Notebookcheck Logo

AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 2700U vs AMD Athlon 300U vs AMD 3015Ce

AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 2700U

► remove from comparison AMD R7 PRO 2700U

The AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 2700U is a mobile SoC that was announced in October 2017. Compared to the consumer Ryzen 7 2700U, the PRO versions offer additional security features. It combines four Zen cores (8 threads) clocked at 2.2 - 3.8 GHz with a Radeon RX Vega 10 graphics card with 10 CUs (640 Shaders) clocked at up to 1300 MHz. The TDP can be configured by the laptop manufacturer between 12 to 25 Watt (15 Watt nominal) and therefore the APU is also suited for thin and light laptops. The integrated dual-channel memory controller supports up to DDR4-2400 memory. More information on Raven Ridge can be found in our launch article.

The performance of the Zen CPU cores should be better than a high end Kaby-Lake-Refresh Quad-Core CPU (e.g. the Core i7-8650U) according to AMD. Therefore, the Ryzen 7 PRO 2700U is suited for all applications.

AMD Athlon 300U

► remove from comparison

The AMD Athlon 300U is a mobile entry level dual core SoC that was announced in January 2019. It combines two Zen cores (with SMT / Hyperthreading so running 4 threads) clocked at 2.4 - 3.3 GHz with a Radeon RX Vega 3 graphics card with 3 CUs (192 Shaders) clocked at up to 1000 MHz. Specified at 15 Watt TDP, the SoC is intended for thin mid-range laptops. It is quite similar to the AMD Ryzen 3 3200U (2.6 - 3.5 GHz).

Compared to the Picasso APUs of the Ryzen 3000 series, the Athlon 300U is still based on the first generation of the 2000 series. Only the PRO variant is based on the new Zen+ microarchitecture that should lead to a 3% IPS (performance per clock) improvement.

The integrated dual-channel memory controller supports up to DDR4-2400 memory. As the features of the Picasso APUs are the same compared to the Raven Ridge predecessors, we point to our Raven Ridge launch article.

In contrast to the faster quad-core Picasso APUs, the Athlon 300U only supports 3 instead of 4 displays in total.

Performance wise, the Athlon 300 should be slightly slower than the Ryzen 3 2200U (2.5 - 3.4 GHz Dual Core with SMT).

AMD 3015Ce

► remove from comparison AMD 3015Ce

The AMD 3015Ce (Codename Dali) is a mobile APU that integrates two Zen cores (with SMT, therefore 4 threads) clocked at 1.2 to 2.3 GHz. It is the Chromebook version of the AMD 3015e with identical specifications. The integrated Radeon graphics card offers 3 CUs at up to 600 MHz (Radeon RX Vega 3). The single channel memory controller supports only DDR4-1600. The chip is manufactured in 14nm and officially counted to the 3000 series of mobile processors.

More information on Raven Ridge can be found in our launch article.

Performance

The average 3015Ce in our database is about as fast as Intel's older Y-class dual-core chips such as the m3-7Y30 are, as far as multi-thread benchmark scores are concerned. Which is not fast at all. In fact, the AMD chip is not much better than Intel Celeron N-series offerings such as the N4100.

Power consumption

This AMD APU has a 6 W default TDP (also known as the long-term power limit). TDP values that low are typical for affordable laptops as well as ultra-compact mini-PCs, mostly with no active cooling solution.

The 3015Ce is manufactured on a 14 nm process making for subpar, as of late 2022, energy efficiency.

