AMD Ryzen 3 3300U vs AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 3300U

AMD Ryzen 3 3300U

► remove from comparison AMD R3 3300U

The AMD Ryzen 3 3300U is a mobile SoC that was announced in January 2019. It combines four Zen+ cores (no SMT / Hyperthreading so only 4 threads) clocked at 2.1 - 3.7 GHz with a Radeon RX Vega 6 graphics card with 6 CUs (384 Shaders) clocked at up to 1200 MHz. Specified at 15 Watt TDP, the SoC is intended for thin mid-range laptops.

The Picasso SoCs use the Zen+ microarchitecture with slight improvements that should lead to a 3% IPS (performance per clock) improvements. Furthermore, the 12nm process allows higher clock rates at similar power consumptions.

The integrated dual-channel memory controller supports up to DDR4-2400 memory. As the features of the Picasso APUs are the same compared to the Raven Ridge predecessors, we point to our Raven Ridge launch article.

AMD states that the Picasso APUs are about 8% faster than the predecessors. Therefore, the Ryzen 3 3300U should be similar to the Ryzen 5 2500U (2 - 3.6 GHz but with SMT).

AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 3300U

► remove from comparison AMD R3 PRO 3300U

The AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 3300U is a mobile SoC that was announced in January 2019. It combines four Zen+ cores (no SMT / Hyperthreading so only 4 threads) clocked at 2.1 - 3.5 GHz with a Radeon RX Vega 6 graphics card with 6 CUs (384 Shaders) clocked at up to 1200 MHz. Specified at 15 Watt TDP, the SoC is intended for thin mid-range laptops. Compared to the similar consumer variant Ryzen 3 3300U, the PRO model features additional management and security features (e.g., full memory encryption) and longer warranty / availability.

The Picasso SoCs use the Zen+ microarchitecture with slight improvements that should lead to a 3% IPS (performance per clock) improvements. Furthermore, the 12nm process allows for higher clock rates at similar power consumptions.

The integrated dual-channel memory controller supports up to DDR4-2400 memory. As the features of the Picasso APUs are the same compared to the Raven Ridge predecessors, we point to our Raven Ridge launch article.

AMD states that the Picasso APUs are about 8% faster than the predecessors. Therefore, the Ryzen 3 PRO 3300U should be similar to the Ryzen 5 PRO 2500U (2 - 3.6 GHz but with SMT).

AMD Ryzen 3 3300UAMD Ryzen 3 PRO 3300U
AMD Picasso (Ryzen 3000 APU)AMD Picasso (Ryzen 3000 APU)
Zen+Zen+
Series: Picasso (Ryzen 3000 APU) Zen+
AMD Ryzen 7 3780U compare2.3 - 4 GHz4 / 84 MB
AMD Ryzen 7 3750H compare2.3 - 4 GHz4 / 84 MB
AMD Ryzen 7 3700U compare2.3 - 4 GHz4 / 84 MB
AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 3700U compare2.3 - 4 GHz4 / 84 MB
AMD Ryzen 5 3550H compare2.1 - 3.7 GHz4 / 84 MB
AMD Ryzen 5 3500U compare2.1 - 3.7 GHz4 / 84 MB
AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 3500U compare2.1 - 3.7 GHz4 / 84 MB
AMD Ryzen 5 3580U compare2.1 - 3.7 GHz4 / 84 MB
» AMD Ryzen 3 3300U2.1 - 3.5 GHz4 / 44 MB
AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 3300U2.1 - 3.5 GHz4 / 44 MB
AMD Ryzen 3 3250U compare2.6 - 3.5 GHz2 / 44 MB
AMD Ryzen 3 3200U compare2.6 - 3.5 GHz2 / 44 MB
AMD Athlon Silver 3050U compare2.3 - 3.2 GHz2 / 24 MB
AMD Ryzen 7 3780U compare2.3 - 4 GHz4 / 84 MB
AMD Ryzen 7 3750H compare2.3 - 4 GHz4 / 84 MB
AMD Ryzen 7 3700U compare2.3 - 4 GHz4 / 84 MB
AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 3700U compare2.3 - 4 GHz4 / 84 MB
AMD Ryzen 5 3550H compare2.1 - 3.7 GHz4 / 84 MB
AMD Ryzen 5 3500U compare2.1 - 3.7 GHz4 / 84 MB
AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 3500U compare2.1 - 3.7 GHz4 / 84 MB
AMD Ryzen 5 3580U compare2.1 - 3.7 GHz4 / 84 MB
AMD Ryzen 3 3300U2.1 - 3.5 GHz4 / 44 MB
» AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 3300U2.1 - 3.5 GHz4 / 44 MB
AMD Ryzen 3 3250U compare2.6 - 3.5 GHz2 / 44 MB
AMD Ryzen 3 3200U compare2.6 - 3.5 GHz2 / 44 MB
AMD Athlon Silver 3050U compare2.3 - 3.2 GHz2 / 24 MB
2100 - 3500 MHz2100 - 3500 MHz
384 KB384 KB
2 MB2 MB
4 MB4 MB
4 / 44 / 4
15 15
4500 4500
12 12
AM4AM4
XFR, FMA3, SSE 4.2, AVX2, SMTXFR, FMA3, SSE 4.2, AVX2, SMT
iGPUAMD Radeon RX Vega 6 (Ryzen 2000/3000) ( - 1200 MHz)AMD Radeon RX Vega 6 (Ryzen 2000/3000) ( - 1200 MHz)
Architecturex86x86
AMD Picasso (Ryzen 3000 APU) R3 PRO 3300U

