ERROR: No GPU found with the ID:140

getGPUInfos: Perhaps the translation is missing or the German GPU is not selected in the page header (or a wrong one is selected) NVIDIA Quadro NVS 140M vs vs Vivante GC800
Notebookcheck Logo

NVIDIA Quadro NVS 140M vs vs Vivante GC800

NVIDIA Quadro NVS 140M

► remove from comparison

The NVIDIA Quadro NVS 140M is a business entry-level graphics card for laptop. It is based on the GeForce 8500M GT consumer graphics card and designed for the business sector providing enhanced compatibility and stability. Regarding performance it should be comparable to a 8400M GT, but, might rate a little lower, because of the drivers that emphasize on stability.  Therefore, the NVS 140M provides only entry-level 3D performance.

► remove from comparison

Vivante GC800

► remove from comparison

The Vivante GC800 is an integrated graphics card for ARM based (e.g. Rockchip RK291x) and MIPS based (e.g. Actions ATM701x) SoCs. It offers a single VEC-4 (or in other words four VEC-1) unified shaders and supports OpenGL ES 2.0 (optional ES 3.0), OpenGL 2.0, OpenVG 1.1, DirectX 9_3 (optional) and OpenCL 1.2 (optional). The clock rate can be choosen between 315 and 575 MHz in 40nm designs and up to 800 MHz in 28nm designs.

show full text
NVIDIA Quadro NVS 140MVivante GC800
Series
Quadro NVS 5100M 48 @ 0.55 GHz128 Bit @ 800 MHz
Quadro NVS 320M 32 @ 0.58 GHz128 Bit @ 700 MHz
Quadro NVS 300M 8/5 cores @ 0.45 GHz128 Bit @ 500 MHz
Quadro NVS 140M 16 @ 0.4 GHz64 Bit @ 700 MHz
Quadro NVS 160M 8 @ 0.58 GHz64 Bit @ 700 MHz
Quadro NVS 150M 8 @ 0.53 GHz64 Bit @ 700 MHz
Quadro NVS 135M 16 @ 0.4 GHz64 Bit @ 600 MHz
Quadro NVS 130M 8 64 Bit @ 700 MHz
Quadro NVS 120M 4/3 cores @ 0.45 GHz64 Bit @ 700 MHz
Quadro NVS 110M 4/3 cores @ 0.3 GHz64 Bit @ 600 MHz
Vivante GC1000+ Dual-Core 2 @ 0.6 GHz
GC800 1 @ 0.32 - 0.58 GHz
Extreme Graphics 2 @ 0.13 GHz
PXP
unknown
CodenameG84M
Pipelines16 - unified1 - unified
Core Speed400 MHz315 - 575 (Boost) MHz
Shader Speed800 MHz
Memory Speed700 MHz
Memory Bus Width64 Bit
Memory TypeGDDR3, GDDR2
Max. Amount of Memory256 MB
Shared Memoryyesyes
APIDirectX 10, Shader 4.0OpenGL ES 2.0
Power Consumption10 Watt
Transistors210 Million
technology80 nm28 nm
FeaturesVGA, DVI-D, LVDS, HDTV, HDMI screen connections, max 2 per card, nView, PCI-e 16x
Date of Announcement09.05.2007 01.01.2012
Link to Manufacturer Pagewww.nvidia.comwww.vivantecorp.com
CPU in GC800GPU Base SpeedGPU Boost / Turbo
Rockchip RK2918 1.2 GHz1 x 1200 MHz? MHz? MHz
Rockchip RK29181 x 1000 MHz? MHz? MHz
min. - max.? MHz? MHz

Benchmarks

3DMark 2001SE - 3DMark 2001 - Standard
min: 7396     avg: 12268     median: 13071.5 (14%)     max: 13747 Points
3DMark 03 - 3DMark 03 - Standard
min: 3185     avg: 4557     median: 5242 (3%)     max: 5244 Points
3DMark 05 - 3DMark 05 - Standard
min: 1969     avg: 2943     median: 3127.5 (3%)     max: 3177 Points
3DMark 06 3DMark 06 - Score Unknown Settings + NVIDIA Quadro NVS 140M
3DMark 06
min: 1281     avg: 1491     median: 1614 (2%)     max: 1640 Points
3DMark 06 - Standard 1280x1024 + NVIDIA Quadro NVS 140M
3DMark 06
1410 Points (2%)
3DMark 06 - Standard 1024x768 + NVIDIA Quadro NVS 140M
3DMark 06
1406 Points (2%)
Cinebench R10 Cinebench R10 Shading (32bit) + NVIDIA Quadro NVS 140M
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Shading (32bit)
2408 Points (2%)
Cinebench R11.5 Cinebench R11.5 OpenGL 64 Bit + NVIDIA Quadro NVS 140M
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 OpenGL 64 Bit
4 fps (1%)
AnTuTu 3DRating - Antutu 3DRating Off-screen
100%
1 GC800 +
1899 Points (66%)
AnTuTu 3DRating - Antutu 3DRating Score
100%
1 GC800 +
3546 Points (31%)
AnTuTu v3 - AnTuTu v3 GPU
100%
1 GC800 +
4199 Points (44%)
Basemark ES 2.0 - Basemark ES 2.0
100%
1 GC800 +
29.1 fps (48%)
NenaMark2 - NenaMark2 Score
100%
1 GC800 +
59.8 fps (89%)
Smartbench 2012 - Smartbench 2012 Gaming Index
100%
1 GC800 +
min: 1254     avg: 1911     median: 1259 (27%)     max: 3219 Points

