Notebookcheck Logo

AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 8945HS vs AMD Ryzen 9 8945H

AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 8945HS

► remove from comparison AMD R9 PRO 8945HS

The Ryzen 9 PRO 8945HS is a powerful Hawk Point family processor (APU) released in April 2024. The R9 PRO 8945HS is identical to the "normal" R9 8945HS in virtually all respects; both come with 8 Zen 4 cores running at 4.0 GHz to 5.2 GHz (16 processing threads), a 16-TOPS Ryzen AI NPU (higher clock speeds) and the top-of-the-line Radeon 780M graphics adapter. Other key features include PCIe 4 and USB 4 support, LPDDR5x-7500 RAM support and 16 MB of L3 cache. Unlike the R9 8945HS however this PRO series chip has ECC memory support and the Secure Processor feature which in a nutshell is an ARM co-processor built into the main chip.

Architecture and Features

Hawk Point APUs are powered by the Zen 4 architecture, just like Dragon Range, Phoenix and Raphael processors are. With this product family, AMD is betting big on generative AI; these chips are said to deliver an up to 40% increase in generative AI performance over 7040 series APUs making apps like DaVinci Resolve and Adobe Photoshop more powerful than ever before.

Unlike Zen 3, Zen 4 features AVX512 support and, thanks to a plethora of other improvements including larger registers/buffers/caches (reportedly at the cost of some of them becoming slightly slower), is supposed to bring an IPC improvement of around 13%.

Elsewhere, the R9 PRO 8945HS has 16 MB of L3 cache and support for super-fast RAM (up to LPDDR5x-7500 or DDR5-5600 with ECC support optionally present depending on the socket). The processor is compatible with USB 4 and thus with Thunderbolt; PCIe support is limited to the 4.0 spec for a throughput of 1.97 GB/s per lane. 20 lanes are available.

OS support is limited to 64-bit editions of Windows 11 and Windows 10 and of course to Linux. Note that the chip isn't overclockable and neither is it user-replaceable as it gets soldered down for good (FP7, FP7r2, FP8 socket interfaces).

Performance

The 8945HS is an R9 7940HS in disguise, so it's realistic to expect the chip to be just slightly faster than the Core i9-12900HK and also the Ryzen 7 7840HS, as far as multi-thread performance is concerned.

Your mileage may vary depending on how high the CPU power limits are and how competent the cooling solution of your system is.

Graphics

The Radeon 780M has 12 CUs (768 shaders) running at up to 2,800 MHz. This is a very fast iGPU, as of late 2023. It will let you use up to 4 monitors with resolutions as high as SUHD 4320p, and it is also capable of HW-encoding and HW-decoding the most widely used video codecs including AVC, HEVC and AV1. More importantly, it is fast enough for proper 1080p gaming as long as one is fine with low to medium detail settings.

Your mileage may vary depending on how high the CPU power limits are, how competent the cooling solution of the system is, how fast the RAM of the system is (there is no dedicated VRAM here).

Power consumption

This Ryzen 9 series chip has a long-term power limit (default TDP) of 35 W to 54 W, giving laptop makers a choice between longer battery life and higher performance. Either way, an active cooling solution is a must for a system powered by this chip.

The 8945HS is built with TSMC's 4 nm process for high, as of late 2023, energy efficiency.

AMD Ryzen 9 8945H

► remove from comparison AMD R9 8945H

The Ryzen 9 8945H is a rebadged Ryzen 9 7940HS with higher clock speeds on the Ryzen AI NPU. To be more specific, this is a powerful Hawk Point family laptop chip that has eight Zen 4 cores running at 4.0 GHz to 5.2 GHz. All of its cores are SMT-enabled for a total of 16 processing threads.

Compared to the 8945HS, the H seems to be a local variant for China and offers the same specifications.

The Radeon 780M serves as the integrated graphics adapter.

