Notebookcheck Logo

AMD Ryzen 7 8840HS vs Intel Core i7-13620H

AMD Ryzen 7 8840HS

► remove from comparison AMD R7 8840HS

The Ryzen 7 8840HS is a powerful processor (APU) of the Hawk Point family. This isn't an entirely new laptop chip; instead, it's a rebadged Ryzen 7 7840U with a slightly higher wattage as well as higher clock speeds on the Ryzen AI NPU. The 8840HS has eight Zen 4 cores running at 3.3 GHz to 5.1 GHz that are SMT-enabled for a total of 16 processing threads, while the great Radeon 780M is responsible for 3D processing and similar duties.

Architecture & Features

Hawk Point family chips are powered by the Zen 4 architecture, much like Phoenix and Dragon Range family chips are. That's not to say there is no difference between the three. With Hawk Point, AMD is betting big on generative AI; these processors are set to deliver an up to 40% increase in generative AI performance over 7040 series APUs, making apps like DaVinci Resolve and Adobe Photoshop more useful than ever before.

Unlike Zen 3, Zen 4 features AVX512 support and, thanks to a plethora of other improvements including larger caches/registers/buffers, is slated to bring a double-digit IPC improvement over the former.

Elsewhere, the 8840HS has 16 MB of L3 cache and support for super-fast DDR5-5600 and LPDDR5x-7500 RAM. The chip is compatible with USB 4 and therefore with Thunderbolt. It comes with 20 PCIe 4 lanes, giving NVMe SSDs up to 7.8 GB/s of throughput.

Systems built around this Ryzen 7 series APU are designed to run 64-bit Windows 11, 64-bit Windows 10, or Linux. Please note that this processor is not overclockable and neither is it user-replaceable. It gets soldered down for good instead (FP7, FP7r2, FP8 socket interfaces).

Performance

Since this is a 7840U in disguise that we are dealing with here, it is safe to expect the 8840HS to be about as fast as the Core i7-12650H, as far as multi-thread performance is concerned.

Your mileage may vary depending on how high the CPU power limits are, and how competent the cooling solution of your laptop is.

Graphics

The Radeon 780M has 12 CUs (768 shaders) purring away at up to 2,700 MHz. This is exactly the right iGPU for people looking for a bit more horsepower than what Intel's aging Xe options can provide. The Radeon will let you use up to 4 monitors with resolutions as high as SUHD 4320p and it will also HW-decode and HW-encode the most widely used video codecs (including AV1, HEVC and AVC) without breaking a sweat. In terms of gaming, the thing is good enough for 1080p and medium-to-low settings, as of late 2023.

Your mileage may vary depending on how high the CPU power limits are, how competent the cooling solution of your system is, how fast the RAM of your system is (there is no dedicated VRAM here).

Power consumption

This Ryzen 7 series chip has a long-term power limit (default TDP) of 28 W that laptop makers are free to tune to their liking, with values between 20 W and 30 W greenlighted by AMD. Either way, an active cooling solution is a must for any system powered by this chip.

The 8840HS is built with TSMC's 4 nm process for high, as of late 2023, energy efficiency.

Intel Core i7-13620H

► remove from comparison Intel i7-13620H

The Intel Core i7-13620H is a high-end mobile CPU for laptops of the Raptor Lake-H series (based on the Alder Lake architecture). It was announced in early 2023 and offers 6 performance cores (P-cores, Golden Cove architecture) and 4 of the 8 efficient cores (E-cores, Gracemont architecture). The P-cores support Hyper-Threading leading to 16 supported threads when combined with the E-cores. The clock rate ranges from 2.4 to 4.9 GHz (single-core boost, all-core boost up to 4.7 GHz) on the performance cluster and 1.8 to 3.6 GHz on the efficient cluster. The performance of the E-cores should be similar to old Skylake cores (compare to the Core i7-6700HQ). All cores can use up to 24 MB L3 cache. Compared to the older i7-12650H, the 13620H offers higher clock speeds.

Performance

Thanks to the improved clock speeds, the i7-13620H should be able to clearly best the old i7-12650H. Still, the faster i7 models of the 13th gen offer more e-Cores and therefore a clearly better multi-threaded performance.

