Notebookcheck Logo

AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 7840HS vs AMD Ryzen 5 8640HS

AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 7840HS

► remove from comparison AMD R7 PRO 7840HS

The AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 7840HS is a fast high-end laptop processor of the Phoenix series. It offers 8 cores (octa core) based on the Zen 4 architecture that supports hyperthreading (16 threads). The cores clock from 3.8 (base) up to 5.1 GHz (single core boost). The processor includes 8 MB L2 cache and 16 MB L3 cache.

Compared to the consumer Ryzen 7 7840HS, the PRO models offer additional security, manageability, and reliability features designed for professional users and workstation environments.

The performance of the R7 PRO 7840HS is only slightly below the fastest model, the R9 PRO 7940HS, as the clock speed difference is only minimal (e.g. -100 MHz / 2% slower single core boost). Therefore, the CPU should also perform slightly higher than the old top model Ryzen 9 6980HX (8 Zen 3 cores with up to 4.9 GHz) at 54W TDP and Ryzen 9 6980HS at 35W TDP. Compared to the higher end Dragon Range series, the 7840HS should be similar to the Ryzen 7 7745HX (also 8 Zen 4 cores, max 5.1 GHz, 55W TDP, 32 MB L3).

The chip integrates a modern and fast RDNA 3 graphics adapter (iGPU) called Radeon 780M with 12 CUs and up to 2.7 GHz clock speed. Furthermore, the Phoenix series include a video engine with AV1 de- and encoding, a new Xilinx FPGA based XDNA AI accelerator (Ryzen AI) that should be faster than the AI engine in the Apple M2 SOC and a dual-channel DDR5-5600 / LPDDR5x-7500 memory controller (with ECC support). The connectivity features includes 2 possible USB 4 (40 Gbps) ports and 20 PCIe 4.0 lanes for a GPU and SSDs.

The Phoenix series uses a single monolithic design (unlike the chiplet design of the 7045HX series) and is manufactured on the modern 4nm process at TSMC. The TDP can be configured between 35 and 45 Watt.

AMD Ryzen 5 8640HS

► remove from comparison AMD R5 8640HS

The Ryzen 5 8640HS is a mid-range, Hawk Point family processor that was unveiled in Q4 2023. The 8640HS isn't actually a new chip; instead, it's a rebadged Ryzen 5 7640U with a slightly higher wattage as well as higher clock speeds on the Ryzen AI NPU. The 8640HS has 6 SMT-enabled cores (12 threads) running at 3.5 GHz to 4.9 GHz. Those Zen 4 architecture cores are mated to the Radeon 760M integrated graphics adapter.

Architecture & Features

Hawk Point chips are powered by the Zen 4 architecture, much like Phoenix and Dragon Range family chips are. That's not to say there is no difference between the three. With Hawk Point, AMD is betting big on generative AI; these processors are set to deliver an up to 40% increase in generative AI performance over 7040 series APUs.

Unlike Zen 3, Zen 4 features AVX512 support and, thanks to a plethora of other improvements including larger caches/registers/buffers, is slated to deliver a double-digit IPC improvement over the former.

Elsewhere, the 8640HS has 16 MB of L3 cache and USB 4 support (therefore, Thunderbolt is supported as well). The chip is compatible with DDR5-5600 and LPDDR5x-7500 RAM which is still impressive as of late 2023.

A system powered by this Ryzen 5 will have access to twenty PCIe 4 lanes; this means a speedy enough NVMe SSD will be able to deliver speeds up to 7.8 GB/s.

Systems powered by this APU are expected to run 64-bit Windows 11, 64-bit Windows 10, or Linux. Like most laptop chips, the 8640HS is neither overclockable nor user-replaceable. It gets soldered to the motherboard for good (FP7, FP7r2, FP8 socket interfaces).

Performance

It's safe to expect the APU to be at least 15% faster than the Zen 3 Plus-powered Ryzen 5 6600U (6 cores, 12 threads, up to 4.5 GHz), as far as multi-thread performance is concerned.

Your mileage may vary depending on how high the CPU power limits are and how competent the cooling solution of your laptop is.

Graphics

The Radeon 760M has 8 CUs (512 shaders) running at up to 2,600 MHz. While not great for gaming (unless you are fine with resolutions such as 900p and low detail settings), the iGPU will let you use up to 4 monitors with resolutions as high as SUHD 4320p. It also HW-decodes and HW-encodes the most widely used video codecs including AV1, HEVC, AVC without breaking a sweat.

