, , , , , ,
search relation.
, , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,
 

AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 2700U vs AMD Ryzen 7 2800H vs AMD Athlon 300U

AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 2700U

► remove from comparison AMD R7 PRO 2700U

The AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 2700U is a mobile SoC that was announced in October 2017. Compared to the consumer Ryzen 7 2700U, the PRO versions offer additional security features. It combines four Zen cores (8 threads) clocked at 2.2 - 3.8 GHz with a Radeon RX Vega 10 graphics card with 10 CUs (640 Shaders) clocked at up to 1300 MHz. The TDP can be configured by the laptop manufacturer between 12 to 25 Watt (15 Watt nominal) and therefore the APU is also suited for thin and light laptops. The integrated dual-channel memory controller supports up to DDR4-2400 memory. More information on Raven Ridge can be found in our launch article.

The performance of the Zen CPU cores should be better than a high end Kaby-Lake-Refresh Quad-Core CPU (e.g. the Core i7-8650U) according to AMD. Therefore, the Ryzen 7 PRO 2700U is suited for all applications.

AMD Ryzen 7 2800H

► remove from comparison AMD R7 2800H

The AMD Ryzen 7 2800H is a mobile SoC that was announced late 2018. It is intended for mid-sized to big laptops and combines four Zen cores (8 threads) clocked at 3.3 (base) - 3.8 GHz (boost) with a Radeon RX Vega 11 Mobile graphics card with 11 CUs (704 Shaders). The integrated dual-channel memory controller supports up to DDR4-3200 memory.

Compared to the older Ryzen 7 2700U for slim and light laptops, the 2800H offers a higher TDP (45 Watt versus 15 Watt), higher clocked memory, a higher base clock (3.4 versus 2.2 GHz), and a faster integrated GPU.

More information on Raven Ridge can be found in our launch article.

The performance should be slightly better than the Ryzen 7 2700U due to the higher TDP and base clock speed. Especially longer loads should profit from this. Due to the high TDP (configurable from 35 - 54 Watt), the Ryzen 7 2800H is best suited for bigger laptops.

AMD Athlon 300U

► remove from comparison

The AMD Athlon 300U is a mobile entry level dual core SoC that was announced in January 2019. It combines two Zen cores (with SMT / Hyperthreading so running 4 threads) clocked at 2.4 - 3.3 GHz with a Radeon RX Vega 3 graphics card with 3 CUs (192 Shaders) clocked at up to 1000 MHz. Specified at 15 Watt TDP, the SoC is intended for thin mid-range laptops. It is quite similar to the AMD Ryzen 3 3200U (2.6 - 3.5 GHz).

Compared to the Picasso APUs of the Ryzen 3000 series, the Athlon 300U is still based on the first generation of the 2000 series. Only the PRO variant is based on the new Zen+ microarchitecture that should lead to a 3% IPS (performance per clock) improvement.

The integrated dual-channel memory controller supports up to DDR4-2400 memory. As the features of the Picasso APUs are the same compared to the Raven Ridge predecessors, we point to our Raven Ridge launch article.

In contrast to the faster quad-core Picasso APUs, the Athlon 300U only supports 3 instead of 4 displays in total.

Performance wise, the Athlon 300 should be slightly slower than the Ryzen 3 2200U (2.5 - 3.4 GHz Dual Core with SMT).

AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 2700UAMD Ryzen 7 2800HAMD Athlon 300U
AMD Raven Ridge (Ryzen 2000 APU)AMD Raven Ridge (Ryzen 2000 APU)AMD Raven Ridge (Ryzen 2000 APU)
ZenZenZen
Series: Raven Ridge (Ryzen 2000 APU) Zen
AMD Ryzen 5 2400G3.6 - 3.9 GHz4 / 84 MB
AMD Ryzen 7 2800H3.3 - 3.8 GHz4 / 84 MB
AMD Ryzen 7 2700U2.2 - 3.8 GHz4 / 84 MB
» AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 2700U2.2 - 3.8 GHz4 / 84 MB
AMD Ryzen 3 2200G3.5 - 3.7 GHz4 / 44 MB
AMD Ryzen 5 2600H3.2 - 3.6 GHz4 / 84 MB
AMD Ryzen 5 2500U2 - 3.6 GHz4 / 84 MB
AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 2500U2 - 3.6 GHz4 / 84 MB
AMD Ryzen Embedded V1605B2 - 3.6 GHz4 / 84 MB
AMD Ryzen 3 2300U2 - 3.4 GHz4 / 44 MB
AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 2300U2 - 3.4 GHz4 / 44 MB
AMD Ryzen 3 2200U2.5 - 3.4 GHz2 / 44 MB
AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 2200U2.5 - 3.4 GHz2 / 44 MB
AMD Ryzen Embedded R1505G2.4 - 3.3 GHz2 / 44 MB
AMD Athlon 300U2.4 - 3.3 GHz2 / 44 MB
AMD Athlon Silver 3050e0 - 2.8 GHz2 / 44 MB
AMD 3020e1.2 - 2.6 GHz2 / 24 MB
AMD 3015e1.2 - 2.3 GHz2 / 44 MB
AMD Ryzen 5 2400G3.6 - 3.9 GHz4 / 84 MB
» AMD Ryzen 7 2800H3.3 - 3.8 GHz4 / 84 MB
AMD Ryzen 7 2700U2.2 - 3.8 GHz4 / 84 MB
AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 2700U2.2 - 3.8 GHz4 / 84 MB
AMD Ryzen 3 2200G3.5 - 3.7 GHz4 / 44 MB
AMD Ryzen 5 2600H3.2 - 3.6 GHz4 / 84 MB
AMD Ryzen 5 2500U2 - 3.6 GHz4 / 84 MB
AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 2500U2 - 3.6 GHz4 / 84 MB
AMD Ryzen Embedded V1605B2 - 3.6 GHz4 / 84 MB
AMD Ryzen 3 2300U2 - 3.4 GHz4 / 44 MB
AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 2300U2 - 3.4 GHz4 / 44 MB
AMD Ryzen 3 2200U2.5 - 3.4 GHz2 / 44 MB
AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 2200U2.5 - 3.4 GHz2 / 44 MB
AMD Ryzen Embedded R1505G2.4 - 3.3 GHz2 / 44 MB
AMD Athlon 300U2.4 - 3.3 GHz2 / 44 MB
AMD Athlon Silver 3050e0 - 2.8 GHz2 / 44 MB
AMD 3020e1.2 - 2.6 GHz2 / 24 MB
AMD 3015e1.2 - 2.3 GHz2 / 44 MB
AMD Ryzen 5 2400G3.6 - 3.9 GHz4 / 84 MB
AMD Ryzen 7 2800H3.3 - 3.8 GHz4 / 84 MB
AMD Ryzen 7 2700U2.2 - 3.8 GHz4 / 84 MB
AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 2700U2.2 - 3.8 GHz4 / 84 MB
AMD Ryzen 3 2200G3.5 - 3.7 GHz4 / 44 MB
AMD Ryzen 5 2600H3.2 - 3.6 GHz4 / 84 MB
AMD Ryzen 5 2500U2 - 3.6 GHz4 / 84 MB
AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 2500U2 - 3.6 GHz4 / 84 MB
AMD Ryzen Embedded V1605B2 - 3.6 GHz4 / 84 MB
AMD Ryzen 3 2300U2 - 3.4 GHz4 / 44 MB
AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 2300U2 - 3.4 GHz4 / 44 MB
AMD Ryzen 3 2200U2.5 - 3.4 GHz2 / 44 MB
AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 2200U2.5 - 3.4 GHz2 / 44 MB
AMD Ryzen Embedded R1505G2.4 - 3.3 GHz2 / 44 MB
» AMD Athlon 300U2.4 - 3.3 GHz2 / 44 MB
AMD Athlon Silver 3050e0 - 2.8 GHz2 / 44 MB
AMD 3020e1.2 - 2.6 GHz2 / 24 MB
AMD 3015e1.2 - 2.3 GHz2 / 44 MB
2200 - 3800 MHz3300 - 3800 MHz2400 - 3300 MHz
384 KB384 KB192 KB
2 MB2 MB1 MB
4 MB4 MB4 MB
4 / 84 / 82 / 4
15 35 15
4500 4500 4500
14 14 12
AM4AM4AM4
XFR, FMA3, SSE 4.2, AVX2, SMTXFR, FMA3, SSE 4.2, AVX2, SMTXFR, FMA3, SSE 4.2, AVX2, SMT
iGPUAMD Radeon RX Vega 10 ( - 1300 MHz)AMD Radeon RX Vega 11 ( - 1300 MHz)AMD Radeon RX Vega 3 ( - 1000 MHz)
Architecturex86x86x86
AMD Raven Ridge (Ryzen 2000 APU) R7 PRO 2700U

