, , , , , ,
search relation.
, , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,
 

NVIDIA Quadro T2000 (Laptop) vs NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 Max-Q

NVIDIA Quadro T2000 (Laptop)

► remove from comparison

The Nvidia Quadro T2000 for laptops is a professional mobile graphics card that is based on the Turing architecture (TU117 chip). It is based on the consumer desktop GTX 1650 Ti with comparable clock speeds and therefore currently between a mobile GTX 1650 and GTX 1660 Ti. The chip is manufactured in 12nm FinFET at TSMC. 

The Turing generation did not only introduce raytracing for the RTX cards, but also optimized the architecture of the cores and caches. According to Nvidia the CUDA cores offer now a concurrent execution of floating point and integer operations for increased performance in compute-heavy workloads of modern games. Furthermore, the caches were reworked (new unified memory architecture with twice the cache compared to Pascal). This leads to up to 50% more instructions per clock and a 40% more power efficient usage compared to Pascal. In contrary to the faster Quadro RTX cards (e.g. Quadro RTX 3000), the T1000 and T2000 don not feature raytracing and Tensor cores.

NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 Max-Q

► remove from comparison

The Nvidia Quadro RTX 4000 with Max-Q Design is a professional high-end graphics card for powerful laptops and mobile workstations. The Max-Q variants are lower clocked versions that are running more efficient and can be used in smaller chassis than the regular versions. It is based on the same TU104 chip as the consumer GeForce RTX 2080 (mobile) but offers fewer shaders (2,560) and is therefore positioned between the GeForce RTX 2080 (2,944) and 2070 (2,304). Currently we know of three different Max-Q variants with a power consumption (TGP) of 90, 85 and 80 Watt and different clock speeds.

ModelShaderTGP (W)Base (MHz)Boost (MHz)
Quadro RTX 4000 Desktop230416010051545
Quadro RTX 4000 Mobile256011013501770
Quadro RTX 4000 Max-Q2560909601485
Quadro RTX 4000 Max-Q2560859001440
Quadro RTX 4000 Max-Q2560807801380
GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile2304115?12151440

The Quadro GPUs offer certified drivers, which are optimized for stability and performance in professional applications (CAD, DCC, medical, prospection, and visualizing applications). The performance in these areas is therefore much better compared to corresponding consumer GPUs.

Features

NVIDIA manufacturers the TU104 chip on a 12 nm FinFET process and includes features like Deep Learning Super Sampling (DLSS) and Real-Time Ray Tracing (RTRT), which should combine to create more realistic lighting effects than older GPUs based on the company's Pascal architecture (if the games support it). The Quadro RTX 5000 is also DisplayPort 1.4 ready, while there is also support for HDMI 2.0b, HDR, Simultaneous Multi-Projection (SMP) and H.265 video en/decoding (PlayReady 3.0).

Performance

For professional applications, the Quadro RTX 4000 Max-Q should be only slightly above the mobile Quadro RTX 3000 (depending on the version). Compared to consumer cards, the mobile RTX 2070 will offer a similar performance (or slightly lower).

The still relatively high power consumption of the RTX4000 Max-Q makes the card most suited for big laptops although we should see thinner designs with the Max-Q variants.

