Notebookcheck Logo

AMD Ryzen 3 5300U vs AMD Ryzen 5 4680U

AMD Ryzen 3 5300U

► remove from comparison AMD R3 5300U

The AMD Ryzen 3 5300U (not to be confused with the A4-5300, a CPU released in 2012) is a Lucienne family processor designed for use in thin and light laptops. The R3 5300U integrates four cores (quad core) based on the Zen 2 microarchitecture. They are clocked at 2.6 (guaranteed base clock) to 3.8 GHz (Turbo) and support SMT for a total of 8 threads. The chip is manufactured on the modern 7 nm TSMC process. Compared to the older and similar Ryzen 3 4300U (Renoir), the Ryzen 3 5300U offers SMT and slightly higher clock speeds. The faster Ryzen 3 5400U is based on the newer Zen 3 architecture. See our hub page on the Renoir Processors for more information on the Lucienne / Renoir architecture.

In addition to the four CPU cores, the APU also integrates a Radeon RX Vega 6 integrated graphics adapter with 6 CUs at up to 1500 MHz. The dual channel memory controller supports DDR4-3200 and energy efficient LPDDR4-4266 RAM. Furthermore, 4 MB level 3 cache can be found on the chip.

Performance

The average 5300U in our database matches the Core i5-11300H, the Core i7-11375H and also the Ryzen 5 4500U in multi-thread performance, making it an outstandingly good chip as far as sub-US$700 laptops go.

Your mileage may vary depending on how high the CPU power limits are and how competent the cooling solution of your system is.

Power consumption

The Ryzen 3 series chip has a default TDP of 15 W, a value that laptop makers are allowed to change to anything between 10 W and 25 W with clock speeds and performance changing accordingly as a result. By going for the lowest value possible, it will be possible to build a passively cooled system around the chip, however, most companies will do the opposite to achieve higher performance levels.

The AMD Ryzen 3 5300U is built with TSMC's 7 nm manufacturing process for average, as of mid 2023, energy efficiency.

AMD Ryzen 5 4680U

► remove from comparison AMD R5 4680U

The AMD Ryzen 5 4680U is a semi-custom APU of the Renoir family designed for Microsoft devices. The 4680U integrates six CPU cores based on the Zen 2 microarchitecture clocked at 2.2 GHz (base) to 4 GHz (Boost) with SMT support for a total 12 threads. The two advantages a 4680U has over the older Ryzen 5 4600U are its higher base clock speed and a faster iGPU.

Architecture

The chip is manufactured on the modern 7 nm TSMC process and in part thanks to this fact, AMD advertises a 2x performance per watt improvement over the 12 nm Ryzen 3000 mobile processors. The built-in dual-channel memory controller supports LPDDR4-4266 RAM. Furthermore, 8 MB of L3 cache can be found on the chip.

Just like the other mobile Ryzen 4000 CPUs, a 4680U supports PCI-Express 3.0. Please go to our Renoir processor hub page for additional information on the product family.

Performance

Multi-thread performance is most comparable to the Ryzen 7 4700U and the Core i5-10500H, the latter being a much more power-hungry chip. This makes the Ryzen a more than decent CPU for most tasks, as of early 2022.

Graphics

In addition to the six CPU cores, the APU also integrates a DX 12 compatible Radeon RX Vega 7 graphics adapter with 7 CUs (448 unified shaders) at up to 1,500 MHz. The Vega iGPU will have no trouble HW-decoding AVC, HEVC and VP9 videos, but the newer AV1 codec will only be decoded via software. In terms of gaming, we are looking at an MX150-level performance. Pretty much all games released in 2020 can be played on low to medium settings in 720p on this graphics adapter.

Power consumption

This Ryzen 5 series chip has a default TDP (also known as the long-term power limit) of 15 W, a value that laptop makers - Microsoft, in this case - are free to change to anything between 10 W and 25 W, with clock speeds and performance changing accordingly as a result. Indeed, we saw the CPU consume roughly 23 watts when subjected to our usual stress testing routine.

The 7 nm TSMC process this Ryzen is built with makes for very decent, as of mid 2022, energy efficiency.