Architecture & Features

Hawk Point family chips are powered by the Zen 4 architecture, much like Phoenix and Dragon Range family chips are. That's not to say there is no difference between the three. With Hawk Point, AMD is betting big on generative AI; these chips are promised to deliver an up to 40% increase in generative AI performance over 7040 series APUs making apps like DaVinci Resolve and Adobe Photoshop even more powerful.

Unlike Zen 3, Zen 4 features AVX512 support and, thanks to a plethora of other improvements including larger caches/registers/buffers across the board, is slated to bring a double-digit IPC improvement over the former.

Elsewhere, the 8945H has 16 MB of L3 cache and support for super-fast RAM (up to LPDDR5x-7500 or DDR5-5600; no ECC support). The processor is compatible with USB 4 and thus with Thunderbolt; PCIe support is limited to the 4.0 spec for a throughput of 1.97 GB/s per lane. 20 lanes are available.

OS support is limited to 64-bit editions of Windows 11 and Windows 10 and of course to Linux. Note that the chip isn't overclockable and neither is it user-replaceable as it gets soldered down for good (FP7, FP7r2, FP8 socket interfaces).

Performance

The 8945H is an R9 7940HS in disguise, so it's realistic to expect the chip to be just slightly faster than the Core i9-12900HK and also the Ryzen 7 7840HS, as far as multi-thread performance is concerned.

Your mileage may vary depending on how high the CPU power limits are and how competent the cooling solution of your system is.

Graphics

The Radeon 780M has 12 CUs (768 shaders) running at up to 2,800 MHz. This is a very fast iGPU, as of late 2023. It will let you use up to 4 monitors with resolutions as high as SUHD 4320p, and it is also capable of HW-encoding and HW-decoding the most widely used video codecs including AVC, HEVC and AV1. More importantly, it is fast enough for proper 1080p gaming as long as one is fine with low to medium detail settings.

Your mileage may vary depending on how high the CPU power limits are, how competent the cooling solution of the system is, how fast the RAM of the system is (there is no dedicated VRAM here).

Power consumption

This Ryzen 9 series chip has a long-term power limit (default TDP) of 35 W to 54 W, giving laptop makers a choice between longer battery life and higher performance. Either way, an active cooling solution is a must for a system powered by this chip.

The 8945H is built with TSMC's 4 nm process for high, as of late 2023, energy efficiency.

ModelAMD Ryzen 9 PRO 8945HSAMD Ryzen 9 8945H
CodenameHawk Point-HS (Zen 4)Hawk Point-HS (Zen 4)
SeriesAMD Hawk Point (Zen 4/4c)AMD Hawk Point (Zen 4/4c)
Series: Hawk Point (Zen 4/4c) Hawk Point-HS (Zen 4)
AMD Ryzen 9 270 compare4 - 5.2 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 9 8945H4 - 5.2 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS compare4 - 5.2 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 8945HS « 4 - 5.2 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 7 260 compare3.8 - 5.1 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS compare3.8 - 5.1 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 7 8840HS compare3.3 - 5.1 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 8840HS compare3.3 - 5.1 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 5 240 compare4.3 - 5 GHz6 / 12 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 5 8645HS compare4.3 - 5 GHz6 / 12 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 5 8640HS compare3.5 - 4.9 GHz6 / 12 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 9 270 compare4 - 5.2 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 9 8945H « 4 - 5.2 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS compare4 - 5.2 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 8945HS4 - 5.2 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 7 260 compare3.8 - 5.1 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS compare3.8 - 5.1 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 7 8840HS compare3.3 - 5.1 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 8840HS compare3.3 - 5.1 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 5 240 compare4.3 - 5 GHz6 / 12 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 5 8645HS compare4.3 - 5 GHz6 / 12 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 5 8640HS compare3.5 - 4.9 GHz6 / 12 cores16 MB L3
Clock4000 - 5200 MHz4000 - 5200 MHz
L1 Cache512 KB512 KB
L2 Cache8 MB8 MB
L3 Cache16 MB16 MB
Cores / Threads8 / 16
8 x 5.2 GHz AMD Zen 4
8 / 16
8 x 5.2 GHz AMD Zen 4
TDP45 Watt45 Watt
Technology4 nm4 nm
Die Size178 mm2178 mm2
max. Temp.100 °C100 °C
SocketFP7/FP7r2FP7/FP7r2/FP8
FeaturesDDR5-5600/LPDDR5x-7500 RAM, PCIe 4, Ryzen AI, MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4A, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, AVX2, AVX-512, BMI2, ABM, FMA, ADX, SMEP, SMAP, SMT, CPB, AES-NI, RDRAND, RDSEED, SHA, SMEDDR5-5600/LPDDR5x-7500 RAM, PCIe 4, Ryzen AI, MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4A, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, AVX2, AVX-512, BMI2, ABM, FMA, ADX, SMEP, SMAP, SMT, CPB, AES-NI, RDRAND, RDSEED, SHA, SME
iGPUAMD Radeon 780M ( - 2800 MHz)AMD Radeon 780M ( - 2800 MHz)
Architecturex86x86
Announced
Manufacturerwww.amd.comwww.amd.com