ModelAMD Ryzen 7 PRO 2700UAMD Athlon 300UAMD 3015Ce
SeriesAMD Raven Ridge (Ryzen 2000 APU)AMD Raven Ridge (Ryzen 2000 APU)AMD Raven Ridge (Ryzen 2000 APU)
CodenameZenZenPollock (Zen)
Series: Raven Ridge (Ryzen 2000 APU) Pollock (Zen)
AMD Ryzen 5 2400G3.6 - 3.9 GHz4 / 8 cores4 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 7 2700U2.2 - 3.8 GHz4 / 8 cores4 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 2700U « 2.2 - 3.8 GHz4 / 8 cores4 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 3 2200G3.5 - 3.7 GHz4 / 4 cores4 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 5 2600H3.2 - 3.6 GHz4 / 8 cores4 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 5 2500U2 - 3.6 GHz4 / 8 cores4 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 2500U2 - 3.6 GHz4 / 8 cores4 MB L3
AMD Ryzen Embedded V1605B2 - 3.6 GHz4 / 8 cores4 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 3 2300U2 - 3.4 GHz4 / 4 cores4 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 2300U2 - 3.4 GHz4 / 4 cores4 MB L3
AMD Ryzen Embedded R1606G2.6 - 3.5 GHz2 / 4 cores4 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 3 2200U2.5 - 3.4 GHz2 / 4 cores4 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 2200U2.5 - 3.4 GHz2 / 4 cores4 MB L3
AMD Ryzen Embedded R1505G2.4 - 3.3 GHz2 / 4 cores4 MB L3
AMD Athlon 300U2.4 - 3.3 GHz2 / 4 cores4 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 5 2400G3.6 - 3.9 GHz4 / 8 cores4 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 7 2700U2.2 - 3.8 GHz4 / 8 cores4 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 2700U2.2 - 3.8 GHz4 / 8 cores4 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 3 2200G3.5 - 3.7 GHz4 / 4 cores4 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 5 2600H3.2 - 3.6 GHz4 / 8 cores4 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 5 2500U2 - 3.6 GHz4 / 8 cores4 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 2500U2 - 3.6 GHz4 / 8 cores4 MB L3
AMD Ryzen Embedded V1605B2 - 3.6 GHz4 / 8 cores4 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 3 2300U2 - 3.4 GHz4 / 4 cores4 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 2300U2 - 3.4 GHz4 / 4 cores4 MB L3
AMD Ryzen Embedded R1606G2.6 - 3.5 GHz2 / 4 cores4 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 3 2200U2.5 - 3.4 GHz2 / 4 cores4 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 2200U2.5 - 3.4 GHz2 / 4 cores4 MB L3
AMD Ryzen Embedded R1505G2.4 - 3.3 GHz2 / 4 cores4 MB L3
AMD Athlon 300U « 2.4 - 3.3 GHz2 / 4 cores4 MB L3
AMD 3015e1.2 - 2.3 GHz2 / 4 cores4 MB L3
AMD 3015Ce « 1.2 - 2.3 GHz2 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Clock2200 - 3800 MHz2400 - 3300 MHz1200 - 2300 MHz
L1 Cache384 KB192 KB192 KB
L2 Cache2 MB1 MB1 MB
L3 Cache4 MB4 MB4 MB
Cores / Threads4 / 82 / 42 / 4
TDP15 Watt15 Watt6 Watt
Transistors4500 Million4500 Million
Technology14 nm12 nm14 nm
SocketAM4AM4FT5
FeaturesXFR, FMA3, SSE 4.2, AVX2, SMTXFR, FMA3, SSE 4.2, AVX2, SMTDDR4-1600 RAM (sin. chan.), PCIe 3, MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4A, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, AVX2, BMI2, ABM, FMA, ADX, SMEP, SMAP, SMT, CPB, AES-NI, RDRAND, RDSEED, SHA, SME
iGPUAMD Radeon RX Vega 10 ( - 1300 MHz)AMD Radeon RX Vega 3 ( - 1000 MHz)AMD Radeon RX Vega 3 ( - 600 MHz)
Architecturex86x86x86
Announced
Manufacturerwww.amd.comwww.amd.com
max. Temp.105 °C

