Notebookcheck Logo

AMD Ryzen 5 2400G vs AMD Ryzen 7 2800H vs AMD 3020e

AMD Ryzen 5 2400G

► remove from comparison AMD R5 2400G

The AMD Ryzen 5 2400G is a desktop APU that was announced in early 2018. It is the fastest Raven Ridge APU at that time and features all four Zen cores (8 threads due to SMT support) clocked at 3.6 - 3.9 GHz with a Radeon RX Vega 11 graphics card with 11 CUs (all of the 704 Shaders on the chip) clocked at up to 1250 MHz. The integrated dual-channel memory controller supports up to DDR-2933. The TDP is specified at 65 Watt and the CPU, GPU and memory are unlocked for overclocking. More information on Raven Ridge can be found in our launch article.

AMD Ryzen 7 2800H

► remove from comparison AMD R7 2800H

The AMD Ryzen 7 2800H is a mobile SoC that was announced late 2018. It is intended for mid-sized to big laptops and combines four Zen cores (8 threads) clocked at 3.3 (base) - 3.8 GHz (boost) with a Radeon RX Vega 11 Mobile graphics card with 11 CUs (704 Shaders). The integrated dual-channel memory controller supports up to DDR4-3200 memory.

Compared to the older Ryzen 7 2700U for slim and light laptops, the 2800H offers a higher TDP (45 Watt versus 15 Watt), higher clocked memory, a higher base clock (3.4 versus 2.2 GHz), and a faster integrated GPU.

More information on Raven Ridge can be found in our launch article.

Performance

While we have not tested a single system built around the 2800H as of August 2023, it's safe to expect the chip to be 10% to 15% faster than Ryzen 3 1200, as far as multi-thread performance is concerned.

Your mileage may vary depending on how high the CPU power limits are, and how competent the cooling solution of your system is.

Power consumption

This Ryzen 7 has a default TDP (also known as the long-term power limit) of 45 W, a value that laptop manufacturers are free to change to anything between 35 W and 54 W with clock speeds and performance changing correspondingly. All the values are rather high, making a high-performance cooling solution with two or three fans pretty much a necessity.

The CPU is built on an old, as of late 2022, 14 nm process for subpar energy efficiency.

AMD 3020e

► remove from comparison AMD 3020e

The AMD 3020e (Codename Dali) is a mobile APU that integrates two Zen cores (without SMT, therefore 2 threads) clocked at 1.2 to 2.6 GHz. The TDP is specified at 6 Watt and therefore the chip can be passively cooled. The integrated Radeon graphics card offers 3 CUs at up to 1,000 MHz (Radeon RX Vega 3). The dual channel memory controller supports DDR4-2400.

More information on Raven Ridge product family can be found in our launch article.

Performance

The average 3020e in our database sits close to the Celeron N4100 and the Core m3-8100Y, as far as multi-thread benchmark scores are concerned. Neither of the three is a performance monster, their fairly low power consumption figures being their main advantage.

Much like the two Intel chips, the 3020e will let you binge-watch Netflix and type e-mails but anything tougher than that will bring the APU to its limits quickly.

Your mileage may vary depending on how high the CPU power limits are.

Power consumption

This little APU has a default TDP (also known as the long-term power limit) of 6 W. Which is low and thus good enough for tablets, laptops and mini-PCs featuring no active cooling solution.

The AMD 3020e is built with a 14 nm process leading to low, as of early 2023, energy efficiency.