Benchmarks

Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - R9 8945H
40.6 pt (68%)
Cinebench 2024 - Cinebench 2024 CPU Single Core
min: 103.3     avg: 105.2     median: 105.2 (59%)     max: 107 Points
Cinebench 2024 - Cinebench 2024 CPU Multi Core
min: 852     avg: 906     median: 906 (17%)     max: 960 Points
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Multi Core
min: 15516     avg: 16908     median: 17423 (16%)     max: 17785 Points
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Single Core
min: 1808     avg: 1811     median: 1812 (77%)     max: 1814 Points
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Single Core)
min: 638     avg: 670     median: 670 (74%)     max: 703 Points
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Multi Core)
min: 6153     avg: 6656     median: 6859 (17%)     max: 6956 Points
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit
min: 2521     avg: 2681     median: 2691 (17%)     max: 2819 Points
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64 Bit
min: 283     avg: 283.7     median: 284 (80%)     max: 284 Points
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64 Bit
29.1 Points (38%)
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64 Bit
3.3 Points (78%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (32bit)
7594 Points (46%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (32bit)
46572 Points (34%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (64bit)
84253 Points (54%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (64bit)
14451 Points (18%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 1024m *
min: 64.042     avg: 69.5     median: 69.5 (1%)     max: 74.917 s
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 32m *
min: 2.569     avg: 2.6     median: 2.6 (1%)     max: 2.688 s
WinRAR - WinRAR 4.0
min: 7339     avg: 7542     median: 7541.5 (12%)     max: 7744 Points
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Multi Thread 4 runs
min: 66557     avg: 70877     median: 72851 (42%)     max: 73222 MIPS
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Single Thread 4 runs
min: 6615     avg: 6657     median: 6664 (79%)     max: 6691 MIPS
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 2
min: 141.2     avg: 150.1     median: 150.1 (50%)     max: 158.9 fps
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 1
min: 284.5     avg: 292.3     median: 292.3 (67%)     max: 300 fps
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 - HWBOT x265 4k Preset
min: 20.6     avg: 21.6     median: 21.9 (38%)     max: 22.4 fps
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Serpent
1.3 GB/s (38%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Twofish
min: 2     avg: 2.1     median: 2.1 (35%)     max: 2.1 GB/s
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt AES
min: 14.5     avg: 15.1     median: 15.1 (39%)     max: 15.7 GB/s
Blender - Blender 3.3 Classroom CPU *
min: 286     avg: 301.7     median: 293 (4%)     max: 326 Seconds
Blender - Blender 2.79 BMW27 CPU *
min: 178     avg: 188.7     median: 182 (1%)     max: 206 Seconds
R Benchmark 2.5 - R Benchmark 2.5 *
min: 0.4298     avg: 0.4     median: 0.4 (9%)     max: 0.4576 sec
3DMark 06 - CPU - 3DMark 06 - CPU
min: 15007     avg: 15476     median: 15476 (33%)     max: 15945 Points
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
min: 6.833     avg: 6.9     median: 6.9 (1%)     max: 6.962 s
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M *
17.4 s (1%)
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 32M *
min: 620.562     avg: 633     median: 632.5 (3%)     max: 644.49 s
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. CPU no Physx
69373 Points (53%)
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Physics
