Notebookcheck Logo

NVIDIA Quadro M1200 vs NVIDIA Quadro M520 vs NVIDIA Quadro M5500

NVIDIA Quadro M1200

► remove from comparison NVIDIA Quadro M1200

The 28 nm Nvidia Quadro M1200 is a mid-range DirectX 12 (FL 11_0) and OpenGL 4.5-compatible graphics card for mobile workstations. It is a (first generation) Maxwell-based GPU built on the GM107 chip with 640 shader cores. Therefore, the GPU is similar to the consumer Nvidia GeForce GTX 960M. The Quadro M1200M is built for the Intel Skylake generation and is the successor to the Quadro M1000M (950M based).

The Quadro series offers certified drivers that are optimized for stability and performance in professional applications like CAD or DCC. OpenGL performance, for example, should be significantly better compared to GeForce graphics cards of similar specifications.

Performance

The performance of the Quadro M1200 is on a level to the previous generation M2000M which is also based on the 960M. In games it is comparable to the GTX 960M although the driver support is not optimized for gaming.

Using CUDA (Compute Capability 5.0) or OpenCL 1.2, the cores of the Quadro M2000M can be used for general calculations.

Power Consumption

The power consumption of the Quadro M1200 is rated for the same TGP of 45 Watt (32.5 Watt TDP) and therefore a bit lower than the M2000M with 55 Watt TGP.

NVIDIA Quadro M520

► remove from comparison

The Nvidia Quadro M520 is a DirectX 12 (FL 11_0) and OpenGL 4.5-compatible graphics card for mobile workstations. It is a Maxwell-based GPU built on the GM108 chip with 384 shader cores and manufactured in 28 nm by TSMC. That means its similar to the Quadro M500M (DDR3) but uses faster GDDR5 memory. The GeForce 940MX with GDDR5 memory is the consumer variant of the Quadro M520.

The Quadro series offers certified drivers that are optimized for stability and performance in professional applications like CAD or DCC. OpenGL performance, for example, should be significantly better than with GeForce graphics cards of similar specifications.

Architecture

Compared to Kepler, Maxwell has been optimized in several details to increase power efficiency. Smaller Streaming Multiprocessors (SMM) with only 128 ALUs (Kepler: 192) and an optimized scheduler should lead to better utilization of the shaders. Nvidia promises that a Maxwell SMM with 128 ALUs can offer 90% of the performance of a Kepler SMX with 192 ALUs. GM108 features 3 SMMs and thus 384 shader cores, 24 TMUs and 8 ROPs (64-bit interface).

Another optimization is the massively enlarged L2 cache. The larger size can reduce some of the memory traffic to allow for a relatively narrow memory interface without significantly hurting performance.

GM108 supports DirectX 11.2 (feature level 11.0 only) as well as DirectX 12.

Performance

Currently the clock speeds are not known of the M520 variant. They should be similar to the consumer 940 MX with GDDR5. Therefore, the performance should be similar to the Quadro K620M.

Features

The feature set should include support for up to four active displays. High-resolution monitors of up to 3840x2160 pixels can be connected using DisplayPort 1.2 or HDMI 1.4a (HDMI 2.0 not supported). HD-Audio codecs, such as Dolby TrueHD and DTS-HD, can be transmitted via bitstream mode through the HDMI port. However, as most laptops will feature Optimus, the integrated GPU will likely have direct control over the display ports and may limit the feature set available by the Nvidia Kepler cards.

Using CUDA or OpenCL, the cores of the Quadro M520 can be used for general calculations.

GM108 integrates the sixth generation of the PureVideo HD video engine (VP6), offering a better decoding performance for H.264 and MPEG-2 videos. Of course, VP6 supports all features of previous generations (4K support, PIP, video encoding via NVENC API).

Power Consumption

The power consumption of the Quadro M520 is rated at 25 Watt TGP (max power consumption including memory and board). That is slightly below the M500M that is rated at 30 Watt. Therefore, the GPU is best suited for laptops 13 - 14-inches in size and above. The M500M also supports Optimus to automatically switch between an integrated graphics card and the Nvidia GPU.