Average Benchmarks NVIDIA Quadro NVS 140M → 0% n=

Average Benchmarks Vivante GC800 → 0% n=

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Game Benchmarks

The following benchmarks stem from our benchmarks of review laptops. The performance depends on the used graphics memory, clock rate, processor, system settings, drivers, and operating systems. So the results don't have to be representative for all laptops with this GPU. For detailed information on the benchmark results, click on the fps number.

Fifa 11

Fifa 11

2010
low 800x600
100%
Quadro NVS 140M:
121.5  fps
med. 1024x768
100%
Quadro NVS 140M:
43.9  fps
high 1360x768
100%
Quadro NVS 140M:
21.8  fps
ultra 1920x1080
100%
Quadro NVS 140M:
5.6  fps
F.E.A.R.

F.E.A.R.

2005
low 640x480
100%
Quadro NVS 140M:
59 278 309 ~ 215 fps
med. 800x600
100%
Quadro NVS 140M:
55 57 ~ 56 fps
high 1024x768
100%
Quadro NVS 140M:
16 17 ~ 17 fps
Doom 3

Doom 3

2004
low 640x480
100%
Quadro NVS 140M:
86.8 99.9 102 ~ 96 fps
med. 640x480
100%
Quadro NVS 140M:
95.7 100.3 102 ~ 99 fps
high 800x600
100%
Quadro NVS 140M:
64.7 65.6 65.7 ~ 65 fps
ultra 1024x768
100%
Quadro NVS 140M:
25.4 31.4 39.1 39.5 ~ 34 fps
Quake 3 Arena - Timedemo

Quake 3 Arena - Timedemo

1999
high 1024x768
100%
Quadro NVS 140M:
127.5  fps

Average Gaming NVIDIA Quadro NVS 140M → 100%

Average Gaming 30-70 fps → 100%

NVIDIA Quadro NVS 140Mlowmed.highultraQHD4K
Fifa 11121.543.921.85.6
F.E.A.R.2155617
Doom 396996534
Quake 3 Arena - Timedemo127.5
< 30 fps
< 60 fps
< 120 fps
≥ 120 fps

1
2
2
1
2

1
1		1
1







For more games that might be playable and a list of all games and graphics cards visit our Gaming List

v1.26
log 25. 05:56:34

#0 checking url part for id 85 +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 140 +0s ... 0s

#2 checking url part for id 3156 +0s ... 0s

#3 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#4 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Thu, 25 Apr 2024 05:40:10 +0200 +0.001s ... 0.001s

#5 composed specs +0.157s ... 0.158s

#6 did output specs +0s ... 0.158s

#7 start showIntegratedCPUs +0s ... 0.158s

#8 getting avg benchmarks for device 85 +0.042s ... 0.2s

#9 got single benchmarks 85 +0.016s ... 0.216s

#10 getting avg benchmarks for device 140 +0.002s ... 0.218s

#11 got single benchmarks 140 +0s ... 0.219s

#12 getting avg benchmarks for device 3156 +0.002s ... 0.22s

#13 got single benchmarks 3156 +0.011s ... 0.231s

#14 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.231s

#15 min, max, avg, median took s +0.182s ... 0.413s

#16 before gaming benchmark output +0s ... 0.413s

#17 Got 25 rows for game benchmarks. +0.005s ... 0.418s

#18 composed SQL query for gamebenchmarks +0s ... 0.418s

#19 got data and put it in $dataArray +0.003s ... 0.421s

#20 benchmarks composed for output. +0.012s ... 0.433s

#21 calculated avg scores. +0s ... 0.433s

#22 return log +0.002s ... 0.436s

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Graphics Card Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)