, , , , , ,
search relation.
, , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,
 

NVIDIA Quadro NVS 160M vs NVIDIA Quadro NVS 110M

NVIDIA Quadro NVS 160M

► remove from comparison NVIDIA Quadro NVS 160M

The Nvidia Quadro NVS 150M is a business graphics adapater for notebooks. It is based on the GeForce 9300M GS consumer graphics card but features special drivers which are optimized for business applications. A short list of the applications which are certified for the NVS line can be found here (including MS Office, Exceed, Notes, McAffee, pcAnywhere, Bloomberg, Reuters, Tradestation).

The gaming performance should be similar to the GeForce 9300M GS and therefore only suited for less demanding games with low details. Still the business drivers are not optimized for games and may therefore show a worse performance (or some bugs). The memory is clocked either with 700 MHz (DDR3) or 400 MHz (DDR2) which is noticable slower.

Compared to the Quadro NVS 150M, the 160M features a higher clock speed and supports higher resolutions up to 1920x1200 (digital) or 2048x1536 (analog).

As the 9300M GS, the Quadro NVS 160M also supports PureVideo HD to decode HD videos with the graphics chip (and save current).

NVIDIA Quadro NVS 110M

► remove from comparison NVIDIA Quadro NVS 110M

It is based on the GeForce Go 7300 with professional certified graphics drivers for applications like CAD, Rendering, 3D modelling, etc. The usability for games is limited. It is the smaller version of the NVIDIA Quadro NVS 120M for notebooks.

NVIDIA Quadro NVS 160MNVIDIA Quadro NVS 110M
ManufacturerNVIDIANVIDIA
Quadro NVS Series
Quadro NVS 5100M compare 48 @ 0.55 GHz128 Bit @ 800 MHz
Quadro NVS 320M compare 32 @ 0.58 GHz128 Bit @ 700 MHz
Quadro NVS 300M compare 8/5 cores @ 0.45 GHz128 Bit @ 500 MHz
Quadro NVS 140M compare 16 @ 0.4 GHz64 Bit @ 700 MHz
Quadro NVS 160M 8 @ 0.58 GHz64 Bit @ 700 MHz
Quadro NVS 150M compare 8 @ 0.53 GHz64 Bit @ 700 MHz
Quadro NVS 135M compare 16 @ 0.4 GHz64 Bit @ 600 MHz
Quadro NVS 130M compare 8 64 Bit @ 700 MHz
Quadro NVS 120M compare 4/3 cores @ 0.45 GHz64 Bit @ 700 MHz
Quadro NVS 110M 4/3 cores @ 0.3 GHz64 Bit @ 600 MHz
Quadro NVS 5100M compare 48 @ 0.55 GHz128 Bit @ 800 MHz
Quadro NVS 320M compare 32 @ 0.58 GHz128 Bit @ 700 MHz
Quadro NVS 300M compare 8/5 cores @ 0.45 GHz128 Bit @ 500 MHz
Quadro NVS 140M compare 16 @ 0.4 GHz64 Bit @ 700 MHz
Quadro NVS 160M 8 @ 0.58 GHz64 Bit @ 700 MHz
Quadro NVS 150M compare 8 @ 0.53 GHz64 Bit @ 700 MHz
Quadro NVS 135M compare 16 @ 0.4 GHz64 Bit @ 600 MHz
Quadro NVS 130M compare 8 64 Bit @ 700 MHz
Quadro NVS 120M compare 4/3 cores @ 0.45 GHz64 Bit @ 700 MHz
Quadro NVS 110M 4/3 cores @ 0.3 GHz64 Bit @ 600 MHz
Pipelines8 - unified4 / 3 Pixel- / Vertexshader
Core Speed580 MHz300 MHz
Shader Speed1450 MHz
Memory Speed700 MHz600 MHz
Memory Bus Width64 Bit64 Bit
Memory TypeGDDR2, GDDR3DDR-3
Max. Amount of Memory256 MB64 MB
Shared Memorynono
DirectXDirectX 10, Shader 4.0DirectX 9c, Shader 3.0
technology65 nm90 nm
Date of Announcement15.08.2008 01.06.2006
InformationOpenGL 2.1, max. 1920x1200 (digital) bzw 2048x1536 (analog), max. 2 unabhängige Displays, PCI-Express x16, optionale Interfaces (des Chips): DP, VGA, DVI, LVDS, HDMI90nm, 112 Mio Transistoren, PCI-E
Link to Manufacturer Pagehttp://www.nvidia.com/object/quadro_nvs_...http://www.nvidia.com/page/quadronvs_not...
CodenameG72M
Transistors112 Million
FeaturesPureVideo, UltraShadow II, Intellisample 4.0, CineFX 4.0, PowerMizer 6.0, High Dynamic-Range (HDR) Lighning

