Notebookcheck Logo

AMD Ryzen 7 6800HS vs AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 6950HS

AMD Ryzen 7 6800HS

► remove from comparison AMD R7 6800HS

The AMD Ryzen 7 6800HS is a processor for big (gaming) laptops based of the Rembrandt generation. The R7 6800HS integrates all eight cores based on the Zen 3+ microarchitecture. They are clocked at 3.2 (guaranteed base clock) to 4.7 GHz (Turbo) and support SMT / Hyperthreading (16 threads). The chip is manufactured on the modern 6 nm TSMC process. The HS variant offers a 10 W reduced TDP and therefore a lower sustained performance than the H version.

The new Zen 3+ is a refresh of the Zen 3 architecture and should not offer a lot of changes. The chip itself however, offers a lot of new features, like support for USB 4 (40 Gbps), PCI-E Gen 4, DDR5-4800MT/s or LPDDR5-6400MT/s, WiFi 6E, Bluetooth LE 5.2, DisplayPort 2, and AV1 decode.

A big novelty is the integrated GPU Radeon 680M, that is now based on the RDNA2 architecture and offers 12 CUs at up to 2.2 GHz. It should be the fastest iGPU at the time of announcement.

Performance

The average 6800HS in our database is in the same league as the Ryzen 7 5800H and also the Core i7-11800H, as far as multi-thread benchmark scores are concerned.

Your mileage may vary depending on how competent the cooling solution of your laptop is and how high the CPU power limits are.

Power consumption

This Ryzen 7 has a default TDP of 35 W (also known as the long-term power limit). Which is definitely too high to allow for passively cooled designs.

The APU is built with TSMC's 6 nm process making for great, as of early 2023, energy efficiency.

AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 6950HS

► remove from comparison AMD R9 PRO 6950HS

The AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 6950HS is a processor for big (workstation) laptops based on the Rembrandt generation. The R9 6950HS integrates all eight cores based on the Zen 3+ microarchitecture. They are clocked at 3.3 (guaranteed base clock) to 4.9 GHz (Turbo) and support SMT / Hyperthreading (16 threads). The chip is manufactured on the modern 6 nm TSMC process. The HS variant offers a 10 W lower TDP and therefore a lower sustained performance than the HX version. Professional version of the consumer R7 6800HS with additional managment features and the Microsoft Pluton Security processor.

The new Zen 3+ is a refresh of the Zen 3 architecture and should not offer a lot of changes. The chip itself however, offers a lot of new features, like support for USB 4 (40 Gbps), PCI-E Gen 4, DDR5-4800MT/s or LPDDR5-6400MT/s, WiFi 6E, Bluetooth LE 5.2, DisplayPort 2, and AV1 decode.

A big novelty is the integrated GPU Radeon 680M, that is now based on the RDNA2 architecture and offers 12 CUs at up to 2.4 GHz. It should be the fastest iGPU of all at the time of announcement.

Performance

The average 6950HS in our database is in the same league as the Intel Core i7-1280P, AMD Ryzen 9 4900H, Intel Core i7-11800H, as far as multi-thread benchmark scores are concerned - which puts it somewhat behind the mighty 12th Gen Alder Lake-H processors. This Ryzen 9 series chip is still more than good enough for proper gaming on the go as well as content creation, as of mid 2022.

Your mileage may vary depending on how high the CPU power limits are and how competent the cooling solution of your system is.

Power consumption

The Ryzen has a default TDP of 35 W (also known as PL1). That's too high to allow for a passively cooled design.

The APU is built with TSMC's 6 nm process for great, as of late 2022, energy efficiency.

ModelAMD Ryzen 7 6800HSAMD Ryzen 9 PRO 6950HS
SeriesAMD Rembrandt (Zen 3+)AMD Rembrandt (Zen 3+)
CodenameRembrandt-HS (Zen 3+)Rembrandt-HS (Zen 3+)
Series: Rembrandt (Zen 3+) Rembrandt-HS (Zen 3+)
AMD Ryzen 9 6980HS compare3.3 - 5 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 6950HS3.3 - 4.9 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 6850HS compare3.2 - 4.7 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 7 6800HS « 3.2 - 4.7 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 6650HS compare3.3 - 4.5 GHz6 / 12 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 5 6600HS compare3.3 - 4.5 GHz6 / 12 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 9 6980HS compare3.3 - 5 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 6950HS « 3.3 - 4.9 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 6850HS compare3.2 - 4.7 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 7 6800HS3.2 - 4.7 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 6650HS compare3.3 - 4.5 GHz6 / 12 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 5 6600HS compare3.3 - 4.5 GHz6 / 12 cores16 MB L3
Clock3200 - 4700 MHz3300 - 4900 MHz
L1 Cache512 KB512 KB
L2 Cache4 MB4 MB
L3 Cache16 MB16 MB
Cores / Threads8 / 168 / 16
TDP35 Watt35 Watt
Technology6 nm6 nm
max. Temp.95 °C95 °C
SocketFP7/FP7r2FP7/FP7r2
FeaturesDDR5-4800/LPDDR5-6400 RAM (incl. ECC), PCIe 4, MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4A, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, AVX2, BMI2, ABM, FMA, ADX, SMEP, SMAP, SMT, CPB, AES-NI, RDRAND, RDSEED, SHA, SMEDDR5-4800/LPDDR5-6400 RAM (incl. ECC), PCIe 4, PRO, MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4A, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, AVX2, BMI2, ABM, FMA, ADX, SMEP, SMAP, SMT, CPB, AES-NI, RDRAND, RDSEED, SHA, SME
iGPUAMD Radeon 680M ( - 2200 MHz)AMD Radeon 680M ( - 2400 MHz)
Architecturex86x86
Announced
Manufacturerwww.amd.comwww.amd.com