ModelAMD Ryzen 3 5300UAMD Ryzen 5 4680U
SeriesAMD Lucienne (Zen 2, Ryzen 5000)AMD Renoir (Ryzen 4000 APU)
CodenameLucienne-U (Zen 2)Renoir-U (Zen 2)
Series: Renoir (Ryzen 4000 APU) Renoir-U (Zen 2)
AMD Ryzen 7 5700U compare1.8 - 4.3 GHz8 / 16 cores8 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 5 5500U compare2.1 - 4 GHz6 / 12 cores8 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 3 5300U « 2.6 - 3.8 GHz4 / 8 cores4 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 7 4980U compare2 - 4.4 GHz8 / 16 cores8 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 7 4800U compare1.8 - 4.2 GHz8 / 16 cores8 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 7 4700U compare2 - 4.1 GHz8 / 8 cores8 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 5 4680U « 2.2 - 4 GHz6 / 12 cores8 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 5 4600U compare2.1 - 4 GHz6 / 12 cores8 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 5 4500U compare2.3 - 4 GHz6 / 6 cores8 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 3 4300U compare2.7 - 3.7 GHz4 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Clock2600 - 3800 MHz2200 - 4000 MHz
L1 Cache256 KB384 KB
L2 Cache2 MB3 MB
L3 Cache4 MB8 MB
Cores / Threads4 / 86 / 12
TDP25 Watt15 Watt
Technology7 nm7 nm
max. Temp.105 °C105 °C
SocketFP6FP6
FeaturesDDR4-3200/LPDDR4-4266 RAM, PCIe 3, MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4A, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, AVX2, BMI2, ABM, FMA, ADX, SMEP, SMAP, SMT, CPB, AES-NI, RDRAND, RDSEED, SHA, SMELPDDR4-4266 RAM, PCIe 3, MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4A, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, AVX2, BMI2, ABM, FMA, ADX, SMEP, SMAP, SMT, CPB, AES-NI, RDRAND, RDSEED, SHA
iGPUAMD Radeon RX Vega 6 (Ryzen 4000/5000) ( - 1500 MHz)AMD Radeon RX Vega 7 ( - 1500 MHz)
Architecturex86x86
Announced
Manufacturerwww.amd.comwww.amd.com