Benchmarks

Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Single Core)
308 Points (48%)
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Multi Core)
637 Points (6%)
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit
308 Points (7%)
020406080100120140160180200220240260280300308.22308.71299.28290.44292.47292.06292.22292.7291.95292.24292.52291.93290.65292.58292.55292.16291.48290.93291.76292.57290.84291.07291.95292.69290.68292.55292.57292.45291.8290.79292.4289.84292.5292.68289.82291.66292.1290.81292.06290.71Tooltip
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64 Bit
119 Points (44%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (32bit)
3968 (35%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (32bit)
8724 (14%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 1024m *
510 s (6%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 32m *
15.4 s (3%)
WinRAR - WinRAR 4.0
1623 (10%)
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 2
18.5 fps (8%)
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 1
88.6 fps (26%)
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 - HWBOT x265 4k Preset
1.8 fps (6%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Serpent
0.2 GB/s (9%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Twofish
0.3 GB/s (8%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt AES
1.9 GB/s (7%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
14.1 s (3%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M *
31.8 s (1%)
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 32M *
807 s (4%)
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Physics
3427 Points (13%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Physics
41974 Points (27%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Extreme Physics
41029 Points (44%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Physics
45359 Points (47%)
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Physics
3217 Points (8%)
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Physics
4729 Points (12%)
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy CPU
1361 Points (9%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Stream
4852 Points (39%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Memory
4449 Points (40%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Floating Point
9250 Points (18%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Integer
6447 Points (13%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Total Score
6868 Points (18%)
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 32 Bit Multi-Core
6134 (11%)
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 32 Bit Single-Core
2919 (60%)
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 64 Bit Multi-Core
6471 (10%)
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 64 Bit Single-Core
3196 (65%)
Geekbench 4.0 - Geekbench 4.0 64 Bit Single-Core
3213 (50%)
Geekbench 4.0 - Geekbench 4.0 64 Bit Multi-Core
5763 (14%)
Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Single-Core
3287 (41%)
Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
6053 (10%)
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Single-Core
765 (41%)
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Multi-Core
1552 (9%)
Geekbench 5.3 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.4 64 Bit Single-Core
882 (47%)
867 (46%)
Geekbench 5.3 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
3183 (19%)
1840 (11%)
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *
1452 ms (2%)
Sunspider - Sunspider 1.0 Total Score *
134 ms (1%)
Octane V2 - Octane V2 Total Score
22253 Points (32%)
WebXPRT 3 - WebXPRT 3 Score
143 Points (48%)

Average Benchmarks AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 2700U → NAN% n=

Average Benchmarks AMD Athlon 300U → NAN% n=

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

v1.16
log 27. 02:24:08

#0 checking url part for id 10132 +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 10144 +0s ... 0s

#2 checking url part for id 11201 +0s ... 0s

#3 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#4 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Thu, 22 Jul 2021 13:08:31 +0200 +0s ... 0s

#5 composed specs +0.01s ... 0.011s

#6 did output specs +0s ... 0.011s

#7 getting avg benchmarks for device 10132 +0s ... 0.011s

#8 got single benchmarks 10132 +0.005s ... 0.016s

#9 getting avg benchmarks for device 10144 +0s ... 0.016s

#10 got single benchmarks 10144 +0s ... 0.016s

#11 getting avg benchmarks for device 11201 +0s ... 0.016s

#12 got single benchmarks 11201 +0.002s ... 0.018s

#13 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.018s

#14 min, max, avg, median took s +0.011s ... 0.029s

#15 return log +0s ... 0.029s

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Notebook / Laptop Reviews and News > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2017-09-11)