Notebookcheck Logo

NVIDIA Quadro M5500 vs NVIDIA Quadro M600M vs NVIDIA Quadro 2000M

NVIDIA Quadro M5500

► remove from comparison NVIDIA Quadro M5500

The Nvidia Quadro M5500 is a high-end, DirectX 12 (FL_12_1) and OpenGL 4.5-compatible graphics card for mobile workstations. It is a Maxwell-based GPU built on the GM204 chip with all 2048 shader cores activated and is manufactured in 28 nm at TSMC. Therefore, the GPU is similar to the consumer Nvidia GeForce GTX 980 (Notebook). Compared to the slower and less power hungry Quadro M5000M, the M5500 offers 512 more shaders which should result in 30-40% more performance according to Nvidia.

The Quadro series offers certified drivers that are optimized for stability and performance in professional applications like CAD or DCC. OpenGL performance, for example, should be significantly better compared to GeForce graphics cards of similar specifications.

Using CUDA (Compute Capability 5.2) or OpenCL 1.2, the cores of the Quadro M5000M can be used for general calculations.

The power consumption of the Quadro M5000M is rated at the same TGP of 150 Watt. Therefore, the card is suited for very large notebooks with 17-inch displays or greater.

The first laptop with the M5500 in it is the MSI WT72 Workstation.

NVIDIA Quadro M600M

► remove from comparison NVIDIA Quadro M600M

The 28nm NVIDIA Quadro M600M is an entry-level DirectX 12 (FL 11_0) and OpenGL 4.5-compatible graphics card for mobile workstations. It is a 1st generation Maxwell GPU that is most likely built on the GM107 architecture with 384 of the 640 shader cores activated. Compared to the older Quadro K620M and consumer GeForce 940M, the GPU offers a 128-Bit memory bus that separates it from the GM108-based K620M. The M600M typically comes with 2 GB GDDR5 VRAM clocked at 1250 MHz (5000 MHz effective at 80 GB/s instead of 16 GB/s on the K620M). 

In the Lenovo Thinkpad P70 the M600M is clocked at 837 - 876 MHz (Boost) for the shaders, and 1253 MHz (5012 MHz effektive) for the 2 GB GDDR5 from Samsung (thanks to our reader John for the GPU-Z screenshot).

The Quadro series offers certified drivers that are optimized for stability and performance in professional applications like CAD or DCC. OpenGL performance, for example, should be significantly better compared to GeForce graphics cards of similar specifications.

Performance

The Quadro M600M is about 20% faster than the previous Quadro K620M thanks to the wider 128-bit memory interface and pretty much right between the siblings Quadro M500M & Quadro M1000M. The consumer GPU GeForce 940MX is beaten by ~10-15%, while the GeForce GTX 950M is another 20% faster.

Using CUDA (Compute Capability 5.0) or OpenCL 1.2, the cores of the Quadro M600M can be used for general calculations.

Power Consumption

The power consumption of the Quadro M600M is rated at the same 30 Watt TGP as the K620M including the board and memory components. Therefore, the card is also suited for thin and light notebooks.

NVIDIA Quadro 2000M

► remove from comparison

The NVIDIA Quadro 2000M is a professional workstation graphics card based on the Fermi architecture (likely the GF104 or GF106). It offers the same amount of shaders like the GeForce GTX 460M, but only a 128 Bit memory bus for DDR3 memory. The slow DDR3 memory in particular could be a bottleneck to the GPU

The Quadro series offers certified drivers that are optimized for stability and performance in professional applications like CAD, DCC, medicine, or visualisation areas. OpenGL performance, for example, should be significantly better than GeForce graphics cards of similar specifications.

The shader/CUDA cores can be accessed using DirectX 11 or OpenGL 4.1 for graphics rendering and DirectCompute, OpenCL, AXE, and CUDA for general purpose calculations. Due to the new Fermi core, the 2000M should offer high performance in general purpose calculations.

Furthermore, the Nvidia Quadro 2000M is compatible with the new stereoscopic solution by Nvidia, NVIDIA 3D Vision Pro.

To automatically switch between the processor graphics card and the Quadro, the 2000M supports Nvidia Optimus. The implementation of the technology into specific notebook models is dependent on the laptop vendor.

The Quadro 2000M is specified at 55 Watt TDP and is therefore best suited for 15.6" or greater laptops.

