Notebookcheck Logo

AMD Ryzen 5 3580U vs AMD Ryzen 3 3200U vs AMD Ryzen 3 3300U

AMD Ryzen 5 3580U

► remove from comparison AMD R5 3580U

The AMD Ryzen 5 3580U, a Microsoft Surface Edition chip, is a mobile SoC that was announced in October 2019 as part of the Surface Book 15. It combines four Zen+ cores (8 threads) clocked at 2.2 - 3.8 GHz with a Radeon RX Vega 9 graphics adapter with 9 CUs (576 Shaders) clocked at up to 1300 MHz. Compared to the similar Ryzen 5 3500U, the 3580 integrates a faster GPU with 9 instead of 8 CUs.

The Picasso SoCs use the Zen+ microarchitecture with slight improvements that should lead to a 3% IPS (performance per clock) improvements. Furthermore, the 12nm process allows higher clock rates at similar power consumptions.

The integrated dual-channel memory controller supports up to DDR4-2400 memory. As the features of the Picasso APUs are the same compared to the Raven Ridge predecessors, we point to our Raven Ridge launch article.

Performance

The average 3580U in our extensive database is in the same league as the Core i5-1035G7 and also the Core i7-10510U, as far as multi-thread benchmark scores are concerned. This is a fairly decent result, as of mid 2021.

Power consumption

This Ryzen 5 has a default TDP (also known as the long-term power limit) of 15 W, a value that laptop manufacturers - or should we say, Microsoft - are allowed to change to anything between 12 W and 35 W with clock speeds and performance changing correspondingly. Those values are not low enough to allow for fan-free designs, for better or worse.

The CPU is built with a fairly old, as of late 2022, 12 nm process for lower-than-average energy efficiency.

AMD Ryzen 3 3200U

► remove from comparison AMD R3 3200U

The AMD Ryzen 3 3200U is a dual-core SoC designed for laptops that was announced in January 2019. The Ryzen features two Zen cores with support for the thread-doubling SMT tech, clocked at 2.6 GHz - 3.5 GHz. The built-in Radeon RX Vega 3 iGPU has 3 CUs (192 unified shaders) clocked at up to 1,200 MHz. The default TDP is 15 W which makes the Ryzen a good fit for thin mid-range laptops.

In comparison to the faster Ryzen 3000 CPUs, the 3200U is not using the newer Zen+ microarchitecture and is still manufactured in 14nm. Compared to the old Ryzen 3 2200U, the 3200U therefore only offers a 100 MHz higher clock speed.

The Ryzen 3 is compatible with single-channel or dual-channel DDR4-2400 RAM.

Please go to our Raven Ridge launch article for details on the architecture and more.

Performance

The average 3200U in our extensive database is anything but a performance monster, its multi-thread benchmark scores only just matching those of the Core i3-8130U and the Pentium N6000. While not as atrociously slow as most N-series and J-series Intel chips, this specific Ryzen is good enough for basic day-to-day activities only.

Your mileage may vary depending on how high the CPU power limits are and how competent the cooling solution of your system is.

Power consumption

This Ryzen 3 series chip has a default TDP, also known as the long-term power limit, of 15 W. Laptop makers are free to change that to anything between 12 W and 25 W; most will go for a higher value to extract more performance out of it. Either way, an active cooling solution will be needed to dissipate the heat.

The R3 3200U is built with a 14 nm manufacturing process for low, as of early 2023, energy efficiency.

AMD Ryzen 3 3300U

► remove from comparison AMD R3 3300U

The AMD Ryzen 3 3300U is a mobile SoC that was announced in January 2019. It combines four Zen+ cores (no SMT / Hyperthreading so only 4 threads) clocked at 2.1 - 3.5 GHz with a Radeon RX Vega 6 graphics card with 6 CUs (384 Shaders) clocked at up to 1200 MHz. Specified at 15 Watt TDP, the SoC is intended for thin mid-range laptops.

The Picasso SoCs use the Zen+ microarchitecture with slight improvements that should lead to a 3% IPS (performance per clock) improvements. Furthermore, the 12nm process allows higher clock rates at similar power consumptions.

The integrated dual-channel memory controller supports up to DDR4-2400 memory. As the features of the Picasso APUs are the same compared to the Raven Ridge predecessors, we point to our Raven Ridge launch article.

AMD states that the Picasso APUs are about 8% faster than the predecessors. Therefore, the Ryzen 3 3300U should be similar to the Ryzen 5 2500U (2 - 3.6 GHz but with SMT).

