, , , , , ,
search relation.
, , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,
 

NVIDIA Quadro M600M vs NVIDIA Quadro M1200

NVIDIA Quadro M600M

► remove from comparison NVIDIA Quadro M600M

The 28nm NVIDIA Quadro M600M is an entry-level DirectX 12 (FL 11_0) and OpenGL 4.5-compatible graphics card for mobile workstations. It is a 1st generation Maxwell GPU that is most likely built on the GM107 architecture with 384 of the 640 shader cores activated. Compared to the older Quadro K620M and consumer GeForce 940M, the GPU offers a 128-Bit memory bus that separates it from the GM108-based K620M. The M600M typically comes with 2 GB GDDR5 VRAM clocked at 1250 MHz (5000 MHz effective at 80 GB/s instead of 16 GB/s on the K620M). 

In the Lenovo Thinkpad P70 the M600M is clocked at 837 - 876 MHz (Boost) for the shaders, and 1253 MHz (5012 MHz effektive) for the 2 GB GDDR5 from Samsung (thanks to our reader John for the GPU-Z screenshot).

The Quadro series offers certified drivers that are optimized for stability and performance in professional applications like CAD or DCC. OpenGL performance, for example, should be significantly better compared to GeForce graphics cards of similar specifications.

Performance

The Quadro M600M is about 20% faster than the previous Quadro K620M thanks to the wider 128-bit memory interface and pretty much right between the siblings Quadro M500M & Quadro M1000M. The consumer GPU GeForce 940MX is beaten by ~10-15%, while the GeForce GTX 950M is another 20% faster.

Using CUDA (Compute Capability 5.0) or OpenCL 1.2, the cores of the Quadro M600M can be used for general calculations.

Power Consumption

The power consumption of the Quadro M600M is rated at the same 30 Watt TGP as the K620M including the board and memory components. Therefore, the card is also suited for thin and light notebooks.

NVIDIA Quadro M1200

► remove from comparison NVIDIA Quadro M1200

The 28 nm Nvidia Quadro M1200 is a mid-range DirectX 12 (FL 11_0) and OpenGL 4.5-compatible graphics card for mobile workstations. It is a (first generation) Maxwell-based GPU built on the GM107 chip with 640 shader cores. Therefore, the GPU is similar to the consumer Nvidia GeForce GTX 960M. The Quadro M1200M is built for the Intel Skylake generation and is the successor to the Quadro M1000M (950M based).

The Quadro series offers certified drivers that are optimized for stability and performance in professional applications like CAD or DCC. OpenGL performance, for example, should be significantly better compared to GeForce graphics cards of similar specifications.

Performance

The performance of the Quadro M1200 is on a level to the previous generation M2000M which is also based on the 960M. In games it is comparable to the GTX 960M although the driver support is not optimized for gaming.

Using CUDA (Compute Capability 5.0) or OpenCL 1.2, the cores of the Quadro M2000M can be used for general calculations.

Power Consumption

The power consumption of the Quadro M1200 is rated for the same TGP of 45 Watt (32.5 Watt TDP) and therefore a bit lower than the M2000M with 55 Watt TGP.

