Notebookcheck Logo

NVIDIA Quadro M2200 vs NVIDIA Quadro 5000M vs NVIDIA Quadro M1200

NVIDIA Quadro M2200

► remove from comparison NVIDIA Quadro M2200

The Nvidia Quadro M2200 is a mid-range DirectX 12 (FL 12_1) and OpenGL 4.5-compatible graphics card for mobile workstations. It is a Maxwell-based GPU built most likely on the GM206 chip with 1024 shader cores. Therefore, the GPU is similar to the consumer Nvidia GeForce GTX 965M (second generation). The Quadro M2200M is built for the Intel Kaby Lake generation.

The Quadro series offers certified drivers that are optimized for stability and performance in professional applications like CAD or DCC. OpenGL performance, for example, should be significantly better compared to GeForce graphics cards of similar specifications.

Performance

The maximum core clock of the Quadro M2200 is 1038 MHz. The performance is between the old Quadro M2000M and Quadro M3000M, but generally closer to the latter (sometimes even on par). It is not surprising that the gaming performance is comparable to the Nvidia GeForce GTX 965M (Ti) and it is just behind the new GeForce GTX 1050 (Pascal).

Using CUDA (Compute Capability 5.0) or OpenCL 1.2, the cores of the Quadro M2200 can be used for general calculations.

Power Consumption

The power consumption of the Quadro M2200 is rated at a TGP of 55 Watt (39.1 Watt TDP) – similar to the previous Quadro M2000M – and therefore best suited for 15-inch laptops and up.

NVIDIA Quadro 5000M

► remove from comparison NVIDIA Quadro 5000M

The NVIDIA Quadro 5000M is a professional workstation graphics card based on the Fermi architecture. Therefore, the 5000M likely shares many similarities  to the GeForce GTX 480M which offers more CUDA cores. The Quadro is the first mobile GPU that offers ECC RAM and double-precision floating point cores.

The Quadro series also offers certified drivers that are optimized for stability and performance in professional applications like CAD or DCC. OpenGL performance, for example, should be significantly better than GeForce graphics cards of similar specifications. 

The shader/CUDA cores can be accessed using DirectX 11 or OpenGL 4.1 for graphics rendering and DirectCompute, OpenCL, AXE and CUDA for general purpose calculations. Due to the new Fermi core, the 5000M should offer higher performance in general purpose calculations compared to its predecessors.

Furthermore, the Quadro 5000M is compatible with Nvidia 3D Vision Pro for stereoscopic viewing.

Similar to the GeForce GTX 480M, the Quadro 5000M is specified at 100 Watt TDP and is therefore usually reserved for large laptops with ample cooling, such as the Clevo D901F.

At the time of arrival (mid 2010), the Quadro 5000M was the fastest professional workstation graphics card for laptops and is the successor to the old G92b-based GeForce FX 3800M. Compared to desktop Quadro cards, the mobile Quadro 5000M offers less shader cores and likely a lower core clock rate as well.

NVIDIA Quadro M1200

► remove from comparison NVIDIA Quadro M1200

The 28 nm Nvidia Quadro M1200 is a mid-range DirectX 12 (FL 11_0) and OpenGL 4.5-compatible graphics card for mobile workstations. It is a (first generation) Maxwell-based GPU built on the GM107 chip with 640 shader cores. Therefore, the GPU is similar to the consumer Nvidia GeForce GTX 960M. The Quadro M1200M is built for the Intel Skylake generation and is the successor to the Quadro M1000M (950M based).

The Quadro series offers certified drivers that are optimized for stability and performance in professional applications like CAD or DCC. OpenGL performance, for example, should be significantly better compared to GeForce graphics cards of similar specifications.

Performance

The performance of the Quadro M1200 is on a level to the previous generation M2000M which is also based on the 960M. In games it is comparable to the GTX 960M although the driver support is not optimized for gaming.

Using CUDA (Compute Capability 5.0) or OpenCL 1.2, the cores of the Quadro M2000M can be used for general calculations.

Power Consumption

The power consumption of the Quadro M1200 is rated for the same TGP of 45 Watt (32.5 Watt TDP) and therefore a bit lower than the M2000M with 55 Watt TGP.