Benchmarks

Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Single Core)
308 Points (34%)
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Multi Core)
637 Points (2%)
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit
308 Points (2%)
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64 Bit
119 Points (36%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (32bit)
3968 Points (24%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (32bit)
8724 Points (6%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 1024m *
510 s (6%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 32m *
15.4 s (3%)
WinRAR - WinRAR 4.0
1623 Points (3%)
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 2
18.5 fps (6%)
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 1
88.6 fps (20%)
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 - HWBOT x265 4k Preset
1.8 fps (3%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Serpent
0.2 GB/s (0%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Twofish
0.3 GB/s (5%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt AES
1.9 GB/s (5%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
14.1 s (3%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M *
31.8 s (1%)
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 32M *
807 s (4%)
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Physics
3427 Points (9%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Physics
41974 Points (34%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Extreme Physics
41029 Points (33%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Physics
45359 Points (38%)
78%
1 3015Ce +
35423 Points (30%)
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Physics
3217 Points (8%)
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Physics
4729 Points (8%)
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy CPU
1361 Points (6%)
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics
100%
1 3015Ce +
2475 Points (29%)
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.4 64 Bit Single-Core
882 Points (37%)
867 Points (37%)
564 Points (24%)
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
3183 Points (6%)
1840 Points (3%)
1135 Points (2%)
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Single-Core
765 Points (3%)
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Multi-Core
1552 Points (5%)
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Single-Core
3287 Points (33%)
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
6053 Points (7%)
Geekbench 4.0 - Geekbench 4.0 64 Bit Single-Core
3213 Points (44%)
Geekbench 4.0 - Geekbench 4.0 64 Bit Multi-Core
5763 Points (14%)
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 32 Bit Multi-Core
6134 Points (11%)
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 32 Bit Single-Core
2919 Points (57%)
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 64 Bit Multi-Core
6471 Points (10%)
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 64 Bit Single-Core
3196 Points (48%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Stream
4852 Points (39%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Memory
4449 Points (40%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Floating Point
9250 Points (18%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Integer
6447 Points (13%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Total Score
6868 Points (18%)
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *
1452 ms (2%)
100%
1 3015Ce +
1415 ms (2%)
Sunspider - Sunspider 1.0 Total Score *
133.6 ms (1%)
98%
1 3015Ce +
344.3 ms (4%)
Octane V2 - Octane V2 Total Score
22253 Points (20%)
105%
1 3015Ce +
23395 Points (21%)
WebXPRT 3 - WebXPRT 3 Score
143 Points (30%)
83%
1 3015Ce +
118 Points (25%)
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Storage 2.0 score
100%
1 3015Ce +
24872 Points (44%)
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Work Score 3.0
100%
1 3015Ce +
9775 Points (45%)
CrXPRT 2 - CrXPRT2 Performance Score
100%
1 3015Ce +
71 Points (39%)
Power Consumption - Idle Power Consumption 150cd 1min *
100%
1 3015Ce +
5.7 Watt (6%)

Average Benchmarks AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 2700U → 100% n=2

Average Benchmarks AMD Athlon 300U → 78% n=2

Average Benchmarks AMD 3015Ce → 50% n=2

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

v1.26
log 29. 12:41:36

#0 checking url part for id 10132 +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 11201 +0s ... 0s

#2 checking url part for id 14368 +0s ... 0s

#3 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#4 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Thu, 28 Mar 2024 05:35:32 +0100 +0.001s ... 0.001s

#5 composed specs +0.033s ... 0.034s

#6 did output specs +0s ... 0.034s

#7 getting avg benchmarks for device 10132 +0.002s ... 0.037s

#8 got single benchmarks 10132 +0.006s ... 0.043s

#9 getting avg benchmarks for device 11201 +0.002s ... 0.045s

#10 got single benchmarks 11201 +0.009s ... 0.054s

#11 getting avg benchmarks for device 14368 +0.002s ... 0.056s

#12 got single benchmarks 14368 +0.006s ... 0.063s

#13 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.063s

#14 min, max, avg, median took s +0.163s ... 0.226s

#15 return log +0s ... 0.226s

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)