, , , , , ,
search relation.
, , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,
 

NVIDIA Quadro M600M vs NVIDIA Quadro M520

NVIDIA Quadro M600M

► remove from comparison NVIDIA Quadro M600M

The 28nm NVIDIA Quadro M600M is an entry-level DirectX 12 (FL 11_0) and OpenGL 4.5-compatible graphics card for mobile workstations. It is a 1st generation Maxwell GPU that is most likely built on the GM107 architecture with 384 of the 640 shader cores activated. Compared to the older Quadro K620M and consumer GeForce 940M, the GPU offers a 128-Bit memory bus that separates it from the GM108-based K620M. The M600M typically comes with 2 GB GDDR5 VRAM clocked at 1250 MHz (5000 MHz effective at 80 GB/s instead of 16 GB/s on the K620M). 

In the Lenovo Thinkpad P70 the M600M is clocked at 837 - 876 MHz (Boost) for the shaders, and 1253 MHz (5012 MHz effektive) for the 2 GB GDDR5 from Samsung (thanks to our reader John for the GPU-Z screenshot).

The Quadro series offers certified drivers that are optimized for stability and performance in professional applications like CAD or DCC. OpenGL performance, for example, should be significantly better compared to GeForce graphics cards of similar specifications.

Performance

The Quadro M600M is about 20% faster than the previous Quadro K620M thanks to the wider 128-bit memory interface and pretty much right between the siblings Quadro M500M & Quadro M1000M. The consumer GPU GeForce 940MX is beaten by ~10-15%, while the GeForce GTX 950M is another 20% faster.

Using CUDA (Compute Capability 5.0) or OpenCL 1.2, the cores of the Quadro M600M can be used for general calculations.

Power Consumption

The power consumption of the Quadro M600M is rated at the same 30 Watt TGP as the K620M including the board and memory components. Therefore, the card is also suited for thin and light notebooks.

NVIDIA Quadro M520

► remove from comparison

The Nvidia Quadro M520 is a DirectX 12 (FL 11_0) and OpenGL 4.5-compatible graphics card for mobile workstations. It is a Maxwell-based GPU built on the GM108 chip with 384 shader cores and manufactured in 28 nm by TSMC. That means its similar to the Quadro M500M (DDR3) but uses faster GDDR5 memory. The GeForce 940MX with GDDR5 memory is the consumer variant of the Quadro M520.

The Quadro series offers certified drivers that are optimized for stability and performance in professional applications like CAD or DCC. OpenGL performance, for example, should be significantly better than with GeForce graphics cards of similar specifications.

Architecture

Compared to Kepler, Maxwell has been optimized in several details to increase power efficiency. Smaller Streaming Multiprocessors (SMM) with only 128 ALUs (Kepler: 192) and an optimized scheduler should lead to better utilization of the shaders. Nvidia promises that a Maxwell SMM with 128 ALUs can offer 90% of the performance of a Kepler SMX with 192 ALUs. GM108 features 3 SMMs and thus 384 shader cores, 24 TMUs and 8 ROPs (64-bit interface).

Another optimization is the massively enlarged L2 cache. The larger size can reduce some of the memory traffic to allow for a relatively narrow memory interface without significantly hurting performance.

GM108 supports DirectX 11.2 (feature level 11.0 only) as well as DirectX 12.

Performance

Currently the clock speeds are not known of the M520 variant. They should be similar to the consumer 940 MX with GDDR5. Therefore, the performance should be similar to the Quadro K620M.

Features

The feature set should include support for up to four active displays. High-resolution monitors of up to 3840x2160 pixels can be connected using DisplayPort 1.2 or HDMI 1.4a (HDMI 2.0 not supported). HD-Audio codecs, such as Dolby TrueHD and DTS-HD, can be transmitted via bitstream mode through the HDMI port. However, as most laptops will feature Optimus, the integrated GPU will likely have direct control over the display ports and may limit the feature set available by the Nvidia Kepler cards.

Using CUDA or OpenCL, the cores of the Quadro M520 can be used for general calculations.

GM108 integrates the sixth generation of the PureVideo HD video engine (VP6), offering a better decoding performance for H.264 and MPEG-2 videos. Of course, VP6 supports all features of previous generations (4K support, PIP, video encoding via NVENC API).

Power Consumption

The power consumption of the Quadro M520 is rated at 25 Watt TGP (max power consumption including memory and board). That is slightly below the M500M that is rated at 30 Watt. Therefore, the GPU is best suited for laptops 13 - 14-inches in size and above. The M500M also supports Optimus to automatically switch between an integrated graphics card and the Nvidia GPU.