NVIDIA Quadro M2200NVIDIA Quadro 5000MNVIDIA Quadro M1200
Quadro M Series
Quadro M5500 2048 @ 1.14 - 1.14 GHz256 Bit @ 6606 MHz
Quadro M5000M 1536 @ 0.96 - 1.05 GHz256 Bit @ 5000 MHz
Quadro M4000M 1280 @ 0.98 - 1.01 GHz256 Bit @ 5012 MHz
Quadro M3000M 1024 @ 1.05 GHz256 Bit @ 5000 MHz
Quadro M2200 1024 @ 0.69 - 1.04 GHz128 Bit @ 5508 MHz
Quadro M1200 640 @ 0.99 - 1.15 GHz128 Bit @ 5000 MHz
Quadro M2000M 640 @ 1.04 - 1.2 GHz128 Bit @ 5000 MHz
Quadro M1000M 512 @ 0.99 - 1.07 GHz128 Bit @ 5000 MHz
Quadro M620 512 @ 1.02 GHz128 Bit @ 5012 MHz
Quadro 5010M 384 @ 0.45 GHz256 Bit @ 1300 MHz
Quadro 4000M 336 @ 0.48 GHz256 Bit @ 1200 MHz
Quadro M520 384 @ 0.76 - 1.02 GHz64 Bit
Quadro M600M 384 @ 0.84 - 0.88 GHz128 Bit @ 5012 MHz
Quadro M500M 384 @ 1.03 - 1.12 GHz64 Bit @ 4004 MHz
Quadro 5000M 320 @ 0.41 GHz256 Bit @ 1200 MHz
Quadro 3000M 240 @ 0.45 GHz256 Bit @ 625 MHz
Quadro 2000M 192 @ 0.55 GHz128 Bit @ 900 MHz
Quadro 1000M 96 @ 0.7 GHz128 Bit @ 900 MHz
Quadro M5500 2048 @ 1.14 - 1.14 GHz256 Bit @ 6606 MHz
Quadro M5000M 1536 @ 0.96 - 1.05 GHz256 Bit @ 5000 MHz
Quadro M4000M 1280 @ 0.98 - 1.01 GHz256 Bit @ 5012 MHz
Quadro M3000M 1024 @ 1.05 GHz256 Bit @ 5000 MHz
Quadro M2200 1024 @ 0.69 - 1.04 GHz128 Bit @ 5508 MHz
Quadro M1200 640 @ 0.99 - 1.15 GHz128 Bit @ 5000 MHz
Quadro M2000M 640 @ 1.04 - 1.2 GHz128 Bit @ 5000 MHz
Quadro M1000M 512 @ 0.99 - 1.07 GHz128 Bit @ 5000 MHz
Quadro M620 512 @ 1.02 GHz128 Bit @ 5012 MHz
Quadro 5010M 384 @ 0.45 GHz256 Bit @ 1300 MHz
Quadro 4000M 336 @ 0.48 GHz256 Bit @ 1200 MHz
Quadro M520 384 @ 0.76 - 1.02 GHz64 Bit
Quadro M600M 384 @ 0.84 - 0.88 GHz128 Bit @ 5012 MHz
Quadro M500M 384 @ 1.03 - 1.12 GHz64 Bit @ 4004 MHz
Quadro 5000M 320 @ 0.41 GHz256 Bit @ 1200 MHz
Quadro 3000M 240 @ 0.45 GHz256 Bit @ 625 MHz
Quadro 2000M 192 @ 0.55 GHz128 Bit @ 900 MHz
Quadro 1000M 96 @ 0.7 GHz128 Bit @ 900 MHz
