NVIDIA Quadro M5500 vs NVIDIA Quadro M600M

NVIDIA Quadro M5500

► remove NVIDIA Quadro M5500

The Nvidia Quadro M5500 is a high-end, DirectX 12 (FL_12_1) and OpenGL 4.5-compatible graphics card for mobile workstations. It is a Maxwell-based GPU built on the GM204 chip with all 2048 shader cores activated and is manufactured in 28 nm at TSMC. Therefore, the GPU is similar to the consumer Nvidia GeForce GTX 980 (Notebook). Compared to the slower and less power hungry Quadro M5000M, the M5500 offers 512 more shaders which should result in 30-40% more performance according to Nvidia.

The Quadro series offers certified drivers that are optimized for stability and performance in professional applications like CAD or DCC. OpenGL performance, for example, should be significantly better compared to GeForce graphics cards of similar specifications.

Using CUDA (Compute Capability 5.2) or OpenCL 1.2, the cores of the Quadro M5000M can be used for general calculations.

The power consumption of the Quadro M5000M is rated at the same TGP of 150 Watt. Therefore, the card is suited for very large notebooks with 17-inch displays or greater.

The first laptop with the M5500 in it is the MSI WT72 Workstation.

NVIDIA Quadro M600M

► remove NVIDIA Quadro M600M

The 28nm NVIDIA Quadro M600M is an entry-level DirectX 12 (FL 11_0) and OpenGL 4.5-compatible graphics card for mobile workstations. It is a 1st generation Maxwell GPU that is most likely built on the GM107 architecture with 384 of the 640 shader cores activated. Compared to the older Quadro K620M and consumer GeForce 940M, the GPU offers a 128-Bit memory bus that separates it from the GM108-based K620M. The M600M typically comes with 2 GB GDDR5 VRAM clocked at 1250 MHz (5000 MHz effective at 80 GB/s instead of 16 GB/s on the K620M). 

In the Lenovo Thinkpad P70 the M600M is clocked at 837 - 876 MHz (Boost) for the shaders, and 1253 MHz (5012 MHz effektive) for the 2 GB GDDR5 from Samsung (thanks to our reader John for the GPU-Z screenshot).

The Quadro series offers certified drivers that are optimized for stability and performance in professional applications like CAD or DCC. OpenGL performance, for example, should be significantly better compared to GeForce graphics cards of similar specifications.

Performance

The Quadro M600M is about 20% faster than the previous Quadro K620M thanks to the wider 128-bit memory interface and pretty much right between the siblings Quadro M500M & Quadro M1000M. The consumer GPU GeForce 940MX is beaten by ~10-15%, while the GeForce GTX 950M is another 20% faster.

Using CUDA (Compute Capability 5.0) or OpenCL 1.2, the cores of the Quadro M600M can be used for general calculations.

Power Consumption

The power consumption of the Quadro M600M is rated at the same 30 Watt TGP as the K620M including the board and memory components. Therefore, the card is also suited for thin and light notebooks.

