AMD Ryzen 5 3580U vs AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 3700U

AMD Ryzen 5 3580U

► remove from comparison AMD R5 3580U

The AMD Ryzen 5 3580U (Microsoft Surface Edition) is a mobile SoC that was announced in October 2019 as part of the Surface Book 15. It combines four Zen+ cores (8 threads) clocked at 2.2 - 3.8 GHz with a Radeon RX Vega 9 graphics card with 9 CUs (576 Shaders) clocked at up to 1300 MHz. Specified at 15 Watt TDP, the SoC is intended for thin mid-range laptops. Compared to the similar Ryzen 5 3500U, the 3580 integrates a faster GPU with 9 instead of 8 CUs.

The Picasso SoCs use the Zen+ microarchitecture with slight improvements that should lead to a 3% IPS (performance per clock) improvements. Furthermore, the 12nm process allows higher clock rates at similar power consumptions.

The integrated dual-channel memory controller supports up to DDR4-2400 memory. As the features of the Picasso APUs are the same compared to the Raven Ridge predecessors, we point to our Raven Ridge launch article.

As the Ryzen 5 3580U CPU specification is identical to the Ryzen 5 3500U, the processor performance should be similar. AMD states that the Picasso APUs are about 8% faster than the predecessors. Therefore, the Ryzen 5 3500U and 3580U should be ahead the Ryzen 5 2500U (2 - 3.6 GHz) and nearly on par with the Ryzen 7 2700U (2.2 - 3.8 GHz).

AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 3700U

► remove from comparison AMD R7 PRO 3700U

The AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 3700U is a mobile SoC for business laptops that was announced in April 2019. It combines four Zen+ cores (8 threads) clocked at 2.3 - 4 GHz with a Radeon RX Vega 10 graphics card with 10 CUs (640 Shaders) clocked at up to 1400 MHz. Specified at 15 Watt TDP, the SoC is intended for thin mid-range laptops. Compared to the similar consumer variant Ryzen 7 3700U, the PRO model features additional management and security features (e.g., full memory encryption) and longer warranty / availability.

The Picasso SoCs use the Zen+ microarchitecture with slight improvements that should lead to a 3% IPS (performance per clock) improvements. Furthermore, the 12nm process allows higher clock rates at similar power consumptions.

The integrated dual-channel memory controller supports up to DDR4-2400 memory. As the features of the Picasso APUs are the same compared to the Raven Ridge predecessors, we point to our Raven Ridge launch article.

AMD states that the Picasso APUs are about 8% faster than the predecessors. Therefore, the Ryzen 7 PRO 3700U should be slightly ahead the Ryzen 7 PRO 2700U.

AMD Ryzen 5 3580UAMD Ryzen 7 PRO 3700U
AMD Picasso (Ryzen 3000 APU)AMD Picasso (Ryzen 3000 APU)
Zen+Zen+
Series: Picasso (Ryzen 3000 APU) Zen+
AMD Ryzen 7 3780U compare2.3 - 4 GHz4 / 84 MB
AMD Ryzen 7 3750H compare2.3 - 4 GHz4 / 84 MB
AMD Ryzen 7 3700U compare2.3 - 4 GHz4 / 84 MB
AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 3700U2.3 - 4 GHz4 / 84 MB
AMD Ryzen 5 3550H compare2.1 - 3.7 GHz4 / 84 MB
AMD Ryzen 5 3500U compare2.1 - 3.7 GHz4 / 84 MB
AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 3500U compare2.1 - 3.7 GHz4 / 84 MB
» AMD Ryzen 5 3580U2.1 - 3.7 GHz4 / 84 MB
AMD Ryzen 3 3300U compare2.1 - 3.5 GHz4 / 44 MB
AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 3300U compare2.1 - 3.5 GHz4 / 44 MB
AMD Ryzen 3 3250U compare2.6 - 3.5 GHz2 / 44 MB
AMD Ryzen 3 3200U compare2.6 - 3.5 GHz2 / 44 MB
AMD Athlon Silver 3050U compare2.3 - 3.2 GHz2 / 24 MB
AMD Ryzen 7 3780U compare2.3 - 4 GHz4 / 84 MB
AMD Ryzen 7 3750H compare2.3 - 4 GHz4 / 84 MB
AMD Ryzen 7 3700U compare2.3 - 4 GHz4 / 84 MB
» AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 3700U2.3 - 4 GHz4 / 84 MB
AMD Ryzen 5 3550H compare2.1 - 3.7 GHz4 / 84 MB
AMD Ryzen 5 3500U compare2.1 - 3.7 GHz4 / 84 MB
AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 3500U compare2.1 - 3.7 GHz4 / 84 MB
AMD Ryzen 5 3580U2.1 - 3.7 GHz4 / 84 MB
AMD Ryzen 3 3300U compare2.1 - 3.5 GHz4 / 44 MB
AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 3300U compare2.1 - 3.5 GHz4 / 44 MB
AMD Ryzen 3 3250U compare2.6 - 3.5 GHz2 / 44 MB
AMD Ryzen 3 3200U compare2.6 - 3.5 GHz2 / 44 MB
AMD Athlon Silver 3050U compare2.3 - 3.2 GHz2 / 24 MB
2100 - 3700 MHz2300 - 4000 MHz
384 KB384 KB
2 MB2 MB
4 MB4 MB
4 / 84 / 8
15 15
4500 4500
12 12
AM4AM4
XFR, FMA3, SSE 4.2, AVX2, SMTXFR, FMA3, SSE 4.2, AVX2, SMT
iGPUAMD Radeon RX Vega 9 ( - 1300 MHz)AMD Radeon RX Vega 10 ( - 1400 MHz)
Architecturex86x86
AMD Picasso (Ryzen 3000 APU) R7 PRO 3700U