Quadro M5500 2048 @ 1.14 - 1.14 GHz256 Bit @ 6606 MHz
Quadro M5000M 1536 @ 0.96 - 1.05 GHz256 Bit @ 5000 MHz
Quadro M4000M 1280 @ 0.98 - 1.01 GHz256 Bit @ 5012 MHz
Quadro M3000M 1024 @ 1.05 GHz256 Bit @ 5000 MHz
Quadro M2200 1024 @ 0.69 - 1.04 GHz128 Bit @ 5508 MHz
Quadro M1200 640 @ 0.99 - 1.15 GHz128 Bit @ 5000 MHz
Quadro M2000M 640 @ 1.04 - 1.2 GHz128 Bit @ 5000 MHz
Quadro M1000M 512 @ 0.99 - 1.07 GHz128 Bit @ 5000 MHz
Quadro M620 512 @ 1.02 GHz128 Bit @ 5012 MHz
Quadro 5010M 384 @ 0.45 GHz256 Bit @ 1300 MHz
Quadro 4000M 336 @ 0.48 GHz256 Bit @ 1200 MHz
Quadro M520 384 @ 0.76 - 1.02 GHz64 Bit
Quadro M600M 384 @ 0.84 - 0.88 GHz128 Bit @ 5012 MHz
Quadro M500M 384 @ 1.03 - 1.12 GHz64 Bit @ 4004 MHz
Quadro 5000M 320 @ 0.41 GHz256 Bit @ 1200 MHz
Quadro 3000M 240 @ 0.45 GHz256 Bit @ 625 MHz
Quadro 2000M 192 @ 0.55 GHz128 Bit @ 900 MHz
Quadro 1000M 96 @ 0.7 GHz128 Bit @ 900 MHz
CodenameN17P-Q3FermiN17P-Q1
ArchitectureMaxwellFermiMaxwell
Pipelines1024 - unified320 - unified640 - unified
Core Speed694 - 1038 (Boost) MHz405 MHz991 - 1150 (Boost) MHz
Memory Speed5508 MHz1200 MHz5000 MHz
Memory Bus Width128 Bit256 Bit128 Bit
Memory TypeGDDR5GDDR5GDDR5
Max. Amount of Memory4 GB2048 MB4 GB
Shared Memorynonono
APIDirectX 12_1, Shader 5.0, OpenGL 4.5DirectX 11, Shader 5.0DirectX 12 (FL 11_0), Shader 5.0, OpenGL 4.5
Power Consumption55 Watt100 Watt45 Watt
Transistors4.9 Billion3 Billion1.9 Billion
technology28 nm40 nm28 nm
FeaturesOptimus, PhysX, 3D Vision Pro, nView, OptimusOpenGL 4.1, DirectX 11, DirectCompute, OpenCL, CUDA, AXE, Error-Correction-Codes (ECC)-Memory, IEEE-Double-Precision-Floating-Point, PowerMizer 9.0Optimus, PhysX, 3D Vision Pro, nView, Optimus
Notebook Sizelargelargelarge
Date of Announcement13.01.2017 27.07.2010 13.01.2017
Link to Manufacturer Pagewww.nvidia.dewww.nvidia.comwww.nvidia.de
Shader Speed810 MHz