NVIDIA Quadro M600MNVIDIA Quadro M520
ManufacturerNVIDIANVIDIA
Quadro M Series
Quadro M5500 compare 2048 @ 1.14 - 1.14 GHz256 Bit @ 6606 MHz
Quadro M5000M compare 1536 @ 0.96 - 1.05 GHz256 Bit @ 5000 MHz
Quadro M4000M compare 1280 @ 0.98 - 1.01 GHz256 Bit @ 5012 MHz
Quadro M3000M compare 1024 @ 1.05 GHz256 Bit @ 5000 MHz
Quadro M2200 compare 1024 @ 0.69 - 1.04 GHz128 Bit @ 5508 MHz
Quadro M1200 compare 640 @ 0.99 - 1.15 GHz128 Bit @ 5000 MHz
Quadro M2000M compare 640 @ 1.04 - 1.2 GHz128 Bit @ 5000 MHz
Quadro M1000M compare 512 @ 0.99 - 1.07 GHz128 Bit @ 5000 MHz
Quadro M620 compare 512 @ 1.02 GHz128 Bit @ 5012 MHz
Quadro 5010M compare 384 @ 0.45 GHz256 Bit @ 1300 MHz
Quadro 4000M compare 336 @ 0.48 GHz256 Bit @ 1200 MHz
Quadro M520 384 @ 0.76 - 1.02 GHz64 Bit
Quadro M600M 384 @ 0.84 - 0.88 GHz128 Bit @ 5012 MHz
Quadro M500M compare 384 @ 1.03 - 1.12 GHz64 Bit @ 4004 MHz
Quadro 5000M compare 320 @ 0.41 GHz256 Bit @ 1200 MHz
Quadro 3000M compare 240 @ 0.45 GHz256 Bit @ 625 MHz
Quadro 2000M compare 192 @ 0.55 GHz128 Bit @ 900 MHz
Quadro 1000M compare 96 @ 0.7 GHz128 Bit @ 900 MHz
Quadro M5500 compare 2048 @ 1.14 - 1.14 GHz256 Bit @ 6606 MHz
Quadro M5000M compare 1536 @ 0.96 - 1.05 GHz256 Bit @ 5000 MHz
Quadro M4000M compare 1280 @ 0.98 - 1.01 GHz256 Bit @ 5012 MHz
Quadro M3000M compare 1024 @ 1.05 GHz256 Bit @ 5000 MHz
Quadro M2200 compare 1024 @ 0.69 - 1.04 GHz128 Bit @ 5508 MHz
Quadro M1200 compare 640 @ 0.99 - 1.15 GHz128 Bit @ 5000 MHz
Quadro M2000M compare 640 @ 1.04 - 1.2 GHz128 Bit @ 5000 MHz
Quadro M1000M compare 512 @ 0.99 - 1.07 GHz128 Bit @ 5000 MHz
Quadro M620 compare 512 @ 1.02 GHz128 Bit @ 5012 MHz
Quadro 5010M compare 384 @ 0.45 GHz256 Bit @ 1300 MHz
Quadro 4000M compare 336 @ 0.48 GHz256 Bit @ 1200 MHz
Quadro M520 384 @ 0.76 - 1.02 GHz64 Bit
Quadro M600M 384 @ 0.84 - 0.88 GHz128 Bit @ 5012 MHz
Quadro M500M compare 384 @ 1.03 - 1.12 GHz64 Bit @ 4004 MHz
Quadro 5000M compare 320 @ 0.41 GHz256 Bit @ 1200 MHz
Quadro 3000M compare 240 @ 0.45 GHz256 Bit @ 625 MHz
Quadro 2000M compare 192 @ 0.55 GHz128 Bit @ 900 MHz
Quadro 1000M compare 96 @ 0.7 GHz128 Bit @ 900 MHz
ArchitectureMaxwellMaxwell
Pipelines384 - unified384 - unified
Core Speed837 - 876 (Boost) MHz756 - 1019 (Boost) MHz
Memory Speed5012 MHz
Memory Bus Width128 Bit64 Bit
Memory TypeGDDR5GDDR5
Max. Amount of Memory2048 MB1024 MB
Shared Memorynono
DirectXDirectX 12 (FL 11_0), Shader 5.0DirectX 12 (FL 11_0), Shader 5.0
technology28 nm28 nm
FeaturesOptimus, PhysX, 3D Vision Pro, nView, OptimusOptimus, PhysX, 3D Vision Pro, nView, Optimus
Notebook Sizelargemedium sized
Date of Announcement02.10.2015 13.01.2017
Link to Manufacturer Pagehttp://www.nvidia.com/object/quadro-for-...http://www.nvidia.de/object/mobile-works...

