The AMD Ryzen Embedded R1606G is a dual-core SoC designed for embedded systems that was announced in March 2019. It is similar to the Ryzen 3 3200U (or the 2200U with slightly increased clock speed) and based on the first generation of the Zen architecture. The Ryzen features two Zen cores with support for the thread-doubling SMT tech, clocked at 2.6 GHz - 3.5 GHz. The built-in Radeon RX Vega 3 iGPU has 3 CUs (192 unified shaders) clocked at up to 1,200 MHz. The default TDP is 15 W which makes the Ryzen a good fit for thin mid-range laptops.
In comparison to the faster Ryzen 3000 CPUs, the 3200U and therefore the R1606G is not using the newer Zen+ microarchitecture and is still manufactured in 14nm. Compared to the old Ryzen 3 2200U, the 3200U and R1606G therefore only offers a 100 MHz higher clock speed.
The R1606G is compatible with single-channel or dual-channel DDR4-2400 RAM. Please go to our Raven Ridge launch article for details on the architecture and more.
The AMD 3015Ce (Codename Dali) is a mobile APU that integrates two Zen cores (with SMT, therefore 4 threads) clocked at 1.2 to 2.3 GHz. It is the Chromebook version of the AMD 3015e with identical specifications. The TDP is specified at 6 Watt and therefore the chip can be passively cooled. The integrated Radeon graphics card offers 3 CUs at up to 600 MHz (Radeon RX Vega 3). The single channel memory controller supports only DDR4-1600. The chip is manufactured in 14nm and officially counted to the 3000 series of mobile processors.
AMD compares the performance of the 3015e (and therefore also the identical 3015Ce) against the entry level Intel Celeron N4120 (Quad-Core Atom). The 3015e should be 36% faster in single thread Cinebench R20 test. This is expected as the Atom cores offer a low single thread performance. Multi-thread benchmarks were not provided, so we guess the N4120 will be faster with its 4 cores. In PCMark 10 the 3015e should be 18% faster and in the 3DMark Night Raid the integrated GPU should beat the UHD Graphics 600 in the N4120 by 24%.
More information on Raven Ridge can be found in our launch article.
The AMD 3020e (Codename Dali) is a mobile APU that integrates two Zen cores (without SMT, therefore 2 threads) clocked at 1.2 to 2.6 GHz. The TDP is specified at 6 Watt and therefore the chip can be passively cooled. The integrated Radeon graphics card offers 3 CUs at up to 1,000 MHz (Radeon RX Vega 3). The dual channel memory controller supports DDR4-2400. The chip is manufactured on the 14 nm process and officially counted to the 3000 series of mobile processors.
The average 3020e in our database sits close to Intel Celeron N4100 and Intel Core m3-8100Y, as far as multi-thread performance is concerned. The latter two got released a couple of years ago as slow albeit fairly energy-efficient CPUs. Much like the Celeron and the Core m3, AMD 3020e will let you binge-watch Netflix and type work-related e-mails but anything tougher than that will bring the AMD to its limits quickly.
More information on Raven Ridge product family can be found in our launch article.
Average Benchmarks AMD Ryzen Embedded R1606G → 100%n=4
Average Benchmarks AMD 3015Ce → 76%n=4
Average Benchmarks AMD 3020e → 76%n=4
- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card - Average benchmark values for this graphics card * Smaller numbers mean a higher performance 1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation
log 09. 19:56:08
#0 checking url part for id 14126 +0s ... 0s
#1 checking url part for id 14368 +0s ... 0s
#2 checking url part for id 12720 +0s ... 0s
#3 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s
#4 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Wed, 07 Dec 2022 16:40:39 +0100 +0.32s ... 0.32s
#5 composed specs +0.04s ... 0.36s
#6 did output specs +0s ... 0.36s
#7 getting avg benchmarks for device 14126 +0.002s ... 0.362s
#8 got single benchmarks 14126 +0.007s ... 0.369s
#9 getting avg benchmarks for device 14368 +0.002s ... 0.371s
#10 got single benchmarks 14368 +0.006s ... 0.377s
#11 getting avg benchmarks for device 12720 +0.014s ... 0.391s
#12 got single benchmarks 12720 +0.018s ... 0.408s
#13 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.408s
#14 min, max, avg, median took s +0.142s ... 0.55s