Benchmarks

Performance Rating - 3DMark 11 + Fire Strike + Time Spy - Quadro M2200
2.7 pt (8%)
Performance Rating - 3DMark 11 + Fire Strike + Time Spy - Quadro M1200
1.9 pt (6%)
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy Score
min: 1845     avg: 1889     median: 1903 (5%)     max: 1920 Points
1290 Points (4%)
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy Graphics
min: 1699     avg: 1724     median: 1724 (5%)     max: 1750 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics
min: 280203     avg: 289176     median: 289176 (33%)     max: 298148 Points
240298 Points (27%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Extreme Graphics
42129 Points (5%)
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Score
min: 20388     avg: 21012     median: 20644 (22%)     max: 22003 Points
min: 12632     avg: 14705     median: 13600 (15%)     max: 17884 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Graphics
min: 36877     avg: 37505     median: 37796 (10%)     max: 37841 Points
min: 26860     avg: 27557     median: 27557 (7%)     max: 28254 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Score
min: 5232     avg: 5253     median: 5252 (9%)     max: 5275 Points
min: 3759     avg: 3846     median: 3878 (7%)     max: 3900 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Graphics
min: 5786     avg: 5835     median: 5850 (7%)     max: 5869 Points
min: 4118     avg: 4142     median: 4141.5 (5%)     max: 4165 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Graphics
min: 127867     avg: 195445     median: 195444 (23%)     max: 263022 Points
63463 Points (8%)
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Score
min: 7453     avg: 7581     median: 7581 (11%)     max: 7709 Points
min: 5513     avg: 5515     median: 5514.5 (8%)     max: 5516 Points
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance GPU
min: 7319     avg: 7372     median: 7372 (6%)     max: 7425 Points
min: 5105     avg: 5310     median: 5310 (5%)     max: 5515 Points
3DMark Vantage
3DM Vant. Perf. total + NVIDIA Quadro M2200
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. total
24622 Points (7%)
3DM Vant. Perf. total + NVIDIA Quadro 5000M
min: 7700     avg: 7767     median: 7766.5 (2%)     max: 7833 Points
3DM Vant. Perf. GPU no PhysX + NVIDIA Quadro M2200
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. GPU no PhysX
24915 Points (14%)
3DM Vant. Perf. GPU no PhysX + NVIDIA Quadro 5000M
7015 Points (4%)
3DMark 03 - 3DMark 03 - Standard
41650 Points (22%)
3DMark 05 - 3DMark 05 - Standard
18903 Points (21%)
3DMark 06 3DMark 06 - Standard 1280x1024 + NVIDIA Quadro M2200
3DMark 06
min: 26834     avg: 28150     median: 28149.5 (37%)     max: 29465 Points
3DMark 06 - Standard 1280x1024 + NVIDIA Quadro 5000M
12967 Points (17%)
3DMark 06 - Standard 1280x1024 + NVIDIA Quadro M1200
26109 Points (34%)
3DMark 06 - Standard 1280x768 + NVIDIA Quadro 5000M
3DMark 06
13127 Points (17%)
Unigine Valley 1.0 - Unigine Valley 1.0 DX
min: 23.2     avg: 26.4     median: 27.9 (9%)     max: 28.1 fps
27.7 fps (9%)
Unigine Heaven 3.0 - Unigine Heaven 3.0 DX 11
30.1 fps (10%)
Unigine Heaven 3.0 - Unigine Heaven 3.0 OpenGL
28.9 fps (13%)
Unigine Heaven 2.1 - Heaven 2.1 high
28.1 fps (5%)
SPECviewperf 11
specvp11 snx-01 + NVIDIA Quadro M2200
SPECviewperf 11 - specvp11 snx-01
min: 48.26     avg: 48.9     median: 48.9 (29%)     max: 49.48 fps
specvp11 snx-01 + NVIDIA Quadro 5000M
min: 28.13     avg: 28.6     median: 28.6 (17%)     max: 29 fps
specvp11 snx-01 + NVIDIA Quadro M1200
43.9 fps (26%)
