Notebookcheck Logo

AMD Ryzen 7 7800X3D vs Intel Core i5-14501E

AMD Ryzen 7 7800X3D

AMD R7 7800X3D

The AMD Ryzen 7 7800X3D is a high-end desktop processor from the Raphael series with 8 Zen 4 cores and SMT (Simultaneous Multithreading), allowing it to handle up to 16 threads simultaneously. After its announcement in January 2023 at CES in Las Vegas, it was launched in April 2023. Following the launch of the two top models, the AMD Ryzen 9 7900X3D and the AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D, the third model was introduced, which offers significantly more gaming performance with the 3D V-Cache.

The CPU cores have a base clock of 4.2 GHz and can be boosted up to 5 GHz (single-core turbo). The AMD Ryzen 7 7800X3D features a CCD with 8 cores, which includes the fast 3D V-Cache. This differs significantly from the two Ryzen 9 models, as they have two CCDs, but only one of them can utilize the 3D V-Cache.

The performance of the AMD Ryzen 7 7800X3D is consistently good, although its multi-threaded performance suffers a bit due to the eight native compute cores. However, the real strength of the AMD Ryzen 7 7800X3D lies in gaming performance, where it excels. In tests, we see consistently high gaming performance, even surpassing that of an Intel Core i9-13900K.

In terms of power consumption, the AMD Ryzen 7 7800X3D aligns with the other two models featuring 3D V-Cache, making the 8-core processor extremely power-efficient. In numbers, this means that the AMD Ryzen 7 7800X3D is specified with a TDP of up to 120 watts. The PPT (Package Power Tracking) is also rated up to 162 watts. For comparison, an AMD Ryzen 9 7950X is specified with 170 watts (TDP) or 230 watts (PPT).

Intel Core i5-14501E

► remove from comparison Intel Core i5-14501E

The Intel Core i5-14501E is a peculiar Raptor Lake family desktop processor (SoC) that has 6 performance cores but 0 efficient cores. It's the lack of E-cores that makes 14X01 chips special.

The product has decently sized level 2 and 3 caches at 12 MB and 24 MB, respectively. Its CPU cores run at up to 5.2 GHz. The UHD 770 serves as the integrated graphics solution. There is no 'proper' NPU here, however, vPro Enterprise features such as RPE (Remote Platform Erase) are onboard.

The i5 chip is manufactured built with the Intel 7 process which is fairly old, as of mid 2025. Its base TDP sits at 65 W which is the standard value for desktop CPUs.

Performance

While we have not tested a single 14X01 processor as of July 2025, we do know that a single 4.6 GHz Raptor Cove core, such as that of an Core i7-14650HX is good for 116 Cinebench 2024 points and 285 Cinebench R15 points. (The 14501E can run at up to 5.2 GHz, too, to remind you.) If we multiply the values by 6, we get a reasonably fair projection that sees the 14501E being about as fast as lower mid-range laptop AMD chips of 2025, such as the AMD Ryzen AI 5 340. While not particularly impressive, this is definitely sufficient for any tasks and applications one could run in 2025, top games included.

ModelAMD Ryzen 7 7800X3DIntel Core i5-14501E
CodenameRaphael (Zen4)Raptor Lake
SeriesAMD Raphael (Zen 4, Ryzen 7000)Intel Raptor Lake-S
Series: Raptor Lake-S Raptor Lake
AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D compare4.2 - 5.7 GHz16 / 32 cores128 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 9 7900X compare4.7 - 5.6 GHz12 / 24 cores64 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 9 7900 compare3.7 - 5.4 GHz12 / 24 cores64 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 7 7700X compare4.5 - 5.4 GHz8 / 16 cores32 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 7 7700 compare3.8 - 5.3 GHz8 / 16 cores32 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 7 7800X3D « 4.2 - 5 GHz8 / 16 cores96 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 5 7600X compare4.7 - 5.3 GHz6 / 12 cores32 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 5 7600 compare3.8 - 5.1 GHz6 / 12 cores32 MB L3
Intel Core i9-13900K compare3 - 5.8 GHz24 / 32 cores36 MB L3
Intel Core i7-13700K compare3.4 - 5.4 GHz16 / 24 cores30 MB L3
Intel Core i5-13600K compare3.5 - 5.1 GHz14 / 20 cores24 MB L3
Intel Core i5-13500 compare2.5 - 4.8 GHz14 / 20 cores24 MB L3
Intel Core i5-14501TE compare2.2 - 5.1 GHz6 / 12 cores12 MB L3
Intel Core i5-14501E « 3.3 - 5.2 GHz6 / 12 cores24 MB L3
Intel Core i5-14401E compare2.5 - 4.7 GHz6 / 12 cores12 MB L3
Intel Core i5-14401TE compare2 - 4.5 GHz6 / 12 cores12 MB L3
Intel Core i5-13500T compare1.6 - 4.6 GHz14 / 20 cores24 MB L3
Clock4200 - 5000 MHz3300 - 5200 MHz
L1 Cache512 KB
L2 Cache8 MB12 MB
L3 Cache96 MB24 MB
Cores / Threads8 / 166 / 12
6 x 5.2 GHz Intel Raptor Cove P-Core
TDP120 Watt65 Watt
TDP Turbo PL2162 Watt
Transistors6570 Million
Technology5 nm10 nm
Voltage1.1 - 1.2 V
Die Size193 mm2
max. Temp.89 °C
SocketAM5 (LGA 1718)LGA1700
FeaturesMMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, SSE4A, x86-64, AMD-V, AES, AVX, AVX2, AVX512, BMI1, BMI2, F16C, FMA3, AMD64, EVP, AMD-V, SMAP, SMEP, SMT SHA, XFR2, Precision Boost 2DDR4-3200/DDR5-4800 RAM, PCIe 5 + PCIe 4, DL Boost, GNA, vPro En., RPE, MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, AVX2, BMI2, ABM, FMA, ADX, SMEP, SMAP, EIST, TM1, TM2, HT, Turbo, SST, AES-NI, RDRAND, RDSEED, SHA
iGPUAMD Radeon Graphics (Ryzen 7000) (400 - 2200 MHz)Intel UHD Graphics 770 ( - 1550 MHz)
Architecturex86x86
$449 U.S.
Announced
Manufacturerwww.intel.com

