Notebookcheck Logo

AMD Ryzen 7 3750H vs AMD Athlon Silver 3050U vs AMD Ryzen 7 3780U

AMD Ryzen 7 3750H

► remove from comparison AMD R7 3750H

The AMD Ryzen 7 3750H is a mobile SoC that was announced in January 2019. It combines four Zen+ cores (8 threads) clocked at 2.3 - 4 GHz with a Radeon RX Vega 10 graphics card with 10 CUs (640 Shaders) clocked at up to 1400 MHz. Compared to the similar Ryzen 7 3700U, the 3750H offers a 20 Watt higher TDP and therefore a better performance under long periods of load. The integrated dual-channel memory controller supports up to DDR4-2400 memory. As the features of the Picasso APUs are the same compared to the Raven Ridge predecessors, we point to our Raven Ridge launch article.

Picasso SoCs use the Zen+ microarchitecture with slight improvements that should lead to a 3% IPS (performance per clock) improvements.

Performance

The average 3750H in our database is in the same league as the Core i7-10610U, as far as multi-thread benchmark scores are concerned. This is a fairly good result, as of early 2022.

The ROG Zephyrus G15 GA502DU is among the fastest laptops built around the 3750H that we know of. It can be about 20% faster in CPU-bound workloads than the slowest system featuring the same chip in our database, as of August 2023.

Power consumption

This Ryzen 7 has a default TDP of 35 W (also known as the long-term power limit). Laptop manufacturers are free to change that value to anything between 12 W and 35 W with clock speeds and performance changing accordingly. These values are comparatively high, making an active cooling solution pretty much a necessity.

Last but not the least, this AMD APU is built with a rather old, as of late 2022, 12 nm process for lower-than-average energy efficiency.

AMD Athlon Silver 3050U

► remove from comparison AMD Athlon 3050U

The AMD Athlon Silver 3050U is a mobile processor for thin and light entry level laptops. It is based on the Picasso series (e.g. Ryzen 3000U APUs) and offers two Zen cores clocked at 2.3 to 3.2 GHz without SMT (two threads at once) and 4 MB of L3 Cache. The integrated graphics card is called Radeon RX Vega 2 and offers only 2 CUs (128 shaders) clocked at up to 1,100 MHz.

In Chromebooks, AMD calles the APU AMD Athlon Silver 3050C, but with the exact same specifications (and performance).

Performance

We have not tested a single system built around the 3050U, as of August 2023. Expect the chip to be just a few percentage points slower than the Athlon 3150U (two Zen cores, 4 threads, up to 3.3 GHz). This kind of performance should suffice for most day-to-day tasks but not much more than that.

Power consumption

This Athlon series chip has a default TDP of 15 W (also known as the long-term power limit). Laptop makers are free to change that to anything between 12 W and 25 W with clock speeds and peformance changing accordingly as a result. Either way, that's a tad too high to allow for passively cooled designs.

Last but not the least, the APU is built with a 14 nm process leading to poor, as of early 2023, energy efficiency.

AMD Ryzen 7 3780U

► remove from comparison AMD R7 3780U

The AMD Ryzen 7 3780U,a Microsoft Surface edition chip, is a mobile SoC that was announced in Oct 2019 as part of the new Surface Laptop 15. It combines four Zen+ cores (8 threads) clocked at 2.3 - 4 GHz with a Radeon RX Vega 11 graphics card with 11 CUs (704 Shaders) clocked at up to 1400 MHz. Specified at 15 Watt TDP, the SoC is intended for thin mid-range laptops.

Compared to the similar Ryzen 7 3700U, the 3780U offers the faster Vega 11 instead of the Vega 10 GPU.

The Picasso SoCs use the Zen+ microarchitecture with slight improvements that should lead to a 3% IPC (performance per clock) improvements. Furthermore, the 12nm process allows higher clock rates at similar power consumptions.

The integrated dual-channel memory controller supports up to DDR4-2400 memory. As the features of the Picasso APUs are the same compared to the Raven Ridge predecessors, we point to our Raven Ridge launch article.