min: 20449     avg: 22187     median: 22340 (56%)     max: 23773 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Physics
85021 Points (69%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Extreme Physics
85496 Points (69%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Physics
86301 Points (72%)
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Physics
20375 Points (52%)
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Physics
min: 27032     avg: 27602     median: 27363 (49%)     max: 28410 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy CPU
min: 10844     avg: 11489     median: 11800 (50%)     max: 11823 Points
Geekbench 6.3 - Geekbench 6.3 Single-Core
min: 2651     avg: 2685     median: 2692 (69%)     max: 2711 Points
Geekbench 6.3 - Geekbench 6.3 Multi-Core
min: 12638     avg: 12821     median: 12662 (49%)     max: 13162 Points
Geekbench 6.0 - Geekbench 6.0 Single-Core
3105 Points (99%)
Geekbench 6.0 - Geekbench 6.0 Multi-Core
21003 Points (86%)
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.5 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 1991     avg: 1993     median: 1994 (78%)     max: 1995 Points
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.5 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 11949     avg: 11986     median: 11980 (21%)     max: 12028 Points
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 1907     avg: 1917     median: 1917 (8%)     max: 1927 Points
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 11804     avg: 11854     median: 11853.5 (37%)     max: 11903 Points
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Single-Core
8140 Points (81%)
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
47917 Points (48%)
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *
min: 505     avg: 506     median: 505.5 (1%)     max: 506 ms
Octane V2 - Octane V2 Total Score
96399 Points (80%)
WebXPRT 4 - WebXPRT 4 Score
min: 263     avg: 265     median: 265 (73%)     max: 267 Points
WebXPRT 3 - WebXPRT 3 Score
min: 308     avg: 308.5     median: 308.5 (55%)     max: 309 Points
CrossMark - CrossMark Overall
min: 1800     avg: 1833     median: 1832.5 (69%)     max: 1865 Points
Power Consumption - Prime95 Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 75.9     avg: 91.7     median: 91.7 (16%)     max: 107.5 Watt
Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Consumption - external Monitor *
70.3 Watt (13%)
Power Consumption - Idle Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 15.9     avg: 17.9     median: 17.9 (12%)     max: 19.8 Watt
Power Consumption - Idle Power Consumption 150cd 1min *
11.7 Watt (13%)
Power Consumption - Power Efficiency - Cinebench R15 Multi external Monitor
35.9 Points per Watt (27%)

Average Benchmarks AMD Ryzen 9 8945H → 0% n=0

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
red legend - Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:
v1.28
log 14. 06:38:14

#0 ran 0s before starting gpusingle class +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 17472 +0s ... 0s

#2 checking url part for id 17942 +0s ... 0s

#3 redirected to Ajax server, took 1739511494s time from redirect:0 +0s ... 0s

#4 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Thu, 13 Feb 2025 10:56:05 +0100 +0s ... 0s

#5 composed specs +0.006s ... 0.006s

#6 did output specs +0s ... 0.006s

#7 getting avg benchmarks for device 17472 +0.001s ... 0.006s

#8 got single benchmarks 17472 +0s ... 0.007s

#9 getting avg benchmarks for device 17942 +0.004s ... 0.01s

#10 got single benchmarks 17942 +0.006s ... 0.016s

#11 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.016s

#12 min, max, avg, median took s +0.027s ... 0.044s

#13 return log +0.001s ... 0.045s

Please share our article, every link counts!
Mail Logo
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)