NVIDIA Quadro M5500NVIDIA Quadro M600MNVIDIA Quadro 2000M
Quadro M Series
Quadro M5500 2048 @ 1.14 - 1.14 GHz256 Bit @ 6606 MHz
Quadro M5000M 1536 @ 0.96 - 1.05 GHz256 Bit @ 5000 MHz
Quadro M4000M 1280 @ 0.98 - 1.01 GHz256 Bit @ 5012 MHz
Quadro M3000M 1024 @ 1.05 GHz256 Bit @ 5000 MHz
Quadro M2200 1024 @ 0.69 - 1.04 GHz128 Bit @ 5508 MHz
Quadro M1200 640 @ 0.99 - 1.15 GHz128 Bit @ 5000 MHz
Quadro M2000M 640 @ 1.04 - 1.2 GHz128 Bit @ 5000 MHz
Quadro M1000M 512 @ 0.99 - 1.07 GHz128 Bit @ 5000 MHz
Quadro M620 512 @ 1.02 GHz128 Bit @ 5012 MHz
Quadro 5010M 384 @ 0.45 GHz256 Bit @ 1300 MHz
Quadro 4000M 336 @ 0.48 GHz256 Bit @ 1200 MHz
Quadro M520 384 @ 0.76 - 1.02 GHz64 Bit
Quadro M600M 384 @ 0.84 - 0.88 GHz128 Bit @ 5012 MHz
Quadro M500M 384 @ 1.03 - 1.12 GHz64 Bit @ 4004 MHz
Quadro 5000M 320 @ 0.41 GHz256 Bit @ 1200 MHz
Quadro 3000M 240 @ 0.45 GHz256 Bit @ 625 MHz
Quadro 2000M 192 @ 0.55 GHz128 Bit @ 900 MHz
Quadro 1000M 96 @ 0.7 GHz128 Bit @ 900 MHz
Quadro M5500 2048 @ 1.14 - 1.14 GHz256 Bit @ 6606 MHz
Quadro M5000M 1536 @ 0.96 - 1.05 GHz256 Bit @ 5000 MHz
Quadro M4000M 1280 @ 0.98 - 1.01 GHz256 Bit @ 5012 MHz
Quadro M3000M 1024 @ 1.05 GHz256 Bit @ 5000 MHz
Quadro M2200 1024 @ 0.69 - 1.04 GHz128 Bit @ 5508 MHz
Quadro M1200 640 @ 0.99 - 1.15 GHz128 Bit @ 5000 MHz
Quadro M2000M 640 @ 1.04 - 1.2 GHz128 Bit @ 5000 MHz
Quadro M1000M 512 @ 0.99 - 1.07 GHz128 Bit @ 5000 MHz
Quadro M620 512 @ 1.02 GHz128 Bit @ 5012 MHz
Quadro 5010M 384 @ 0.45 GHz256 Bit @ 1300 MHz
Quadro 4000M 336 @ 0.48 GHz256 Bit @ 1200 MHz
Quadro M520 384 @ 0.76 - 1.02 GHz64 Bit
Quadro M600M 384 @ 0.84 - 0.88 GHz128 Bit @ 5012 MHz
Quadro M500M 384 @ 1.03 - 1.12 GHz64 Bit @ 4004 MHz
Quadro 5000M 320 @ 0.41 GHz256 Bit @ 1200 MHz
Quadro 3000M 240 @ 0.45 GHz256 Bit @ 625 MHz
Quadro 2000M 192 @ 0.55 GHz128 Bit @ 900 MHz
Quadro 1000M 96 @ 0.7 GHz128 Bit @ 900 MHz
Quadro M5500 2048 @ 1.14 - 1.14 GHz256 Bit @ 6606 MHz
Quadro M5000M 1536 @ 0.96 - 1.05 GHz256 Bit @ 5000 MHz
Quadro M4000M 1280 @ 0.98 - 1.01 GHz256 Bit @ 5012 MHz
Quadro M3000M 1024 @ 1.05 GHz256 Bit @ 5000 MHz
Quadro M2200 1024 @ 0.69 - 1.04 GHz128 Bit @ 5508 MHz
Quadro M1200 640 @ 0.99 - 1.15 GHz128 Bit @ 5000 MHz
Quadro M2000M 640 @ 1.04 - 1.2 GHz128 Bit @ 5000 MHz
Quadro M1000M 512 @ 0.99 - 1.07 GHz128 Bit @ 5000 MHz
Quadro M620 512 @ 1.02 GHz128 Bit @ 5012 MHz
Quadro 5010M 384 @ 0.45 GHz256 Bit @ 1300 MHz
Quadro 4000M 336 @ 0.48 GHz256 Bit @ 1200 MHz
Quadro M520 384 @ 0.76 - 1.02 GHz64 Bit
Quadro M600M 384 @ 0.84 - 0.88 GHz128 Bit @ 5012 MHz
Quadro M500M 384 @ 1.03 - 1.12 GHz64 Bit @ 4004 MHz
Quadro 5000M 320 @ 0.41 GHz256 Bit @ 1200 MHz
Quadro 3000M 240 @ 0.45 GHz256 Bit @ 625 MHz
Quadro 2000M 192 @ 0.55 GHz128 Bit @ 900 MHz
Quadro 1000M 96 @ 0.7 GHz128 Bit @ 900 MHz
ArchitectureMaxwellMaxwellFermi
Pipelines2048 - unified384 - unified192 - unified
Core Speed1139 - 1140 (Boost) MHz837 - 876 (Boost) MHz550 MHz
Memory Speed6606 MHz5012 MHz900 MHz
Memory Bus Width256 Bit128 Bit128 Bit
Memory TypeGDDR5GDDR5DDR3
Max. Amount of Memory8 GB2048 MB2048 MB
Shared Memorynonono
APIDirectX 12_1, OpenGL 4.5DirectX 12 (FL 11_0), Shader 5.0, OpenGL 4.5DirectX 11, Shader 5.0
Power Consumption150 Watt30 Watt55 Watt
Transistors5.2 Billion
technology28 nm28 nm40 nm
FeaturesCUDA, 3D Vision, PhysX, GeForce Experience, Surround, GameStream, GPU Boost 2.0, Adaptive Vertical Sync, G-SYNC, SLIOptimus, PhysX, 3D Vision Pro, nView, OptimusOpenGl 4.1, FP32
Notebook Sizelargelargemedium sized
Date of Announcement04.04.2016 02.10.2015 22.02.2011
Link to Manufacturer Pagewww.nvidia.com
CodenameFermi
Shader Speed1100 MHz