Features

The integrated memory controller supports various memory types up to DDR5-5200 (up from DDR5-4800 of the 12th gen.). The Thread Director (in hardware) can support the operating system to decide which thread to use on the performance or efficient cores for the best performance. For AI tasks, the CPU also integrates GNA 3.0 and DL Boost (via AVX2). Quick Sync in version 8 is the same as in the Rocket Lake CPUs and supports MPEG-2, AVC, VC-1 decode, JPEG, VP8 decode, VP9, HEVC, and AV1 decode in hardware. The CPU now supports PCIe 5.0 x8 for a GPU and two PCIe 4.0 x4 for SSDs.

The integrated graphics card is based on the Xe-architecture and offers 64 of the 96 EUs (Execution Units) clocked at up to 1.5GHz.

Power consumption

The i7-13620H is rated at a TDP of 55W (PL1, 115W PL2) and is manufactured in a further improved 10nm process (Intel 7) that allows the higher clock speeds compared to the 12th gen CPUs.

ModelAMD Ryzen 7 8840HSIntel Core i7-13620H
CodenameHawk Point-HS (Zen 4)Raptor Lake-H
SeriesAMD Hawk Point (Zen 4/4c)Intel Raptor Lake-H
Series: Raptor Lake-H Raptor Lake-H
AMD Ryzen 9 270 compare4 - 5.2 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 9 8945H compare4 - 5.2 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS compare4 - 5.2 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 8945HS compare4 - 5.2 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 7 260 compare3.8 - 5.1 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS compare3.8 - 5.1 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 7 8745HS compare3.8 - 4.9 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 7 8840HS « 3.3 - 5.1 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 8840HS compare3.3 - 5.1 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 5 240 compare4.3 - 5 GHz6 / 12 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 5 8645HS compare4.3 - 5 GHz6 / 12 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 5 8640HS compare3.5 - 4.9 GHz6 / 12 cores16 MB L3
Intel Core i9-13900HK compare1.9 - 5.4 GHz14 / 20 cores24 MB L3
Intel Core i9-13905H compare1.9 - 5.4 GHz14 / 20 cores24 MB L3
Intel Core i9-13900H compare1.9 - 5.4 GHz14 / 20 cores24 MB L3
Intel Core i7-13800H compare1.8 - 5.2 GHz14 / 20 cores24 MB L3
Intel Core i7-13705H compare1.8 - 5 GHz14 / 20 cores24 MB L3
Intel Core i7-13700H compare1.8 - 5 GHz14 / 20 cores24 MB L3
Intel Core i7-13620H « 1.8 - 4.9 GHz10 / 16 cores24 MB L3
Intel Core i5-13600H compare2.1 - 4.8 GHz12 / 16 cores18 MB L3
Intel Core i5-13505H compare1.9 - 4.7 GHz12 / 16 cores18 MB L3
Intel Core i5-13500H compare1.9 - 4.7 GHz12 / 16 cores18 MB L3
Intel Core i5-13420H compare1.5 - 4.6 GHz8 / 12 cores12 MB L3
Clock3300 - 5100 MHz1800 - 4900 MHz
L1 Cache512 KB864 KB
L2 Cache8 MB9.5 MB
L3 Cache16 MB24 MB
Cores / Threads8 / 16
8 x 5.1 GHz AMD Zen 4
10 / 16
6 x 4.9 GHz Intel Golden Cove P-Core
4 x 3.6 GHz Intel Gracemont E-Core
TDP28 Watt45 Watt
Technology4 nm10 nm
Die Size178 mm2
max. Temp.100 °C100 °C
SocketFP7/FP7r2/FP8BGA1700
FeaturesDDR5-5600/LPDDR5x-7500 RAM, PCIe 4, Ryzen AI, AES, AVX, AVX2, AVX512, FMA3, MMX (+), SHA, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, SSE4A, SSSE3Thread Director
iGPUAMD Radeon 780M ( - 2700 MHz)Intel UHD Graphics 64EUs (Alder Lake 12th Gen) ( - 1500 MHz)
Architecturex86x86
Announced
Manufacturerwww.amd.comark.intel.com

