AMD Ryzen 3 3300U vs AMD Ryzen 7 3750H

AMD Ryzen 3 3300U

► remove from comparison AMD R3 3300U

The AMD Ryzen 3 3300U is a mobile SoC that was announced in January 2019. It combines four Zen+ cores (no SMT / Hyperthreading so only 4 threads) clocked at 2.1 - 3.7 GHz with a Radeon RX Vega 6 graphics card with 6 CUs (384 Shaders) clocked at up to 1200 MHz. Specified at 15 Watt TDP, the SoC is intended for thin mid-range laptops.

The Picasso SoCs use the Zen+ microarchitecture with slight improvements that should lead to a 3% IPS (performance per clock) improvements. Furthermore, the 12nm process allows higher clock rates at similar power consumptions.

The integrated dual-channel memory controller supports up to DDR4-2400 memory. As the features of the Picasso APUs are the same compared to the Raven Ridge predecessors, we point to our Raven Ridge launch article.

AMD states that the Picasso APUs are about 8% faster than the predecessors. Therefore, the Ryzen 3 3300U should be similar to the Ryzen 5 2500U (2 - 3.6 GHz but with SMT).

AMD Ryzen 7 3750H

► remove from comparison AMD R7 3750H

The AMD Ryzen 7 3750H is a mobile SoC that was announced in January 2019. It combines four Zen+ cores (8 threads) clocked at 2.3 - 4 GHz with a Radeon RX Vega 10 graphics card with 10 CUs (640 Shaders) clocked at up to 1400 MHz. Compared to the similar Ryzen 7 3700U, the 3750H offers a 20 Watt higher TDP and therefore a better performance under long periods of load. The integrated dual-channel memory controller supports up to DDR4-2400 memory. As the features of the Picasso APUs are the same compared to the Raven Ridge predecessors, we point to our Raven Ridge launch article.

The Picasso SoCs use the Zen+ microarchitecture with slight improvements that should lead to a 3% IPS (performance per clock) improvements. Furthermore, the 12nm process allows higher clock rates at similar power consumptions.

AMD states that the Picasso APUs are about 8% faster than the predecessors. Including the 35 Watt TDP, the 3750H should be a capable upper mid-range processor for laptops, including gaming laptops.

AMD Ryzen 3 3300UAMD Ryzen 7 3750H
AMD Picasso (Ryzen 3000 APU)AMD Picasso (Ryzen 3000 APU)
Zen+Zen+
Series: Picasso (Ryzen 3000 APU) Zen+
AMD Ryzen 7 3780U compare2.3 - 4 GHz4 / 84 MB
AMD Ryzen 7 3750H2.3 - 4 GHz4 / 84 MB
AMD Ryzen 7 3700U compare2.3 - 4 GHz4 / 84 MB
AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 3700U compare2.3 - 4 GHz4 / 84 MB
AMD Ryzen 5 3550H compare2.1 - 3.7 GHz4 / 84 MB
AMD Ryzen 5 3500U compare2.1 - 3.7 GHz4 / 84 MB
AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 3500U compare2.1 - 3.7 GHz4 / 84 MB
AMD Ryzen 5 3580U compare2.1 - 3.7 GHz4 / 84 MB
» AMD Ryzen 3 3300U2.1 - 3.5 GHz4 / 44 MB
AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 3300U compare2.1 - 3.5 GHz4 / 44 MB
AMD Ryzen 3 3250U compare2.6 - 3.5 GHz2 / 44 MB
AMD Ryzen 3 3200U compare2.6 - 3.5 GHz2 / 44 MB
AMD Athlon Silver 3050U compare2.3 - 3.2 GHz2 / 24 MB
AMD Ryzen 7 3780U compare2.3 - 4 GHz4 / 84 MB
» AMD Ryzen 7 3750H2.3 - 4 GHz4 / 84 MB
AMD Ryzen 7 3700U compare2.3 - 4 GHz4 / 84 MB
AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 3700U compare2.3 - 4 GHz4 / 84 MB
AMD Ryzen 5 3550H compare2.1 - 3.7 GHz4 / 84 MB
AMD Ryzen 5 3500U compare2.1 - 3.7 GHz4 / 84 MB
AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 3500U compare2.1 - 3.7 GHz4 / 84 MB
AMD Ryzen 5 3580U compare2.1 - 3.7 GHz4 / 84 MB
AMD Ryzen 3 3300U2.1 - 3.5 GHz4 / 44 MB
AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 3300U compare2.1 - 3.5 GHz4 / 44 MB
AMD Ryzen 3 3250U compare2.6 - 3.5 GHz2 / 44 MB
AMD Ryzen 3 3200U compare2.6 - 3.5 GHz2 / 44 MB
AMD Athlon Silver 3050U compare2.3 - 3.2 GHz2 / 24 MB
2100 - 3500 MHz2300 - 4000 MHz
384 KB384 KB
2 MB2 MB
4 MB4 MB
4 / 44 / 8
15 35
4500 4500
12 12
AM4AM4
XFR, FMA3, SSE 4.2, AVX2, SMTXFR, FMA3, SSE 4.2, AVX2, SMT
iGPUAMD Radeon RX Vega 6 (Ryzen 2000/3000) ( - 1200 MHz)AMD Radeon RX Vega 10 ( - 1400 MHz)
Architecturex86x86