NVIDIA Quadro M600MNVIDIA Quadro M1200
ManufacturerNVIDIANVIDIA
Quadro M Series
Quadro M5500 compare 2048 @ 1.14 - 1.14 GHz256 Bit @ 6606 MHz
Quadro M5000M compare 1536 @ 0.96 - 1.05 GHz256 Bit @ 5000 MHz
Quadro M4000M compare 1280 @ 0.98 - 1.01 GHz256 Bit @ 5012 MHz
Quadro M3000M compare 1024 @ 1.05 GHz256 Bit @ 5000 MHz
Quadro M2200 compare 1024 @ 0.69 - 1.04 GHz128 Bit @ 5508 MHz
Quadro M1200 640 @ 0.99 - 1.15 GHz128 Bit @ 5000 MHz
Quadro M2000M compare 640 @ 1.04 - 1.2 GHz128 Bit @ 5000 MHz
Quadro M1000M compare 512 @ 0.99 - 1.07 GHz128 Bit @ 5000 MHz
Quadro M620 compare 512 @ 1.02 GHz128 Bit @ 5012 MHz
Quadro 5010M compare 384 @ 0.45 GHz256 Bit @ 1300 MHz
Quadro 4000M compare 336 @ 0.48 GHz256 Bit @ 1200 MHz
Quadro M520 compare 384 @ 0.76 - 1.02 GHz64 Bit
Quadro M600M 384 @ 0.84 - 0.88 GHz128 Bit @ 5012 MHz
Quadro M500M compare 384 @ 1.03 - 1.12 GHz64 Bit @ 4004 MHz
Quadro 5000M compare 320 @ 0.41 GHz256 Bit @ 1200 MHz
Quadro 3000M compare 240 @ 0.45 GHz256 Bit @ 625 MHz
Quadro 2000M compare 192 @ 0.55 GHz128 Bit @ 900 MHz
Quadro 1000M compare 96 @ 0.7 GHz128 Bit @ 900 MHz
Quadro M5500 compare 2048 @ 1.14 - 1.14 GHz256 Bit @ 6606 MHz
Quadro M5000M compare 1536 @ 0.96 - 1.05 GHz256 Bit @ 5000 MHz
Quadro M4000M compare 1280 @ 0.98 - 1.01 GHz256 Bit @ 5012 MHz
Quadro M3000M compare 1024 @ 1.05 GHz256 Bit @ 5000 MHz
Quadro M2200 compare 1024 @ 0.69 - 1.04 GHz128 Bit @ 5508 MHz
Quadro M1200 640 @ 0.99 - 1.15 GHz128 Bit @ 5000 MHz
Quadro M2000M compare 640 @ 1.04 - 1.2 GHz128 Bit @ 5000 MHz
Quadro M1000M compare 512 @ 0.99 - 1.07 GHz128 Bit @ 5000 MHz
Quadro M620 compare 512 @ 1.02 GHz128 Bit @ 5012 MHz
Quadro 5010M compare 384 @ 0.45 GHz256 Bit @ 1300 MHz
Quadro 4000M compare 336 @ 0.48 GHz256 Bit @ 1200 MHz
Quadro M520 compare 384 @ 0.76 - 1.02 GHz64 Bit
Quadro M600M 384 @ 0.84 - 0.88 GHz128 Bit @ 5012 MHz
Quadro M500M compare 384 @ 1.03 - 1.12 GHz64 Bit @ 4004 MHz
Quadro 5000M compare 320 @ 0.41 GHz256 Bit @ 1200 MHz
Quadro 3000M compare 240 @ 0.45 GHz256 Bit @ 625 MHz
Quadro 2000M compare 192 @ 0.55 GHz128 Bit @ 900 MHz
Quadro 1000M compare 96 @ 0.7 GHz128 Bit @ 900 MHz
ArchitectureMaxwellMaxwell
Pipelines384 - unified640 - unified
Core Speed837 - 876 (Boost) MHz991 - 1150 (Boost) MHz
Memory Speed5012 MHz5000 MHz
Memory Bus Width128 Bit128 Bit
Memory TypeGDDR5GDDR5
Max. Amount of Memory2048 MB4096 MB
Shared Memorynono
DirectXDirectX 12 (FL 11_0), Shader 5.0DirectX 12 (FL 11_0), Shader 5.0
technology28 nm28 nm
FeaturesOptimus, PhysX, 3D Vision Pro, nView, OptimusOptimus, PhysX, 3D Vision Pro, nView, Optimus
Notebook Sizelargelarge
Date of Announcement02.10.2015 13.01.2017
Link to Manufacturer Pagehttp://www.nvidia.com/object/quadro-for-...http://www.nvidia.de/object/mobile-works...
CodenameN17P-Q1
Transistors1870 Million