Benchmarks

Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - R3 5300U
29.6 pt (41%)
Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - R5 4680U
31.1 pt (43%)
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Multi Core
min: 4772     avg: 5212     median: 5341 (5%)     max: 5522 Points
7073 Points (7%)
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Single Core
min: 1102     avg: 1115     median: 1115 (47%)     max: 1129 Points
1163 Points (49%)
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Single Core)
min: 431     avg: 436     median: 436 (48%)     max: 441 Points
451 Points (50%)
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Multi Core)
min: 1883     avg: 2039     median: 2067 (5%)     max: 2138 Points
2478 Points (6%)
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit
min: 832     avg: 884     median: 906 (6%)     max: 915 Points
1291 Points (8%)
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64 Bit
min: 166     avg: 168.7     median: 170 (51%)     max: 170 Points
170 Points (51%)
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64 Bit
9.3 Points (12%)
15.6 Points (20%)
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64 Bit
1.9 Points (47%)
2 Points (50%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (32bit)
5118 Points (31%)
5301 Points (32%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (32bit)
22139 Points (16%)
31826 Points (23%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (64bit)
35101 Points (24%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (64bit)
8723 Points (11%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 1024m *
248.6 s (3%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 32m *
8.2 s (2%)
wPrime 1.55 - wPrime 1.55 1024m *
321.8 s (1%)
wPrime 1.55 - wPrime 1.55 32m *
10 s (5%)
WinRAR - WinRAR 4.0
2551 Points (4%)
3576 Points (6%)
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Multli Thread 4 runs
min: 19170     avg: 21836     median: 21971 (13%)     max: 24366 MIPS
32745 MIPS (19%)
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Single Thread 4 runs
min: 3755     avg: 3971     median: 3960 (47%)     max: 4198 MIPS
4077 MIPS (49%)
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 - HWBOT x265 4k Preset
min: 5.87     avg: 6.4     median: 6.5 (11%)     max: 6.74 fps
7.7 fps (13%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Serpent
0.5 GB/s (0%)
1.2 GB/s (0%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Twofish
0.9 GB/s (16%)
1.4 GB/s (24%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt AES
5.1 GB/s (13%)
8.3 GB/s (22%)
Blender - Blender 3.3 Classroom CPU *
min: 968     avg: 1069     median: 1069 (14%)     max: 1170 Seconds
Blender - Blender 2.79 BMW27 CPU *
min: 524     avg: 562     median: 544 (4%)     max: 617 Seconds
458 Seconds (3%)
R Benchmark 2.5 - R Benchmark 2.5 *
min: 0.654     avg: 0.7     median: 0.7 (14%)     max: 0.664 sec
0.7 sec (15%)
3DMark 06 - CPU - 3DMark 06 - CPU
7931 Points (17%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
7 s (2%)
10.5 s (2%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M *
16 s (1%)
24.6 s (1%)
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 32M *
366 s (2%)
581 s (3%)
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Physics
min: 6183     avg: 7499     median: 7958 (22%)     max: 8356 Points
10051 Points (27%)
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Physics
min: 7689     avg: 8517     median: 8604 (22%)     max: 9257 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Physics
min: 10839     avg: 11948     median: 12075 (22%)     max: 12929 Points
16642 Points (30%)
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy CPU
min: 3541     avg: 3683     median: 3587 (15%)     max: 3920 Points
5067 Points (21%)
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.4 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 1040     avg: 1063     median: 1070 (45%)     max: 1080 Points
1078 Points (45%)
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 3730     avg: 3976     median: 4008 (7%)     max: 4191 Points
5785 Points (10%)
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 1049     avg: 1063     median: 1062.5 (5%)     max: 1076 Points
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 4079     avg: 4107     median: 4106.5 (13%)     max: 4134 Points
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Single-Core
4560 Points (46%)
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
16261 Points (18%)
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 32 Bit Multi-Core
16771 Points (30%)
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 32 Bit Single-Core
4096 Points (80%)
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 64 Bit Multi-Core
18122 Points (28%)
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 64 Bit Single-Core
4432 Points (66%)
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *
min: 878     avg: 891     median: 890 (1%)     max: 906 ms
877 ms (1%)
Octane V2 - Octane V2 Total Score
52372 Points (47%)
47184 Points (42%)
WebXPRT 4 - WebXPRT 4 Score
min: 144.3     avg: 147.3     median: 147.3 (42%)     max: 150.3 Points
WebXPRT 3 - WebXPRT 3 Score
min: 187.3     avg: 191.9     median: 187.4 (39%)     max: 201 Points
198 Points (41%)
CrossMark - CrossMark Overall
min: 932     avg: 934     median: 933.5 (36%)     max: 935 Points
Power Consumption - Prime95 Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 30.2     avg: 36.6     median: 36.6 (6%)     max: 43 Watt
Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 33     avg: 40.1     median: 40.7 (7%)     max: 46.5 Watt
Power Consumption - Idle Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 3.11     avg: 3.3     median: 3.3 (2%)     max: 3.51 Watt
Power Consumption - Idle Power Consumption 150cd 1min *
min: 5.43     avg: 16.9     median: 5.9 (7%)     max: 39.4 Watt
Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Efficiency - external Monitor
min: 19.7     avg: 22.5     median: 22.5 (17%)     max: 25.2 Points per Watt

Average Benchmarks AMD Ryzen 3 5300U → 100% n=30

Average Benchmarks AMD Ryzen 5 4680U → 124% n=30

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:

show all (including archived), 2024, 2023
v1.26
log 19. 03:38:39

#0 checking url part for id 12985 +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 13178 +0s ... 0s

#2 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#3 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Tue, 16 Apr 2024 05:37:29 +0200 +0.001s ... 0.001s

#4 composed specs +0.031s ... 0.031s

#5 did output specs +0s ... 0.032s

#6 getting avg benchmarks for device 12985 +0.019s ... 0.05s

#7 got single benchmarks 12985 +0.026s ... 0.077s

#8 getting avg benchmarks for device 13178 +0.016s ... 0.093s

#9 got single benchmarks 13178 +0.009s ... 0.102s

#10 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.102s

#11 min, max, avg, median took s +0.283s ... 0.385s

#12 return log +0.023s ... 0.408s

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)