ModelAMD Ryzen 5 2400GAMD Ryzen 7 2800HAMD 3020e
SeriesAMD Raven Ridge (Ryzen 2000 APU)AMD Raven Ridge (Ryzen 2000 APU)AMD Raven Ridge (Ryzen 2000 APU)
CodenameZenRaven Ridge (Zen)Dali (Zen)
Series: Raven Ridge (Ryzen 2000 APU) Dali (Zen)
AMD Ryzen 5 2400G « 3.6 - 3.9 GHz4 / 8 cores4 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 7 2700U2.2 - 3.8 GHz4 / 8 cores4 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 2700U2.2 - 3.8 GHz4 / 8 cores4 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 3 2200G3.5 - 3.7 GHz4 / 4 cores4 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 5 2600H3.2 - 3.6 GHz4 / 8 cores4 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 5 2500U2 - 3.6 GHz4 / 8 cores4 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 2500U2 - 3.6 GHz4 / 8 cores4 MB L3
AMD Ryzen Embedded V1605B2 - 3.6 GHz4 / 8 cores4 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 3 2300U2 - 3.4 GHz4 / 4 cores4 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 2300U2 - 3.4 GHz4 / 4 cores4 MB L3
AMD Ryzen Embedded R1606G2.6 - 3.5 GHz2 / 4 cores4 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 3 2200U2.5 - 3.4 GHz2 / 4 cores4 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 2200U2.5 - 3.4 GHz2 / 4 cores4 MB L3
AMD Ryzen Embedded R1505G2.4 - 3.3 GHz2 / 4 cores4 MB L3
AMD Athlon 300U2.4 - 3.3 GHz2 / 4 cores4 MB L3
AMD Athlon Silver 3050e1.4 - 2.8 GHz2 / 4 cores4 MB L3
AMD 3020e « 1.2 - 2.6 GHz2 / 2 cores4 MB L3
Clock3600 - 3900 MHz3300 - 3800 MHz1200 - 2600 MHz
L1 Cache384 KB192 KB192 KB
L2 Cache2 MB2 MB1 MB
L3 Cache4 MB4 MB4 MB
Cores / Threads4 / 84 / 82 / 2
TDP65 Watt45 Watt6 Watt
Transistors4500 Million4500 Million
Technology14 nm14 nm14 nm
SocketAM4FP5
FeaturesXFR, FMA3, SSE 4.2, AVX2, SMTDDR4-2400 RAM, PCIe 3, MMX (+), SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, SSE4A, AES, AVX, AVX2, FMA3, SHADDR4-2400, PCIe 3, MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4A, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, AVX2, BMI2, ABM, FMA, ADX, SMEP, SMAP, CPB, AES-NI, RDRAND, RDSEED, SHA, SME
iGPUAMD Radeon RX Vega 11 ( - 1250 MHz)AMD Radeon RX Vega 11 ( - 1300 MHz)AMD Radeon RX Vega 3 ( - 1000 MHz)
Architecturex86x86x86
Announced
Manufacturerproducts.amd.comwww.amd.comwww.amd.com
max. Temp.95 °C