Benchmarks

Performance Rating - 3DMark 11 + Fire Strike + Time Spy - Quadro M600M
8.4 pt (9%)
Performance Rating - 3DMark 11 + Fire Strike + Time Spy - Quadro M1200
10.1 pt (11%)
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy Score
719 Points (4%)
1290 Points (7%)
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy Graphics
631 Points (3%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics
240298 Points (37%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Extreme Graphics
66347 Points (9%)
42129 Points (6%)
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Score
13310 Points (18%)
min: 12632     avg: 14705     median: 13600 (18%)     max: 17884 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Graphics
18491 Points (9%)
min: 26860     avg: 27557     median: 27557 (14%)     max: 28254 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Score
2322 Points (6%)
min: 3759     avg: 3846     median: 3878 (10%)     max: 3900 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Graphics
2430 Points (5%)
min: 4118     avg: 4142     median: 4141.5 (8%)     max: 4165 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Graphics
73348 Points (10%)
63463 Points (8%)
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Score
3216 Points (8%)
min: 5513     avg: 5515     median: 5514.5 (13%)     max: 5516 Points
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance GPU
2911 Points (5%)
min: 5105     avg: 5310     median: 5310 (9%)     max: 5515 Points
3DMark Vantage
3DM Vant. Perf. total + NVIDIA Quadro M600M
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. total
12734 Points (12%)
3DM Vant. Perf. GPU no PhysX + NVIDIA Quadro M600M
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. GPU no PhysX
10958 Points (10%)
3DMark 06 3DMark 06 - Standard 1280x1024 + NVIDIA Quadro M600M
3DMark 06
20563 Points (38%)
3DMark 06 - Standard 1280x1024 + NVIDIA Quadro M1200
26109 Points (49%)
Unigine Valley 1.0 - Unigine Valley 1.0 DX
27.7 fps (13%)
Unigine Heaven 3.0 - Unigine Heaven 3.0 DX 11
30.1 fps (10%)
Unigine Heaven 3.0 - Unigine Heaven 3.0 OpenGL
28.9 fps (13%)
Unigine Heaven 2.1 - Heaven 2.1 high
28.1 fps (5%)
SPECviewperf 11
specvp11 snx-01 + NVIDIA Quadro M600M
SPECviewperf 11 - specvp11 snx-01
34.2 fps (24%)
specvp11 snx-01 + NVIDIA Quadro M1200
43.9 fps (31%)
specvp11 tcvis-02 + NVIDIA Quadro M600M
SPECviewperf 11 - specvp11 tcvis-02
36.7 fps (61%)
specvp11 tcvis-02 + NVIDIA Quadro M1200
44.2 fps (74%)
specvp11 sw-02 + NVIDIA Quadro M600M
SPECviewperf 11 - specvp11 sw-02
47.5 fps (57%)
specvp11 sw-02 + NVIDIA Quadro M1200
56.4 fps (68%)
specvp11 proe-05 + NVIDIA Quadro M600M
SPECviewperf 11 - specvp11 proe-05
16.4 fps (68%)
specvp11 proe-05 + NVIDIA Quadro M1200
22 fps (92%)
specvp11 maya-03 + NVIDIA Quadro M600M
SPECviewperf 11 - specvp11 maya-03
51.9 fps (39%)
specvp11 maya-03 + NVIDIA Quadro M1200
57.2 fps (43%)
specvp11 lightwave-01 + NVIDIA Quadro M600M
SPECviewperf 11 - specvp11 lightwave-01
52.3 fps (56%)
specvp11 lightwave-01 + NVIDIA Quadro M1200
57.8 fps (62%)
specvp11 ensight-04 + NVIDIA Quadro M600M
SPECviewperf 11 - specvp11 ensight-04
27.6 fps (13%)
specvp11 ensight-04 + NVIDIA Quadro M1200
46.7 fps (22%)
specvp11 catia-03 + NVIDIA Quadro M600M
SPECviewperf 11 - specvp11 catia-03
45.1 fps (55%)
specvp11 catia-03 + NVIDIA Quadro M1200
53.4 fps (65%)
SPECviewperf 12
specvp12 sw-03 + NVIDIA Quadro M600M
SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 sw-03
52.4 fps (23%)
specvp12 sw-03 + NVIDIA Quadro M1200