specvp11 tcvis-02 + NVIDIA Quadro M2200
SPECviewperf 11 - specvp11 tcvis-02
min: 49.11     avg: 51     median: 51 (29%)     max: 52.9 fps
specvp11 tcvis-02 + NVIDIA Quadro 5000M
min: 25.96     avg: 26.4     median: 26.4 (15%)     max: 26.82 fps
specvp11 tcvis-02 + NVIDIA Quadro M1200
44.2 fps (25%)
specvp11 sw-02 + NVIDIA Quadro M2200
SPECviewperf 11 - specvp11 sw-02
min: 42.66     avg: 49.7     median: 49.7 (38%)     max: 56.8 fps
specvp11 sw-02 + NVIDIA Quadro 5000M
min: 29.99     avg: 30.1     median: 30.1 (23%)     max: 30.2 fps
specvp11 sw-02 + NVIDIA Quadro M1200
56.4 fps (43%)
specvp11 proe-05 + NVIDIA Quadro M2200
SPECviewperf 11 - specvp11 proe-05
min: 16.23     avg: 19.2     median: 19.2 (23%)     max: 22.18 fps
specvp11 proe-05 + NVIDIA Quadro 5000M
min: 6.4     avg: 6.6     median: 6.6 (8%)     max: 6.71 fps
specvp11 proe-05 + NVIDIA Quadro M1200
22 fps (26%)
specvp11 maya-03 + NVIDIA Quadro M2200
SPECviewperf 11 - specvp11 maya-03
min: 56.6     avg: 57.2     median: 57.2 (43%)     max: 57.7 fps
specvp11 maya-03 + NVIDIA Quadro 5000M
min: 43.9     avg: 44.6     median: 44.6 (34%)     max: 45.2 fps
specvp11 maya-03 + NVIDIA Quadro M1200
57.2 fps (43%)
specvp11 lightwave-01 + NVIDIA Quadro M2200
SPECviewperf 11 - specvp11 lightwave-01
min: 47.95     avg: 52.7     median: 52.7 (57%)     max: 57.5 fps
specvp11 lightwave-01 + NVIDIA Quadro 5000M
min: 31.9     avg: 33.3     median: 33.3 (36%)     max: 34.7 fps
specvp11 lightwave-01 + NVIDIA Quadro M1200
57.8 fps (62%)
specvp11 ensight-04 + NVIDIA Quadro M2200
SPECviewperf 11 - specvp11 ensight-04
min: 55.7     avg: 57.1     median: 57.1 (27%)     max: 58.5 fps
specvp11 ensight-04 + NVIDIA Quadro 5000M
min: 28.6     avg: 29     median: 29 (14%)     max: 29.3 fps
specvp11 ensight-04 + NVIDIA Quadro M1200
46.7 fps (22%)
specvp11 catia-03 + NVIDIA Quadro M2200
SPECviewperf 11 - specvp11 catia-03
min: 48.49     avg: 50.6     median: 50.6 (27%)     max: 52.7 fps
specvp11 catia-03 + NVIDIA Quadro 5000M
min: 25.1     avg: 26.9     median: 26.9 (14%)     max: 28.7 fps
specvp11 catia-03 + NVIDIA Quadro M1200
53.3 fps (28%)
SPECviewperf 12
specvp12 sw-03 + NVIDIA Quadro M2200
SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 sw-03
min: 85.3     avg: 90.3     median: 86.2 (21%)     max: 99.5 fps
specvp12 sw-03 + NVIDIA Quadro M1200
min: 69     avg: 72.5     median: 70 (17%)     max: 78.4 fps
specvp12 snx-02 + NVIDIA Quadro M2200
SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 snx-02
min: 57.7     avg: 58.3     median: 58.1 (9%)     max: 59 fps
specvp12 snx-02 + NVIDIA Quadro M1200
min: 34.18     avg: 35     median: 34.7 (5%)     max: 36 fps
specvp12 showcase-01 + NVIDIA Quadro M2200
SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 showcase-01
min: 31.14     avg: 32.2     median: 32.8 (7%)     max: 32.8 fps
specvp12 showcase-01 + NVIDIA Quadro M1200
min: 22.17     avg: 24.8     median: 26 (6%)     max: 26.2 fps
specvp12 mediacal-01 + NVIDIA Quadro M2200
SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 mediacal-01
min: 20.34     avg: 23.6     median: 24.6 (6%)     max: 25.66 fps
specvp12 mediacal-01 + NVIDIA Quadro M1200
min: 17.49     avg: 17.8     median: 17.8 (5%)     max: 18 fps
specvp12 maya-04 + NVIDIA Quadro M2200
SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 maya-04
min: 46.93     avg: 47.4     median: 46.9 (13%)     max: 48.34 fps
specvp12 maya-04 + NVIDIA Quadro M1200
min: 32.07     avg: 34.4     median: 33.7 (9%)     max: 37.29 fps
specvp12 energy-01 + NVIDIA Quadro M2200
SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 energy-01
min: 4.28     avg: 4.9     median: 5.2 (5%)     max: 5.26 fps
specvp12 energy-01 + NVIDIA Quadro M1200
min: 3.78     avg: 3.8     median: 3.9 (3%)     max: 3.9 fps
specvp12 creo-01 + NVIDIA Quadro M2200
SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 creo-01
min: 68.2     avg: 69.3     median: 68.5 (27%)     max: 71.2 fps
specvp12 creo-01 + NVIDIA Quadro M1200
min: 45     avg: 46     median: 46.1 (18%)     max: 46.97 fps
specvp12 catia-04 + NVIDIA Quadro M2200
SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 catia-04
min: 71.4     avg: 72.2     median: 72 (12%)     max: 73.2 fps
specvp12 catia-04 + NVIDIA Quadro M1200
min: 45.75     avg: 46.2     median: 45.9 (8%)     max: 47 fps
specvp12 3dsmax-05 + NVIDIA Quadro M1200
SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 3dsmax-05
46 fps (8%)
Cinebench R10 Cinebench R10 Shading (32bit) + NVIDIA Quadro M2200
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Shading (32bit)
6833 Points (5%)
Cinebench R11.5 Cinebench R11.5 OpenGL 64 Bit + NVIDIA Quadro M2200
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 OpenGL 64 Bit
88.6 fps (31%)
Cinebench R11.5 OpenGL 64 Bit + NVIDIA Quadro 5000M
32.7 fps (11%)
Cinebench R11.5 OpenGL 64 Bit + NVIDIA Quadro M1200
102.2 fps (35%)
Cinebench R15
Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64 Bit + NVIDIA Quadro M2200
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64 Bit
min: 102.9     avg: 107.4     median: 103.9 (6%)     max: 115.5 fps
Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64 Bit + NVIDIA Quadro M1200
min: 102.8     avg: 108.2     median: 108.2 (6%)     max: 113.5 fps
Cinebench R15 OpenGL Ref. Match 64 Bit + NVIDIA Quadro M2200
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 OpenGL Ref. Match 64 Bit
99.6 % (100%)
Cinebench R15 OpenGL Ref. Match 64 Bit + NVIDIA Quadro M1200
99.6 % (100%)
GFXBench - GFXBench Car Chase Offscreen
110.7 fps (12%)
GFXBench 3.1 - GFXBench Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen
163.7 fps (3%)
GFXBench 3.0 - GFXBench 3.0 Manhattan Offscreen
219.1 fps (13%)
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
GFXBench T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 + NVIDIA Quadro M2200
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 - GFXBench T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16
432 fps (3%)
LuxMark v2.0 64Bit - LuxMark v2.0 Room GPU
min: 1204     avg: 1276     median: 1306 (6%)     max: 1318 Samples/s
min: 656     avg: 818     median: 817.5 (4%)     max: 979 Samples/s
LuxMark v2.0 64Bit - LuxMark v2.0 Sala GPU
min: 2086     avg: 2097     median: 2099 (4%)     max: 2107 Samples/s
min: 852     avg: 1207     median: 1207 (2%)     max: 1562 Samples/s
ComputeMark v2.1 - ComputeMark v2.1 Result
4332 Points (5%)
388 Points (0%)
Power Consumption - Furmark Stress Test Power Consumption - external Monitor *
68.5 Watt (10%)
Power Consumption - The Witcher 3 Power Consumption - external Monitor *
89.2 Watt (12%)
Power Consumption - Witcher 3 Power Consumption *
87.7 Watt (19%)
min: 74.8     avg: 87.5     median: 87.5 (19%)     max: 100.2 Watt
Power Consumption - Witcher 3 ultra Power Efficiency
0.2 fps per Watt (20%)
0.2 fps per Watt (17%)
Power Consumption - Witcher 3 ultra Power Efficiency - external Monitor
0.2 fps per Watt (19%)
Emissions Witcher 3 Fan Noise + NVIDIA Quadro M2200
Emissions - Witcher 3 Fan Noise
39.5 dB(A) (63%)
Witcher 3 Fan Noise + NVIDIA Quadro M1200
min: 42.3     avg: 43.9     median: 43.9 (70%)     max: 45.5 dB(A)

