Notebookcheck Logo

AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 5875U vs AMD Ryzen 3 5400U vs AMD Ryzen 7 5800U

AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 5875U

► remove from comparison AMD R7 PRO 5875U

The AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 5875U is a processor for thin and light laptops based on the Cezanne / Barcelo generation. The R7 5875U integrates all eight cores based on the Zen 3 microarchitecture and is the fastest U-series PRO processor at launch. They are clocked at 2 (guaranteed base clock) to 4.5 GHz (Turbo) and support SMT for a total of 16 processing threads. The chip is manufactured on the modern 7 nm TSMC process.

The PRO CPUs offer additional management and security features. The 5875U is the refresh of the Ryzen 7 PRO 5850U and offers 100 MHz higher clocked CPU cores.

The Zen 3 microarchitecture offers a significantly higher IPC (instructions per clock) compared to Zen 2. For desktop processors AMD claims 19 percent on average and in applications reviews showed around 12% gains at the same clock speed.

With the increased clock speed and IPC improvements thanks to Zen 3, the Ryzen 7 PRO 5875U should be clearly faster than the lower clocked Ryzen 7 4800U.

In addition to the eight CPU cores, the APU also integrates a Radeon RX Vega 8 graphics processor with 8 CUs at up to 2000 MHz. The dual channel memory controller supports DDR4-3200 and energy efficient LPDDR4-4266 RAM. Furthermore, 16 MB level 3 cache (up from 8 MB at the 4800U) can be found on the chip.

The TDP of the APU is specified at 15 Watt (default) and can be configured from 10 to 25 Watt by the laptop vendor (most chips are configured higher than 15 Watt). That means the chip is intended for thin and light laptops (but with fans).

AMD Ryzen 3 5400U

► remove from comparison AMD R3 5400U

The AMD Ryzen 3 5400U is a processor for thin and light laptops based on the Cezanne generation. The R3 5400U integrates four of the eight cores based on the Zen 3 microarchitecture and is the slowest U-series processor of the Cezanne generation at launch. The cores are clocked at 2.6 (guaranteed base clock) to 4 GHz (Turbo) and support SMT / Hyperthreading (8 threads). The chip is manufactured in the modern 7 nm process at TSMC.

The new Zen 3 microarchitecture offers a significantly higher IPC (instructions per clock) compared to Zen 2. For desktop processors AMD claims 19 percent on average and in applications reviews showed around 12% gains at the same clock speed.

Performance

While we have not tested a single system built around the 5400U as of August 2023, we are fairly confident the chip is a little faster than the Ryzen 3 5300U and its four Zen 2 cores running at clock speeds similar to what the 5400U has. Naturally, your mileage may vary depending on how competent the cooling solution of your laptop is and how high the CPU power limits are.

In addition to the four CPU cores, the APU also integrates a Radeon RX Vega 6 integrated graphics card with 6 CUs and up to 1600 MHz. The dual channel memory controller supports DDR4-3200 and energy efficient LPDDR4-4266 RAM. Furthermore, 8 MB level 3 cache (same as the old 4800U) can be found on the chip.

Power consumption

This Ryzen 3 has a default TDP (also known as the long-term power limit) of 15 W. Laptop manufacturers are free to change that value to anything between 10 W and 25 W if so desired, with clock speeds and performance changing correspondingly. Those values aren't low enough to allow for passively cooled designs.

This is a 7 nm chip; it thus has higher-than-average, as of late 2022, energy efficiency.

AMD Ryzen 7 5800U

► remove from comparison AMD R7 5800U

The AMD Ryzen 7 5800U is a processor for thin and light laptops based on the Cezanne generation. The R7 5800U integrates all eight cores based on the Zen 3 microarchitecture and is the fastest U-series processor at launch. They are clocked at 1.9 (guaranteed base clock) to 4.4 GHz (Turbo) and support SMT / Hyperthreading (16 threads). The chip is manufactured on the modern 7 nm TSMC process.

The new Zen 3 microarchitecture offers a significantly higher IPC (instructions per clock) compared to Zen 2. For desktop processors AMD claims 19 percent on average and in applications reviews showed around 12% gains at the same clock speed.