Power consumption

The 8640HS has a long-term power limit (default TDP) of 28 W that laptop makers are free to change to anything between 20 W and 30 W. Most companies will probably go for a higher value to get better performance. Either way, an active cooling solution is a must for any system powered by the chip.

Last but not the least, the 8640HS is manufactured on TSMC's 4 nm process for high, as of late 2023, energy efficiency.

ModelAMD Ryzen 7 PRO 7840HSAMD Ryzen 5 8640HS
CodenamePhoenix-HS PRO (Zen 4)Hawk Point-HS (Zen 4)
SeriesAMD Phoenix (Zen 4)AMD Hawk Point (Zen 4/4c)
Clock3800 - 5100 MHz3500 - 4900 MHz
L1 Cache512 KB384 KB
L2 Cache8 MB6 MB
L3 Cache16 MB16 MB
Cores / Threads8 / 16
8 x 5.1 GHz AMD Zen 4
6 / 12
6 x 4.9 GHz AMD Zen 4
TDP35 Watt28 Watt
Technology4 nm4 nm
Die Size178 mm2178 mm2
max. Temp.100 °C100 °C
SocketFP7/FP8FP7/FP7r2/FP8
iGPUAMD Radeon 780M ( - 2700 MHz)AMD Radeon 760M ( - 2600 MHz)
Architecturex86x86
Announced
Manufacturerwww.amd.comwww.amd.com
Series: Hawk Point (Zen 4/4c) Hawk Point-HS (Zen 4)
AMD Ryzen 9 270 compare4 - 5.2 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 9 8945H compare4 - 5.2 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS compare4 - 5.2 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 8945HS compare4 - 5.2 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 7 260 compare3.8 - 5.1 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS compare3.8 - 5.1 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 7 8745HS compare3.8 - 4.9 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 7 8840HS compare3.3 - 5.1 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 8840HS compare3.3 - 5.1 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 5 240 compare4.3 - 5 GHz6 / 12 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 5 8645HS compare4.3 - 5 GHz6 / 12 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 5 8640HS « 3.5 - 4.9 GHz6 / 12 cores16 MB L3
FeaturesDDR5-5600/LPDDR5x-7500 RAM, PCIe 4, Ryzen AI, AES, AVX, AVX2, AVX512, FMA3, MMX (+), SHA, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, SSE4A, SSSE3