Average Benchmarks NVIDIA Quadro M2200 → 100% n=10

Average Benchmarks NVIDIA Quadro 5000M → 53% n=10

Average Benchmarks NVIDIA Quadro M1200 → 101% n=10

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Game Benchmarks

The following benchmarks stem from our benchmarks of review laptops. The performance depends on the used graphics memory, clock rate, processor, system settings, drivers, and operating systems. So the results don't have to be representative for all laptops with this GPU. For detailed information on the benchmark results, click on the fps number.

low 1280x720
100%
Quadro M2200:
83.4  fps
med. 1920x1080
100%
Quadro M2200:
37.1  fps
high 1920x1080
100%
Quadro M2200:
33.7  fps
ultra 1920x1080
100%
Quadro M2200:
17.6  fps
For Honor

For Honor

2017
low 1280x720
100%
Quadro M2200:
78  fps
med. 1920x1080
100%
Quadro M2200:
52.3 54.8 ~ 54 fps
high 1920x1080
100%
Quadro M2200:
50.5 51.9 ~ 51 fps
ultra 1920x1080
100%
Quadro M2200:
36.2 37.5 ~ 37 fps
4K 3840x2160
100%
Quadro M2200:
14.6  fps
low 1280x720
100%
Quadro M2200:
139.4  fps
med. 1366x768
100%
Quadro M2200:
105.3  fps
high 1920x1080
100%
Quadro M2200:
47.1  fps
ultra 1920x1080
100%
Quadro M2200:
42  fps
Doom

Doom

2016
low 1280x720
Quadro M1200:
79  fps
med. 1366x768
Quadro M1200:
66  fps
high 1920x1080
Quadro M1200:
37  fps
ultra 1920x1080
Quadro M1200:
34  fps
4K 3840x2160
Quadro M1200:
12  fps
low 1024x768
100%
Quadro M2200:
123 128.7 ~ 126 fps
70%
Quadro M1200:
88.1  fps
med. 1366x768
100%
Quadro M2200:
68.5 71.6 72.8 ~ 71 fps
69%
Quadro M1200:
49.2  fps
high 1920x1080
100%
Quadro M2200:
37.4 40.7 41.6 ~ 40 fps
71%
Quadro M1200:
28.4  fps
ultra 1920x1080
100%
Quadro M2200:
33 34.4 35.2 ~ 34 fps
70%
Quadro M1200:
23.9  fps
4K 3840x2160
100%
Quadro M2200:
13.7  fps
72%
Quadro M1200:
9.9  fps
low 1024x768
100%
Quadro M2200:
214.2  fps
med. 1366x768
100%
Quadro M2200:
131.2  fps
high 1920x1080
100%
Quadro M2200:
70.4  fps
ultra 1920x1080
100%
Quadro M2200:
52.4  fps
low 1024x768
100%
Quadro M2200:
148.8  fps
med. 1366x768
100%
Quadro M2200:
119  fps
high 1920x1080
100%
Quadro M2200:
56.4  fps
ultra 1920x1080
100%
Quadro M2200:
48.2  fps
low 1280x720
Quadro M1200:
74  fps
med. 1366x768
Quadro M1200:
63  fps
high 1920x1080
Quadro M1200:
35  fps
ultra 1920x1080
Quadro M1200:
29  fps
4K 3840x2160
Quadro M1200:
11  fps
low 1024x768
100%
Quadro M2200:
104.6 116.6 ~ 111 fps
66%
Quadro M1200:
73.6  fps
med. 1366x768
100%
Quadro M2200:
63.4 66.6 68.4 ~ 66 fps
70%
Quadro M1200:
45.9  fps
high 1920x1080
100%
Quadro M2200:
30.3 37.2 37.8 ~ 35 fps
80%
Quadro M1200:
26.3 29 ~ 28 fps
ultra 1920x1080
100%
Quadro M2200:
18 20 20.3 ~ 19 fps
68%
Quadro M1200:
13  fps
4K 3840x2160
100%
Quadro M2200:
12.7  fps
Thief