Benchmarks

Performance Rating - 3DMark 11 + Fire Strike + Time Spy - Quadro M600M
8.4 pt (9%)
Performance Rating - 3DMark 11 + Fire Strike + Time Spy - Quadro M520
5.4 pt (6%)
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy Score
719 Points (4%)
684 Points (4%)
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy Graphics
631 Points (3%)
614 Points (3%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics
166193 Points (26%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Extreme Graphics
66347 Points (9%)
20741 Points (3%)
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Score
13310 Points (18%)
8544 Points (11%)
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Graphics
18491 Points (9%)
13394 Points (7%)
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Score
2322 Points (6%)
2139 Points (5%)
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Graphics
2430 Points (5%)
2342 Points (5%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Graphics
73348 Points (10%)
33703 Points (4%)
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Score
3216 Points (8%)
2884 Points (7%)
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance GPU
2911 Points (5%)
2658 Points (4%)
3DMark Vantage
3DM Vant. Perf. total + NVIDIA Quadro M600M
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. total
12734 Points (12%)
3DM Vant. Perf. total + NVIDIA Quadro M520
11278 Points (11%)
3DM Vant. Perf. GPU no PhysX + NVIDIA Quadro M600M
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. GPU no PhysX
10958 Points (10%)
3DM Vant. Perf. GPU no PhysX + NVIDIA Quadro M520
10861 Points (10%)
3DMark 06 3DMark 06 - Standard 1280x1024 + NVIDIA Quadro M600M
3DMark 06
20563 Points (38%)
3DMark 06 - Standard 1280x1024 + NVIDIA Quadro M520
17305 Points (32%)
Unigine Valley 1.0 - Unigine Valley 1.0 DX
11.4 fps (6%)
Unigine Heaven 3.0 - Unigine Heaven 3.0 DX 11
27.9 fps (9%)
Unigine Heaven 3.0 - Unigine Heaven 3.0 OpenGL
28.8 fps (13%)
Unigine Heaven 2.1 - Heaven 2.1 high
39.5 fps (7%)
SPECviewperf 11
specvp11 snx-01 + NVIDIA Quadro M600M
SPECviewperf 11 - specvp11 snx-01
34.2 fps (24%)
specvp11 snx-01 + NVIDIA Quadro M520
31.3 fps (22%)
specvp11 tcvis-02 + NVIDIA Quadro M600M
SPECviewperf 11 - specvp11 tcvis-02
36.7 fps (61%)
specvp11 tcvis-02 + NVIDIA Quadro M520
35.8 fps (60%)
specvp11 sw-02 + NVIDIA Quadro M600M
SPECviewperf 11 - specvp11 sw-02
47.5 fps (57%)
specvp11 sw-02 + NVIDIA Quadro M520
43.7 fps (53%)
specvp11 proe-05 + NVIDIA Quadro M600M
SPECviewperf 11 - specvp11 proe-05
16.4 fps (68%)
specvp11 proe-05 + NVIDIA Quadro M520
16.8 fps (70%)
specvp11 maya-03 + NVIDIA Quadro M600M
SPECviewperf 11 - specvp11 maya-03
51.9 fps (39%)
specvp11 maya-03 + NVIDIA Quadro M520
50.8 fps (38%)
specvp11 lightwave-01 + NVIDIA Quadro M600M
SPECviewperf 11 - specvp11 lightwave-01
52.3 fps (56%)
specvp11 lightwave-01 + NVIDIA Quadro M520
48.3 fps (52%)
specvp11 ensight-04 + NVIDIA Quadro M600M
SPECviewperf 11 - specvp11 ensight-04
27.6 fps (13%)
specvp11 ensight-04 + NVIDIA Quadro M520
24.8 fps (12%)
specvp11 catia-03 + NVIDIA Quadro M600M
SPECviewperf 11 - specvp11 catia-03
45.1 fps (55%)
specvp11 catia-03 + NVIDIA Quadro M520
40.5 fps (49%)
SPECviewperf 12
specvp12 sw-03 + NVIDIA Quadro M600M
SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 sw-03
52.4 fps (23%)
specvp12 sw-03 + NVIDIA Quadro M520
45.9 fps (20%)