min: 69.01     avg: 72.5     median: 70 (30%)     max: 78.37 fps
specvp12 snx-02 + NVIDIA Quadro M600M
SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 snx-02
24.8 fps (9%)
specvp12 snx-02 + NVIDIA Quadro M1200
min: 34.18     avg: 34.9     median: 34.7 (12%)     max: 36 fps
specvp12 showcase-01 + NVIDIA Quadro M600M
SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 showcase-01
17.2 fps (7%)
specvp12 showcase-01 + NVIDIA Quadro M1200
min: 22.17     avg: 24.8     median: 26 (11%)     max: 26.2 fps
specvp12 mediacal-01 + NVIDIA Quadro M600M
SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 mediacal-01
7.5 fps (5%)
specvp12 mediacal-01 + NVIDIA Quadro M1200
min: 17.49     avg: 17.8     median: 17.8 (11%)     max: 18 fps
specvp12 maya-04 + NVIDIA Quadro M600M
SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 maya-04
22 fps (9%)
specvp12 maya-04 + NVIDIA Quadro M1200
min: 32.07     avg: 34.4     median: 33.7 (14%)     max: 37.29 fps
specvp12 energy-01 + NVIDIA Quadro M600M
SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 energy-01
0.5 fps (1%)
specvp12 energy-01 + NVIDIA Quadro M1200
min: 3.78     avg: 3.8     median: 3.9 (10%)     max: 3.9 fps
specvp12 creo-01 + NVIDIA Quadro M600M
SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 creo-01
31.7 fps (18%)
specvp12 creo-01 + NVIDIA Quadro M1200
min: 45     avg: 46     median: 46.1 (26%)     max: 46.97 fps
specvp12 catia-04 + NVIDIA Quadro M600M
SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 catia-04
27.6 fps (9%)
specvp12 catia-04 + NVIDIA Quadro M1200
min: 45.75     avg: 46.2     median: 45.9 (16%)     max: 47 fps
specvp12 3dsmax-05 + NVIDIA Quadro M1200
SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 3dsmax-05
46 fps (14%)
Cinebench R10 Cinebench R10 Shading (32bit) + NVIDIA Quadro M600M
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Shading (32bit)
6832 (32%)
Cinebench R11.5 Cinebench R11.5 OpenGL 64 Bit + NVIDIA Quadro M600M
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 OpenGL 64 Bit
67.1 fps (29%)
Cinebench R11.5 OpenGL 64 Bit + NVIDIA Quadro M1200
102 fps (43%)
Cinebench R15
Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64 Bit + NVIDIA Quadro M600M
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64 Bit
75.2 fps (21%)
Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64 Bit + NVIDIA Quadro M1200
min: 102.79     avg: 108     median: 108.2 (30%)     max: 113.54 fps
Cinebench R15 OpenGL Ref. Match 64 Bit + NVIDIA Quadro M600M
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 OpenGL Ref. Match 64 Bit
99.6 % (100%)
Cinebench R15 OpenGL Ref. Match 64 Bit + NVIDIA Quadro M1200
99.6 % (100%)
GFXBench 3.0 - GFXBench 3.0 Manhattan Offscreen
104 fps (11%)
GFXBench 3.0 - GFXBench 3.0 Manhattan
59.4 fps (16%)
GFXBench - GFXBench Car Chase Offscreen
49.8 fps (0%)
GFXBench - GFXBench Car Chase Onscreen
45.9 fps (1%)
LuxMark v2.0 64Bit - LuxMark v2.0 Room GPU
484 Samples/s (5%)
min: 656     avg: 818     median: 817.5 (8%)     max: 979 Samples/s
LuxMark v2.0 64Bit - LuxMark v2.0 Sala GPU
1016 Samples/s (3%)
min: 852     avg: 1207     median: 1207 (4%)     max: 1562 Samples/s
ComputeMark v2.1 - ComputeMark v2.1 Result
1754 (4%)
388 (1%)
Power Consumption - Furmark Stress Test Power Consumption - external Monitor *
59.5 Watt (11%)
Power Consumption - The Witcher 3 Power Consumption - external Monitor *
48.6 Watt (8%)
Power Consumption - Witcher 3 Power Consumption *
min: 74.8     avg: 87.5     median: 87.5 (19%)     max: 100.2 Watt