Benchmarks

Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - R7 7800X3D
42.3 pt (70%)
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Multi Core
min: 16688     avg: 17197     median: 16817 (16%)     max: 18086 Points
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Single Core
min: 1646     avg: 1726     median: 1713 (72%)     max: 1820 Points
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Single Core)
min: 663     avg: 686     median: 686 (75%)     max: 709 Points
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Multi Core)
min: 6488     avg: 6805     median: 6804.5 (17%)     max: 7121 Points
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit
min: 2783     avg: 2879     median: 2878.5 (18%)     max: 2974 Points
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64 Bit
min: 272     avg: 281.5     median: 281.5 (78%)     max: 291 Points
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64 Bit
33.5 Points (43%)
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64 Bit
3.4 Points (81%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (32bit)
8026 Points (48%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (32bit)
51950 Points (38%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (64bit)
94035 Points (60%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (64bit)
14485 Points (18%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 1024m *
62.7 s (1%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 32m *
2.4 s (0%)
WinRAR - WinRAR 4.0
16585 Points (26%)
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Multi Thread 4 runs
min: 75558     avg: 80313     median: 80312.5 (46%)     max: 85067 MIPS
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Single Thread 4 runs
min: 7412     avg: 7824     median: 7823.5 (92%)     max: 8235 MIPS
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 2
169.3 fps (57%)
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 1
344 fps (79%)
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 - HWBOT x265 4k Preset
min: 22.1     avg: 23.3     median: 23.3 (41%)     max: 24.4 fps
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Serpent
1.3 GB/s (38%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Twofish
2.1 GB/s (36%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt AES
15.3 GB/s (40%)
Blender - Blender 3.3 Classroom CPU *
min: 266     avg: 282.5     median: 282.5 (4%)     max: 299 Seconds
Blender - Blender 2.79 BMW27 CPU *
min: 169     avg: 178     median: 178 (1%)     max: 187 Seconds
R Benchmark 2.5 - R Benchmark 2.5 *
min: 0.4152     avg: 0.4     median: 0.4 (9%)     max: 0.4479 sec
3DMark 06 - CPU - 3DMark 06 - CPU
16892 Points (36%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
7.1 s (2%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M *
15.3 s (1%)
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 32M *
337.6 s (1%)
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. CPU no Physx
97391 Points (75%)
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Physics
min: 30767     avg: 32947     median: 32947 (81%)     max: 35127 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Physics
89617 Points (73%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Extreme Physics
89287 Points (72%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Physics
91846 Points (76%)
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Physics
25510 Points (65%)
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Physics
min: 30333     avg: 31455     median: 30687 (55%)     max: 33345 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy CPU
min: 10908     avg: 12327     median: 11975 (50%)     max: 14098 Points
Geekbench 6.4 - Geekbench 6.4 Single-Core
2634 Points (66%)
Geekbench 6.4 - Geekbench 6.4 Multi-Core
14288 Points (55%)
Geekbench 6.0 - Geekbench 6.0 Single-Core
2175 Points (69%)
Geekbench 6.0 - Geekbench 6.0 Multi-Core
12046 Points (49%)
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.5 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 1856     avg: 1934     median: 1920 (75%)     max: 2027 Points
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.5 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 12073     avg: 13013     median: 12715 (23%)     max: 14252 Points
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Single-Core
1938 Points (8%)
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Multi-Core
13888 Points (44%)
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Single-Core
9097 Points (91%)
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
54840 Points (55%)
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *
min: 487     avg: 504     median: 503.5 (1%)     max: 520 ms
WebXPRT 4 - WebXPRT 4 Score
282 Points (77%)
WebXPRT 3 - WebXPRT 3 Score
353 Points (63%)
CrossMark - CrossMark Overall
2216 Points (83%)
Power Consumption - Prime95 Power Consumption - external Monitor *
218 Watt (38%)
Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Consumption - external Monitor *
207 Watt (38%)
Power Consumption - Idle Power Consumption - external Monitor *
121.6 Watt (80%)
Power Consumption - Power Efficiency - Cinebench R15 Multi external Monitor
14.4 Points per Watt (11%)

Average Benchmarks AMD Ryzen 7 7800X3D → 0% n=0

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
red legend - Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:
v1.33
log 14. 13:51:56

#0 ran 0s before starting gpusingle class +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 15064 +0s ... 0s

#2 checking url part for id 18709 +0s ... 0s

#3 redirected to Ajax server, took 1752493916s time from redirect:0 +0s ... 0s

#4 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Sun, 13 Jul 2025 05:20:07 +0200 +0s ... 0s

#5 composed specs +0.005s ... 0.006s

#6 did output specs +0s ... 0.006s

#7 getting avg benchmarks for device 15064 +0.005s ... 0.01s

#8 got single benchmarks 15064 +0.006s ... 0.016s

#9 getting avg benchmarks for device 18709 +0.001s ... 0.017s

#10 got single benchmarks 18709 +0s ... 0.017s

#11 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.017s

#12 min, max, avg, median took s +0.028s ... 0.045s

#13 return log +0.001s ... 0.046s

Please share our article, every link counts!
Mail Logo
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)