specvp12 snx-02 + NVIDIA Quadro M600M
SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 snx-02
24.8 fps (9%)
specvp12 snx-02 + NVIDIA Quadro M520
24.1 fps (9%)
specvp12 showcase-01 + NVIDIA Quadro M600M
SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 showcase-01
17.2 fps (7%)
specvp12 showcase-01 + NVIDIA Quadro M520
11.8 fps (5%)
specvp12 mediacal-01 + NVIDIA Quadro M600M
SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 mediacal-01
7.5 fps (5%)
specvp12 mediacal-01 + NVIDIA Quadro M520
8.3 fps (5%)
specvp12 maya-04 + NVIDIA Quadro M600M
SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 maya-04
22 fps (9%)
specvp12 maya-04 + NVIDIA Quadro M520
19.5 fps (8%)
specvp12 energy-01 + NVIDIA Quadro M600M
SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 energy-01
0.5 fps (1%)
specvp12 energy-01 + NVIDIA Quadro M520
0.5 fps (1%)
specvp12 creo-01 + NVIDIA Quadro M600M
SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 creo-01
31.7 fps (18%)
specvp12 creo-01 + NVIDIA Quadro M520
28 fps (16%)
specvp12 catia-04 + NVIDIA Quadro M600M
SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 catia-04
27.6 fps (9%)
specvp12 catia-04 + NVIDIA Quadro M520
26.2 fps (9%)
specvp12 3dsmax-05 + NVIDIA Quadro M520
SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 3dsmax-05
19.7 fps (6%)
Cinebench R10 Cinebench R10 Shading (32bit) + NVIDIA Quadro M600M
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Shading (32bit)
6832 (32%)
Cinebench R10 Shading (32bit) + NVIDIA Quadro M520
6813 (32%)
Cinebench R11.5 Cinebench R11.5 OpenGL 64 Bit + NVIDIA Quadro M600M
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 OpenGL 64 Bit
67.1 fps (29%)
Cinebench R11.5 OpenGL 64 Bit + NVIDIA Quadro M520
70.9 fps (30%)
Cinebench R15
Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64 Bit + NVIDIA Quadro M600M
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64 Bit
75.2 fps (21%)
Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64 Bit + NVIDIA Quadro M520
75.5 fps (21%)
Cinebench R15 OpenGL Ref. Match 64 Bit + NVIDIA Quadro M600M
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 OpenGL Ref. Match 64 Bit
99.6 % (100%)
Cinebench R15 OpenGL Ref. Match 64 Bit + NVIDIA Quadro M520
99.6 % (100%)
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
GLBench 2.7 T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 + NVIDIA Quadro M520
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 - GLBench 2.7 T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16
179 fps (1%)
GLBench 2.7 T-Rex HD Onscreen C24Z16 + NVIDIA Quadro M520
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 - GLBench 2.7 T-Rex HD Onscreen C24Z16
53.8 fps (2%)
GFXBench 3.0 - GFXBench 3.0 Manhattan Offscreen
104 fps (11%)
95.4 fps (10%)
GFXBench 3.0 - GFXBench 3.0 Manhattan
59.4 fps (16%)
27.3 fps (7%)
GFXBench - GFXBench Car Chase Offscreen
49.8 fps (0%)
53.1 fps (0%)
GFXBench - GFXBench Car Chase Onscreen
45.9 fps (1%)
11.6 fps (0%)
LuxMark v2.0 64Bit - LuxMark v2.0 Room GPU
484 Samples/s (5%)
405 Samples/s (4%)
LuxMark v2.0 64Bit - LuxMark v2.0 Sala GPU
1016 Samples/s (3%)
708 Samples/s (2%)
ComputeMark v2.1 - ComputeMark v2.1 Result
1754 (4%)
2045 (4%)
Power Consumption - Furmark Stress Test Power Consumption - external Monitor *
59.5 Watt (11%)
34.6 Watt (6%)
Power Consumption - The Witcher 3 Power Consumption - external Monitor *
48.6 Watt (8%)
43.4 Watt (7%)