Thief

2014
low 1024x768
100%
Quadro M2200:
108.8  fps
86%
Quadro M1200:
93.3  fps
med. 1366x768
100%
Quadro M2200:
88.6  fps
66%
Quadro M1200:
58.9  fps
high 1366x768
100%
Quadro M2200:
74.8  fps
67%
Quadro M1200:
50.1  fps
ultra 1920x1080
100%
Quadro M2200:
39.6  fps
66%
Quadro M1200:
26.2  fps
low 1024x768
100%
Quadro M2200:
171.5  fps
med. 1366x768
100%
Quadro M2200:
148.3  fps
high 1366x768
100%
Quadro M2200:
115.9  fps
ultra 1920x1080
100%
Quadro M2200:
47.8  fps
low 1280x720
100%
Quadro M2200:
229.4 270.9 ~ 250 fps
83%
Quadro M1200:
189 224.7 ~ 207 fps
med. 1366x768
100%
Quadro M2200:
174.1 177.2 ~ 176 fps
76%
Quadro M1200:
130.8 137 ~ 134 fps
high 1366x768
100%
Quadro M2200:
149.1 155.5 ~ 152 fps
78%
Quadro M1200:
113.1 125 ~ 119 fps
ultra 1920x1080
100%
Quadro M2200:
56.8 58.6 ~ 58 fps
78%
Quadro M1200:
42.6 47 ~ 45 fps
low 1024x768
100%
Quadro M2200:
381.4  fps
med. 1366x768
100%
Quadro M2200:
238.8  fps
high 1366x768
100%
Quadro M2200:
149.3  fps
ultra 1920x1080
100%
Quadro M2200:
70.2  fps

Average Gaming NVIDIA Quadro M2200 → 100%

Average Gaming 30-70 fps → 100%

Average Gaming NVIDIA Quadro M1200 → 73%

Average Gaming 30-70 fps → 70%

NVIDIA Quadro M2200lowmed.highultraQHD4K
Ghost Recon Wildlands83.437.133.717.6
For Honor7854513714.6
Battlefield 1139.4105.347.142
Rise of the Tomb Raider12671403413.7
Rainbow Six Siege214.2131.270.452.4
Star Wars Battlefront148.811956.448.2
The Witcher 311166351912.7
Thief108.888.674.839.6
Battlefield 4171.5148.3115.947.8
BioShock Infinite25017615258
Tomb Raider381.4238.8149.370.2
< 30 fps
< 60 fps
< 120 fps
≥ 120 fps


4
7

2
5
4

6
3
2
2
8
1



3


NVIDIA Quadro M1200lowmed.highultraQHD4K
Doom7966373412
Rise of the Tomb Raider88.149.1528.3623.929.88
Batman: Arkham Knight7463352911
The Witcher 373.645.92813
Thief93.358.950.126.2
BioShock Infinite20713411945
< 30 fps
< 60 fps
< 120 fps
≥ 120 fps


5
1

3
2
1
2
3
1
4
2




3


For more games that might be playable and a list of all games and graphics cards visit our Gaming List

v1.26
log 28. 13:05:12

#0 checking url part for id 7706 +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 1939 +0s ... 0s

#2 checking url part for id 7704 +0s ... 0s

#3 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#4 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Thu, 28 Mar 2024 05:37:00 +0100 +0.001s ... 0.001s

#5 composed specs +0.141s ... 0.142s

#6 did output specs +0s ... 0.142s

#7 start showIntegratedCPUs +0s ... 0.142s

#8 getting avg benchmarks for device 7706 +0.053s ... 0.196s

#9 got single benchmarks 7706 +0.019s ... 0.215s

#10 getting avg benchmarks for device 1939 +0.002s ... 0.216s

#11 got single benchmarks 1939 +0.008s ... 0.225s

#12 getting avg benchmarks for device 7704 +0.015s ... 0.24s

#13 got single benchmarks 7704 +0.014s ... 0.255s

#14 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.255s

#15 min, max, avg, median took s +0.421s ... 0.676s

#16 before gaming benchmark output +0s ... 0.676s

#17 Got 100 rows for game benchmarks. +0.014s ... 0.69s

#18 composed SQL query for gamebenchmarks +0s ... 0.69s

#19 got data and put it in $dataArray +0.009s ... 0.698s

#20 benchmarks composed for output. +0.031s ... 0.729s

#21 calculated avg scores. +0s ... 0.729s

#22 return log +0.002s ... 0.731s

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Graphics Card Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)