Notebookcheck Logo

AMD Ryzen 7 3750H vs AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 3500U vs AMD Ryzen 3 3200U

AMD Ryzen 7 3750H

► remove from comparison AMD R7 3750H

The AMD Ryzen 7 3750H is a mobile SoC that was announced in January 2019. It combines four Zen+ cores (8 threads) clocked at 2.3 - 4 GHz with a Radeon RX Vega 10 graphics card with 10 CUs (640 Shaders) clocked at up to 1400 MHz. Compared to the similar Ryzen 7 3700U, the 3750H offers a 20 Watt higher TDP and therefore a better performance under long periods of load. The integrated dual-channel memory controller supports up to DDR4-2400 memory. As the features of the Picasso APUs are the same compared to the Raven Ridge predecessors, we point to our Raven Ridge launch article.

Picasso SoCs use the Zen+ microarchitecture with slight improvements that should lead to a 3% IPS (performance per clock) improvements.

Performance

The average 3750H in our database is in the same league as the Core i7-10610U, as far as multi-thread benchmark scores are concerned. This is a fairly good result, as of early 2022.

The ROG Zephyrus G15 GA502DU is among the fastest laptops built around the 3750H that we know of. It can be about 20% faster in CPU-bound workloads than the slowest system featuring the same chip in our database, as of August 2023.

Power consumption

This Ryzen 7 has a default TDP of 35 W (also known as the long-term power limit). Laptop manufacturers are free to change that value to anything between 12 W and 35 W with clock speeds and performance changing accordingly. These values are comparatively high, making an active cooling solution pretty much a necessity.

Last but not the least, this AMD APU is built with a rather old, as of late 2022, 12 nm process for lower-than-average energy efficiency.

AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 3500U

► remove from comparison AMD R5 PRO 3500U

The AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 3500U is a mobile SoC for business laptops that was announced in April  2019. It combines four Zen+ cores (8 threads) clocked at 2.1 - 3.7 GHz with a Radeon RX Vega 8 graphics card with 8 CUs (512 Shaders) clocked at up to 1200 MHz. Specified at 15 Watt TDP, the SoC is intended for thin mid-range laptops. Compared to the similar consumer variant Ryzen 5 3500U, the PRO model features additional management and security features (e.g., full memory encryption) and longer warranty / availability.

The Picasso SoCs use the Zen+ microarchitecture with slight improvements that should lead to a 3% IPS (performance per clock) improvements. Furthermore, the 12nm process allows higher clock rates at similar power consumptions.

The integrated dual-channel memory controller supports up to DDR4-2400 memory. As the features of the Picasso APUs are the same compared to the Raven Ridge predecessors, we point to our Raven Ridge launch article.

AMD states that the Picasso APUs are about 8% faster than the predecessors. Therefore, the Ryzen 5 3500U should be ahead the Ryzen 5 PRO 2500U (2 - 3.6 GHz) and nearly on par with the Ryzen 7 PRO 2700U (2.2 - 3.8 GHz).

AMD Ryzen 3 3200U

► remove from comparison AMD R3 3200U

The AMD Ryzen 3 3200U is a dual-core SoC designed for laptops that was announced in January 2019. The Ryzen features two Zen cores with support for the thread-doubling SMT tech, clocked at 2.6 GHz - 3.5 GHz. The built-in Radeon RX Vega 3 iGPU has 3 CUs (192 unified shaders) clocked at up to 1,200 MHz. The default TDP is 15 W which makes the Ryzen a good fit for thin mid-range laptops.

In comparison to the faster Ryzen 3000 CPUs, the 3200U is not using the newer Zen+ microarchitecture and is still manufactured in 14nm. Compared to the old Ryzen 3 2200U, the 3200U therefore only offers a 100 MHz higher clock speed.

The Ryzen 3 is compatible with single-channel or dual-channel DDR4-2400 RAM.

Please go to our Raven Ridge launch article for details on the architecture and more.

Performance

The average 3200U in our extensive database is anything but a performance monster, its multi-thread benchmark scores only just matching those of the Core i3-8130U and the Pentium N6000. While not as atrociously slow as most N-series and J-series Intel chips, this specific Ryzen is good enough for basic day-to-day activities only.

