Notebookcheck Logo

AMD Ryzen 3 2200G vs AMD Ryzen 3 1300X vs AMD Athlon 300U

AMD Ryzen 3 2200G

► remove from comparison

The AMD Ryzen 3 2200G is a desktop APU that was announced in early 2018. It combines four Zen cores (4 threads as no SMT/HyperThreading support) clocked at 3.5 - 3.7 GHz with a Radeon RX Vega 8 graphics card with 8 CUs (512 of the 704 Shaders on the chip) clocked at up to 1100 MHz. The integrated dual-channel memory controller supports up to DDR-2933. The TDP is specified at 65 Watt and the CPU, GPU and memory are unlocked for overclocking. More information on Raven Ridge can be found in our launch article.

AMD Ryzen 3 1300X

► remove from comparison AMD R3 1300X

The AMD Ryzen 3 1300X is a desktop quad-core processor with 4 cores and no Hyperthreading / SMT (4 threads only). Mid 2017 it is the fastest Ryzen 3 quad-core CPU. The TDP is specified at 65 Watt and the CPU cores clock with up to 3.9 GHz (XFR 2 cores, 3.7 GHz without XFR). A detailed review can be found here.

AMD Athlon 300U

► remove from comparison

The AMD Athlon 300U is a mobile entry level dual core SoC that was announced in January 2019. It combines two Zen cores (with SMT / Hyperthreading so running 4 threads) clocked at 2.4 - 3.3 GHz with a Radeon RX Vega 3 graphics card with 3 CUs (192 Shaders) clocked at up to 1000 MHz. Specified at 15 Watt TDP, the SoC is intended for thin mid-range laptops. It is quite similar to the AMD Ryzen 3 3200U (2.6 - 3.5 GHz).

Compared to the Picasso APUs of the Ryzen 3000 series, the Athlon 300U is still based on the first generation of the 2000 series. Only the PRO variant is based on the new Zen+ microarchitecture that should lead to a 3% IPS (performance per clock) improvement.

The integrated dual-channel memory controller supports up to DDR4-2400 memory. As the features of the Picasso APUs are the same compared to the Raven Ridge predecessors, we point to our Raven Ridge launch article.

In contrast to the faster quad-core Picasso APUs, the Athlon 300U only supports 3 instead of 4 displays in total.

Performance wise, the Athlon 300 should be slightly slower than the Ryzen 3 2200U (2.5 - 3.4 GHz Dual Core with SMT).

