR3 933, LPDDR4x 1333 MHz
iGPUPowerVR SGX540 (400 MHz)PowerVR GE8300 ( - 800 MHz)
ArchitectureARMARM
Announced
Manufacturerwww.rock-chips.comwww.unisoc.com

Benchmarks

3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics
100%
1 T310 +
1588 Points (19%)
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot (ES 3.0) Unlimited Physics
100%
1 T310 +
1590 Points (18%)
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.4 64 Bit Single-Core
100%
1 T310 +
376 Points (16%)
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
100%
1 T310 +
756 Points (1%)
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Single-Core
100%
1 T310 +
1687 Points (17%)
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
100%
1 T310 +
2969 Points (3%)
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 64 Bit Multi-Core
100%
1 T310 +
2987 Points (5%)
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 64 Bit Single-Core
100%
1 T310 +
1656 Points (25%)
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *
100%
1 T310 +
3239 ms (4%)
Octane V2 - Octane V2 Total Score
100%
1 T310 +
11986 Points (11%)
WebXPRT 4 - WebXPRT 4 Score
100%
1 T310 +
45 Points (13%)
WebXPRT 3 - WebXPRT 3 Score
100%
1 T310 +
63 Points (13%)
Antutu v9 - AnTuTu v9 Total Score
100%
1 T310 +
162595 Points (10%)
Antutu v9 - AnTuTu v9 CPU
100%
1 T310 +
57138 Points (16%)
PassMark PerformanceTest Mobile V1 - PerformanceTest Mobile V1 CPU Tests
100%
1 T310 +
1653 Points (0%)
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Storage 2.0 score
100%
1 T310 +
9900 Points (17%)
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Work Score 3.0
100%
1 T310 +
6866 Points (32%)
Power Consumption - Geekbench 5.5 Power Consumption 150cd *
100%
1 T310 +
3.7 Watt (2%)
Power Consumption - Idle Power Consumption 150cd 1min *
100%
1 T310 +
1.6 Watt (2%)

Average Benchmarks UNISOC Tiger T310 → 0% n=

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:

show all (including archived), 2024, 2023
v1.26
log 29. 12:27:43

#0 checking url part for id 4129 +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 14530 +0s ... 0s

#2 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#3 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Thu, 28 Mar 2024 05:35:32 +0100 +0.001s ... 0.001s

#4 composed specs +0.089s ... 0.09s

#5 did output specs +0s ... 0.09s

#6 getting avg benchmarks for device 4129 +0.003s ... 0.093s

#7 got single benchmarks 4129 +0.006s ... 0.098s

#8 getting avg benchmarks for device 14530 +0.002s ... 0.101s

#9 got single benchmarks 14530 +0.008s ... 0.108s

#10 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.108s

#11 min, max, avg, median took s +0.047s ... 0.156s

#12 return log +0.025s ... 0.18s

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)