In addition to the eight CPU cores, the APU also integrates a Radeon RX Vega 8 GPU with 8 CUs at up to 2000 MHz. The dual channel memory controller supports DDR4-3200 and energy efficient LPDDR4-4266 RAM. Furthermore, 16 MB level 3 cache (up from 8 MB at the 4800U) can be found on the chip.

Performance

The average 5800U in our database matches the Core i5-11260H and, perhaps a little disappointingly, the Ryzen 7 4800U in multi-core performance.

Thanks to its decent cooling solution and a long-term CPU power limit of 22 W, the ProBook x360 435 G8 is among the fastest laptops powered by the 5800U that we know of. It can be more than 10% faster in CPU-bound workloads than the slowest system featuring the same chip in our database, as of August 2023.

Power consumption

This Ryzen 7 series chip has a default TDP (also known as the long-term power limit) of 15 W, a value that laptop makers are allowed to change to anything between 10 W and 25 W with clock speeds and performance changing accordingly as a result. Choosing the lowest value would allow one to build a passively cooled system around the Ryzen, however, most laptop manufacturers will do the opposite to extract as much performance out of the chip as possible.

The Ryzen 7 5800U is built with TSMC's 7 nm process for average, as of mid 2023, energy efficiency.

ModelAMD Ryzen 7 PRO 5875UAMD Ryzen 3 5400UAMD Ryzen 7 5800U
SeriesAMD Cezanne (Zen 3, Ryzen 5000)AMD Cezanne (Zen 3, Ryzen 5000)AMD Cezanne (Zen 3, Ryzen 5000)
CodenameCezanne U (Zen 3)Cezanne-U (Zen 3)Cezanne-U (Zen 3)
Clock2000 - 4500 MHz2600 - 4000 MHz1900 - 4400 MHz
L1 Cache512 KB256 KB512 KB
L2 Cache4 MB2 MB4 MB
L3 Cache16 MB8 MB16 MB
Cores / Threads8 / 164 / 88 / 16
TDP25 Watt25 Watt25 Watt
Technology7 nm7 nm7 nm
max. Temp.105 °C105 °C105 °C
SocketFP6FP6FP6
FeaturesXFR, FMA3, SSE 4.2, AVX2, SMTDDR4-3200/LPDDR4-4266 RAM, PCIe 3, MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4A, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, AVX2, BMI2, ABM, FMA, ADX, SMEP, SMAP, SMT, CPB, AES-NI, RDRAND, RDSEED, SHA, SMEDDR4-3200/LPDDR4-4266 RAM, PCIe 3, MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4A, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, AVX2, BMI2, ABM, FMA, ADX, SMEP, SMAP, SMT, CPB, AES-NI, RDRAND, RDSEED, SHA, SME
iGPUAMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 4000/5000) ( - 2000 MHz)AMD Radeon RX Vega 6 (Ryzen 4000/5000) ( - 1600 MHz)AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 4000/5000) ( - 2000 MHz)
Architecturex86x86x86
Announced
Manufacturerwww.amd.comwww.amd.comwww.amd.com
Series: Cezanne (Zen 3, Ryzen 5000) Cezanne-U (Zen 3)
AMD Ryzen 7 5800U1.9 - 4.4 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 5 5600U2.3 - 4.2 GHz6 / 12 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 5 5560U2.3 - 4 GHz6 / 12 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 3 5400U « 2.6 - 4 GHz4 / 8 cores8 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 7 5800U « 1.9 - 4.4 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 5 5600U2.3 - 4.2 GHz6 / 12 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 5 5560U2.3 - 4 GHz6 / 12 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 3 5400U2.6 - 4 GHz4 / 8 cores8 MB L3