NVIDIA Quadro T2000 (Laptop)NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 Max-Q
ManufacturerNVIDIANVIDIA
Quadro Turing Series
Quadro RTX 6000 (Laptop) compare 4608 @ 1.28 - 1.46 GHz384 Bit @ 14000 MHz
Quadro RTX 5000 (Laptop) compare 3072 @ 1.04 - 1.55 GHz256 Bit @ 14000 MHz
Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q compare 3072 @ 0.6 - 1.35 GHz256 Bit @ 14000 MHz
Quadro RTX 4000 (Laptop) compare 2560 @ 1.11 - 1.56 GHz256 Bit @ 14000 MHz
Quadro RTX 4000 Max-Q 2560 @ 0.78 - 1.38 GHz256 Bit @ 14000 MHz
Quadro RTX 3000 (Laptop) compare 1920 @ 0.95 - 1.38 GHz192 Bit @ 14000 MHz
Quadro RTX 3000 Max-Q compare 1920 @ 0.6 - 1.22 GHz192 Bit @ 14000 MHz
Quadro T2000 (Laptop) 1024 @ 1.58 - 1.79 GHz128 Bit @ 8000 MHz
Quadro T2000 Max-Q compare 1024 @ 0.93 - 1.5 GHz128 Bit @ 8000 MHz
T1200 Laptop GPU compare 1024 128 Bit @ 12000 MHz
Quadro T1000 (Laptop) compare 768 @ 1.4 - 1.46 GHz128 Bit @ 8000 MHz
Quadro T1000 Max-Q compare 768 @ 0.8 - 1.46 GHz128 Bit @ 8000 MHz
T600 Laptop GPU compare 896 @ 1.4 GHz128 Bit @ 10000 MHz
T500 Laptop GPU compare 896 @ 1.37 - 1.7 GHz64 Bit @ 10000 MHz
Quadro RTX 6000 (Laptop) compare 4608 @ 1.28 - 1.46 GHz384 Bit @ 14000 MHz
Quadro RTX 5000 (Laptop) compare 3072 @ 1.04 - 1.55 GHz256 Bit @ 14000 MHz
Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q compare 3072 @ 0.6 - 1.35 GHz256 Bit @ 14000 MHz
Quadro RTX 4000 (Laptop) compare 2560 @ 1.11 - 1.56 GHz256 Bit @ 14000 MHz
Quadro RTX 4000 Max-Q 2560 @ 0.78 - 1.38 GHz256 Bit @ 14000 MHz
Quadro RTX 3000 (Laptop) compare 1920 @ 0.95 - 1.38 GHz192 Bit @ 14000 MHz
Quadro RTX 3000 Max-Q compare 1920 @ 0.6 - 1.22 GHz192 Bit @ 14000 MHz
Quadro T2000 (Laptop) 1024 @ 1.58 - 1.79 GHz128 Bit @ 8000 MHz
Quadro T2000 Max-Q compare 1024 @ 0.93 - 1.5 GHz128 Bit @ 8000 MHz
T1200 Laptop GPU compare 1024 128 Bit @ 12000 MHz
Quadro T1000 (Laptop) compare 768 @ 1.4 - 1.46 GHz128 Bit @ 8000 MHz
Quadro T1000 Max-Q compare 768 @ 0.8 - 1.46 GHz128 Bit @ 8000 MHz
T600 Laptop GPU compare 896 @ 1.4 GHz128 Bit @ 10000 MHz
T500 Laptop GPU compare 896 @ 1.37 - 1.7 GHz64 Bit @ 10000 MHz
CodenameN19P-Q3N19E-Q3 MAX-Q
ArchitectureTuringTuring
Pipelines1024 - unified2560 - unified
Core Speed1575 - 1785 (Boost) MHz780 - 960 - 1380 - 1485 (Boost) MHz
Memory Speed8000 MHz14000 MHz
Memory Bus Width128 Bit256 Bit
Memory TypeGDDR5GDDR6
Max. Amount of Memory4096 MB8192 MB
Shared Memorynono
DirectXDirectX 12_1DirectX 12_1
Transistors4700 Million10800 Million
technology12 nm12 nm
Notebook Sizemedium sizedlarge
Date of Announcement27.05.2019 27.05.2019
FeaturesDLSS, Raytraycing, VR Ready, G-SYNC, Vulkan, Multi Monitor