Benchmarks

Performance Rating - 3DMark 11 + Fire Strike + Time Spy - Quadro M600M
1.1 pt (3%)
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy Score
719 Points (2%)
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy Graphics
631 Points (2%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Extreme Graphics
66347 Points (8%)
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Score
13310 Points (14%)
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Graphics
18491 Points (5%)
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Score
2322 Points (4%)
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Graphics
2430 Points (3%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Graphics
73348 Points (9%)
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Score
14413 Points (20%)
3216 Points (4%)
min: 1416     avg: 1422     median: 1421 (2%)     max: 1428 Points
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance GPU
2911 Points (3%)
min: 1259     avg: 1261     median: 1261 (1%)     max: 1263 Points
3DMark Vantage
3DM Vant. Perf. total + NVIDIA Quadro M600M
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. total
12734 Points (4%)
3DM Vant. Perf. total + NVIDIA Quadro 2000M
min: 6608     avg: 6634     median: 6633.5 (2%)     max: 6659 Points
3DM Vant. Perf. GPU no PhysX + NVIDIA Quadro M600M
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. GPU no PhysX
10958 Points (6%)
3DM Vant. Perf. GPU no PhysX + NVIDIA Quadro 2000M
min: 5391     avg: 5411     median: 5410.5 (3%)     max: 5430 Points
3DMark 05 - 3DMark 05 - Standard
21287 Points (23%)
3DMark 06 3DMark 06 - Standard 1280x1024 + NVIDIA Quadro M600M
3DMark 06
20563 Points (27%)
3DMark 06 - Standard 1280x1024 + NVIDIA Quadro 2000M
min: 11575     avg: 11659     median: 11656 (15%)     max: 11747 Points
Unigine Heaven 2.1 - Heaven 2.1 high
min: 14.1     avg: 17     median: 17 (3%)     max: 19.8 fps
SPECviewperf 11
specvp11 snx-01 + NVIDIA Quadro M600M
SPECviewperf 11 - specvp11 snx-01
34.2 fps (20%)
specvp11 snx-01 + NVIDIA Quadro 2000M
min: 19.28     avg: 19.3     median: 19.3 (12%)     max: 19.32 fps
specvp11 tcvis-02 + NVIDIA Quadro M600M
SPECviewperf 11 - specvp11 tcvis-02
36.7 fps (21%)
specvp11 tcvis-02 + NVIDIA Quadro 2000M
min: 22.13     avg: 22.3     median: 22.3 (13%)     max: 22.52 fps
specvp11 sw-02 + NVIDIA Quadro M600M
SPECviewperf 11 - specvp11 sw-02
47.5 fps (36%)
specvp11 sw-02 + NVIDIA Quadro 2000M
min: 32.8     avg: 33.1     median: 33.1 (25%)     max: 33.4 fps
specvp11 proe-05 + NVIDIA Quadro M600M
SPECviewperf 11 - specvp11 proe-05
16.4 fps (19%)
specvp11 proe-05 + NVIDIA Quadro 2000M
min: 9.45     avg: 9.6     median: 9.6 (11%)     max: 9.83 fps
specvp11 maya-03 + NVIDIA Quadro M600M
SPECviewperf 11 - specvp11 maya-03
51.9 fps (39%)
specvp11 maya-03 + NVIDIA Quadro 2000M
min: 45.28     avg: 45.6     median: 45.6 (34%)     max: 45.96 fps
specvp11 lightwave-01 + NVIDIA Quadro M600M
SPECviewperf 11 - specvp11 lightwave-01
52.3 fps (56%)
specvp11 lightwave-01 + NVIDIA Quadro 2000M
min: 40.8     avg: 41.9     median: 41.9 (45%)     max: 42.93 fps
specvp11 ensight-04 + NVIDIA Quadro M600M
SPECviewperf 11 - specvp11 ensight-04
27.6 fps (13%)
specvp11 ensight-04 + NVIDIA Quadro 2000M
min: 17.84     avg: 17.9     median: 17.9 (9%)     max: 17.96 fps