Your mileage may vary depending on how high the CPU power limits are and how competent the cooling solution of your system is.

Power consumption

This Ryzen 3 series chip has a default TDP, also known as the long-term power limit, of 15 W. Laptop makers are free to change that to anything between 12 W and 25 W; most will go for a higher value to extract more performance out of it. Either way, an active cooling solution will be needed to dissipate the heat.

The R3 3200U is built with a 14 nm manufacturing process for low, as of early 2023, energy efficiency.

ModelAMD Ryzen 7 3750HAMD Ryzen 5 PRO 3500UAMD Ryzen 3 3200U
SeriesAMD Picasso (Ryzen 3000 APU)AMD Picasso (Ryzen 3000 APU)AMD Picasso (Ryzen 3000 APU)
CodenamePicasso (Zen+)Zen+Picasso-U (Zen)
Clock2300 - 4000 MHz2100 - 3700 MHz2600 - 3500 MHz
L1 Cache384 KB384 KB192 KB
L2 Cache2 MB2 MB1 MB
L3 Cache4 MB4 MB4 MB
Cores / Threads4 / 84 / 82 / 4
TDP35 Watt15 Watt15 Watt
Transistors4500 Million4500 Million4500 Million
Technology12 nm12 nm14 nm
max. Temp.105 °C105 °C
SocketFP5AM4FP5
FeaturesDDR4-2400 RAM, PCIe 3, MMX (+), SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, SSE4A, AES, AVX, AVX2, FMA3, SHAXFR, FMA3, SSE 4.2, AVX2, SMTDDR4-2400 RAM, PCIe 3, MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4A, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, AVX2, BMI2, ABM, FMA, ADX, SMEP, SMAP, SMT, CPB, AES-NI, RDRAND, RDSEED, SHA, SME
iGPUAMD Radeon RX Vega 10 ( - 1400 MHz)AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 2000/3000) ( - 1200 MHz)AMD Radeon RX Vega 3 ( - 1200 MHz)
Architecturex86x86x86
Announced
Manufacturerwww.amd.comwww.amd.comwww.amd.com
Series: Picasso (Ryzen 3000 APU) Zen+
AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 3700U2.3 - 4 GHz4 / 8 cores4 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 3500U « 2.1 - 3.7 GHz4 / 8 cores4 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 3 3350U2.1 - 3.5 GHz4 / 4 cores4 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 3 3300U2.1 - 3.5 GHz4 / 4 cores4 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 3300U2.1 - 3.5 GHz4 / 4 cores4 MB L3