Benchmarks

Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - R5 2400G
28.2 pt (39%)
Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - 3020e
18.8 pt (26%)
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Multi Core
100%
1 3020e +
943 Points (1%)
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Single Core
100%
1 3020e +
603 Points (26%)
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Single Core)
min: 381     avg: 382.5     median: 382.5 (43%)     max: 384 Points
62%
1 3020e +
236 Points (26%)
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Multi Core)
min: 1804     avg: 1850     median: 1849.5 (5%)     max: 1895 Points
20%
1 3020e +
369 Points (1%)
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit
min: 828     avg: 844     median: 846.5 (5%)     max: 856 Points
23%
1 3020e +
196 Points (1%)
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64 Bit
min: 153.2     avg: 155.6     median: 155.7 (47%)     max: 158 Points
59%
1 3020e +
92 Points (28%)
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64 Bit
9.5 Points (12%)
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64 Bit
1.8 Points (44%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (32bit)
4805 Points (29%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (32bit)
21024 Points (15%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (64bit)
30473 Points (21%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (64bit)
7495 Points (9%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 1024m *
198 s (2%)
91%
1 3020e +
903 s (11%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 32m *
6.9 s (1%)
95%
1 3020e +
29 s (6%)
WinRAR - WinRAR 4.0
3846 Points (6%)
32%
1 3020e +
1232 Points (2%)
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Multli Thread 4 runs
min: 19478     avg: 20059     median: 19885 (11%)     max: 20814 MIPS
25%
1 3020e +
4963 MIPS (3%)
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Single Thread 4 runs
min: 3855     avg: 3972     median: 3909 (47%)     max: 4153 MIPS
66%
1 3020e +
2597 MIPS (31%)
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 2
48 fps (17%)
27%
1 3020e +
12.8 fps (4%)
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 1
171.6 fps (40%)
38%
1 3020e +
65.3 fps (15%)
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 - HWBOT x265 4k Preset
min: 4.86     avg: 12.2     median: 5.1 (9%)     max: 26.5 fps
23%
1 3020e +
1.2 fps (2%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Serpent
0.5 GB/s (0%)
21%
1 3020e +
0.1 GB/s (0%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Twofish
0.8 GB/s (14%)
20%
1 3020e +
0.2 GB/s (3%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt AES
5.2 GB/s (14%)
21%
1 3020e +
1.1 GB/s (3%)
Blender - Blender 2.79 BMW27 CPU *
min: 550     avg: 551     median: 550.5 (4%)     max: 551 Seconds
82%
1 3020e +
2964 Seconds (21%)
R Benchmark 2.5 - R Benchmark 2.5 *
min: 0.648     avg: 0.7     median: 0.7 (15%)     max: 0.683 sec
77%
1 3020e +
1.6 sec (34%)
3DMark 06 - CPU - 3DMark 06 - CPU
6672 Points (14%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
11.3 s (2%)
99%
1 3020e +
17 s (4%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M *
25.1 s (1%)
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 32M *
624 s (3%)
99%
1 3020e +
879 s (4%)
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Physics
min: 7325     avg: 8058     median: 8241 (22%)     max: 8607 Points
32%
1 3020e +
2618 Points (7%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Physics
58446 Points (47%)
42%
1 3020e +
24677 Points (20%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Extreme Physics
57457 Points (47%)
43%
1 3020e +
24593 Points (20%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Physics
min: 32977     avg: 55118     median: 65172 (55%)     max: 67206 Points
40%
1 3020e +
26064 Points (22%)
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Physics
min: 6650     avg: 7355     median: 7465 (19%)     max: 7951 Points
29%
1 3020e +
2128 Points (5%)
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Physics
min: 10705     avg: 10784     median: 10784 (19%)     max: 10863 Points
27%
1 3020e +
2961 Points (5%)
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy CPU
min: 3198     avg: 3414     median: 3414 (14%)     max: 3630 Points
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.4 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 970     avg: 1081     median: 1001 (42%)     max: 1223 Points
64%
1 3020e +
638 Points (27%)
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 3462     avg: 4780     median: 3885 (7%)     max: 6372 Points
31%
1 3020e +
1188 Points (2%)
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 967     avg: 989     median: 990 (4%)     max: 1010 Points
65%
1 3020e +
646 Points (3%)
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 3557     avg: 3736     median: 3825 (12%)     max: 3826 Points
31%
1 3020e +
1195 Points (4%)
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 4181     avg: 4319     median: 4268 (43%)     max: 4508 Points
66%
1 3020e +
2809 Points (28%)
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 13259     avg: 13858     median: 13653 (15%)     max: 14662 Points
35%
1 3020e +
4803 Points (5%)
Geekbench 4.0 - Geekbench 4.0 64 Bit Single-Core
4226 Points (58%)
Geekbench 4.0 - Geekbench 4.0 64 Bit Multi-Core
13211 Points (32%)
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *
min: 962     avg: 980     median: 978 (1%)     max: 1000 ms
99%
1 3020e +
min: 1532     avg: 1545     median: 1545 (2%)     max: 1558 ms
Octane V2 - Octane V2 Total Score
100%
1 3020e +
20692 Points (19%)
WebXPRT 3 - WebXPRT 3 Score
min: 169     avg: 170.7     median: 170 (35%)     max: 173 Points
62%
1 3020e +
105 Points (22%)
Power Consumption - Prime95 Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 100.5     avg: 103.5     median: 103.5 (18%)     max: 106.5 Watt
119%
1 3020e +
12.6 Watt (2%)
Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 95.3     avg: 99.7     median: 99.7 (18%)     max: 104.1 Watt
119%
1 3020e +
12.8 Watt (2%)
Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Efficiency - external Monitor
9 Points per Watt (7%)
170%
1 3020e +
15.3 Points per Watt (11%)

Average Benchmarks AMD Ryzen 5 2400G → 0% n=

Average Benchmarks AMD 3020e → 0% n=

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

v1.26
log 23. 09:56:03

#0 checking url part for id 9894 +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 10144 +0s ... 0s

#2 checking url part for id 12720 +0s ... 0s

#3 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#4 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Tue, 23 Apr 2024 05:40:15 +0200 +0.001s ... 0.001s

#5 composed specs +0.033s ... 0.034s

#6 did output specs +0s ... 0.034s

#7 getting avg benchmarks for device 9894 +0.017s ... 0.051s

#8 got single benchmarks 9894 +0.014s ... 0.065s

#9 getting avg benchmarks for device 10144 +0.003s ... 0.067s

#10 got single benchmarks 10144 +0s ... 0.068s

#11 getting avg benchmarks for device 12720 +0.016s ... 0.084s

#12 got single benchmarks 12720 +0.023s ... 0.107s

#13 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.107s

#14 min, max, avg, median took s +0.331s ... 0.439s

#15 return log +0s ... 0.439s

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)