specvp11 catia-03 + NVIDIA Quadro M600M
SPECviewperf 11 - specvp11 catia-03
45.1 fps (24%)
specvp11 catia-03 + NVIDIA Quadro 2000M
min: 27.08     avg: 27.4     median: 27.4 (14%)     max: 27.69 fps
SPECviewperf 12
specvp12 sw-03 + NVIDIA Quadro M5500
SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 sw-03
144 fps (36%)
specvp12 sw-03 + NVIDIA Quadro M600M
52.4 fps (13%)
specvp12 snx-02 + NVIDIA Quadro M5500
SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 snx-02
120 fps (18%)
specvp12 snx-02 + NVIDIA Quadro M600M
24.8 fps (4%)
specvp12 showcase-01 + NVIDIA Quadro M5500
SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 showcase-01
60.3 fps (13%)
specvp12 showcase-01 + NVIDIA Quadro M600M
17.2 fps (4%)
specvp12 mediacal-01 + NVIDIA Quadro M5500
SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 mediacal-01
53.8 fps (14%)
specvp12 mediacal-01 + NVIDIA Quadro M600M
7.5 fps (2%)
specvp12 maya-04 + NVIDIA Quadro M5500
SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 maya-04
95 fps (26%)
specvp12 maya-04 + NVIDIA Quadro M600M
22 fps (6%)
specvp12 energy-01 + NVIDIA Quadro M5500
SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 energy-01
12.2 fps (11%)
specvp12 energy-01 + NVIDIA Quadro M600M
0.5 fps (0%)
specvp12 creo-01 + NVIDIA Quadro M5500
SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 creo-01
110 fps (44%)
specvp12 creo-01 + NVIDIA Quadro M600M
31.7 fps (13%)
specvp12 catia-04 + NVIDIA Quadro M5500
SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 catia-04
137 fps (23%)
specvp12 catia-04 + NVIDIA Quadro M600M
27.6 fps (5%)
Windows 7 Experience Index - Win7 Gaming graphics
6.9 Points (87%)
Windows 7 Experience Index - Win7 Graphics
6.9 Points (87%)
Cinebench R10 Cinebench R10 Shading (32bit) + NVIDIA Quadro M600M
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Shading (32bit)
6832 Points (5%)
Cinebench R10 Shading (32bit) + NVIDIA Quadro 2000M
5671 Points (4%)
Cinebench R11.5 Cinebench R11.5 OpenGL 64 Bit + NVIDIA Quadro M600M
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 OpenGL 64 Bit
67.1 fps (23%)
Cinebench R11.5 OpenGL 64 Bit + NVIDIA Quadro 2000M
min: 38.3     avg: 38.4     median: 38.4 (13%)     max: 38.44 fps
Cinebench R15
Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64 Bit + NVIDIA Quadro M5500
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64 Bit
106.7 fps (6%)
Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64 Bit + NVIDIA Quadro M600M
75.2 fps (4%)
Cinebench R15 OpenGL Ref. Match 64 Bit + NVIDIA Quadro M600M
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 OpenGL Ref. Match 64 Bit
99.6 % (100%)
GFXBench - GFXBench Car Chase Offscreen
49.8 fps (6%)
GFXBench 3.1 - GFXBench Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen
75.7 fps (2%)
GFXBench 3.0 - GFXBench 3.0 Manhattan Offscreen
104.3 fps (6%)
LuxMark v2.0 64Bit - LuxMark v2.0 Room GPU
484 Samples/s (2%)
LuxMark v2.0 64Bit - LuxMark v2.0 Sala GPU
1016 Samples/s (2%)
ComputeMark v2.1 - ComputeMark v2.1 Result
1754 Points (2%)
Power Consumption - Furmark Stress Test Power Consumption - external Monitor *
59.5 Watt (8%)
Power Consumption - The Witcher 3 Power Consumption - external Monitor *
48.6 Watt (7%)
Power Consumption - Witcher 3 ultra Power Efficiency - external Monitor
0.2 fps per Watt (13%)