Benchmarks

Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - R3 3300U
33.2 pt (33%)
Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - R7 3750H
39.2 pt (40%)
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Single Core)
337 Points (53%)
min: 340     avg: 359     median: 352 (55%)     max: 386 Points
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Multi Core)
921 Points (9%)
min: 1633     avg: 1750     median: 1793 (17%)     max: 1825 Points
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit
471 Points (10%)
0102030405060708090100110120130140150160170180190200210220230240250260270280290300310320330340350360370380390400410420430440450460470480Tooltip
min: 672     avg: 753     median: 757 (17%)     max: 805 Points
0102030405060708090100110120130140150160170180190200210220230240250260270280290300310320330340350360370380390400410420430440450460470480490500510520530540550560570580590600610620630640650660670680690700710720730740750760770780790800Tooltip
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64 Bit
134 Points (49%)
min: 135     avg: 144     median: 143.5 (53%)     max: 157 Points
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64 Bit
9.2 Points (19%)
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64 Bit
1.6 Points (52%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (32bit)
4280 (38%)
min: 4527     avg: 4732     median: 4770 (43%)     max: 4898
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (32bit)
12357 (21%)
min: 19290     avg: 20242     median: 20687 (35%)     max: 20750
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 1024m *
405 s (5%)
197 s (2%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 32m *
11.9 s (2%)
7.4 s (1%)
WinRAR - WinRAR 4.0
2398 (15%)
2866 (18%)
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Multli Thread 4 runs
12118 MIPS (9%)
min: 18689     avg: 18938     median: 18938 (15%)     max: 19187 MIPS
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Single Thread 4 runs
3340 MIPS (22%)
min: 3511     avg: 3585     median: 3585 (24%)     max: 3659 MIPS
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 2
26.2 fps (12%)
48.6 fps (22%)
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 1
132 fps (39%)
139 fps (41%)
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 - HWBOT x265 4k Preset
2.8 fps (9%)
010Tooltip
min: 4.352     avg: 4.4     median: 4.4 (14%)     max: 4.4 fps
010Tooltip
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Serpent
0.3 GB/s (11%)
0.5 GB/s (19%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Twofish
0.4 GB/s (12%)
0.7 GB/s (19%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt AES
2.7 GB/s (10%)
5 GB/s (19%)
Blender 2.79 - Blender 2.79 BMW27 CPU *
1212 Seconds (9%)
min: 584.19     avg: 609     median: 608.6 (4%)     max: 633 Seconds
R Benchmark 2.5 - R Benchmark 2.5 *
0.8 sec (17%)
0.7 sec (15%)
3DMark 06 - CPU - 3DMark 06 - CPU
4332 Points (24%)
min: 7187     avg: 7715     median: 7431 (41%)     max: 8812 Points
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
12.8 s (3%)
11 s (2%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M *
28.4 s (1%)
25.7 s (1%)
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 32M *
709 s (3%)
650 s (3%)
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. CPU no Physx
25143 Points (29%)
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Physics
4587 Points (19%)
min: 6606     avg: 7734     median: 7941 (33%)     max: 8648 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Physics
51741 Points (33%)
min: 39182     avg: 48304     median: 48251 (31%)     max: 57479 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Extreme Physics
47170 Points (50%)
min: 44524     avg: 50874     median: 51438 (55%)     max: 56661 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Physics
55407 Points (57%)
min: 55479     avg: 58242     median: 55515 (57%)     max: 63731 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Physics
3953 Points (10%)
min: 5698     avg: 7502     median: 7786.5 (20%)     max: 8117 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Physics
5629 Points (14%)
min: 10737     avg: 11312     median: 11370.5 (29%)     max: 11900 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy CPU
2006 Points (14%)
min: 3276     avg: 3409     median: 3373 (24%)     max: 3574 Points
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Stream
8470 Points (68%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Memory
6808 Points (62%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Floating Point
12111 Points (24%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Integer
8746 Points (18%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Total Score
9508 Points (25%)
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 32 Bit Multi-Core
10170 (18%)
min: 14478     avg: 14749     median: 14748.5 (26%)     max: 15019
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 32 Bit Single-Core
3469 (71%)
min: 3717     avg: 3768     median: 3768 (77%)     max: 3819
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 64 Bit Multi-Core
11467 (18%)
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 64 Bit Single-Core
3780 (77%)
Geekbench 4.0 - Geekbench 4.0 64 Bit Single-Core
3672 (57%)
Geekbench 4.0 - Geekbench 4.0 64 Bit Multi-Core
10223 (25%)
Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Single-Core
3861 (53%)
min: 3898     avg: 4104     median: 4166 (57%)     max: 4186
Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
10787 (17%)
min: 11396     avg: 12985     median: 13403.5 (21%)     max: 13738
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Single-Core
843 (50%)
min: 853     avg: 895     median: 884 (53%)     max: 959
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Multi-Core
2722 (16%)
min: 3007     avg: 3467     median: 3571.5 (22%)     max: 3718
Geekbench 5.3 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.3 64 Bit Single-Core
874 (48%)
Geekbench 5.3 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.3 64 Bit Multi-Core
3537 (21%)
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *
min: 1192     avg: 1237     median: 1236.6 (2%)     max: 1281.2 ms
min: 1157.6     avg: 1182     median: 1161.5 (2%)     max: 1227.7 ms
Sunspider - Sunspider 1.0 Total Score *
137 ms (2%)
Octane V2 - Octane V2 Total Score
27764 Points (44%)
min: 29949     avg: 30479     median: 30626 (49%)     max: 30714 Points
Power Consumption - Prime95 Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 95     avg: 139     median: 138.5 (37%)     max: 182 Watt
Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 66.4     avg: 81.8     median: 81.8 (22%)     max: 97.1 Watt

Average Benchmarks AMD Ryzen 3 3300U → 100% n=38

Average Benchmarks AMD Ryzen 7 3750H → 133% n=38

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:

show all (including archived), 2021, 2020
v1.16
Please share our article, every link counts!
> Notebook / Laptop Reviews and News > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2017-09-11)