NVIDIA Quadro M5500NVIDIA Quadro M600M
ManufacturerNVIDIANVIDIA
Quadro M Series
Quadro M5500 2048 @ 1139 - 1140 (Boost) MHz256 Bit @ 6606 MHz
Quadro M5000M (compare) 1536 @ 962 - 1051 (Boost) MHz256 Bit @ 5000 MHz
Quadro M4000M (compare) 1280 @ 975 - 1013 (Boost) MHz256 Bit @ 5012 MHz
Quadro M3000M (compare) 1024 @ 1050 MHz256 Bit @ 5000 MHz
Quadro M2200 (compare) 1024 @ 694 - 1038 (Boost) MHz128 Bit @ 5508 MHz
Quadro M1200 (compare) 640 @ 991 - 1150 (Boost) MHz128 Bit @ 5000 MHz
Quadro M2000M (compare) 640 @ 1038 - 1197 (Boost) MHz128 Bit @ 5000 MHz
Quadro M1000M (compare) 512 @ 993 - 1072 (Boost) MHz128 Bit @ 5000 MHz
Quadro M620 (compare) 512 @ 1018 MHz128 Bit @ 5012 MHz
Quadro 5010M (compare) 384 @ 450 MHz256 Bit @ 1300 MHz
Quadro 4000M (compare) 336 @ 475 MHz256 Bit @ 1200 MHz
Quadro M520 (compare) 384 @ 756 - 1019 (Boost) MHz64 Bit
Quadro M600M 384 @ 837 - 876 (Boost) MHz128 Bit @ 5012 MHz
Quadro M500M (compare) 384 @ 1029 - 1124 (Boost) MHz64 Bit @ 4004 MHz
Quadro 5000M (compare) 320 @ 405 MHz256 Bit @ 1200 MHz
Quadro 3000M (compare) 240 @ 450 MHz256 Bit @ 625 MHz
Quadro 2000M (compare) 192 @ 550 MHz128 Bit @ 900 MHz
Quadro 1000M (compare) 96 @ 700 MHz128 Bit @ 900 MHz
Quadro M5500 2048 @ 1139 - 1140 (Boost) MHz256 Bit @ 6606 MHz
Quadro M5000M (compare) 1536 @ 962 - 1051 (Boost) MHz256 Bit @ 5000 MHz
Quadro M4000M (compare) 1280 @ 975 - 1013 (Boost) MHz256 Bit @ 5012 MHz
Quadro M3000M (compare) 1024 @ 1050 MHz256 Bit @ 5000 MHz
Quadro M2200 (compare) 1024 @ 694 - 1038 (Boost) MHz128 Bit @ 5508 MHz
Quadro M1200 (compare) 640 @ 991 - 1150 (Boost) MHz128 Bit @ 5000 MHz
Quadro M2000M (compare) 640 @ 1038 - 1197 (Boost) MHz128 Bit @ 5000 MHz
Quadro M1000M (compare) 512 @ 993 - 1072 (Boost) MHz128 Bit @ 5000 MHz
Quadro M620 (compare) 512 @ 1018 MHz128 Bit @ 5012 MHz
Quadro 5010M (compare) 384 @ 450 MHz256 Bit @ 1300 MHz
Quadro 4000M (compare) 336 @ 475 MHz256 Bit @ 1200 MHz
Quadro M520 (compare) 384 @ 756 - 1019 (Boost) MHz64 Bit
Quadro M600M 384 @ 837 - 876 (Boost) MHz128 Bit @ 5012 MHz
Quadro M500M (compare) 384 @ 1029 - 1124 (Boost) MHz64 Bit @ 4004 MHz
Quadro 5000M (compare) 320 @ 405 MHz256 Bit @ 1200 MHz
Quadro 3000M (compare) 240 @ 450 MHz256 Bit @ 625 MHz
Quadro 2000M (compare) 192 @ 550 MHz128 Bit @ 900 MHz
Quadro 1000M (compare) 96 @ 700 MHz128 Bit @ 900 MHz
ArchitectureMaxwellMaxwell
2048 - 384 -
Core1139 - 1140 (Boost) MHz837 - 876 (Boost) MHz
Memory6606 MHz5012 MHz
Bus256 Bit128 Bit
MemoryGDDR5GDDR5
Max. Memory8192 MB2048 MB
nono
DirectXDirectX 12 (FL 12_1)DirectX 12 (FL 11_0), 5.0
Transistors5200 Million
Technology28 nm28 nm
FeaturesCUDA, 3D Vision, PhysX, GeForce Experience, Surround, GameStream, GPU Boost 2.0, Adaptive Vertical Sync, G-SYNC, SLIOptimus, PhysX, 3D Vision Pro, nView, Optimus
Size
Introduced04.04.2016 02.10.2015
Manufacturerhttp://www.nvidia.com/object/quadro-for-...