Benchmarks

Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - R7 8840HS
38.5 pt (64%)
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - i7-13620H
38.7 pt (64%)
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
Cinebench 2024 - Cinebench 2024 CPU Single Core
min: 99     avg: 100.7     median: 99.6 (56%)     max: 103.6 Points
min: 109     avg: 109.5     median: 109.5 (62%)     max: 110 Points
Cinebench 2024 - Cinebench 2024 CPU Multi Core
min: 675     avg: 714     median: 677 (13%)     max: 790 Points
min: 691     avg: 758     median: 757.5 (14%)     max: 824 Points
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Multi Core
min: 12359     avg: 13222     median: 13082 (12%)     max: 14060 Points
min: 10819     avg: 14472     median: 15247 (14%)     max: 15496 Points
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Single Core
min: 1719     avg: 1736     median: 1737 (73%)     max: 1746 Points
min: 1805     avg: 1842     median: 1846.5 (78%)     max: 1871 Points
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Single Core)
min: 649     avg: 669     median: 671 (73%)     max: 681 Points
min: 693     avg: 704     median: 702.5 (77%)     max: 719 Points
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Multi Core)
min: 4788     avg: 5121     median: 4994 (12%)     max: 5556 Points
min: 4214     avg: 5505     median: 5727 (14%)     max: 5905 Points
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit
min: 1934     avg: 2070     median: 2045 (13%)     max: 2244 Points
min: 1681     avg: 2246     median: 2315 (15%)     max: 2492 Points
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64 Bit
min: 261     avg: 267.8     median: 270 (75%)     max: 270 Points
min: 258     avg: 262.7     median: 263 (73%)     max: 269 Points
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64 Bit
27.1 Points (35%)
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64 Bit
3.3 Points (78%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (32bit)
10181 Points (62%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (32bit)
54809 Points (40%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 1024m *
1021 s (12%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 32m *
3.1 s (1%)
WinRAR - WinRAR 4.0
8682 Points (14%)
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Multi Thread 4 runs
min: 49930     avg: 57219     median: 59682 (34%)     max: 61047 MIPS
min: 45983     avg: 56867     median: 58483 (34%)     max: 62324 MIPS
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Single Thread 4 runs
min: 5702     avg: 6151     median: 6205 (73%)     max: 6493 MIPS
min: 5742     avg: 5966     median: 5902.5 (70%)     max: 6326 MIPS
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 2
138.2 fps (46%)
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 1
345.4 fps (80%)
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 - HWBOT x265 4k Preset
min: 13.1     avg: 15.6     median: 15.7 (28%)     max: 17.4 fps
min: 12.9     avg: 16.3     median: 16.7 (29%)     max: 17.7 fps
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Serpent
1.3 GB/s (38%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Twofish
2.3 GB/s (40%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt AES
13.8 GB/s (36%)
Blender - Blender 3.3 Classroom CPU *
min: 369     avg: 407.8     median: 404 (5%)     max: 486 Seconds
min: 353     avg: 405.8     median: 384.5 (5%)     max: 506 Seconds
Blender - Blender 2.79 BMW27 CPU *
min: 226     avg: 246     median: 232 (2%)     max: 297 Seconds
min: 215     avg: 234.2     median: 220.5 (2%)     max: 289 Seconds
R Benchmark 2.5 - R Benchmark 2.5 *
min: 0.439     avg: 0.5     median: 0.5 (10%)     max: 0.4774 sec
min: 0.4438     avg: 0.4     median: 0.4 (10%)     max: 0.4545 sec
3DMark 06 - CPU - 3DMark 06 - CPU
13632 Points (29%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
6.7 s (1%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M *
15.2 s (1%)
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 32M *
380 s (2%)
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. CPU no Physx
75313 Points (58%)
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Physics
min: 17441     avg: 17857     median: 17623 (43%)     max: 18690 Points
min: 14557     avg: 20157     median: 20971 (52%)     max: 22258 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Physics
min: 72358     avg: 88076     median: 91770 (75%)     max: 100099 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Extreme Physics
100899 Points (82%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Physics
98837 Points (82%)
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Physics