Benchmarks

Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - R7 3750H
27 pt (37%)
Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - R5 PRO 3500U
26.2 pt (36%)
Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - R3 3200U
23.5 pt (33%)
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Multi Core
3897 Points (4%)
min: 1767     avg: 1786     median: 1786 (2%)     max: 1804 Points
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Single Core
971 Points (41%)
min: 208     avg: 584     median: 765 (33%)     max: 780 Points
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Single Core)
min: 340     avg: 363.8     median: 364.5 (41%)     max: 386 Points
min: 354     avg: 361.5     median: 361.5 (40%)     max: 369 Points
min: 274     avg: 298.2     median: 301 (33%)     max: 318 Points
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Multi Core)
min: 1514     avg: 1691     median: 1713 (4%)     max: 1825 Points
min: 1328     avg: 1339     median: 1338.5 (3%)     max: 1349 Points
min: 453     avg: 607     median: 690 (2%)     max: 727 Points
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit
min: 672     avg: 743     median: 734 (5%)     max: 805 Points
min: 611     avg: 624     median: 624 (4%)     max: 637 Points
min: 318     avg: 335     median: 334 (2%)     max: 353 Points
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64 Bit
min: 135     avg: 143.9     median: 144 (43%)     max: 157 Points
min: 140     avg: 142     median: 142 (43%)     max: 144 Points
min: 126     avg: 128.3     median: 129 (39%)     max: 130 Points
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64 Bit
9.2 Points (12%)
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64 Bit
1.6 Points (41%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (32bit)
min: 4527     avg: 4732     median: 4770 (29%)     max: 4898 Points
4258 Points (26%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (32bit)
min: 19290     avg: 20242     median: 20687 (15%)     max: 20750 Points
9284 Points (7%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 1024m *
197.1 s (2%)
483.5 s (6%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 32m *
7.4 s (1%)
14 s (3%)
WinRAR - WinRAR 4.0
2866 Points (5%)
1613 Points (3%)
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Multli Thread 4 runs
min: 17077     avg: 18318     median: 18689 (11%)     max: 19187 MIPS
min: 15910     avg: 16221     median: 16220.5 (9%)     max: 16531 MIPS
min: 8785     avg: 9083     median: 9081.5 (5%)     max: 9382 MIPS
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Single Thread 4 runs
min: 3511     avg: 3641     median: 3659 (44%)     max: 3752 MIPS
min: 3432     avg: 3474     median: 3474 (42%)     max: 3516 MIPS
min: 3333     avg: 3371     median: 3372 (40%)     max: 3406 MIPS
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 2
48.6 fps (17%)
19.5 fps (7%)
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 1
139.4 fps (32%)
97.8 fps (23%)
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 - HWBOT x265 4k Preset
min: 4.14     avg: 4.3     median: 4.4 (8%)     max: 4.4 fps
min: 3.36     avg: 3.5     median: 3.5 (6%)     max: 3.6 fps
min: 1.864     avg: 2     median: 2 (3%)     max: 2.03 fps
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Serpent
0.5 GB/s (0%)
0.2 GB/s (0%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Twofish
0.7 GB/s (12%)
0.4 GB/s (6%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt AES
5 GB/s (13%)
2.2 GB/s (6%)
Blender - Blender 2.79 BMW27 CPU *
min: 584     avg: 630     median: 633 (4%)     max: 672 Seconds
min: 786     avg: 796     median: 795.5 (6%)     max: 805 Seconds
min: 1439     avg: 1484     median: 1485 (10%)     max: 1528 Seconds
R Benchmark 2.5 - R Benchmark 2.5 *
min: 0.6902     avg: 0.7     median: 0.7 (15%)     max: 0.723 sec
0.8 sec (17%)
min: 0.846     avg: 0.8     median: 0.8 (18%)     max: 0.852 sec
3DMark 06 - CPU - 3DMark 06 - CPU
min: 7187     avg: 7715     median: 7431 (16%)     max: 8812 Points
3755 Points (8%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
11 s (2%)
12.5 s (3%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M *
25.7 s (1%)
29 s (1%)
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 32M *
650 s (3%)
730 s (3%)
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. CPU no Physx
25143 Points (22%)
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Physics
min: 6360     avg: 7609     median: 7878 (21%)     max: 8648 Points
min: 5150     avg: 5781     median: 5781 (16%)     max: 6412 Points
min: 3653     avg: 3758     median: 3772 (10%)     max: 3835 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Physics
min: 39182     avg: 48304     median: 48251 (39%)     max: 57479 Points
43514 Points (35%)
min: 40774     avg: 42358     median: 41370 (34%)     max: 45919 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Extreme Physics
min: 44524     avg: 50874     median: 51438 (42%)     max: 56661 Points
min: 39108     avg: 41332     median: 41308 (34%)     max: 43602 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Physics
min: 55479     avg: 58242     median: 55515 (47%)     max: 63731 Points
min: 44389     avg: 48213     median: 48111 (41%)     max: 52242 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Physics