NVIDIA Quadro M5500

► remove from comparison NVIDIA Quadro M5500

The Nvidia Quadro M5500 is a high-end, DirectX 12 (FL_12_1) and OpenGL 4.5-compatible graphics card for mobile workstations. It is a Maxwell-based GPU built on the GM204 chip with all 2048 shader cores activated and is manufactured in 28 nm at TSMC. Therefore, the GPU is similar to the consumer Nvidia GeForce GTX 980 (Notebook). Compared to the slower and less power hungry Quadro M5000M, the M5500 offers 512 more shaders which should result in 30-40% more performance according to Nvidia.

The Quadro series offers certified drivers that are optimized for stability and performance in professional applications like CAD or DCC. OpenGL performance, for example, should be significantly better compared to GeForce graphics cards of similar specifications.

Using CUDA (Compute Capability 5.2) or OpenCL 1.2, the cores of the Quadro M5000M can be used for general calculations.

The power consumption of the Quadro M5000M is rated at the same TGP of 150 Watt. Therefore, the card is suited for very large notebooks with 17-inch displays or greater.

The first laptop with the M5500 in it is the MSI WT72 Workstation.

NVIDIA Quadro M1200NVIDIA Quadro M520NVIDIA Quadro M5500
Quadro M Series
Quadro M5500 2048 @ 1.14 - 1.14 GHz256 Bit @ 6606 MHz
Quadro M5000M 1536 @ 0.96 - 1.05 GHz256 Bit @ 5000 MHz
Quadro M4000M 1280 @ 0.98 - 1.01 GHz256 Bit @ 5012 MHz
Quadro M3000M 1024 @ 1.05 GHz256 Bit @ 5000 MHz
Quadro M2200 1024 @ 0.69 - 1.04 GHz128 Bit @ 5508 MHz
Quadro M1200 640 @ 0.99 - 1.15 GHz128 Bit @ 5000 MHz
Quadro M2000M 640 @ 1.04 - 1.2 GHz128 Bit @ 5000 MHz
Quadro M1000M 512 @ 0.99 - 1.07 GHz128 Bit @ 5000 MHz
Quadro M620 512 @ 1.02 GHz128 Bit @ 5012 MHz
Quadro 5010M 384 @ 0.45 GHz256 Bit @ 1300 MHz
Quadro 4000M 336 @ 0.48 GHz256 Bit @ 1200 MHz
Quadro M520 384 @ 0.76 - 1.02 GHz64 Bit
Quadro M600M 384 @ 0.84 - 0.88 GHz128 Bit @ 5012 MHz
Quadro M500M 384 @ 1.03 - 1.12 GHz64 Bit @ 4004 MHz
Quadro 5000M 320 @ 0.41 GHz256 Bit @ 1200 MHz
Quadro 3000M 240 @ 0.45 GHz256 Bit @ 625 MHz
Quadro 2000M 192 @ 0.55 GHz128 Bit @ 900 MHz
Quadro 1000M 96 @ 0.7 GHz128 Bit @ 900 MHz
Quadro M5500 2048 @ 1.14 - 1.14 GHz256 Bit @ 6606 MHz
Quadro M5000M 1536 @ 0.96 - 1.05 GHz256 Bit @ 5000 MHz
Quadro M4000M 1280 @ 0.98 - 1.01 GHz256 Bit @ 5012 MHz
Quadro M3000M 1024 @ 1.05 GHz256 Bit @ 5000 MHz
Quadro M2200 1024 @ 0.69 - 1.04 GHz128 Bit @ 5508 MHz
Quadro M1200 640 @ 0.99 - 1.15 GHz128 Bit @ 5000 MHz