Performance

While we have not tested a single system powered by the 3780U as of August 2023, it's safe to expect the chip to be about as fast as the Ryzen 7 3700U, as far as multi-thread performance is concerned.

ModelAMD Ryzen 7 3750HAMD Athlon Silver 3050UAMD Ryzen 7 3780U
SeriesAMD Picasso (Ryzen 3000 APU)AMD Picasso (Ryzen 3000 APU)AMD Picasso (Ryzen 3000 APU)
CodenamePicasso (Zen+)Dali (Zen)Picasso-U (Zen+)
Clock2300 - 4000 MHz2300 - 3200 MHz2300 - 4000 MHz
L1 Cache384 KB192 KB384 KB
L2 Cache2 MB1 MB2 MB
L3 Cache4 MB4 MB4 MB
Cores / Threads4 / 82 / 24 / 8
TDP35 Watt15 Watt15 Watt
Transistors4500 Million4500 Million4500 Million
Technology12 nm14 nm12 nm
max. Temp.105 °C95 °C105 °C
SocketFP5FP5FP5
FeaturesDDR4-2400 RAM, PCIe 3, MMX (+), SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, SSE4A, AES, AVX, AVX2, FMA3, SHADDR4-2400 RAM, PCIe 3, MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4A, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, AVX2, BMI2, ABM, FMA, ADX, SMEP, SMAP, CPB, AES-NI, RDRAND, RDSEED, SHA, SMEDDR4-2400 RAM, PCIe 3, MMX (+), SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, SSE4A, AES, AVX, AVX2, FMA3, SHA
iGPUAMD Radeon RX Vega 10 ( - 1400 MHz)AMD Radeon RX Vega 2 ( - 1100 MHz)AMD Radeon RX Vega 11 ( - 1400 MHz)
Architecturex86x86x86
Announced
Manufacturerwww.amd.comwww.amd.comwww.amd.com
Series: Picasso (Ryzen 3000 APU) Picasso-U (Zen+)
AMD Athlon Gold 3150U2.4 - 3.3 GHz2 / 4 cores4 MB L3
AMD Athlon Silver 3050U « 2.3 - 3.2 GHz2 / 2 cores4 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 7 3780U « 2.3 - 4 GHz4 / 8 cores4 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 7 3700U2.3 - 4 GHz4 / 8 cores4 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 5 3550H2.1 - 3.7 GHz4 / 8 cores4 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 5 3500U2.1 - 3.7 GHz4 / 8 cores4 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 5 3450U2.1 - 3.5 GHz4 / 8 cores4 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 5 3580U2.1 - 3.7 GHz4 / 8 cores4 MB L3