min: 5698     avg: 7447     median: 7716 (20%)     max: 8117 Points
min: 5629     avg: 5860     median: 5859.5 (15%)     max: 6090 Points
min: 3321     avg: 3335     median: 3329 (8%)     max: 3362 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Physics
min: 10095     avg: 11205     median: 11316 (20%)     max: 11900 Points
min: 8547     avg: 8809     median: 8808.5 (16%)     max: 9070 Points
min: 4743     avg: 4930     median: 4867 (9%)     max: 5241 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy CPU
min: 2861     avg: 3318     median: 3344 (14%)     max: 3574 Points
min: 2595     avg: 2638     median: 2638 (11%)     max: 2681 Points
min: 1509     avg: 1536     median: 1541 (6%)     max: 1553 Points
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.4 64 Bit Single-Core
874 Points (37%)
863 Points (36%)
min: 770     avg: 803     median: 796.5 (34%)     max: 847 Points
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
3537 Points (6%)
2824 Points (5%)
min: 1604     avg: 1661     median: 1651.5 (3%)     max: 1736 Points
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 853     avg: 895     median: 884 (4%)     max: 959 Points
min: 823     avg: 827     median: 826.5 (4%)     max: 830 Points
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 3007     avg: 3467     median: 3571.5 (11%)     max: 3718 Points
min: 1529     avg: 1649     median: 1649 (5%)     max: 1769 Points
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 3898     avg: 4104     median: 4166 (42%)     max: 4186 Points
3820 Points (38%)
min: 3366     avg: 3562     median: 3562 (36%)     max: 3758 Points
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 11396     avg: 12985     median: 13403.5 (15%)     max: 13738 Points
10419 Points (12%)
min: 6553     avg: 7143     median: 7143 (8%)     max: 7733 Points
Geekbench 4.0 - Geekbench 4.0 64 Bit Single-Core
3626 Points (49%)
Geekbench 4.0 - Geekbench 4.0 64 Bit Multi-Core
7237 Points (18%)
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 32 Bit Multi-Core
min: 14478     avg: 14749     median: 14748.5 (26%)     max: 15019 Points
6922 Points (12%)
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 32 Bit Single-Core
min: 3717     avg: 3768     median: 3768 (74%)     max: 3819 Points
3282 Points (64%)
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 64 Bit Multi-Core
7496 Points (12%)
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 64 Bit Single-Core
3673 Points (55%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Stream
7535 Points (61%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Memory
5586 Points (51%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Floating Point
9447 Points (19%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Integer
7540 Points (15%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Total Score
7816 Points (20%)
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *
min: 1132     avg: 1170     median: 1160 (1%)     max: 1228 ms
min: 1097     avg: 1211     median: 1211 (1%)     max: 1325 ms
min: 1185     avg: 1243     median: 1205.5 (1%)     max: 1374 ms
Sunspider - Sunspider 1.0 Total Score *
130.3 ms (1%)
Octane V2 - Octane V2 Total Score
min: 29949     avg: 30479     median: 30626 (28%)     max: 30714 Points
min: 27185     avg: 27437     median: 27437 (25%)     max: 27689 Points
23991 Points (22%)
WebXPRT 3 - WebXPRT 3 Score
153 Points (32%)
142 Points (30%)
min: 137     avg: 142.3     median: 139 (29%)     max: 154 Points
Power Consumption - Prime95 Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 43.3     avg: 106.8     median: 95 (16%)     max: 182 Watt
17.2 Watt (3%)
Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 40.7     avg: 68.1     median: 66.4 (12%)     max: 97.1 Watt
19.4 Watt (4%)
Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Efficiency - external Monitor
min: 8.29     avg: 12     median: 11 (8%)     max: 16.7 Points per Watt
18.2 Points per Watt (14%)

Average Benchmarks AMD Ryzen 7 3750H → 100% n=21

Average Benchmarks AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 3500U → 88% n=21

Average Benchmarks AMD Ryzen 3 3200U → 69% n=21

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

v1.26
log 18. 12:23:44

#0 checking url part for id 11131 +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 11334 +0s ... 0s

#2 checking url part for id 11191 +0s ... 0s

#3 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#4 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Tue, 16 Apr 2024 05:37:29 +0200 +0.001s ... 0.001s

#5 composed specs +0.04s ... 0.041s

#6 did output specs +0s ... 0.041s

#7 getting avg benchmarks for device 11131 +0.018s ... 0.059s

#8 got single benchmarks 11131 +0.049s ... 0.108s

#9 getting avg benchmarks for device 11334 +0.014s ... 0.122s

#10 got single benchmarks 11334 +0.008s ... 0.13s

#11 getting avg benchmarks for device 11191 +0.015s ... 0.145s

#12 got single benchmarks 11191 +0.03s ... 0.175s

#13 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.175s

#14 min, max, avg, median took s +0.396s ... 0.571s

#15 return log +0s ... 0.571s

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)