Benchmarks

3DMark 2001SE - 3DMark 2001 - Standard
13740 Points (14%)
11000 Points (11%)
3DMark 03 - 3DMark 03 - Standard
min: 5278     avg: 5911     median: 5911 (3%)     max: 6544 Points
min: 3300     avg: 3686     median: 3685.5 (2%)     max: 4071 Points
3DMark 05 - 3DMark 05 - Standard
min: 3250     avg: 3587     median: 3586.5 (5%)     max: 3923 Points
1500 Points (2%)
3DMark 06 3DMark 06 - Standard 1280x800 + NVIDIA Quadro NVS 160M
3DMark 06
min: 1698     avg: 1939     median: 1841 (3%)     max: 2278 Points
3DMark 06 - Score Unknown Settings + NVIDIA Quadro NVS 110M
3DMark 06
590 (1%)
3DMark 06 - Standard 1280x1024 + NVIDIA Quadro NVS 110M
3DMark 06
600 Points (1%)
Cinebench R10 Cinebench R10 Shading (32bit) + NVIDIA Quadro NVS 160M
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Shading (32bit)
min: 2663     avg: 2864     median: 2923 (14%)     max: 3006

Average Benchmarks NVIDIA Quadro NVS 160M → 100% n=3

Average Benchmarks NVIDIA Quadro NVS 110M → 61% n=3

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Game Benchmarks

The following benchmarks stem from our benchmarks of review laptops. The performance depends on the used graphics memory, clock rate, processor, system settings, drivers, and operating systems. So the results don't have to be representative for all laptops with this GPU. For detailed information on the benchmark results, click on the fps number.

F.E.A.R.

F.E.A.R.

2005
low 640x480
100%
Quadro NVS 160M:
297  fps
med. 800x600
100%
Quadro NVS 160M:
58  fps
high 1024x768
100%
Quadro NVS 160M:
13  fps
Doom 3

Doom 3

2004
low 640x480
100%
Quadro NVS 160M:
106.4  fps
med. 640x480
100%
Quadro NVS 160M:
106.6  fps
high 800x600
100%
Quadro NVS 160M:
78.5  fps
ultra 1024x768
100%
Quadro NVS 160M:
49.8  fps
Quake 3 Arena - Timedemo

Quake 3 Arena - Timedemo

1999
high 1024x768
100%
Quadro NVS 160M:
210.7  fps

Average Gaming NVIDIA Quadro NVS 160M → 100%

Average Gaming 30-70 fps → 100%

For more games that might be playable and a list of all games and graphics cards visit our Gaming List

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:

show all (including archived), 2021, 2020
v1.16
log 31. 09:20:49

#0 checking url part for id 879 +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 39 +0s ... 0s

#2 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#3 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Thu, 29 Jul 2021 17:21:20 +0200 +0s ... 0s

#4 composed specs +0.041s ... 0.041s

#5 did output specs +0s ... 0.041s

#6 start showIntegratedCPUs +0s ... 0.041s

#7 getting avg benchmarks for device 879 +0.023s ... 0.065s

#8 got single benchmarks 879 +0.006s ... 0.07s

#9 getting avg benchmarks for device 39 +0s ... 0.071s

#10 got single benchmarks 39 +0.005s ... 0.076s

#11 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.076s

#12 min, max, avg, median took s +0.003s ... 0.079s

#13 before gaming benchmark output +0s ... 0.079s

#14 Got 8 rows for game benchmarks. +0.002s ... 0.081s

#15 composed SQL query for gamebenchmarks +0s ... 0.081s

#16 got data and put it in $dataArray +0.001s ... 0.082s

#17 benchmarks composed for output. +0.002s ... 0.084s

#18 calculated avg scores. +0s ... 0.084s

#19 return log +0.003s ... 0.087s

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Notebook / Laptop Reviews and News > Benchmarks / Tech > Graphics Card Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2017-09-11)