Benchmarks

Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - R3 3300U
33.2 pt (33%)
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Single Core)
337 Points (53%)
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Multi Core)
921 Points (9%)
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit
471 Points (10%)
0102030405060708090100110120130140150160170180190200210220230240250260270280290300310320330340350360370380390400410420430440450460470480Tooltip
481 Points (11%)
0102030405060708090100110120130140150160170180190200210220230240250260270280290300310320330340350360370380390400410420430440450460470480Tooltip
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64 Bit
134 Points (49%)
126 Points (46%)
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64 Bit
5.5 Points (11%)
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64 Bit
1.4 Points (46%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (32bit)
4280 (38%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (32bit)
12357 (21%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (64bit)
22657 Points (22%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (64bit)
6410 Points (48%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 1024m *
405 s (5%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 32m *
11.9 s (2%)
WinRAR - WinRAR 4.0
2398 (15%)
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Multli Thread 4 runs
12118 MIPS (9%)
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Single Thread 4 runs
3340 MIPS (22%)
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 2
26.2 fps (12%)
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 1
132 fps (39%)
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 - HWBOT x265 4k Preset
2.8 fps (9%)
010Tooltip
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Serpent
0.3 GB/s (11%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Twofish
0.4 GB/s (12%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt AES
2.7 GB/s (10%)
Blender 2.79 - Blender 2.79 BMW27 CPU *
1212 Seconds (9%)
R Benchmark 2.5 - R Benchmark 2.5 *
0.8 sec (17%)
3DMark 06 - CPU - 3DMark 06 - CPU
4332 Points (24%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
12.8 s (3%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M *
28.4 s (1%)
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 32M *
709 s (3%)
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Physics
4587 Points (19%)
5408 Points (22%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Physics
51741 Points (33%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Extreme Physics
47170 Points (50%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Physics
55407 Points (57%)
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Physics
3953 Points (10%)
4646 Points (12%)
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Physics
5629 Points (14%)
6596 Points (17%)
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy CPU
2006 Points (14%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Stream
8470 Points (68%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Memory
6808 Points (62%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Floating Point
12111 Points (24%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Integer
8746 Points (18%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Total Score
9508 Points (25%)
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 32 Bit Multi-Core
10170 (18%)
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 32 Bit Single-Core
3469 (71%)
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 64 Bit Multi-Core
11467 (18%)
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 64 Bit Single-Core
3780 (77%)
Geekbench 4.0 - Geekbench 4.0 64 Bit Single-Core
3672 (57%)
Geekbench 4.0 - Geekbench 4.0 64 Bit Multi-Core
10223 (25%)
Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Single-Core
3861 (53%)
Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
10787 (17%)
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Single-Core
843 (50%)
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Multi-Core
2722 (16%)
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *
min: 1192     avg: 1237     median: 1236.6 (2%)     max: 1281.2 ms
Sunspider - Sunspider 1.0 Total Score *
137 ms (2%)
Octane V2 - Octane V2 Total Score
27764 Points (44%)

Average Benchmarks AMD Ryzen 3 3300U → 100% n=5

Average Benchmarks AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 3300U → 110% n=5

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:

show all (including archived), 2021, 2020
v1.16
Please share our article, every link counts!
> Notebook / Laptop Reviews and News > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2017-09-11)