Notebookcheck Logo

AMD Ryzen 3 3350U vs AMD Ryzen 7 3780U

AMD Ryzen 3 3350U

► remove from comparison AMD R3 3350U

The AMD Ryzen 3 3350U is a mobile SoC that was announced in January 2019. It combines four Zen+ cores (no SMT / Hyperthreading so only 4 threads) clocked at 2.1 - 3.5 GHz with a Radeon RX Vega 6 graphics card with 6 CUs (384 Shaders) clocked at up to 1200 MHz. Specified at 15 Watt TDP, the SoC is intended for thin mid-range laptops. Compared to the similar Ryzen 3 3300U, the 3350U offers the same specifications according to AMD.

The Picasso SoCs use the Zen+ microarchitecture with slight improvements that should lead to a 3% IPS (performance per clock) improvements. Furthermore, the 12nm process allows higher clock rates at similar power consumptions.

The integrated dual-channel memory controller supports up to DDR4-2400 memory. As the features of the Picasso APUs are the same compared to the Raven Ridge predecessors, we point to our Raven Ridge launch article.

AMD states that the Picasso APUs are about 8% faster than the predecessors. Therefore, the Ryzen 3 3350U should be similar to the Ryzen 5 2500U (2 - 3.6 GHz but with SMT).

AMD Ryzen 7 3780U

► remove from comparison AMD R7 3780U

The AMD Ryzen 7 3780U (Microsoft Surface Edition) is a mobile SoC that was announced in Oct 2019 as part of the new Surface Laptop 15. It combines four Zen+ cores (8 threads) clocked at 2.3 - 4 GHz with a Radeon RX Vega 11 graphics card with 11 CUs (704 Shaders) clocked at up to 1400 MHz. Specified at 15 Watt TDP, the SoC is intended for thin mid-range laptops.

Compared to the similar Ryzen 7 3700U, the 3780U offers the faster Vega 11 instead of the Vega 10 GPU.

The Picasso SoCs use the Zen+ microarchitecture with slight improvements that should lead to a 3% IPC (performance per clock) improvements. Furthermore, the 12nm process allows higher clock rates at similar power consumptions.

The integrated dual-channel memory controller supports up to DDR4-2400 memory. As the features of the Picasso APUs are the same compared to the Raven Ridge predecessors, we point to our Raven Ridge launch article.

AMD states that the Picasso APUs are about 8% faster than the predecessors. Therefore, the Ryzen 7 3780U should be slightly ahead the Ryzen 7 2700U. In our benchmark the Ryzen 7 3700U and therefore also the 3780U could not pull ahead much compared to the average Ryzen 7 2700U.

ModelAMD Ryzen 3 3350UAMD Ryzen 7 3780U
SeriesAMD Picasso (Ryzen 3000 APU)AMD Picasso (Ryzen 3000 APU)
CodenameZen+Zen+
Series: Picasso (Ryzen 3000 APU) Zen+
AMD Ryzen 7 3780U2.3 - 4 GHz4 / 84 MB
AMD Ryzen 7 3750H compare2.3 - 4 GHz4 / 84 MB
AMD Ryzen 7 3700U compare2.3 - 4 GHz4 / 84 MB
AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 3700U compare2.3 - 4 GHz4 / 84 MB
AMD Ryzen 5 3550H compare2.1 - 3.7 GHz4 / 84 MB
AMD Ryzen 5 3500U compare2.1 - 3.7 GHz4 / 84 MB
AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 3500U compare2.1 - 3.7 GHz4 / 84 MB
AMD Ryzen 5 3580U compare2.1 - 3.7 GHz4 / 84 MB
AMD Ryzen 5 3450U compare2.1 - 3.5 GHz4 / 84 MB
» AMD Ryzen 3 3350U2.1 - 3.5 GHz4 / 44 MB
AMD Ryzen 3 3300U compare2.1 - 3.5 GHz4 / 44 MB
AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 3300U compare2.1 - 3.5 GHz4 / 44 MB
» AMD Ryzen 7 3780U2.3 - 4 GHz4 / 84 MB
AMD Ryzen 7 3750H compare2.3 - 4 GHz4 / 84 MB
AMD Ryzen 7 3700U compare2.3 - 4 GHz4 / 84 MB
AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 3700U compare2.3 - 4 GHz4 / 84 MB
AMD Ryzen 5 3550H compare2.1 - 3.7 GHz4 / 84 MB
AMD Ryzen 5 3500U compare2.1 - 3.7 GHz4 / 84 MB
AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 3500U compare2.1 - 3.7 GHz4 / 84 MB
AMD Ryzen 5 3580U compare2.1 - 3.7 GHz4 / 84 MB
AMD Ryzen 5 3450U compare2.1 - 3.5 GHz4 / 84 MB
AMD Ryzen 3 3350U2.1 - 3.5 GHz4 / 44 MB
AMD Ryzen 3 3300U compare2.1 - 3.5 GHz4 / 44 MB
AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 3300U compare2.1 - 3.5 GHz4 / 44 MB
Clock2100 - 3500 MHz2300 - 4000 MHz
L1 Cache384 KB384 KB
L2 Cache2 MB2 MB
L3 Cache4 MB4 MB
Cores / Threads4 / 44 / 8
TDP15 Watt15 Watt
Transistors4500 Million4500 Million
Technology12 nm12 nm
max. Temp.105 °C
SocketAM4AM4
FeaturesXFR, FMA3, SSE 4.2, AVX2, SMTXFR, FMA3, SSE 4.2, AVX2, SMT
iGPUAMD Radeon RX Vega 6 (Ryzen 2000/3000) ( - 1200 MHz)AMD Radeon RX Vega 11 ( - 1400 MHz)
Architecturex86x86
Announced
ManufacturerAMD Picasso (Ryzen 3000 APU) R3 3350U

Benchmarks

Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Single Core)
290 Points (33%)
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Multi Core)
1580 Points (7%)
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit
788 Points (8%)
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64 Bit
166 Points (51%)
Geekbench 5.4 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.4 64 Bit Single-Core
864 Points (37%)
940 Points (41%)
Geekbench 5.4 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
2455 Points (9%)
3050 Points (11%)
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Single-Core
890 Points (40%)
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Multi-Core
3380 Points (11%)

Average Benchmarks AMD Ryzen 3 3350U → 100% n=2

Average Benchmarks AMD Ryzen 7 3780U → 117% n=2

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:

show all (including archived), 2022, 2021
v1.19
log 27. 19:17:44

#0 checking url part for id 13237 +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 11512 +0s ... 0s

#2 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#3 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Thu, 24 Nov 2022 12:15:05 +0100 +0s ... 0s

#4 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.006s ... 0.007s

#5 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.006s ... 0.012s

#6 composed specs +0s ... 0.013s

#7 did output specs +0s ... 0.013s

#8 getting avg benchmarks for device 13237 +0s ... 0.013s

#9 got single benchmarks 13237 +0.007s ... 0.02s

#10 getting avg benchmarks for device 11512 +0s ... 0.02s

#11 got single benchmarks 11512 +0.006s ... 0.027s

#12 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.027s

#13 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.027s

#14 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.027s

#15 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.028s

#16 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.028s

#17 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.028s

#18 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.029s

#19 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.029s

#20 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.029s

#21 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.03s

#22 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.03s

#23 min, max, avg, median took s +0s ... 0.03s

#24 return log +0.004s ... 0.034s

Please share our article, every link counts!
.170
> Notebook / Laptop Reviews and News > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2017-09-11)