Average Benchmarks NVIDIA Quadro M600M → 100% n=40

Average Benchmarks NVIDIA Quadro M520 → 87% n=40

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Game Benchmarks

The following benchmarks stem from our benchmarks of review laptops. The performance depends on the used graphics memory, clock rate, processor, system settings, drivers, and operating systems. So the results don't have to be representative for all laptops with this GPU. For detailed information on the benchmark results, click on the fps number.

Prey

Prey

2017
low 1280x720
Quadro M520:
85.4  fps
med. 1920x1080
Quadro M520:
32.8  fps
high 1920x1080
Quadro M520:
26.7  fps
ultra 1920x1080
Quadro M520:
22  fps
low 1280x720
Quadro M520:
38.1  fps
med. 1920x1080
Quadro M520:
14.3  fps
high 1920x1080
Quadro M520:
12  fps
ultra 1920x1080
Quadro M520:
3.6  fps
For Honor

For Honor

2017
low 1280x720
100%
Quadro M600M:
36.3  fps
178%
Quadro M520:
64.6  fps
med. 1920x1080
100%
Quadro M600M:
24.6  fps
93%
Quadro M520:
23  fps
high 1920x1080
100%
Quadro M600M:
23.1  fps
95%
Quadro M520:
21.9  fps
ultra 1920x1080
100%
Quadro M600M:
16  fps
99%
Quadro M520:
15.9  fps
low 1280x720
Quadro M520:
84  fps
med. 1920x1080
Quadro M520:
40  fps
high 1920x1080
Quadro M520:
22.1  fps
ultra 1920x1080
Quadro M520:
6.6  fps
low 1280x720
Quadro M520:
72.2  fps
med. 1366x768
Quadro M520:
52.5  fps
high 1920x1080
Quadro M520:
21.3  fps
ultra 1920x1080
Quadro M520:
17.3  fps
low 1280x720
Quadro M520:
183.1  fps
med. 1366x768
Quadro M520:
120.6  fps
high 1920x1080
Quadro M520:
49.8  fps
ultra 1920x1080
Quadro M520:
32.1  fps
4K 3840x2160
Quadro M520:
13.7  fps
low 1280x720
100%
Quadro M600M:
73.7  fps
77%
Quadro M520:
56.4  fps
med. 1366x768
100%
Quadro M600M:
42.7  fps
103%
Quadro M520:
43.9  fps
high 1920x1080
100%
Quadro M600M:
18.3  fps
180%
Quadro M520:
33  fps
ultra 1920x1080
100%
Quadro M600M:
16.3  fps
173%
Quadro M520:
28.2  fps
low 1024x768
Quadro M520:
50.8  fps
med. 1366x768
Quadro M520:
30.4  fps
high 1920x1080
Quadro M520:
15.2  fps
ultra 1920x1080
Quadro M520:
11.7  fps
low 1280x720
100%
Quadro M600M:
29  fps
94%
Quadro M520:
27.2  fps
med. 1366x768
100%
Quadro M600M:
21.6  fps
97%
Quadro M520:
21  fps
high 1920x1080
100%
Quadro M600M:
11.5  fps
101%
Quadro M520:
11.6  fps
ultra 1920x1080
100%
Quadro M600M:
5.8  fps
91%
Quadro M520:
5.3  fps
low 1280x768
Quadro M520:
23.6  fps
med. 1920x1080
Quadro M520:
14.3  fps
high 1920x1080
Quadro M520:
12  fps
low 1280x720
Quadro M520:
52.2  fps
med. 1366x768
Quadro M520:
31.8  fps
high 1920x1080
Quadro M520:
14.8  fps
ultra 1920x1080
Quadro M520:
11.2  fps
low 1280x720
Quadro M520:
46  fps
med. 1920x1080
Quadro M520:
20  fps
high 1920x1080
Quadro M520:
18  fps
ultra 1920x1080
Quadro M520:
12  fps
low 1024x768
100%
Quadro M600M:
46.2  fps
65%
Quadro M520:
30  fps
med. 1366x768
100%
Quadro M600M:
28.6  fps
75%
Quadro M520:
21.5  fps
high 1920x1080
100%
Quadro M600M:
15.3  fps
87%
Quadro M520:
13.3  fps
ultra 1920x1080
100%
Quadro M600M:
12.7  fps
92%
Quadro M520:
11.7  fps
low 1024x768
Quadro M520:
94.5  fps
med. 1366x768
Quadro M520:
60.1  fps
high 1920x1080
Quadro M520:
31.8  fps
ultra 1920x1080
Quadro M520:
22.8  fps
4K 3840x2160
Quadro M520:
8.1  fps
low 1024x768
100%
Quadro M600M:
83  fps
94%
Quadro M520:
78.2  fps
med. 1366x768
100%
Quadro M600M:
47.9  fps
102%
Quadro M520:
48.9  fps
high 1920x1080
100%
Quadro M600M:
21.4  fps
104%
Quadro M520:
22.3  fps
ultra 1920x1080
100%
Quadro M600M:
18.5  fps
103%
Quadro M520:
19.1  fps
Anno 2205