Benchmarks

Performance Rating - 3DMark 11 + Fire Strike + Time Spy - Quadro RTX 4000 Max-Q
26.6 pt (29%)
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy Score
6724 Points (37%)
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy Graphics
6764 Points (34%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Extreme Graphics
23072 Points (3%)
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Score
23809 Points (32%)
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Graphics
35167 Points (17%)
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Score
15010 Points (38%)
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Graphics
17049 Points (34%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Graphics
35402 Points (5%)
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Score
min: 13150     avg: 13271     median: 13271 (31%)     max: 13392 Points
min: 19079     avg: 19888     median: 19888 (47%)     max: 20697 Points
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance GPU
min: 13370     avg: 13524     median: 13523.5 (22%)     max: 13677 Points
min: 23464     avg: 23574     median: 23574 (38%)     max: 23684 Points
SPECviewperf 12
specvp12 sw-03 + NVIDIA Quadro T2000 (Laptop)
SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 sw-03
106 fps (46%)
specvp12 sw-03 + NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 Max-Q
116 fps (50%)
specvp12 snx-02 + NVIDIA Quadro T2000 (Laptop)
SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 snx-02
91.1 fps (32%)
specvp12 snx-02 + NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 Max-Q
128 fps (45%)
specvp12 showcase-01 + NVIDIA Quadro T2000 (Laptop)
SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 showcase-01
43.9 fps (18%)
specvp12 showcase-01 + NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 Max-Q
96.6 fps (40%)
specvp12 maya-04 + NVIDIA Quadro T2000 (Laptop)
SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 maya-04
47.2 fps (20%)
specvp12 maya-04 + NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 Max-Q
77.6 fps (33%)
specvp12 creo-01 + NVIDIA Quadro T2000 (Laptop)
SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 creo-01
101 fps (58%)
specvp12 creo-01 + NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 Max-Q
131 fps (75%)
specvp12 catia-04 + NVIDIA Quadro T2000 (Laptop)
SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 catia-04
101 fps (35%)
specvp12 catia-04 + NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 Max-Q
122 fps (42%)
specvp12 3dsmax-05 + NVIDIA Quadro T2000 (Laptop)
SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 3dsmax-05
111 fps (34%)
specvp12 3dsmax-05 + NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 Max-Q
175 fps (53%)
SPECviewperf 13 specvp13 sw-04 + NVIDIA Quadro T2000 (Laptop)
SPECviewperf 13 - specvp13 sw-04
111 fps (51%)
specvp13 sw-04 + NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 Max-Q
min: 112.06     avg: 121     median: 121 (56%)     max: 130 fps
specvp13 snx-03 + NVIDIA Quadro T2000 (Laptop)
SPECviewperf 13 - specvp13 snx-03
167 fps (33%)
specvp13 snx-03 + NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 Max-Q
min: 225.45     avg: 245     median: 245.2 (48%)     max: 265 fps
specvp13 showcase-02 + NVIDIA Quadro T2000 (Laptop)
SPECviewperf 13 - specvp13 showcase-02
42.7 fps (18%)
specvp13 showcase-02 + NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 Max-Q
min: 89.26     avg: 92.9     median: 92.9 (39%)     max: 96.6 fps
specvp13 maya-05 + NVIDIA Quadro T2000 (Laptop)
SPECviewperf 13 - specvp13 maya-05
125 fps (27%)
specvp13 maya-05 + NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 Max-Q
min: 162     avg: 185     median: 185 (39%)     max: 208 fps
specvp13 creo-02 + NVIDIA Quadro T2000 (Laptop)
SPECviewperf 13 - specvp13 creo-02
120 fps (32%)
specvp13 creo-02 + NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 Max-Q
min: 162.13     avg: 186     median: 186.1 (50%)     max: 210 fps
specvp13 catia-05 + NVIDIA Quadro T2000 (Laptop)
SPECviewperf 13 - specvp13 catia-05
164 fps (35%)
specvp13 catia-05 + NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 Max-Q
min: 181.55     avg: 205     median: 204.8 (44%)     max: 228 fps
specvp13 3dsmax-06 + NVIDIA Quadro T2000 (Laptop)
SPECviewperf 13 - specvp13 3dsmax-06
111 fps (33%)
specvp13 3dsmax-06 + NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 Max-Q
min: 129.46     avg: 151     median: 150.7 (45%)     max: 172 fps
specvp13 medical-02 + NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 Max-Q
SPECviewperf 13 - specvp13 medical-02
81.9 fps (55%)
specvp13 energy-02 + NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 Max-Q
SPECviewperf 13 - specvp13 energy-02
35.3 fps (40%)
SPECviewperf 2020 specvp2020 solidworks-05 1080p + NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 Max-Q
SPECviewperf 2020 - specvp2020 solidworks-05 1080p
114 fps (75%)
specvp2020 snx-04 1080p + NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 Max-Q
SPECviewperf 2020 - specvp2020 snx-04 1080p
181 fps (98%)
specvp2020 medical-03 1080p + NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 Max-Q
SPECviewperf 2020 - specvp2020 medical-03 1080p
min: 38.33     avg: 38.3     median: 38.3 (100%)     max: 38.33000183105469 fps
specvp2020 maya-06 1080p + NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 Max-Q
SPECviewperf 2020 - specvp2020 maya-06 1080p
160 fps (72%)
specvp2020 energy-03 1080p + NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 Max-Q
SPECviewperf 2020 - specvp2020 energy-03 1080p
35.7 fps (100%)
specvp2020 creo-03 1080p + NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 Max-Q
SPECviewperf 2020 - specvp2020 creo-03 1080p
88.3 fps (87%)
specvp2020 catia-06 1080p + NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 Max-Q
SPECviewperf 2020 - specvp2020 catia-06 1080p
min: 60.47     avg: 60.5     median: 60.5 (100%)     max: 60.470001220703125 fps
specvp2020 3dsmax-07 1080p + NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 Max-Q
SPECviewperf 2020 - specvp2020 3dsmax-07 1080p
64.1 fps (74%)
specvp2020 solidworks-05 4k + NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 Max-Q
SPECviewperf 2020 - specvp2020 solidworks-05 4k
63.1 fps (19%)
specvp2020 snx-04 4k + NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 Max-Q
SPECviewperf 2020 - specvp2020 snx-04 4k
111 fps (24%)
specvp2020 medical-03 4k + NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 Max-Q
SPECviewperf 2020 - specvp2020 medical-03 4k
14.6 fps (28%)
specvp2020 maya-06 4k + NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 Max-Q
SPECviewperf 2020 - specvp2020 maya-06 4k
75.8 fps (17%)
specvp2020 energy-03 4k + NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 Max-Q
SPECviewperf 2020 - specvp2020 energy-03 4k
41.4 fps (47%)
specvp2020 creo-03 4k + NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 Max-Q
SPECviewperf 2020 - specvp2020 creo-03 4k
58.7 fps (36%)
specvp2020 catia-06 4k + NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 Max-Q
SPECviewperf 2020 - specvp2020 catia-06 4k
36 fps (30%)
specvp2020 3dsmax-07 4k + NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 Max-Q
SPECviewperf 2020 - specvp2020 3dsmax-07 4k
45.3 fps (27%)
Cinebench R15
Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64 Bit + NVIDIA Quadro T2000 (Laptop)
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64 Bit
203 fps (57%)
Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64 Bit + NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 Max-Q
min: 191     avg: 211     median: 210.5 (59%)     max: 230 fps
Cinebench R15 OpenGL Ref. Match 64 Bit + NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 Max-Q
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 OpenGL Ref. Match 64 Bit
99.6 % (100%)
Power Consumption - Furmark Stress Test Power Consumption - external Monitor *
149 Watt (27%)
Power Consumption - The Witcher 3 Power Consumption - external Monitor *
153 Watt (26%)
Power Consumption - Witcher 3 Power Consumption *
168 Watt (37%)