Average Benchmarks NVIDIA Quadro M5500 → 100% n=1

Average Benchmarks NVIDIA Quadro M600M → 22% n=1

Average Benchmarks NVIDIA Quadro 2000M → 10% n=1

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Game Benchmarks

The following benchmarks stem from our benchmarks of review laptops. The performance depends on the used graphics memory, clock rate, processor, system settings, drivers, and operating systems. So the results don't have to be representative for all laptops with this GPU. For detailed information on the benchmark results, click on the fps number.

For Honor

For Honor

2017
low 1280x720
Quadro M600M:
36.3  fps
med. 1920x1080
Quadro M600M:
24.6  fps
high 1920x1080
Quadro M600M:
23.1  fps
ultra 1920x1080
Quadro M600M:
16  fps
low 1280x720
Quadro M600M:
73.7  fps
med. 1366x768
Quadro M600M:
42.7  fps
high 1920x1080
Quadro M600M:
18.3  fps
ultra 1920x1080
Quadro M600M:
16.3  fps
low 1280x720
Quadro M600M:
29  fps
med. 1366x768
Quadro M600M:
21.6  fps
high 1920x1080
Quadro M600M:
11.5  fps
ultra 1920x1080
Quadro M600M:
5.8  fps
low 1024x768
Quadro M600M:
46.2  fps
med. 1366x768
Quadro M600M:
28.6  fps
high 1920x1080
Quadro M600M:
15.3  fps
ultra 1920x1080
Quadro M600M:
12.7  fps
low 1024x768
Quadro M600M:
83  fps
med. 1366x768
Quadro M600M:
47.9  fps
high 1920x1080
Quadro M600M:
21.4  fps
ultra 1920x1080
Quadro M600M:
18.5  fps
low 1024x768
Quadro M600M:
43  fps
med. 1366x768
Quadro M600M:
26.2  fps
high 1920x1080
Quadro M600M:
14.2  fps
ultra 1920x1080
Quadro M600M:
7.6  fps
low 1024x768
Quadro M600M:
103.9  fps
med. 1366x768
Quadro M600M:
65.2  fps
high 1366x768
Quadro M600M:
47.1  fps
ultra 1920x1080
Quadro M600M:
20.6  fps
low 1280x720
Quadro M600M:
127.6  fps
med. 1366x768
Quadro M600M:
80.2  fps
high 1366x768
Quadro M600M:
71.7  fps
ultra 1920x1080
Quadro M600M:
26.9  fps
low 800x600
Quadro 2000M:
86.7  fps
med. 1024x768
Quadro 2000M:
75  fps
high 1360x768
Quadro 2000M:
71.7  fps
ultra 1920x1080
Quadro 2000M:
41.7  fps
Fifa 11

