Notebookcheck Logo

AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 3300U vs AMD Ryzen 3 3200U

AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 3300U

► remove from comparison AMD R3 PRO 3300U

The AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 3300U is a mobile SoC that was announced in January 2019. It combines four Zen+ cores (no SMT / Hyperthreading so only 4 threads) clocked at 2.1 - 3.5 GHz with a Radeon RX Vega 6 graphics card with 6 CUs (384 Shaders) clocked at up to 1200 MHz. Specified at 15 Watt TDP, the SoC is intended for thin mid-range laptops. Compared to the similar consumer variant Ryzen 3 3300U, the PRO model features additional management and security features (e.g., full memory encryption) and longer warranty / availability.

The Picasso SoCs use the Zen+ microarchitecture with slight improvements that should lead to a 3% IPS (performance per clock) improvements. Furthermore, the 12nm process allows for higher clock rates at similar power consumptions.

The integrated dual-channel memory controller supports up to DDR4-2400 memory. As the features of the Picasso APUs are the same compared to the Raven Ridge predecessors, we point to our Raven Ridge launch article.

AMD states that the Picasso APUs are about 8% faster than the predecessors. Therefore, the Ryzen 3 PRO 3300U should be similar to the Ryzen 5 PRO 2500U (2 - 3.6 GHz but with SMT).

AMD Ryzen 3 3200U

► remove from comparison AMD R3 3200U

The AMD Ryzen 3 3200U is a dual-core SoC designed for laptops that was announced in January 2019. The Ryzen features two Zen cores with support for the thread-doubling SMT tech, clocked at 2.6 GHz - 3.5 GHz. The built-in Radeon RX Vega 3 iGPU has 3 CUs (192 unified shaders) clocked at up to 1,200 MHz. The default TDP is 15 W which makes the Ryzen a good fit for thin mid-range laptops.

In comparison to the faster Ryzen 3000 CPUs, the 3200U is not using the newer Zen+ microarchitecture and is still manufactured in 14nm. Compared to the old Ryzen 3 2200U, the 3200U therefore only offers a 100 MHz higher clock speed.

The Ryzen 3 is compatible with single-channel or dual-channel DDR4-2400 RAM.

Please go to our Raven Ridge launch article for details on the architecture and more.

Performance

The average 3200U in our extensive database is anything but a performance monster, its multi-thread benchmark scores only just matching those of the Core i3-8130U and the Pentium N6000. While not as atrociously slow as most N-series and J-series Intel chips, this specific Ryzen is good enough for basic day-to-day activities only.

Your mileage may vary depending on how high the CPU power limits are and how competent the cooling solution of your system is.

Power consumption

This Ryzen 3 series chip has a default TDP, also known as the long-term power limit, of 15 W. Laptop makers are free to change that to anything between 12 W and 25 W; most will go for a higher value to extract more performance out of it. Either way, an active cooling solution will be needed to dissipate the heat.

The R3 3200U is built with a 14 nm manufacturing process for low, as of early 2023, energy efficiency.

ModelAMD Ryzen 3 PRO 3300UAMD Ryzen 3 3200U
SeriesAMD Picasso (Ryzen 3000 APU)AMD Picasso (Ryzen 3000 APU)
CodenameZen+Picasso-U (Zen)
Series: Picasso (Ryzen 3000 APU) Zen+
AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 3700U compare2.3 - 4 GHz4 / 8 cores4 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 3500U compare2.1 - 3.7 GHz4 / 8 cores4 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 3 3350U compare2.1 - 3.5 GHz4 / 4 cores4 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 3 3300U compare2.1 - 3.5 GHz4 / 4 cores4 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 3300U « 2.1 - 3.5 GHz4 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Clock2100 - 3500 MHz2600 - 3500 MHz
L1 Cache384 KB192 KB
L2 Cache2 MB1 MB
L3 Cache4 MB4 MB
Cores / Threads4 / 42 / 4
TDP15 Watt15 Watt
Transistors4500 Million4500 Million
Technology12 nm14 nm
SocketAM4FP5
FeaturesXFR, FMA3, SSE 4.2, AVX2, SMTDDR4-2400 RAM, PCIe 3, MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4A, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, AVX2, BMI2, ABM, FMA, ADX, SMEP, SMAP, SMT, CPB, AES-NI, RDRAND, RDSEED, SHA, SME
iGPUAMD Radeon RX Vega 6 (Ryzen 2000/3000) ( - 1200 MHz)AMD Radeon RX Vega 3 ( - 1200 MHz)
Architecturex86x86
Announced
Manufacturerwww.amd.comwww.amd.com
max. Temp.105 °C