Quadro M2000M 640 @ 1.04 - 1.2 GHz128 Bit @ 5000 MHz
Quadro M1000M 512 @ 0.99 - 1.07 GHz128 Bit @ 5000 MHz
Quadro M620 512 @ 1.02 GHz128 Bit @ 5012 MHz
Quadro 5010M 384 @ 0.45 GHz256 Bit @ 1300 MHz
Quadro 4000M 336 @ 0.48 GHz256 Bit @ 1200 MHz
Quadro M520 384 @ 0.76 - 1.02 GHz64 Bit
Quadro M600M 384 @ 0.84 - 0.88 GHz128 Bit @ 5012 MHz
Quadro M500M 384 @ 1.03 - 1.12 GHz64 Bit @ 4004 MHz
Quadro 5000M 320 @ 0.41 GHz256 Bit @ 1200 MHz
Quadro 3000M 240 @ 0.45 GHz256 Bit @ 625 MHz
Quadro 2000M 192 @ 0.55 GHz128 Bit @ 900 MHz
Quadro 1000M 96 @ 0.7 GHz128 Bit @ 900 MHz
Quadro M5500 2048 @ 1.14 - 1.14 GHz256 Bit @ 6606 MHz
Quadro M5000M 1536 @ 0.96 - 1.05 GHz256 Bit @ 5000 MHz
Quadro M4000M 1280 @ 0.98 - 1.01 GHz256 Bit @ 5012 MHz
Quadro M3000M 1024 @ 1.05 GHz256 Bit @ 5000 MHz
Quadro M2200 1024 @ 0.69 - 1.04 GHz128 Bit @ 5508 MHz
Quadro M1200 640 @ 0.99 - 1.15 GHz128 Bit @ 5000 MHz
Quadro M2000M 640 @ 1.04 - 1.2 GHz128 Bit @ 5000 MHz
Quadro M1000M 512 @ 0.99 - 1.07 GHz128 Bit @ 5000 MHz
Quadro M620 512 @ 1.02 GHz128 Bit @ 5012 MHz
Quadro 5010M 384 @ 0.45 GHz256 Bit @ 1300 MHz
Quadro 4000M 336 @ 0.48 GHz256 Bit @ 1200 MHz
Quadro M520 384 @ 0.76 - 1.02 GHz64 Bit
Quadro M600M 384 @ 0.84 - 0.88 GHz128 Bit @ 5012 MHz
Quadro M500M 384 @ 1.03 - 1.12 GHz64 Bit @ 4004 MHz
Quadro 5000M 320 @ 0.41 GHz256 Bit @ 1200 MHz
Quadro 3000M 240 @ 0.45 GHz256 Bit @ 625 MHz
Quadro 2000M 192 @ 0.55 GHz128 Bit @ 900 MHz
Quadro 1000M 96 @ 0.7 GHz128 Bit @ 900 MHz
CodenameN17P-Q1
ArchitectureMaxwellMaxwellMaxwell
Pipelines640 - unified384 - unified2048 - unified
Core Speed991 - 1150 (Boost) MHz756 - 1019 (Boost) MHz1139 - 1140 (Boost) MHz
Memory Speed5000 MHz6606 MHz
Memory Bus Width128 Bit64 Bit256 Bit
Memory TypeGDDR5GDDR5GDDR5
Max. Amount of Memory4 GB1024 MB8 GB
Shared Memorynonono
APIDirectX 12 (FL 11_0), Shader 5.0, OpenGL 4.5DirectX 12 (FL 11_0), Shader 5.0, OpenGL 4.5DirectX 12_1, OpenGL 4.5
Power Consumption45 Watt25 Watt150 Watt
Transistors1.9 Billion5.2 Billion
technology28 nm28 nm28 nm
FeaturesOptimus, PhysX, 3D Vision Pro, nView, OptimusOptimus, PhysX, 3D Vision Pro, nView, OptimusCUDA, 3D Vision, PhysX, GeForce Experience, Surround, GameStream, GPU Boost 2.0, Adaptive Vertical Sync, G-SYNC, SLI
Notebook Sizelargemedium sizedlarge
Date of Announcement13.01.2017 13.01.2017 04.04.2016
Link to Manufacturer Pagewww.nvidia.dewww.nvidia.de

Benchmarks

Performance Rating - 3DMark 11 + Fire Strike + Time Spy - Quadro M1200
1.9 pt (6%)
Performance Rating - 3DMark 11 + