Notebookcheck Logo

AMD Ryzen 9 7845HX vs AMD Ryzen 7 7745HX

AMD Ryzen 9 7845HX

► remove from comparison AMD R9 7845HX

The AMD Ryzen 9 7845HX is a fast high-end laptop processor of the Dragon Range series. It offers 12 of the 16 cores based on the Zen 4 architecture that supports hyperthreading (24 threads). The cores clock from 3 (base) up to 5.2 GHz (single core boost). The 7845HX is the second-fastest mobile Ryzen CPU at launch and derived from the desktop Ryzen 9 7900X.

The performance of the R9 7845HX is significantly faster than the old top model Ryzen 9 6980HX (8 Zen 3 cores, 5 GHz max) thanks to the higher core count, improved architecture and higher clock speed.

The Dragon Range series still uses a chiplet design with two CCD-clusters (each with 8 possible cores) in 5nm and an IO-die (including the memory controller and the Radeon 610M iGPU) in 6nm. The chip integrates 4x USB 3.2 Gen2 (10 Gbps) ports (no USB4), 28 PCIe 5.0 lanes (for GPU and SSDs) and a dual-channel DDR5-5200 memory controller.

The R9 7845HX is rated at a TDP of 55 Watt and can be configured from 45 to 75 Watt (cTDP).

AMD Ryzen 7 7745HX

► remove from comparison AMD R7 7745HX

The AMD Ryzen 7 7745HX is a fast high-end laptop processor of the Dragon Range series. It offers 8 cores based on the Zen 4 architecture that supports hyperthreading (16 threads). The cores clock from 3.6 (base) up to 5.1 GHz (single core boost).

The performance of the R7 7745HX should be slightly higher than the old top model Ryzen 9 6980HX (8 Zen 3 cores with up to 4.9 GHz) thanks to the improved architecture and slightly higher clock speed.

The Dragon Range series still uses a chiplet design with two CCD-clusters (each with 8 possible cores, the 7745HX only uses one CCD) in 5nm and an IO-die (including the memory controller and the Radeon 610M iGPU) in 6nm. The chip integrates 4x USB 3.2 Gen2 (10 Gbps) ports (no USB4), 28 PCIe 5.0 lanes (for GPU and SSDs) and a dual-channel DDR5-5200 memory controller.

The R7 7745HX is rated at a TDP of 55 Watt and can be configured up to 75 Watt (cTDP).

ModelAMD Ryzen 9 7845HXAMD Ryzen 7 7745HX
SeriesAMD Dragon Range (Zen 4, Ryzen 7045)AMD Dragon Range (Zen 4, Ryzen 7045)
CodenameDragon Range-HX (Zen 4)Dragon Range (Zen 4)
Clock3000 - 5200 MHz3600 - 5100 MHz
L1 Cache768 KB512 KB
L2 Cache12 MB8 MB
L3 Cache64 MB32 MB
Cores / Threads12 / 248 / 16
TDP55 Watt55 Watt
Transistors9900 Million9900 Million
TechnologyCCD = 5 nm, I/O = 6 nmCCD = 5 nm, I/O = 6 nm
max. Temp.100 °C100 °C
SocketFL1FL1
iGPUAMD Radeon 610M (400 - 2200 MHz)AMD Radeon 610M (400 - 2200 MHz)
Architecturex86x86
Announced
ManufacturerAMD Dragon Range (Zen 4, Ryzen 7045) R9 7845HXAMD Dragon Range (Zen 4, Ryzen 7045) R7 7745HX
Series: Dragon Range (Zen 4, Ryzen 7045) Dragon Range (Zen 4)
AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX compare2.5 - 5.4 GHz16 / 32 cores64 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 7 7745HX « 3.6 - 5.1 GHz8 / 16 cores32 MB L3

Benchmarks

Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - R7 7745HX
65.1 pt (73%)
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Multi Core
18060 Points (30%)
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Single Core
1846 Points (81%)
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Single Core)
717 Points (82%)
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Multi Core)
7072 Points (30%)
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit
2978 Points (31%)
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64 Bit
294 Points (90%)
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Multli Thread 4 runs
75557 MIPS (47%)
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Single Thread 4 runs
7244 MIPS (87%)
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 - HWBOT x265 4k Preset
23.2 fps (50%)
Blender - Blender 3.3 Classroom CPU *
277 Seconds (4%)
Blender - Blender 2.79 BMW27 CPU *
174 Seconds (1%)
R Benchmark 2.5 - R Benchmark 2.5 *
0.4 sec (9%)
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Physics
25054 Points (68%)
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Physics
31487 Points (58%)
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy CPU
11477 Points (57%)
Geekbench 5.4 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.4 64 Bit Single-Core
2040 Points (88%)
Geekbench 5.4 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
12378 Points (43%)
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Single-Core
1971 Points (9%)
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Multi-Core
12179 Points (38%)
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *
471 ms (1%)
WebXPRT 4 - WebXPRT 4 Score
283 Points (84%)
WebXPRT 3 - WebXPRT 3 Score
345 Points (80%)
CrossMark - CrossMark Overall
2027 Points (78%)
Power Consumption - Prime95 Power Consumption - external Monitor *
147.3 Watt (25%)
Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Consumption - external Monitor *
146.3 Watt (30%)
Power Consumption - Idle Power Consumption - external Monitor *
12.5 Watt (11%)
Power Consumption - Idle Power Consumption 150cd 1min *
13.6 Watt (16%)
Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Efficiency - external Monitor
20.4 Points per Watt (24%)

Average Benchmarks AMD Ryzen 7 7745HX → NAN% n=

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:

show all (including archived), 2023, 2022
v1.22
log 07. 10:34:27

#0 checking url part for id 14938 +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 14940 +0s ... 0s

#2 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#3 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Fri, 02 Jun 2023 13:55:08 +0200 +0.001s ... 0.001s

#4 composed specs +0.016s ... 0.017s

#5 did output specs +0s ... 0.017s

#6 getting avg benchmarks for device 14938 +0.002s ... 0.019s

#7 got single benchmarks 14938 +0s ... 0.02s

#8 getting avg benchmarks for device 14940 +0.011s ... 0.03s

#9 got single benchmarks 14940 +0.007s ... 0.038s

#10 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.038s

#11 min, max, avg, median took s +0.056s ... 0.094s

#12 return log +0.024s ... 0.118s

Please share our article, every link counts!
.170
> Notebook / Laptop Reviews and News > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2017-09-11)