ModelAMD Ryzen 5 3580UAMD Ryzen 3 3200UAMD Ryzen 3 3300U
SeriesAMD Picasso (Ryzen 3000 APU)AMD Picasso (Ryzen 3000 APU)AMD Picasso (Ryzen 3000 APU)
CodenamePicasso-U (Zen+)Picasso-U (Zen)Zen+
Series: Picasso (Ryzen 3000 APU) Zen+
AMD Ryzen 7 3780U2.3 - 4 GHz4 / 8 cores4 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 7 3700U2.3 - 4 GHz4 / 8 cores4 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 5 3550H2.1 - 3.7 GHz4 / 8 cores4 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 5 3500U2.1 - 3.7 GHz4 / 8 cores4 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 5 3450U2.1 - 3.5 GHz4 / 8 cores4 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 5 3580U « 2.1 - 3.7 GHz4 / 8 cores4 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 3700U2.3 - 4 GHz4 / 8 cores4 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 3500U2.1 - 3.7 GHz4 / 8 cores4 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 3 3350U2.1 - 3.5 GHz4 / 4 cores4 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 3 3300U « 2.1 - 3.5 GHz4 / 4 cores4 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 3300U2.1 - 3.5 GHz4 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Clock2100 - 3700 MHz2600 - 3500 MHz2100 - 3500 MHz
L1 Cache384 KB192 KB384 KB
L2 Cache2 MB1 MB2 MB
L3 Cache4 MB4 MB4 MB
Cores / Threads4 / 82 / 44 / 4
TDP15 Watt15 Watt15 Watt
Transistors4500 Million4500 Million4500 Million
Technology12 nm14 nm12 nm
max. Temp.105 °C105 °C
SocketFP5FP5AM4
FeaturesDDR4-2400 RAM, PCIe 3, MMX (+), SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, SSE4A, AES, AVX, AVX2, FMA3, SHADDR4-2400 RAM, PCIe 3, MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4A, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, AVX2, BMI2, ABM, FMA, ADX, SMEP, SMAP, SMT, CPB, AES-NI, RDRAND, RDSEED, SHA, SMEXFR, FMA3, SSE 4.2, AVX2, SMT
iGPUAMD Radeon RX Vega 9 ( - 1300 MHz)AMD Radeon RX Vega 3 ( - 1200 MHz)AMD Radeon RX Vega 6 (Ryzen 2000/3000) ( - 1200 MHz)
Architecturex86x86x86
Announced
Manufacturerwww.amd.comwww.amd.com