ModelAMD Ryzen 3 2200GAMD Ryzen 3 1300XAMD Athlon 300U
SeriesAMD Raven Ridge (Ryzen 2000 APU)AMD Ryzen 3AMD Raven Ridge (Ryzen 2000 APU)
CodenameZenZenZen
Series: Raven Ridge (Ryzen 2000 APU) Zen
AMD Ryzen 5 2400G3.6 - 3.9 GHz4 / 8 cores4 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 7 2700U2.2 - 3.8 GHz4 / 8 cores4 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 2700U2.2 - 3.8 GHz4 / 8 cores4 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 3 2200G « 3.5 - 3.7 GHz4 / 4 cores4 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 5 2600H3.2 - 3.6 GHz4 / 8 cores4 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 5 2500U2 - 3.6 GHz4 / 8 cores4 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 2500U2 - 3.6 GHz4 / 8 cores4 MB L3
AMD Ryzen Embedded V1605B2 - 3.6 GHz4 / 8 cores4 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 3 2300U2 - 3.4 GHz4 / 4 cores4 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 2300U2 - 3.4 GHz4 / 4 cores4 MB L3
AMD Ryzen Embedded R1606G2.6 - 3.5 GHz2 / 4 cores4 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 3 2200U2.5 - 3.4 GHz2 / 4 cores4 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 2200U2.5 - 3.4 GHz2 / 4 cores4 MB L3
AMD Ryzen Embedded R1505G2.4 - 3.3 GHz2 / 4 cores4 MB L3
AMD Athlon 300U2.4 - 3.3 GHz2 / 4 cores4 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 5 2400G3.6 - 3.9 GHz4 / 8 cores4 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 7 2700U2.2 - 3.8 GHz4 / 8 cores4 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 2700U2.2 - 3.8 GHz4 / 8 cores4 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 3 2200G3.5 - 3.7 GHz4 / 4 cores4 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 5 2600H3.2 - 3.6 GHz4 / 8 cores4 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 5 2500U2 - 3.6 GHz4 / 8 cores4 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 2500U2 - 3.6 GHz4 / 8 cores4 MB L3
AMD Ryzen Embedded V1605B2 - 3.6 GHz4 / 8 cores4 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 3 2300U2 - 3.4 GHz4 / 4 cores4 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 2300U2 - 3.4 GHz4 / 4 cores4 MB L3
AMD Ryzen Embedded R1606G2.6 - 3.5 GHz2 / 4 cores4 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 3 2200U2.5 - 3.4 GHz2 / 4 cores4 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 2200U2.5 - 3.4 GHz2 / 4 cores4 MB L3
AMD Ryzen Embedded R1505G2.4 - 3.3 GHz2 / 4 cores4 MB L3
AMD Athlon 300U « 2.4 - 3.3 GHz2 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Clock3500 - 3700 MHz3500 - 3700 MHz2400 - 3300 MHz
L1 Cache384 KB384 KB192 KB
L2 Cache2 MB2 MB1 MB
L3 Cache4 MB8 MB4 MB
Cores / Threads4 / 44 / 42 / 4
TDP65 Watt65 Watt15 Watt
Transistors4500 Million4800 Million4500 Million
Technology14 nm14 nm12 nm
SocketAM4AM4AM4
FeaturesXFR, FMA3, SSE 4.2, AVX2, SMTXFR, FMA3, SSE 4.2, AVX2, SMTXFR, FMA3, SSE 4.2, AVX2, SMT
iGPUAMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 2000/3000) ( - 1100 MHz)AMD Radeon RX Vega 3 ( - 1000 MHz)
Architecturex86x86x86
Announced
Manufacturerproducts.amd.comwww.amd.com

