Notebookcheck Logo

AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 6860Z vs AMD Ryzen 7 6800U

AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 6860Z

► remove from comparison AMD R7 PRO 6860Z

The AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 6860Z is a processor for thin and light laptops based of the Rembrandt generation. The R7 6850U integrates all eight cores based on the Zen 3+ microarchitecture. They are clocked at 2.7 (guaranteed base clock) to 4.7 GHz (Turbo) and support SMT / Hyperthreading (16 threads). The chip is manufactured on the modern 6 nm TSMC process. The Ryzen 7 PRO 6860Z is the professional version of the consumer R7 6800U with additional management features and the Microsoft Pluton Security processor. Compared to the similar Ryzen 7 PRO 6850U, the 6860Z offers a 50 MHz higher Turbo clock speed for the processor cores and the TDP is specified at 28 Watt (6850U can go down to 15 Watt).

The new Zen 3+ is a refresh of the Zen 3 architecture and should not offer a lot of changes. The chip itself however, offers a lot of new features, like support for USB 4 (40 Gbps), PCI-E Gen 4, DDR5-4800MT/s or LPDDR5-6400MT/s, WiFi 6E, Bluetooth LE 5.2, DisplayPort 2, and AV1 decode.

The processor performance is very similar to the Ryzen 7 6800U and Ryzen 7 PRO 6850U and clearly better than the old Ryzen 7 5800U thanks to the improved clock speeds. The average Intel Core i7-1280P is only slightly faster, although there can be clearly faster models thanks to the higher core count (depends on the cooling and TDP settings).

A big novelty is the integrated GPU Radeon 680M, that is now based on the RDNA2 architecture and offers 12 CUs at up to 2.2 GHz. It should be the fastest iGPU of all at the time of announcement.

The TDP of the APU is specified at 28 Watts. The power efficiency should be very good, thanks to the improved 6nm process and additional power saving features in the 6000 series.

AMD Ryzen 7 6800U

► remove from comparison AMD R7 6800U

The AMD Ryzen 7 6800U is a processor for thin and light laptops based of the Rembrandt generation. The R7 6800U integrates all eight cores based on the Zen 3+ microarchitecture. They are clocked at 2.7 (guaranteed base clock) to 4.7 GHz (Turbo) and support SMT / Hyperthreading (16 threads). The chip is manufactured on the modern 6 nm TSMC process. Compared to the similar R7 6800H, the 6800U offers a lower base clock speed and a lower TDP.

The new Zen 3+ is a refresh of the Zen 3 architecture and should not offer a lot of changes. The chip itself however, offers a lot of new features, like support for USB 4 (40 Gbps), PCI-E Gen 4, DDR5-4800MT/s or LPDDR5-6400MT/s, WiFi 6E, Bluetooth LE 5.2, DisplayPort 2, and AV1 decode.

A big novelty is the integrated GPU Radeon 680M, that is now based on the RDNA2 architecture and offers 12 CUs at up to 2.2 GHz. It should be the fastest iGPU of all at the time of announcement.

Performance

The average 6800U in our database easily shoulders its way towards the best of the best, trading blows with the Core i7-1270P, the Core i7-11850H and the Ryzen 7 PRO 6850H as far as multi-thread benchmark scores are concerned. Throw everything you can at this little guy. He'll take it all and ask for more.

Thanks to its decent cooling solution and a long-term CPU power limit of more than 20 W, the Mercury EM680 is among the fastest systems built around the 6800U that we know of. It can be at least 20% faster in CPU-bound workloads than the slowest system featuring the same chip in our database, as of August 2023.

Power consumption

This Ryzen 7 series chip has a default TDP, also known as the long-term power limit, of 15 W to 28 W, the expectation being that laptop makers will go for a higher value in exchange for higher performance. Either way, a proper cooling solution is a must.

The R7 6800U is manufactured on the 6 nm TSMC process for higher-than-average, as of mid 2023, energy efficiency.