Benchmarks

Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - R7 6800HS
39.3 pt (55%)
Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - R9 PRO 6950HS
39.3 pt (55%)
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Multi Core
11992 Points (11%)
11515 Points (11%)
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Single Core
1455 Points (62%)
1514 Points (64%)
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Single Core)
570 Points (63%)
591 Points (66%)
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Multi Core)
4634 Points (11%)
4577 Points (11%)
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit
1987 Points (13%)
1913 Points (12%)
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64 Bit
234 Points (70%)
239 Points (72%)
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64 Bit
26.2 Points (34%)
22.1 Points (29%)
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64 Bit
2.8 Points (69%)
2.8 Points (70%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (32bit)
6258 Points (38%)
6266 Points (38%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (32bit)
41339 Points (30%)
36583 Points (27%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (64bit)
75070 Points (52%)
66188 Points (46%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (64bit)
11833 Points (14%)
11968 Points (15%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 1024m *
252 s (3%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 32m *
8.4 s (2%)
wPrime 1.55 - wPrime 1.55 1024m *
250 s (1%)
wPrime 1.55 - wPrime 1.55 32m *
8.5 s (4%)
WinRAR - WinRAR 4.0
6716 Points (11%)
5970 Points (9%)
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Multli Thread 4 runs
56170 MIPS (32%)
49474 MIPS (28%)
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Single Thread 4 runs
5495 MIPS (66%)
5516 MIPS (66%)
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 2
113.7 fps (40%)
103 fps (36%)
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 1
254.7 fps (59%)
222 fps (51%)
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 - HWBOT x265 4k Preset
15.1 fps (27%)
12.8 fps (22%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Serpent
1.1 GB/s (0%)
1 GB/s (0%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Twofish
1.7 GB/s (29%)
1.6 GB/s (28%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt AES
11.4 GB/s (30%)
11.7 GB/s (30%)
Blender - Blender 2.79 BMW27 CPU *
258 Seconds (2%)
264 Seconds (2%)
R Benchmark 2.5 - R Benchmark 2.5 *
0.5 sec (11%)
0.5 sec (11%)
3DMark 06 - CPU - 3DMark 06 - CPU
13890 Points (30%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
8.4 s (2%)
7.2 s (2%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M *
20.1 s (1%)
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 32M *
711 s (3%)
366 s (2%)
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. CPU no Physx
68865 Points (60%)
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Physics
18829 Points (51%)
13952 Points (38%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Physics
74164 Points (60%)
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Physics
18745 Points (47%)
15038 Points (38%)
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Physics
25588 Points (46%)
20509 Points (37%)
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy CPU
10146 Points (43%)
7132 Points (30%)
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.4 64 Bit Single-Core
1492 Points (63%)
1549 Points (65%)
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
9298 Points (17%)
7664 Points (14%)
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Single-Core
1522 Points (7%)
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Multi-Core
8033 Points (25%)
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Single-Core
6168 Points (62%)
6351 Points (63%)
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
36693 Points (41%)
31423 Points (35%)
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *
618 ms (1%)
612 ms (1%)
WebXPRT 3 - WebXPRT 3 Score
280 Points (58%)
274 Points (57%)
CrossMark - CrossMark Overall
1345 Points (52%)
Power Consumption - Prime95 Power Consumption - external Monitor *
78.9 Watt (14%)
62.2 Watt (11%)
Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Consumption - external Monitor *
83.6 Watt (15%)
64.7 Watt (12%)
Power Consumption - Idle Power Consumption - external Monitor *
5.1 Watt (3%)
Power Consumption - Idle Power Consumption 150cd 1min *
18.1 Watt (20%)
9.1 Watt (10%)
Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Efficiency - external Monitor
23.8 Points per Watt (18%)
29.6 Points per Watt (22%)

Average Benchmarks AMD Ryzen 7 6800HS → 100% n=35

Average Benchmarks AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 6950HS → 94% n=35

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:

show all (including archived), 2024, 2023
v1.26
log 20. 08:32:37

#0 checking url part for id 14120 +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 14372 +0s ... 0s

#2 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#3 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Fri, 19 Apr 2024 05:38:49 +0200 +0.001s ... 0.001s

#4 composed specs +0.031s ... 0.033s

#5 did output specs +0s ... 0.033s

#6 getting avg benchmarks for device 14120 +0.02s ... 0.053s

#7 got single benchmarks 14120 +0.021s ... 0.073s

#8 getting avg benchmarks for device 14372 +0.014s ... 0.087s

#9 got single benchmarks 14372 +0.01s ... 0.097s

#10 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.097s

#11 min, max, avg, median took s +0.351s ... 0.448s

#12 return log +0.03s ... 0.478s

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)