Benchmarks

Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - R7 PRO 7840HS
39.5 pt (66%)
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - R5 8640HS
37.9 pt (63%)
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
Cinebench 2024 - Cinebench 2024 CPU Single Core
min: 103.4     avg: 103.7     median: 103.7 (58%)     max: 104 Points
97 Points (54%)
Cinebench 2024 - Cinebench 2024 CPU Multi Core
min: 852     avg: 882     median: 881.5 (16%)     max: 911 Points
634 Points (12%)
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Multi Core
min: 14240     avg: 15052     median: 15051.5 (14%)     max: 15863 Points
11486 Points (11%)
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Single Core
min: 1691     avg: 1733     median: 1732.5 (73%)     max: 1774 Points
1711 Points (72%)
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Single Core)
min: 651     avg: 672     median: 672 (73%)     max: 693 Points
664 Points (73%)
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Multi Core)
min: 5327     avg: 5781     median: 5781 (14%)     max: 6235 Points
4475 Points (11%)
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit
min: 2361     avg: 2440     median: 2440 (15%)     max: 2519 Points
1845 Points (12%)
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64 Bit
min: 262     avg: 269     median: 269 (75%)     max: 276 Points
268 Points (75%)
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64 Bit
21.6 Points (28%)
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64 Bit
3.2 Points (76%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (32bit)
7163 Points (43%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (32bit)
38415 Points (28%)
WinRAR - WinRAR 4.0
6125 Points (10%)
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Multi Thread 4 runs
min: 62497     avg: 66442     median: 66442 (38%)     max: 70387 MIPS
49939 MIPS (29%)
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Single Thread 4 runs
min: 6493     avg: 6496     median: 6495.5 (77%)     max: 6498 MIPS
5975 MIPS (70%)
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 2
108.8 fps (36%)
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 1
260.1 fps (60%)
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 - HWBOT x265 4k Preset
min: 18.1     avg: 19     median: 19 (33%)     max: 19.9 fps
14.5 fps (25%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Serpent
1 GB/s (29%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Twofish
1.6 GB/s (28%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt AES
10.8 GB/s (28%)
Blender - Blender 3.3 Classroom CPU *
min: 325     avg: 327     median: 327 (4%)     max: 329 Seconds
452 Seconds (6%)
Blender - Blender 2.79 BMW27 CPU *
min: 201     avg: 203     median: 203 (1%)     max: 205 Seconds
276 Seconds (2%)
R Benchmark 2.5 - R Benchmark 2.5 *
min: 0.44     avg: 0.4     median: 0.4 (10%)     max: 0.4487 sec
0.5 sec (11%)
3DMark 06 - CPU - 3DMark 06 - CPU
14772 Points (31%)
12782 Points (27%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
7.2 s (2%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M *
18.4 s (1%)
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 32M *
683 s (3%)
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. CPU no Physx
79794 Points (61%)
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Physics
min: 17015     avg: 20787     median: 20787 (51%)     max: 24559 Points
15544 Points (38%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Physics
75919 Points (62%)
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Physics
13365 Points (34%)
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Physics
min: 26669     avg: 27465     median: 27464.5 (49%)     max: 28260 Points
21026 Points (37%)
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy CPU
min: 10679     avg: 10990     median: 10990 (46%)     max: 11301 Points
7059 Points (30%)
Geekbench 6.4 - Geekbench 6.4 Single-Core
min: 2419     avg: 2546     median: 2581 (64%)     max: 2638 Points
min: 2413     avg: 2455     median: 2455 (61%)     max: 2497 Points
Geekbench 6.4 - Geekbench 6.4 Multi-Core
min: 10518     avg: 12078     median: 12457 (48%)     max: 13259 Points
min: 9120     avg: 9729     median: 9729 (38%)     max: 10338 Points
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.5 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 1822     avg: 1888     median: 1887.5 (74%)     max: 1953 Points
1877 Points (73%)
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.5 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 10034     avg: 11037     median: 11036.5 (20%)     max: 12039 Points
9060 Points (16%)
Geekbench 4.0 - Geekbench 4.0 64 Bit Single-Core
7558 Points (83%)
Geekbench 4.0 - Geekbench 4.0 64 Bit Multi-Core
37474 Points (54%)
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *
539 ms (1%)
551 ms (1%)
Octane V2 - Octane V2 Total Score
89380 Points (68%)
WebXPRT 4 - WebXPRT 4 Score
min: 222     avg: 242     median: 242 (66%)     max: 262 Points
248 Points (68%)
WebXPRT 3 - WebXPRT 3 Score
min: 311     avg: 363     median: 363 (65%)     max: 415 Points
292 Points (52%)
CrossMark - CrossMark Overall
min: 1574     avg: 1620     median: 1620 (61%)     max: 1666 Points
Power Consumption - Prime95 Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 76.6     avg: 83     median: 83 (14%)     max: 89.4 Watt
51.4 Watt (9%)
Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 85.9     avg: 86.8     median: 86.8 (16%)     max: 87.7 Watt
Power Consumption - Idle Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 5.01     avg: 5.2     median: 5.2 (3%)     max: 5.32 Watt
3.4 Watt (2%)
Power Consumption - Idle Power Consumption 150cd 1min *
min: 5.11     avg: 6.3     median: 6.3 (7%)     max: 7.44 Watt
5.2 Watt (6%)
Power Consumption - Power Efficiency - Cinebench R15 Multi external Monitor
27.5 Points per Watt (20%)

Average Benchmarks AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 7840HS → 100% n=25

Average Benchmarks AMD Ryzen 5 8640HS → 84% n=25

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
red legend - Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:
v1.33
log 24. 22:49:06

#0 ran 0s before starting gpusingle class +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 15054 +0s ... 0s

#2 checking url part for id 16411 +0s ... 0s

#3 redirected to Ajax server, took 1750798146s time from redirect:0 +0s ... 0s

#4 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Sun, 22 Jun 2025 05:19:33 +0200 +0s ... 0s

#5 composed specs +0.006s ... 0.006s

#6 did output specs +0s ... 0.006s

#7 getting avg benchmarks for device 15054 +0.003s ... 0.01s

#8 got single benchmarks 15054 +0.006s ... 0.016s

#9 getting avg benchmarks for device 16411 +0.004s ... 0.02s

#10 got single benchmarks 16411 +0.005s ... 0.024s

#11 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.025s

#12 min, max, avg, median took s +0.03s ... 0.055s

#13 return log +0.005s ... 0.06s

Please share our article, every link counts!
Mail Logo
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)