ModelAMD Ryzen 7 PRO 6860ZAMD Ryzen 7 6800U
SeriesAMD Rembrandt (Zen 3+)AMD Rembrandt (Zen 3+)
CodenameRembrandt U (Zen 3+)Rembrandt-U (Zen 3+)
Clock2700 - 4750 MHz2700 - 4700 MHz
L1 Cache512 KB512 KB
L2 Cache4 MB4 MB
L3 Cache16 MB16 MB
Cores / Threads8 / 168 / 16
TDP28 Watt28 Watt
Technology6 nm6 nm
max. Temp.95 °C95 °C
SocketFP7FP7/FP7r2
FeaturesXFR, FMA3, SSE 4.2, AVX2, SMTDDR5-4800/LPDDR5-6400 RAM (incl. ECC), PCIe 4, MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4A, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, AVX2, BMI2, ABM, FMA, ADX, SMEP, SMAP, SMT, CPB, AES-NI, RDRAND, RDSEED, SHA, SME
iGPUAMD Radeon 680M ( - 2200 MHz)AMD Radeon 680M ( - 2200 MHz)
Architecturex86x86
Announced
Manufacturerwww.amd.comwww.amd.com
Series: Rembrandt (Zen 3+) Rembrandt-U (Zen 3+)
AMD Ryzen 7 6800U « 2.7 - 4.7 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 5 6600U compare2.9 - 4.5 GHz6 / 12 cores16 MB L3