Benchmarks

Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - R3 3200U
23.5 pt (33%)
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Multi Core
min: 1767     avg: 1786     median: 1786 (2%)     max: 1804 Points
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Single Core
min: 208     avg: 584     median: 765 (33%)     max: 780 Points
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Single Core)
min: 274     avg: 298.2     median: 301 (33%)     max: 318 Points
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Multi Core)
min: 453     avg: 607     median: 690 (2%)     max: 727 Points
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit
481 Points (3%)
min: 318     avg: 335     median: 334 (2%)     max: 353 Points
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64 Bit
126 Points (38%)
min: 126     avg: 128.3     median: 129 (39%)     max: 130 Points
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64 Bit
5.5 Points (7%)
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64 Bit
1.4 Points (36%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (32bit)
4258 Points (26%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (32bit)
9284 Points (7%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (64bit)
22657 Points (16%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (64bit)
6410 Points (8%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 1024m *
483.5 s (6%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 32m *
14 s (3%)
WinRAR - WinRAR 4.0
1613 Points (3%)
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Multli Thread 4 runs
min: 8785     avg: 9083     median: 9081.5 (5%)     max: 9382 MIPS
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Single Thread 4 runs
min: 3333     avg: 3371     median: 3372 (40%)     max: 3406 MIPS
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 2
19.5 fps (7%)
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 1
97.8 fps (23%)
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 - HWBOT x265 4k Preset
min: 1.864     avg: 2     median: 2 (3%)     max: 2.03 fps
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Serpent
0.2 GB/s (0%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Twofish
0.4 GB/s (6%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt AES
2.2 GB/s (6%)
Blender - Blender 2.79 BMW27 CPU *
min: 1439     avg: 1484     median: 1485 (10%)     max: 1528 Seconds
R Benchmark 2.5 - R Benchmark 2.5 *
min: 0.846     avg: 0.8     median: 0.8 (18%)     max: 0.852 sec
3DMark 06 - CPU - 3DMark 06 - CPU
3755 Points (8%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
12.5 s (3%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M *
29 s (1%)
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 32M *
730 s (3%)
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Physics
5408 Points (15%)
min: 3653     avg: 3758     median: 3772 (10%)     max: 3835 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Physics
min: 40774     avg: 42358     median: 41370 (34%)     max: 45919 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Extreme Physics
min: 39108     avg: 41332     median: 41308 (34%)     max: 43602 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Physics
min: 44389     avg: 48213     median: 48111 (41%)     max: 52242 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Physics
4646 Points (12%)
min: 3321     avg: 3335     median: 3329 (8%)     max: 3362 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Physics
6596 Points (12%)
min: 4743     avg: 4930     median: 4867 (9%)     max: 5241 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy CPU
min: 1509     avg: 1536     median: 1541 (6%)     max: 1553 Points
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.4 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 770     avg: 803     median: 796.5 (34%)     max: 847 Points
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 1604     avg: 1661     median: 1651.5 (3%)     max: 1736 Points
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 823     avg: 827     median: 826.5 (4%)     max: 830 Points
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 1529     avg: 1649     median: 1649 (5%)     max: 1769 Points
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 3366     avg: 3562     median: 3562 (36%)     max: 3758 Points
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 6553     avg: 7143     median: 7143 (8%)     max: 7733 Points
Geekbench 4.0 - Geekbench 4.0 64 Bit Single-Core
3626 Points (49%)
Geekbench 4.0 - Geekbench 4.0 64 Bit Multi-Core
7237 Points (18%)
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 32 Bit Multi-Core
6922 Points (12%)
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 32 Bit Single-Core
3282 Points (64%)
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 64 Bit Multi-Core
7496 Points (12%)
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 64 Bit Single-Core
3673 Points (55%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Stream
7535 Points (61%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Memory
5586 Points (51%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Floating Point
9447 Points (19%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Integer
7540 Points (15%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Total Score
7816 Points (20%)
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *
min: 1185     avg: 1243     median: 1205.5 (1%)     max: 1374 ms
Sunspider - Sunspider 1.0 Total Score *
130.3 ms (1%)
Octane V2 - Octane V2 Total Score
23991 Points (22%)
WebXPRT 3 - WebXPRT 3 Score
min: 137     avg: 142.3     median: 139 (29%)     max: 154 Points
Power Consumption - Prime95 Power Consumption - external Monitor *
17.2 Watt (3%)
Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Consumption - external Monitor *
19.4 Watt (4%)
Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Efficiency - external Monitor
18.2 Points per Watt (14%)

Average Benchmarks AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 3300U → 100% n=5

Average Benchmarks AMD Ryzen 3 3200U → 77% n=5

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:

show all (including archived), 2024, 2023
v1.26
log 29. 01:52:45

#0 checking url part for id 11336 +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 11191 +0s ... 0s

#2 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#3 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Thu, 28 Mar 2024 05:35:32 +0100 +0.001s ... 0.001s

#4 composed specs +0.029s ... 0.03s

#5 did output specs +0s ... 0.03s

#6 getting avg benchmarks for device 11336 +0.003s ... 0.033s

#7 got single benchmarks 11336 +0.008s ... 0.041s

#8 getting avg benchmarks for device 11191 +0.018s ... 0.059s

#9 got single benchmarks 11191 +0.039s ... 0.098s

#10 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.098s

#11 min, max, avg, median took s +0.26s ... 0.358s

#12 return log +0.025s ... 0.383s

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)