3DMark - Time Spy Score 2560x1440
719 Points (5%)
3DMark - Time Spy Graphics 2560x1440
631 Points (4%)
3DMark - Ice Storm Extreme Graphics 1920x1080
66347 Points (9%)
3DMark - Cloud Gate Standard Score 1280x720
13310 Points (22%)
3DMark - Cloud Gate Standard Graphics 1280x720
18491 Points (10%)
3DMark - Fire Strike Score 1920x1080
2322 Points (9%)
3DMark - Fire Strike Graphics 1920x1080
2430 Points (6%)
3DMark - Ice Storm Standard Graphics 1280x720
73348 Points (10%)
3DMark 11 - Performance 1280x720
14413 points (41%)
3216 points (9%)
3DMark 11 - Performance GPU 1280x720
2911 points (6%)
3DMark Vantage
P Result 1280x1024 + NVIDIA Quadro M600M
P GPU no PhysX 1280x1024 + NVIDIA Quadro M600M
3DMark 06 Standard 1280x1024 + NVIDIA Quadro M600M
SPECviewperf 11
Siemens NX 1920x1080 + NVIDIA Quadro M600M
Tcvis 1920x1080 + NVIDIA Quadro M600M
SolidWorks 1920x1080 + NVIDIA Quadro M600M
Pro/ENGINEER 1920x1080 + NVIDIA Quadro M600M
Maya 1920x1080 + NVIDIA Quadro M600M
Lightwave 1920x1080 + NVIDIA Quadro M600M
Ensight 1920x1080 + NVIDIA Quadro M600M
Catia 1920x1080 + NVIDIA Quadro M600M
SPECviewperf 12
Solidworks (sw-03) 1900x1060 + NVIDIA Quadro M5500
Solidworks (sw-03) 1900x1060 + NVIDIA Quadro M600M
Siemens NX (snx-02) 1900x1060 + NVIDIA Quadro M5500
Siemens NX (snx-02) 1900x1060 + NVIDIA Quadro M600M
Showcase (showcase-01) 1900x1060 + NVIDIA Quadro M5500
Showcase (showcase-01) 1900x1060 + NVIDIA Quadro M600M
Medical (medical-01) 1900x1060 + NVIDIA Quadro M5500
Medical (medical-01) 1900x1060 + NVIDIA Quadro M600M
Maya (maya-04) 1900x1060 + NVIDIA Quadro M5500
Maya (maya-04) 1900x1060 + NVIDIA Quadro M600M
Energy (energy-01) 1900x1060 + NVIDIA Quadro M5500
Energy (energy-01) 1900x1060 + NVIDIA Quadro M600M
Creo (creo-01) 1900x1060 + NVIDIA Quadro M5500
Creo (creo-01) 1900x1060 + NVIDIA Quadro M600M
Catia (catia-04) 1900x1060 + NVIDIA Quadro M5500
Catia (catia-04) 1900x1060 + NVIDIA Quadro M600M
Cinebench R10 Shading 32Bit + NVIDIA Quadro M600M
Cinebench R11.5 OpenGL 64Bit + NVIDIA Quadro M600M
Cinebench R15
OpenGL 64Bit + NVIDIA Quadro M5500
OpenGL 64Bit + NVIDIA Quadro M600M
Ref. Match 64Bit + NVIDIA Quadro M600M
GFXBench 3.0 - Manhattan Offscreen OGL off screen
104.3 fps (19%)
GFXBench 3.0 - Manhattan Onscreen OGL on screen
59.4 fps (16%)
GFXBench - Car Chase Offscreen off screen
49.8 fps (13%)
GFXBench - Car Chase Onscreen on screen
45.9 fps (27%)
LuxMark v2.0 64Bit - Room GPUs-only
484 Samples/s (9%)
LuxMark v2.0 64Bit - Sala GPUs-only
1016 Samples/s (9%)
ComputeMark v2.1 - Normal, Score 1024x600
1754 Points (6%)
Power Consumption - FurMark 1.19 GPU Stress Test - Power Consumption (external Monitor) 1280x720 *
59.5 Watt (14%)
Power Consumption - The Witcher 3 Power Consumption (external Monitor) ultra 1920x1080 *
48.6 Watt (11%)

Average Benchmarks NVIDIA Quadro M5500 → 100%

Average Benchmarks NVIDIA Quadro M600M → 82%

-
-
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

For Honor

For Honor

2017
low 1280x720
Quadro M600M:
36.3  fps
med. 1920x1080
Quadro M600M:
24.6  fps
high 1920x1080
Quadro M600M:
23.1  fps
ultra 1920x1080
Quadro M600M:
16  fps
Quadro M600M:
»
low 1280x720
Quadro M600M:
73.7  fps
med. 1366x768
Quadro M600M:
42.7  fps
high 1920x1080
Quadro M600M:
18.3  fps
ultra 1920x1080
Quadro M600M:
16.3  fps
Quadro M600M:
»
low 1280x720
Quadro M600M:
29  fps
med. 1366x768
Quadro M600M:
21.6  fps
high 1920x1080
Quadro M600M:
11.5  fps
ultra 1920x1080
Quadro M600M:
5.8  fps
Quadro M600M:
»
low 1024x768
Quadro M600M:
46.2  fps
med. 1366x768
Quadro M600M:
28.6  fps
high 1920x1080
Quadro M600M:
15.3  fps
ultra 1920x1080
Quadro M600M:
12.7  fps
Quadro M600M:
»
low 1024x768
Quadro M600M:
83  fps
med. 1366x768
Quadro M600M:
47.9  fps
high 1920x1080
Quadro M600M:
21.4  fps
ultra 1920x1080
Quadro M600M:
18.5  fps
Quadro M600M:
»
low 1024x768
Quadro M600M:
43  fps
med. 1366x768
Quadro M600M:
26.2  fps
high 1920x1080
Quadro M600M:
14.2  fps
ultra 1920x1080
Quadro M600M:
7.6  fps
Quadro M600M:
»
low 1024x768
Quadro M600M:
103.9  fps
med. 1366x768
Quadro M600M:
65.2  fps
high 1366x768
Quadro M600M:
47.1  fps
ultra 1920x1080
Quadro M600M:
20.6  fps
Quadro M600M:
»
low 1280x720
Quadro M600M:
127.6  fps
med. 1366x768
Quadro M600M:
80.2  fps
high 1366x768
Quadro M600M:
71.7  fps
ultra 1920x1080
Quadro M600M:
26.9  fps
Quadro M600M:
»

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:

show all (including archived), 2019, 2018
v1.8.1a
Please share our article, every link counts!
> Notebook / Laptop Reviews and News > Benchmarks / Tech > Graphics Card Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2017-09-11)