Benchmarks

Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - R5 3580U
26.2 pt (36%)
Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - R3 3200U
23.5 pt (33%)
Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - R3 3300U
24.6 pt (34%)
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Multi Core
min: 1767     avg: 1786     median: 1786 (2%)     max: 1804 Points
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Single Core
min: 208     avg: 584     median: 765 (33%)     max: 780 Points
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Single Core)
352 Points (39%)
min: 274     avg: 298.2     median: 301 (33%)     max: 318 Points
337 Points (37%)
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Multi Core)
1549 Points (4%)
min: 453     avg: 607     median: 690 (2%)     max: 727 Points
921 Points (2%)
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit
693 Points (4%)
min: 318     avg: 335     median: 334 (2%)     max: 353 Points
471 Points (3%)
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64 Bit
139 Points (42%)
min: 126     avg: 128.3     median: 129 (39%)     max: 130 Points
134 Points (40%)
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64 Bit
7.8 Points (10%)
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64 Bit
1.7 Points (41%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (32bit)
4525 Points (27%)
4258 Points (26%)
4280 Points (26%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (32bit)
18307 Points (13%)
9284 Points (7%)
12357 Points (9%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 1024m *
274.7 s (3%)
483.5 s (6%)
404.6 s (5%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 32m *
7.2 s (1%)
14 s (3%)
11.9 s (2%)
WinRAR - WinRAR 4.0
2924 Points (5%)
1613 Points (3%)
2398 Points (4%)
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Multli Thread 4 runs
15209 MIPS (9%)
min: 8785     avg: 9083     median: 9081.5 (5%)     max: 9382 MIPS
12118 MIPS (7%)
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Single Thread 4 runs
3572 MIPS (43%)
min: 3333     avg: 3371     median: 3372 (40%)     max: 3406 MIPS
3340 MIPS (40%)
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 2
40.1 fps (14%)
19.5 fps (7%)
26.2 fps (9%)
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 1
135.3 fps (31%)
97.8 fps (23%)
132.1 fps (30%)
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 - HWBOT x265 4k Preset
4.1 fps (7%)
min: 1.864     avg: 2     median: 2 (3%)     max: 2.03 fps
2.8 fps (5%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Serpent
0.4 GB/s (0%)
0.2 GB/s (0%)
0.3 GB/s (0%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Twofish
0.6 GB/s (10%)
0.4 GB/s (6%)
0.4 GB/s (7%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt AES
3.5 GB/s (9%)
2.2 GB/s (6%)
2.7 GB/s (7%)
Blender - Blender 2.79 BMW27 CPU *
710 Seconds (5%)
min: 1439     avg: 1484     median: 1485 (10%)     max: 1528 Seconds
1212 Seconds (9%)
R Benchmark 2.5 - R Benchmark 2.5 *
min: 0.846     avg: 0.8     median: 0.8 (18%)     max: 0.852 sec
0.8 sec (17%)
3DMark 06 - CPU - 3DMark 06 - CPU
5545 Points (12%)
3755 Points (8%)
4332 Points (9%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
12 s (3%)
12.5 s (3%)
12.8 s (3%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M *
27.2 s (1%)
29 s (1%)
28.4 s (1%)
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 32M *
694 s (3%)
730 s (3%)
709 s (3%)
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. CPU no Physx
21501 Points (19%)
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Physics
6856 Points (19%)
min: 3653     avg: 3758     median: 3772 (10%)     max: 3835 Points
4587 Points (12%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Physics
47473 Points (39%)
min: 40774     avg: 42358     median: 41370 (34%)     max: 45919 Points
51741 Points (42%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Extreme Physics
48287 Points (39%)
min: 39108     avg: 41332     median: 41308 (34%)     max: 43602 Points
47170 Points (38%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Physics
52082 Points (44%)
min: 44389     avg: 48213     median: 48111 (41%)     max: 52242 Points
55407 Points (47%)
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Physics
6687 Points (17%)
min: 3321     avg: 3335     median: 3329 (8%)     max: 3362 Points
3953 Points (10%)
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Physics
9805 Points (17%)
min: 4743     avg: 4930     median: 4867 (9%)     max: 5241 Points
5629 Points (10%)
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy CPU
2898 Points (12%)
min: 1509     avg: 1536     median: 1541 (6%)     max: 1553 Points
2006 Points (8%)
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.4 64 Bit Single-Core
900 Points (38%)
min: 770     avg: 803     median: 796.5 (34%)     max: 847 Points
824 Points (35%)
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
2990 Points (5%)
min: 1604     avg: 1661     median: 1651.5 (3%)     max: 1736 Points
2578 Points (5%)
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 823     avg: 827     median: 826.5 (4%)     max: 830 Points
843 Points (4%)
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 1529     avg: 1649     median: 1649 (5%)     max: 1769 Points
2722 Points (9%)
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 3366     avg: 3562     median: 3562 (36%)     max: 3758 Points
3861 Points (39%)
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 6553     avg: 7143     median: 7143 (8%)     max: 7733 Points
10787 Points (12%)
Geekbench 4.0 - Geekbench 4.0 64 Bit Single-Core
3908 Points (53%)
3626 Points (49%)
3672 Points (50%)
Geekbench 4.0 - Geekbench 4.0 64 Bit Multi-Core
11829 Points (29%)
7237 Points (18%)
10223 Points (25%)
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 32 Bit Multi-Core
6922 Points (12%)
10170 Points (18%)
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 32 Bit Single-Core
3282 Points (64%)
3469 Points (68%)
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 64 Bit Multi-Core
7496 Points (12%)
11467 Points (18%)
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 64 Bit Single-Core
3673 Points (55%)
3780 Points (57%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Stream
7535 Points (61%)
8470 Points (68%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Memory
5586 Points (51%)
6808 Points (62%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Floating Point
9447 Points (19%)
12111 Points (24%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Integer
7540 Points (15%)
8746 Points (18%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Total Score
7816 Points (20%)
9508 Points (25%)
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *
1243 ms (1%)
min: 1185     avg: 1243     median: 1205.5 (1%)     max: 1374 ms
min: 1192     avg: 1237     median: 1236.5 (1%)     max: 1281 ms
Sunspider - Sunspider 1.0 Total Score *
130.3 ms (1%)
136.9 ms (2%)
Octane V2 - Octane V2 Total Score
28517 Points (26%)
23991 Points (22%)
27764 Points (25%)
WebXPRT 3 - WebXPRT 3 Score
min: 137     avg: 142.3     median: 139 (29%)     max: 154 Points
min: 141     avg: 153.5     median: 153.5 (32%)     max: 166 Points
Power Consumption - Prime95 Power Consumption - external Monitor *
41.1 Watt (7%)
17.2 Watt (3%)
Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Consumption - external Monitor *
40 Watt (7%)
19.4 Watt (4%)
Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Efficiency - external Monitor
17.3 Points per Watt (13%)
18.2 Points per Watt (14%)

Average Benchmarks AMD Ryzen 5 3580U → 100% n=35

Average Benchmarks AMD Ryzen 3 3200U → 74% n=35

Average Benchmarks AMD Ryzen 3 3300U → 85% n=35

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

v1.26
log 16. 16:41:29

#0 checking url part for id 11514 +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 11191 +0s ... 0s

#2 checking url part for id 11181 +0s ... 0s

#3 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#4 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Tue, 16 Apr 2024 05:37:29 +0200 +0.001s ... 0.001s

#5 composed specs +0.089s ... 0.09s

#6 did output specs +0s ... 0.091s

#7 getting avg benchmarks for device 11514 +0.019s ... 0.11s

#8 got single benchmarks 11514 +0.011s ... 0.12s

#9 getting avg benchmarks for device 11191 +0.019s ... 0.139s

#10 got single benchmarks 11191 +0.035s ... 0.174s

#11 getting avg benchmarks for device 11181 +0.013s ... 0.187s

#12 got single benchmarks 11181 +0.011s ... 0.199s

#13 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.199s

#14 min, max, avg, median took s +0.532s ... 0.731s

#15 return log +0s ... 0.731s

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)