Fifa 11

2010
high 1360x768
Quadro 2000M:
92  fps
ultra 1920x1080
Quadro 2000M:
59  fps
Mafia 2

Mafia 2

2010
low 800x600
Quadro 2000M:
92  fps
med. 1024x768
Quadro 2000M:
71  fps
high 1360x768
Quadro 2000M:
59.1  fps
ultra 1920x1080
Quadro 2000M:
35.1  fps
low 1024x768
Quadro 2000M:
165 243 ~ 204 fps
med. 1360x768
Quadro 2000M:
82  fps
high 1360x768
Quadro 2000M:
45  fps
ultra 1920x1080
Quadro 2000M:
23 37 ~ 30 fps
med. 1366x768
Quadro 2000M:
64.6  fps
high 1366x768
Quadro 2000M:
46.9  fps
ultra 1920x1080
Quadro 2000M:
22.8  fps
low 800x600
Quadro 2000M:
200.3  fps
med. 1024x768
Quadro 2000M:
74.8  fps
high 1366x768
Quadro 2000M:
59.5  fps
ultra 1920x1080
Quadro 2000M:
37.6  fps
Anno 1404

Anno 1404

2009
low 1024x768
Quadro 2000M:
62  fps
ultra 1280x1024
Quadro 2000M:
36 43 ~ 40 fps
Sims 3

Sims 3

2009
low 800x600
Quadro 2000M:
269  fps
med. 1024x768
Quadro 2000M:
93  fps
high 1280x1024
Quadro 2000M:
47.9  fps
NVIDIA Quadro M600Mlowmed.highultraQHD4K
For Honor36.324.623.116
Battlefield 173.742.718.316.3
Deus Ex Mankind Divided2921.611.55.8
Rise of the Tomb Raider46.228.615.312.7
Star Wars Battlefront8347.921.418.5
The Witcher 34326.214.27.6
Battlefield 4103.965.247.120.6
BioShock Infinite127.680.271.726.9
< 30 fps
< 60 fps
< 120 fps
≥ 120 fps
1
3
3
1
4
2
2
6
1
1
8








NVIDIA Quadro 2000Mlowmed.highultraQHD4K
Call of Duty: Black Ops86.77571.741.7
Fifa 119259
Mafia 2927159.135.1
StarCraft 2204824530
Battlefield: Bad Company 264.646.922.8
CoD Modern Warfare 2200.374.859.537.6
Anno 14046240
Sims 32699347.89
< 30 fps
< 60 fps
< 120 fps
≥ 120 fps


3
3


6

5
2
1
6







For more games that might be playable and a list of all games and graphics cards visit our Gaming List

v1.26
log 28. 11:44:01

#0 checking url part for id 7282 +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 6510 +0s ... 0s

#2 checking url part for id 2435 +0s ... 0s

#3 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#4 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Thu, 28 Mar 2024 05:37:00 +0100 +0.001s ... 0.001s

#5 composed specs +0.145s ... 0.146s

#6 did output specs +0s ... 0.146s

#7 start showIntegratedCPUs +0s ... 0.146s

#8 getting avg benchmarks for device 7282 +0.036s ... 0.182s

#9 got single benchmarks 7282 +0.008s ... 0.19s

#10 getting avg benchmarks for device 6510 +0.018s ... 0.208s

#11 got single benchmarks 6510 +0.01s ... 0.217s

#12 getting avg benchmarks for device 2435 +0.001s ... 0.219s

#13 got single benchmarks 2435 +0.01s ... 0.228s

#14 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.228s

#15 min, max, avg, median took s +0.219s ... 0.447s

#16 before gaming benchmark output +0s ... 0.447s

#17 Got 61 rows for game benchmarks. +0.006s ... 0.454s

#18 composed SQL query for gamebenchmarks +0s ... 0.454s

#19 got data and put it in $dataArray +0.011s ... 0.465s

#20 benchmarks composed for output. +0.037s ... 0.501s

#21 calculated avg scores. +0s ... 0.501s

#22 return log +0.002s ... 0.503s

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Graphics Card Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)