Benchmarks

Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - R7 3750H
27 pt (37%)
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Multi Core
3897 Points (4%)
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Single Core
971 Points (41%)
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Single Core)
min: 340     avg: 363.8     median: 364.5 (41%)     max: 386 Points
290 Points (32%)
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Multi Core)
min: 1514     avg: 1691     median: 1713 (4%)     max: 1825 Points
1580 Points (4%)
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit
min: 672     avg: 743     median: 734 (5%)     max: 805 Points
788 Points (5%)
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64 Bit
min: 135     avg: 143.9     median: 144 (43%)     max: 157 Points
166 Points (50%)
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64 Bit
9.2 Points (12%)
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64 Bit
1.6 Points (41%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (32bit)
min: 4527     avg: 4732     median: 4770 (29%)     max: 4898 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (32bit)
min: 19290     avg: 20242     median: 20687 (15%)     max: 20750 Points
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 1024m *
197.1 s (2%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 32m *
7.4 s (1%)
WinRAR - WinRAR 4.0
2866 Points (5%)
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Multli Thread 4 runs
min: 17077     avg: 18318     median: 18689 (11%)     max: 19187 MIPS
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Single Thread 4 runs
min: 3511     avg: 3641     median: 3659 (44%)     max: 3752 MIPS
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 2
48.6 fps (17%)
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 1
139.4 fps (32%)
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 - HWBOT x265 4k Preset
min: 4.14     avg: 4.3     median: 4.4 (8%)     max: 4.4 fps
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Serpent
0.5 GB/s (0%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Twofish
0.7 GB/s (12%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt AES
5 GB/s (13%)
Blender - Blender 2.79 BMW27 CPU *
min: 584     avg: 630     median: 633 (4%)     max: 672 Seconds
R Benchmark 2.5 - R Benchmark 2.5 *
min: 0.6902     avg: 0.7     median: 0.7 (15%)     max: 0.723 sec
3DMark 06 - CPU - 3DMark 06 - CPU
min: 7187     avg: 7715     median: 7431 (16%)     max: 8812 Points
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
11 s (2%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M *
25.7 s (1%)
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 32M *
650 s (3%)
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. CPU no Physx
25143 Points (22%)
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Physics
min: 6360     avg: 7609     median: 7878 (21%)     max: 8648 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Physics
min: 39182     avg: 48304     median: 48251 (39%)     max: 57479 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Extreme Physics
min: 44524     avg: 50874     median: 51438 (42%)     max: 56661 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Physics
min: 55479     avg: 58242     median: 55515 (47%)     max: 63731 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Physics
min: 5698     avg: 7447     median: 7716 (20%)     max: 8117 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Physics
min: 10095     avg: 11205     median: 11316 (20%)     max: 11900 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy CPU
min: 2861     avg: 3318     median: 3344 (14%)     max: 3574 Points
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.4 64 Bit Single-Core
874 Points (37%)
743 Points (31%)
940 Points (40%)
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
3537 Points (6%)
1429 Points (3%)
3050 Points (5%)
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 853     avg: 895     median: 884 (4%)     max: 959 Points
890 Points (4%)
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 3007     avg: 3467     median: 3571.5 (11%)     max: 3718 Points
3380 Points (11%)
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 3898     avg: 4104     median: 4166 (42%)     max: 4186 Points
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 11396     avg: 12985     median: 13403.5 (15%)     max: 13738 Points
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 32 Bit Multi-Core
min: 14478     avg: 14749     median: 14748.5 (26%)     max: 15019 Points
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 32 Bit Single-Core
min: 3717     avg: 3768     median: 3768 (74%)     max: 3819 Points
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *
min: 1132     avg: 1170     median: 1160 (1%)     max: 1228 ms
Octane V2 - Octane V2 Total Score
min: 29949     avg: 30479     median: 30626 (28%)     max: 30714 Points
WebXPRT 3 - WebXPRT 3 Score
153 Points (32%)
Power Consumption - Prime95 Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 43.3     avg: 106.8     median: 95 (16%)     max: 182 Watt
Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 40.7     avg: 68.1     median: 66.4 (12%)     max: 97.1 Watt
Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Efficiency - external Monitor
min: 8.29     avg: 12     median: 11 (8%)     max: 16.7 Points per Watt

Average Benchmarks AMD Ryzen 7 3750H → 100% n=2

Average Benchmarks AMD Athlon Silver 3050U → 63% n=2

Average Benchmarks AMD Ryzen 7 3780U → 97% n=2

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

v1.26
log 28. 21:52:11

#0 checking url part for id 11131 +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 11695 +0s ... 0s

#2 checking url part for id 11512 +0s ... 0s

#3 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#4 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Thu, 28 Mar 2024 05:35:32 +0100 +0.001s ... 0.001s

#5 composed specs +0.031s ... 0.033s

#6 did output specs +0s ... 0.033s

#7 getting avg benchmarks for device 11131 +0.017s ... 0.049s

#8 got single benchmarks 11131 +0.049s ... 0.099s

#9 getting avg benchmarks for device 11695 +0.003s ... 0.101s

#10 got single benchmarks 11695 +0.016s ... 0.117s

#11 getting avg benchmarks for device 11512 +0.002s ... 0.12s

#12 got single benchmarks 11512 +0.007s ... 0.126s

#13 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.126s

#14 min, max, avg, median took s +0.18s ... 0.306s

#15 return log +0s ... 0.306s

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)