Anno 2205

2015
low 1024x768
Quadro M520:
60.1  fps
med. 1366x768
Quadro M520:
36.2  fps
high 1920x1080
Quadro M520:
17.7  fps
ultra 1920x1080
Quadro M520:
7.4  fps
low 1366x768
Quadro M520:
135.6  fps
med. 1366x768
Quadro M520:
108.1  fps
high 1920x1080
Quadro M520:
54  fps
ultra 1920x1080
Quadro M520:
36.7  fps
4K 3840 x 2160
Quadro M520:
11  fps
low 1024x768
100%
Quadro M600M:
43  fps
med. 1366x768
100%
Quadro M600M:
26.2  fps
high 1920x1080
100%
Quadro M600M:
14.2  fps
ultra 1920x1080
100%
Quadro M600M:
7.6  fps
low 1024x768
Quadro M520:
145.6  fps
med. 1366x768
Quadro M520:
75.1  fps
high 1920x1080
Quadro M520:
40.5  fps
ultra 1920x1080
Quadro M520:
18.7  fps
4K 3840x2160
Quadro M520:
14.7  fps
low 1024x768
Quadro M520:
81.1  fps
med. 1366x768
Quadro M520:
74.2  fps
high 1920x1080
Quadro M520:
30.4  fps
ultra 1920x1080
Quadro M520:
19.6  fps
low 1024x768
Quadro M520:
68.2  fps
med. 1366x768
Quadro M520:
51.7  fps
high 1920x1080
Quadro M520:
18.3  fps
ultra 1920x1080
Quadro M520:
12.2  fps
low 1280x720
Quadro M520:
54.6  fps
med. 1344x756
Quadro M520:
32.9  fps
high 1920x1080
Quadro M520:
22.8  fps
ultra 1920x1080
Quadro M520:
16.2  fps
low 1024x768
100%
Quadro M600M:
103.9  fps
med. 1366x768
100%
Quadro M600M:
65.2  fps
high 1366x768
100%
Quadro M600M:
47.1  fps
ultra 1920x1080
100%
Quadro M600M:
20.6  fps
low 1280x720
100%
Quadro M600M:
127.6  fps
108%
Quadro M520:
138.2  fps
med. 1366x768
100%
Quadro M600M:
80.2  fps
96%
Quadro M520:
76.9  fps
high 1366x768
100%
Quadro M600M:
71.7  fps
89%
Quadro M520:
64.1  fps
ultra 1920x1080
100%
Quadro M600M:
26.9  fps
90%
Quadro M520:
24.2  fps
low 1024x768
Quadro M520:
188.1  fps
med. 1366x768
Quadro M520:
97.9  fps
high 1366x768
Quadro M520:
59.5  fps
ultra 1920x1080
Quadro M520:
28.8  fps

Average Gaming NVIDIA Quadro M600M → 100%

Average Gaming 30-70 fps → 100%

Average Gaming NVIDIA Quadro M520 → 104%

Average Gaming 30-70 fps → 122%

For more games that might be playable and a list of all games and graphics cards visit our Gaming List

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:

show all (including archived), 2021, 2020
v1.16
log 19. 15:09:52

#0 checking url part for id 6510 +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 7710 +0s ... 0s

#2 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#3 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Fri, 17 Sep 2021 17:22:03 +0200 +0s ... 0s

#4 composed specs +0.046s ... 0.047s

#5 did output specs +0s ... 0.047s

#6 start showIntegratedCPUs +0s ... 0.047s

#7 getting avg benchmarks for device 6510 +0.028s ... 0.075s

#8 got single benchmarks 6510 +0.006s ... 0.081s

#9 getting avg benchmarks for device 7710 +0.005s ... 0.086s

#10 got single benchmarks 7710 +0.008s ... 0.094s

#11 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.094s

#12 min, max, avg, median took s +0.034s ... 0.128s

#13 before gaming benchmark output +0s ... 0.128s

#14 Got 127 rows for game benchmarks. +0.01s ... 0.138s

#15 composed SQL query for gamebenchmarks +0s ... 0.138s

#16 got data and put it in $dataArray +0.002s ... 0.14s

#17 benchmarks composed for output. +0.012s ... 0.152s

#18 calculated avg scores. +0s ... 0.152s

#19 return log +0.003s ... 0.156s

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Notebook / Laptop Reviews and News > Benchmarks / Tech > Graphics Card Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2017-09-11)