Average Benchmarks NVIDIA Quadro T2000 (Laptop) → 100% n=17

Average Benchmarks NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 Max-Q → 148% n=17

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Game Benchmarks

The following benchmarks stem from our benchmarks of review laptops. The performance depends on the used graphics memory, clock rate, processor, system settings, drivers, and operating systems. So the results don't have to be representative for all laptops with this GPU. For detailed information on the benchmark results, click on the fps number.

low 1280x720
Quadro RTX 4000 Max-Q:
93.3  fps
med. 1920x1080
Quadro RTX 4000 Max-Q:
78.8  fps
high 1920x1080
Quadro RTX 4000 Max-Q:
66.2  fps
4K 3840x2160
Quadro RTX 4000 Max-Q:
45.3  fps
low 1280x720
Quadro RTX 4000 Max-Q:
118  fps
med. 1920x1080
Quadro RTX 4000 Max-Q:
86.5  fps
high 1920x1080
Quadro RTX 4000 Max-Q:
68.3  fps
QHD 2560x1440
Quadro RTX 4000 Max-Q:
46.3  fps
4K 3840x2160
Quadro RTX 4000 Max-Q:
29.7  fps
low 1280x720
Quadro RTX 4000 Max-Q:
131 fps  fps
med. 1366x768
Quadro RTX 4000 Max-Q:
116 fps  fps
high 1920x1080
Quadro RTX 4000 Max-Q:
107 fps  fps
ultra 1920x1080
Quadro RTX 4000 Max-Q:
101 fps  fps
4K 3840x2160
Quadro RTX 4000 Max-Q:
65 fps  fps
low 1024x768
Quadro RTX 4000 Max-Q:
221  fps
med. 1366x768
Quadro RTX 4000 Max-Q:
178  fps
high 1920x1080
Quadro RTX 4000 Max-Q:
115  fps
ultra 1920x1080
Quadro RTX 4000 Max-Q:
62.6 fps  fps
4K 3840x2160
Quadro RTX 4000 Max-Q:
36  fps

For more games that might be playable and a list of all games and graphics cards visit our Gaming List

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:

show all (including archived), 2021, 2020
v1.16
log 18. 16:33:40

#0 checking url part for id 9858 +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 9882 +0s ... 0s

#2 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#3 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Fri, 17 Sep 2021 17:22:03 +0200 +0s ... 0s

#4 composed specs +0.063s ... 0.064s

#5 did output specs +0s ... 0.064s

#6 start showIntegratedCPUs +0s ... 0.064s

#7 getting avg benchmarks for device 9858 +0.026s ... 0.09s

#8 got single benchmarks 9858 +0.008s ... 0.097s

#9 getting avg benchmarks for device 9882 +0.005s ... 0.102s

#10 got single benchmarks 9882 +0.006s ... 0.108s

#11 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.108s

#12 min, max, avg, median took s +0.02s ... 0.128s

#13 before gaming benchmark output +0s ... 0.128s

#14 Got 19 rows for game benchmarks. +0.004s ... 0.132s

#15 composed SQL query for gamebenchmarks +0s ... 0.132s

#16 got data and put it in $dataArray +0s ... 0.132s

#17 benchmarks composed for output. +0.005s ... 0.137s

#18 calculated avg scores. +0s ... 0.137s

#19 return log +0.003s ... 0.14s

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Notebook / Laptop Reviews and News > Benchmarks / Tech > Graphics Card Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2017-09-11)