min: 16214     avg: 16905     median: 16660 (42%)     max: 17842 Points
min: 13351     avg: 17139     median: 17901.5 (45%)     max: 19637 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Physics
min: 18812     avg: 21790     median: 22488 (40%)     max: 23382 Points
min: 19126     avg: 25548     median: 26217 (47%)     max: 29465 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy CPU
min: 7391     avg: 8296     median: 8297 (35%)     max: 9011 Points
min: 7713     avg: 10561     median: 11123.5 (47%)     max: 12228 Points
Geekbench 6.4 - Geekbench 6.4 Single-Core
min: 2477     avg: 2550     median: 2552 (64%)     max: 2602 Points
min: 2498     avg: 2568     median: 2592 (65%)     max: 2605 Points
Geekbench 6.4 - Geekbench 6.4 Multi-Core
min: 9922     avg: 11062     median: 11279 (44%)     max: 11700 Points
min: 9131     avg: 11687     median: 12557 (49%)     max: 13077 Points
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.5 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 1822     avg: 1906     median: 1928 (75%)     max: 1946 Points
min: 1785     avg: 1817     median: 1813 (71%)     max: 1865 Points
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.5 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 9229     avg: 9948     median: 9897 (18%)     max: 10884 Points
min: 8357     avg: 10876     median: 11359.5 (20%)     max: 12223 Points
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 1796     avg: 1825     median: 1817 (8%)     max: 1863 Points
1767 Points (8%)
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 9436     avg: 10052     median: 9866 (31%)     max: 10854 Points
11205 Points (35%)
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Single-Core
7977 Points (80%)
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
42882 Points (43%)
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *
min: 518     avg: 537     median: 538 (1%)     max: 563 ms
min: 508     avg: 515     median: 513 (1%)     max: 532 ms
Octane V2 - Octane V2 Total Score
min: 89899     avg: 93041     median: 93040.5 (70%)     max: 96182 Points
WebXPRT 4 - WebXPRT 4 Score
min: 246     avg: 249.6     median: 248 (68%)     max: 257 Points
min: 260     avg: 264.7     median: 264 (73%)     max: 270 Points
WebXPRT 3 - WebXPRT 3 Score
min: 297     avg: 328.2     median: 299 (54%)     max: 440 Points
min: 271     avg: 292.5     median: 287 (52%)     max: 319 Points
CrossMark - CrossMark Overall
min: 1643     avg: 1670     median: 1672 (63%)     max: 1698 Points
min: 1493     avg: 1830     median: 1869 (70%)     max: 1986 Points
Power Consumption - Prime95 Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 37.9     avg: 44.7     median: 46.6 (8%)     max: 53 Watt
min: 61.1     avg: 110.2     median: 116.5 (20%)     max: 135 Watt
Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 22.3     avg: 41.3     median: 42.6 (8%)     max: 53.1 Watt
min: 124.9     avg: 138.1     median: 128.8 (24%)     max: 170 Watt
Power Consumption - Idle Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 4.62     avg: 5.4     median: 5.3 (4%)     max: 6.09 Watt
min: 10.1     avg: 18.5     median: 19.5 (13%)     max: 21.4 Watt
Power Consumption - Idle Power Consumption 150cd 1min *
min: 5.36     avg: 6     median: 5.8 (6%)     max: 7.5 Watt
min: 11.3     avg: 15.6     median: 14.8 (16%)     max: 21.7 Watt
Power Consumption - Power Efficiency - Cinebench R15 Multi external Monitor
min: 42.3     avg: 46     median: 45.9 (34%)     max: 49.8 Points per Watt
min: 14.7     avg: 17.5     median: 18 (13%)     max: 19.2 Points per Watt

Average Benchmarks AMD Ryzen 7 8840HS → 100% n=28

Average Benchmarks Intel Core i7-13620H → 108% n=28

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
red legend - Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:
v1.33
log 20. 13:48:24

#0 ran 0s before starting gpusingle class +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 16413 +0s ... 0s

#2 checking url part for id 14723 +0s ... 0s

#3 redirected to Ajax server, took 1753012104s time from redirect:0 +0s ... 0s

#4 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Sat, 19 Jul 2025 13:28:35 +0200 +0s ... 0s

#5 composed specs +0.005s ... 0.005s

#6 did output specs +0s ... 0.005s

#7 getting avg benchmarks for device 16413 +0.003s ... 0.008s

#8 got single benchmarks 16413 +0.008s ... 0.016s

#9 getting avg benchmarks for device 14723 +0.001s ... 0.018s

#10 got single benchmarks 14723 +0.002s ... 0.019s

#11 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.019s

#12 min, max, avg, median took s +0.027s ... 0.046s

#13 return log +0.001s ... 0.048s

Please share our article, every link counts!
Mail Logo
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)