Benchmarks

Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - R5 3580U
37.5 pt (38%)
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Single Core)
352 Points (55%)
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Multi Core)
1549 Points (15%)
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit
693 Points (15%)
0102030405060708090100110120130140150160170180190200210220230240250260270280290300310320330340350360370380390400410420430440450460470480490500510520530540550560570580590600610620630640650660670680690700Tooltip
658 Points (15%)
0102030405060708090100110120130140150160170180190200210220230240250260270280290300310320330340350360370380390400410420430440450460470480490500510520530540550560570580590600610620630640650660Tooltip
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64 Bit
139 Points (51%)
149 Points (55%)
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64 Bit
7.8 Points (16%)
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64 Bit
1.7 Points (53%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (32bit)
4525 (40%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (32bit)
18307 (31%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 1024m *
275 s (3%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 32m *
7.2 s (1%)
WinRAR - WinRAR 4.0
2924 (19%)
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Multli Thread 4 runs
15209 MIPS (12%)
16735 MIPS (13%)
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Single Thread 4 runs
3572 MIPS (24%)
3680 MIPS (24%)
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 2
40.1 fps (18%)
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 1
135 fps (40%)
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 - HWBOT x265 4k Preset
4.1 fps (13%)
3.6 fps (11%)
010Tooltip
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Serpent
0.4 GB/s (16%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Twofish
0.6 GB/s (16%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt AES
3.5 GB/s (13%)
Blender 2.79 - Blender 2.79 BMW27 CPU *
710 Seconds (5%)
785 Seconds (6%)
3DMark 06 - CPU - 3DMark 06 - CPU
5545 Points (31%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
12 s (3%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M *
27.2 s (1%)
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 32M *
694 s (3%)
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. CPU no Physx
21501 Points (25%)
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Physics
6856 Points (28%)
6539 Points (27%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Physics
47473 Points (31%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Extreme Physics
48287 Points (51%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Physics
52082 Points (54%)
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Physics
6687 Points (17%)
2098 Points (5%)
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Physics
9805 Points (25%)
9338 Points (24%)
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy CPU
2898 Points (20%)
2706 Points (19%)
Geekbench 4.0 - Geekbench 4.0 64 Bit Single-Core
3908 (60%)
Geekbench 4.0 - Geekbench 4.0 64 Bit Multi-Core
11829 (29%)
Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Single-Core
3928 (54%)
Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
11249 (18%)
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Single-Core
839 (50%)
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Multi-Core
3091 (19%)
Geekbench 5.3 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.3 64 Bit Single-Core
900 (50%)
Geekbench 5.3 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.3 64 Bit Multi-Core
2990 (18%)
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *
1243 ms (2%)
1278 ms (2%)
Octane V2 - Octane V2 Total Score
28517 Points (45%)
27979 Points (44%)
Power Consumption - Prime95 Power Consumption - external Monitor *
41.1 Watt (11%)
Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Consumption - external Monitor *
40 Watt (11%)

Average Benchmarks AMD Ryzen 5 3580U → 100% n=12

Average Benchmarks AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 3700U → 93% n=12

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:

show all (including archived), 2021, 2020
v1.16
Please share our article, every link counts!
> Notebook / Laptop Reviews and News > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2017-09-11)