Benchmarks

Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - R3 2200G
26.8 pt (37%)
Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - R3 1300X
26.4 pt (37%)
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Multi Core
3486 Points (3%)
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Single Core
947 Points (40%)
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Single Core)
363 Points (40%)
345 Points (38%)
308 Points (34%)
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Multi Core)
1446 Points (4%)
1336 Points (3%)
637 Points (2%)
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit
min: 561     avg: 574     median: 577 (4%)     max: 581 Points
558 Points (4%)
308 Points (2%)
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64 Bit
min: 142     avg: 145.8     median: 145.6 (44%)     max: 150 Points
152 Points (46%)
119 Points (36%)
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64 Bit
6.7 Points (9%)
6.4 Points (8%)
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64 Bit
1.7 Points (42%)
1.7 Points (43%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (32bit)
4625 Points (28%)
4676 Points (28%)
3968 Points (24%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (32bit)
16684 Points (12%)
16094 Points (12%)
8724 Points (6%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 1024m *
333 s (4%)
334.8 s (4%)
510 s (6%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 32m *
10.8 s (2%)
10.8 s (2%)
15.4 s (3%)
WinRAR - WinRAR 4.0
3229 Points (5%)
2677 Points (4%)
1623 Points (3%)
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Multli Thread 4 runs
14790 MIPS (8%)
13712 MIPS (8%)
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Single Thread 4 runs
3948 MIPS (47%)
3772 MIPS (45%)
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 2
39.7 fps (14%)
38.4 fps (13%)
18.5 fps (6%)
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 1
184 fps (42%)
181.6 fps (42%)
88.6 fps (20%)
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 - HWBOT x265 4k Preset
4.3 fps (8%)
4.1 fps (7%)
1.8 fps (3%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Serpent
0.3 GB/s (0%)
0.3 GB/s (0%)
0.2 GB/s (0%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Twofish
0.5 GB/s (8%)
0.5 GB/s (8%)
0.3 GB/s (5%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt AES
3.1 GB/s (8%)
3 GB/s (8%)
1.9 GB/s (5%)
Blender - Blender 2.79 BMW27 CPU *
min: 825     avg: 826     median: 826 (6%)     max: 827 Seconds
870 Seconds (6%)
R Benchmark 2.5 - R Benchmark 2.5 *
0.7 sec (15%)
0.7 sec (15%)
3DMark 06 - CPU - 3DMark 06 - CPU
6636 Points (14%)
6310 Points (13%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
11.7 s (3%)
11 s (2%)
14.1 s (3%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M *
26.2 s (1%)
25.1 s (1%)
31.8 s (1%)
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 32M *
651 s (3%)
619 s (3%)
807 s (4%)
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Physics
min: 6549     avg: 6805     median: 6805 (18%)     max: 7061 Points
6579 Points (18%)
3427 Points (9%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Physics
41974 Points (34%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Extreme Physics
41029 Points (33%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Physics
71141 Points (60%)
45359 Points (38%)
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Physics
5655 Points (14%)
3217 Points (8%)
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Physics
7706 Points (14%)
4729 Points (8%)
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy CPU
1361 Points (6%)
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.4 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 950     avg: 1087     median: 1086.5 (46%)     max: 1223 Points
920 Points (39%)
867 Points (37%)
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 3391     avg: 4882     median: 4881.5 (9%)     max: 6372 Points
5210 Points (9%)
1840 Points (3%)
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Single-Core
959 Points (4%)
765 Points (3%)
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Multi-Core
3431 Points (11%)
1552 Points (5%)
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 4148     avg: 4249     median: 4249 (42%)     max: 4350 Points
4327 Points (43%)
3287 Points (33%)
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 11266     avg: 11897     median: 11896.5 (13%)     max: 12527 Points
12230 Points (14%)
6053 Points (7%)
Geekbench 4.0 - Geekbench 4.0 64 Bit Single-Core
4082 Points (56%)
4250 Points (58%)
3213 Points (44%)
Geekbench 4.0 - Geekbench 4.0 64 Bit Multi-Core
11105 Points (27%)
11803 Points (29%)
5763 Points (14%)
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 64 Bit Multi-Core
13096 Points (21%)
6471 Points (10%)
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 64 Bit Single-Core
4173 Points (62%)
3196 Points (48%)
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 32 Bit Multi-Core
6134 Points (11%)
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 32 Bit Single-Core
2919 Points (57%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Stream
4852 Points (39%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Memory
4449 Points (40%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Floating Point
9250 Points (18%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Integer
6447 Points (13%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Total Score
6868 Points (18%)
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *
min: 954     avg: 997     median: 997 (1%)     max: 1040 ms
min: 989     avg: 1002     median: 1001.5 (1%)     max: 1014 ms
1452 ms (2%)
Sunspider - Sunspider 1.0 Total Score *
92.7 ms (1%)
81 ms (1%)
133.6 ms (1%)
Octane V2 - Octane V2 Total Score
34670 Points (31%)
35289 Points (32%)
22253 Points (20%)
WebXPRT 3 - WebXPRT 3 Score
171 Points (36%)
143 Points (30%)
Power Consumption - Prime95 Power Consumption - external Monitor *
95.4 Watt (16%)
Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Consumption - external Monitor *
69 Watt (13%)
Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Efficiency - external Monitor
8.4 Points per Watt (6%)

Average Benchmarks AMD Ryzen 3 2200G → 100% n=28

Average Benchmarks AMD Ryzen 3 1300X → 98% n=28

Average Benchmarks AMD Athlon 300U → 70% n=28

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

v1.26
log 20. 03:51:18

#0 checking url part for id 9896 +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 9304 +0s ... 0s

#2 checking url part for id 11201 +0s ... 0s

#3 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#4 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Fri, 19 Apr 2024 05:38:49 +0200 +0.001s ... 0.001s

#5 composed specs +0.028s ... 0.029s

#6 did output specs +0s ... 0.029s

#7 getting avg benchmarks for device 9896 +0.017s ... 0.046s

#8 got single benchmarks 9896 +0.012s ... 0.058s

#9 getting avg benchmarks for device 9304 +0.012s ... 0.071s

#10 got single benchmarks 9304 +0.009s ... 0.08s

#11 getting avg benchmarks for device 11201 +0.003s ... 0.082s

#12 got single benchmarks 11201 +0.012s ... 0.095s

#13 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.095s

#14 min, max, avg, median took s +0.383s ... 0.478s

#15 return log +0s ... 0.478s

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)