Benchmarks

Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - R7 5800U
37.3 pt (52%)
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Multi Core
min: 7872     avg: 8851     median: 8154 (8%)     max: 10624 Points
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Single Core
min: 1415     avg: 1425     median: 1427 (61%)     max: 1430 Points
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Single Core)
min: 551     avg: 555     median: 555 (62%)     max: 560 Points
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Multi Core)
min: 2995     avg: 3347     median: 3303 (8%)     max: 3691 Points
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit
min: 1390     avg: 1628     median: 1613 (10%)     max: 1925 Points
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64 Bit
min: 227     avg: 228.5     median: 229 (69%)     max: 229 Points
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64 Bit
14.8 Points (19%)
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64 Bit
2.7 Points (67%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (32bit)
6039 Points (36%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (32bit)
26711 Points (19%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (64bit)
46311 Points (32%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (64bit)
11485 Points (14%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 1024m *
136.5 s (2%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 32m *
4.1 s (1%)
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Multli Thread 4 runs
min: 39618     avg: 42703     median: 42603.5 (24%)     max: 45985 MIPS
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Single Thread 4 runs
min: 5285     avg: 5354     median: 5362.5 (64%)     max: 5405 MIPS
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 2
80.8 fps (28%)
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 1
230.5 fps (53%)
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 - HWBOT x265 4k Preset
min: 9.68     avg: 10.3     median: 10.3 (18%)     max: 11 fps
Blender - Blender 2.79 BMW27 CPU *
min: 319     avg: 353.4     median: 351.9 (2%)     max: 391 Seconds
R Benchmark 2.5 - R Benchmark 2.5 *
min: 0.54     avg: 0.5     median: 0.5 (12%)     max: 0.546 sec
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
9.8 s (2%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M *
21.2 s (1%)
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 32M *
514 s (2%)
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Physics
min: 10893     avg: 12059     median: 12124 (33%)     max: 13093 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Physics
75960 Points (62%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Extreme Physics
75286 Points (61%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Physics
83999 Points (71%)
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Physics
min: 12642     avg: 13408     median: 13484 (34%)     max: 14021 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Physics
min: 15881     avg: 17158     median: 17427.5 (31%)     max: 17897 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy CPU
min: 5352     avg: 5793     median: 5704 (24%)     max: 6410 Points
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.4 64 Bit Single-Core
1170 Points (49%)
min: 1411     avg: 1430     median: 1428.5 (60%)     max: 1450 Points
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
3095 Points (6%)
min: 6093     avg: 6641     median: 6722.5 (12%)     max: 7026 Points
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Single-Core
1411 Points (6%)
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Multi-Core
7053 Points (22%)
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Single-Core
5878 Points (59%)
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
28418 Points (32%)
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *
min: 632     avg: 636     median: 633 (1%)     max: 646 ms
Octane V2 - Octane V2 Total Score
min: 63284     avg: 65366     median: 64961 (58%)     max: 67852 Points
WebXPRT 3 - WebXPRT 3 Score
min: 248     avg: 252.3     median: 249 (52%)     max: 260 Points
CrossMark - CrossMark Overall
1335 Points (51%)
Power Consumption - Prime95 Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 28     avg: 30     median: 28.9 (5%)     max: 34.1 Watt
Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 26.9     avg: 34.1     median: 33.2 (6%)     max: 42.9 Watt
Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Efficiency - external Monitor
min: 43.5     avg: 48     median: 48.3 (36%)     max: 51.9 Points per Watt

Average Benchmarks AMD Ryzen 3 5400U → 0% n=

Average Benchmarks AMD Ryzen 7 5800U → 0% n=

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

v1.26
log 29. 07:51:36

#0 checking url part for id 14365 +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 12989 +0s ... 0s

#2 checking url part for id 12976 +0s ... 0s

#3 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#4 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Thu, 28 Mar 2024 05:35:32 +0100 +0.001s ... 0.001s

#5 composed specs +0.026s ... 0.027s

#6 did output specs +0s ... 0.027s

#7 getting avg benchmarks for device 14365 +0.003s ... 0.03s

#8 got single benchmarks 14365 +0s ... 0.031s

#9 getting avg benchmarks for device 12989 +0.003s ... 0.034s

#10 got single benchmarks 12989 +0.006s ... 0.04s

#11 getting avg benchmarks for device 12976 +0.018s ... 0.058s

#12 got single benchmarks 12976 +0.034s ... 0.091s

#13 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.091s

#14 min, max, avg, median took s +0.16s ... 0.251s

#15 return log +0s ... 0.251s

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)