Average Benchmarks NVIDIA Quadro M600M → 100% n=32

Average Benchmarks NVIDIA Quadro M1200 → 157% n=32

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Game Benchmarks

The following benchmarks stem from our benchmarks of review laptops. The performance depends on the used graphics memory, clock rate, processor, system settings, drivers, and operating systems. So the results don't have to be representative for all laptops with this GPU. For detailed information on the benchmark results, click on the fps number.

For Honor

For Honor

2017
low 1280x720
100%
Quadro M600M:
36.3  fps
med. 1920x1080
100%
Quadro M600M:
24.6  fps
high 1920x1080
100%
Quadro M600M:
23.1  fps
ultra 1920x1080
100%
Quadro M600M:
16  fps
low 1280x720
100%
Quadro M600M:
73.7  fps
med. 1366x768
100%
Quadro M600M:
42.7  fps
high 1920x1080
100%
Quadro M600M:
18.3  fps
ultra 1920x1080
100%
Quadro M600M:
16.3  fps
low 1280x720
100%
Quadro M600M:
29  fps
med. 1366x768
100%
Quadro M600M:
21.6  fps
high 1920x1080
100%
Quadro M600M:
11.5  fps
ultra 1920x1080
100%
Quadro M600M:
5.8  fps
Doom

Doom

2016
low 1280x720
Quadro M1200:
79  fps
med. 1366x768
Quadro M1200:
66  fps
high 1920x1080
Quadro M1200:
37  fps
ultra 1920x1080
Quadro M1200:
34  fps
4K 3840x2160
Quadro M1200:
12  fps
low 1024x768
100%
Quadro M600M:
46.2  fps
191%
Quadro M1200:
88.1  fps
med. 1366x768
100%
Quadro M600M:
28.6  fps
172%
Quadro M1200:
49.2  fps
high 1920x1080
100%
Quadro M600M:
15.3  fps
185%
Quadro M1200:
28.4  fps
ultra 1920x1080
100%
Quadro M600M:
12.7  fps
188%
Quadro M1200:
23.9  fps
4K 3840x2160
Quadro M1200:
9.9  fps
low 1024x768
100%
Quadro M600M:
83  fps
med. 1366x768
100%
Quadro M600M:
47.9  fps
high 1920x1080
100%
Quadro M600M:
21.4  fps
ultra 1920x1080
100%
Quadro M600M:
18.5  fps
low 1280x720
Quadro M1200:
74  fps
med. 1366x768
Quadro M1200:
63  fps
high 1920x1080
Quadro M1200:
35  fps
ultra 1920x1080
Quadro M1200:
29  fps
4K 3840x2160
Quadro M1200:
11  fps
low 1024x768
100%
Quadro M600M:
43  fps
171%
Quadro M1200:
73.6  fps
med. 1366x768
100%
Quadro M600M:
26.2  fps
175%
Quadro M1200:
45.9  fps
high 1920x1080
100%
Quadro M600M:
14.2  fps
197%
Quadro M1200:
26.3 29 fps ~ 28 fps
ultra 1920x1080
100%
Quadro M600M:
7.6  fps
171%
Quadro M1200:
13 fps  fps
Thief

Thief

2014
low 1024x768
Quadro M1200:
93.3  fps
med. 1366x768
Quadro M1200:
58.9  fps
high 1366x768
Quadro M1200:
50.1  fps
ultra 1920x1080
Quadro M1200:
26.2  fps
low 1024x768
100%
Quadro M600M:
103.9  fps
med. 1366x768
100%
Quadro M600M:
65.2  fps
high 1366x768
100%
Quadro M600M:
47.1  fps
ultra 1920x1080
100%
Quadro M600M:
20.6  fps
low 1280x720
100%
Quadro M600M:
127.6  fps
162%
Quadro M1200:
189 224.7 ~ 207 fps
med. 1366x768
100%
Quadro M600M:
80.2  fps
167%
Quadro M1200:
130.8 137 ~ 134 fps
high 1366x768
100%
Quadro M600M:
71.7  fps
166%
Quadro M1200:
113.1 125 ~ 119 fps
ultra 1920x1080
100%
Quadro M600M:
26.9  fps
167%
Quadro M1200:
42.6 47 ~ 45 fps

Average Gaming NVIDIA Quadro M600M → 100%

Average Gaming 30-70 fps → 100%

Average Gaming NVIDIA Quadro M1200 → 176%

Average Gaming 30-70 fps → 171%

For more games that might be playable and a list of all games and graphics cards visit our Gaming List

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:

show all (including archived), 2021, 2020
v1.16
log 25. 02:53:31

#0 checking url part for id 6510 +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 7704 +0s ... 0s

#2 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#3 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Wed, 22 Sep 2021 17:22:07 +0200 +0s ... 0s

#4 composed specs +0.048s ... 0.048s

#5 did output specs +0s ... 0.048s

#6 start showIntegratedCPUs +0s ... 0.048s

#7 getting avg benchmarks for device 6510 +0.027s ... 0.075s

#8 got single benchmarks 6510 +0.006s ... 0.081s

#9 getting avg benchmarks for device 7704 +0.003s ... 0.084s

#10 got single benchmarks 7704 +0.009s ... 0.093s

#11 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.093s

#12 min, max, avg, median took s +0.026s ... 0.119s

#13 before gaming benchmark output +0s ... 0.119s

#14 Got 64 rows for game benchmarks. +0.006s ... 0.125s

#15 composed SQL query for gamebenchmarks +0s ... 0.125s

#16 got data and put it in $dataArray +0.001s ... 0.127s

#17 benchmarks composed for output. +0.012s ... 0.138s

#18 calculated avg scores. +0s ... 0.138s

#19 return log +0.003s ... 0.142s

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Notebook / Laptop Reviews and News > Benchmarks / Tech > Graphics Card Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2017-09-11)