Benchmarks

Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - R7 PRO 6860Z
39 pt (54%)
Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - R7 6800U
39.1 pt (54%)
Cinebench 2024 - CB24 CPU Single Core
79 Points (55%)
Cinebench 2024 - CB24 CPU Multi Core
496 Points (9%)
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Multi Core
11822 Points (11%)
min: 9130     avg: 10653     median: 10546 (10%)     max: 11741 Points
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Single Core
1468 Points (62%)
min: 878     avg: 1418     median: 1506 (64%)     max: 1534 Points
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Single Core)
588 Points (65%)
min: 341     avg: 553     median: 585.5 (65%)     max: 602 Points
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Multi Core)
4555 Points (11%)
min: 3529     avg: 4122     median: 4083.5 (10%)     max: 4574 Points
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit
1992 Points (13%)
min: 1463     avg: 1766     median: 1776 (11%)     max: 1978.53 Points
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64 Bit
233 Points (70%)
min: 142.6     avg: 225.4     median: 242 (73%)     max: 246 Points
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64 Bit
23.1 Points (30%)
21.1 Points (27%)
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64 Bit
2.9 Points (71%)
2.9 Points (72%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (32bit)
6238 Points (38%)
6450 Points (39%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (32bit)
36959 Points (27%)
35314 Points (26%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (64bit)
60447 Points (42%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (64bit)
12163 Points (15%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 1024m *
252.1 s (3%)
113.5 s (1%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 32m *
7.9 s (2%)
4.5 s (1%)
WinRAR - WinRAR 4.0
4639 Points (7%)
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Multli Thread 4 runs
52568 MIPS (30%)
min: 40058     avg: 49128     median: 50614 (29%)     max: 53934 MIPS
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Single Thread 4 runs
5289 MIPS (63%)
min: 3398     avg: 5120     median: 5452.5 (65%)     max: 5511 MIPS
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 2
101.1 fps (35%)
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 1
219.5 fps (51%)
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 - HWBOT x265 4k Preset
14.7 fps (26%)
min: 11.8     avg: 13.1     median: 13.1 (23%)     max: 14.2 fps
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Serpent
1.1 GB/s (0%)
1 GB/s (0%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Twofish
1.3 GB/s (22%)
1.5 GB/s (26%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt AES
7.7 GB/s (20%)
10.7 GB/s (28%)
Blender - Blender 3.3 Classroom CPU *
483 Seconds (6%)
min: 474     avg: 516     median: 504 (6%)     max: 572 Seconds
Blender - Blender 2.79 BMW27 CPU *
274 Seconds (2%)
min: 272     avg: 302.5     median: 304 (2%)     max: 347 Seconds
R Benchmark 2.5 - R Benchmark 2.5 *
0.5 sec (11%)
min: 0.508     avg: 0.5     median: 0.5 (11%)     max: 0.529 sec
3DMark 06 - CPU - 3DMark 06 - CPU
min: 9102     avg: 9965     median: 9964.5 (21%)     max: 10827 Points
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
7.6 s (2%)
7.9 s (2%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M *
18.6 s (1%)
19.3 s (1%)
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 32M *
694 s (3%)
692 s (3%)
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. CPU no Physx
min: 52884     avg: 55833     median: 55833 (49%)     max: 58782 Points
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Physics
13574 Points (37%)
min: 12198     avg: 14018     median: 14280 (39%)     max: 15136 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Physics
min: 51726     avg: 54789     median: 54788.5 (45%)     max: 57851 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Extreme Physics
min: 51601     avg: 54760     median: 54760 (44%)     max: 57919 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Physics
min: 58776     avg: 63558     median: 63558 (54%)     max: 68340 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Physics
14140 Points (36%)
min: 12402     avg: 13741     median: 13574 (34%)     max: 15247 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Physics
20062 Points (36%)
min: 15312     avg: 18647     median: 18882 (34%)     max: 21992 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy CPU
6779 Points (29%)
min: 6355     avg: 7107     median: 7103.5 (30%)     max: 7731 Points
Geekbench 6.2 - Geekbench 6.2 Single-Core
2028 Points (62%)
Geekbench 6.2 - Geekbench 6.2 Multi-Core
8771 Points (35%)
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.4 64 Bit Single-Core
1452 Points (61%)
min: 926     avg: 1431     median: 1514 (64%)     max: 1555 Points
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
8734 Points (16%)
min: 6854     avg: 7729     median: 7678 (14%)     max: 8935 Points
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 1306     avg: 1433     median: 1462.5 (6%)     max: 1500 Points
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 7024     avg: 7646     median: 7767 (24%)     max: 8026 Points
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 5657     avg: 6065     median: 6261 (63%)     max: 6278 Points
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 27734     avg: 30075     median: 30925 (34%)     max: 31566 Points
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *
599 ms (1%)
min: 594     avg: 690     median: 634.5 (1%)     max: 1016 ms
Octane V2 - Octane V2 Total Score
73281 Points (66%)
min: 43921     avg: 62717     median: 69752 (63%)     max: 74479 Points
WebXPRT 4 - WebXPRT 4 Score
214 Points (61%)
min: 133.2     avg: 198.2     median: 213 (61%)     max: 221 Points
WebXPRT 3 - WebXPRT 3 Score
270 Points (56%)
min: 181.3     avg: 254.9     median: 270 (56%)     max: 295 Points
CrossMark - CrossMark Overall
1505 Points (58%)
min: 1009     avg: 1436     median: 1481 (57%)     max: 1575 Points
Power Consumption - Prime95 Power Consumption - external Monitor *
45.6 Watt (8%)
min: 37.8     avg: 47.2     median: 48 (8%)     max: 55.6 Watt
Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Consumption - external Monitor *
62.3 Watt (11%)
min: 43.3     avg: 50     median: 47 (9%)     max: 58 Watt
Power Consumption - Idle Power Consumption - external Monitor *
6.6 Watt (4%)
min: 4.62     avg: 6.8     median: 7.2 (5%)     max: 8.73 Watt
Power Consumption - Idle Power Consumption 150cd 1min *
min: 8.59     avg: 8.9     median: 8.8 (10%)     max: 9.41 Watt
Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Efficiency - external Monitor
32 Points per Watt (24%)
min: 34.1     avg: 36.2     median: 34.2 (25%)     max: 40.2 Points per Watt

Average Benchmarks AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 6860Z → 100% n=35

Average Benchmarks AMD Ryzen 7 6800U → 100% n=35

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:

show all (including archived), 2024, 2023
v1.26
log 25. 18:35:04

#0 checking url part for id 14631 +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 14088 +0s ... 0s

#2 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#3 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Thu, 25 Apr 2024 05:38:32 +0200 +0.001s ... 0.001s

#4 composed specs +0.025s ... 0.026s

#5 did output specs +0s ... 0.026s

#6 getting avg benchmarks for device 14631 +0.017s ... 0.043s

#7 got single benchmarks 14631 +0.008s ... 0.051s

#8 getting avg benchmarks for device 14088 +0.012s ... 0.063s

#9 got single benchmarks 14088 +0.025s ... 0.088s

#10 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.088s

#11 min, max, avg, median took s +0.289s ... 0.376s

#12 return log +0.023s ... 0.399s

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)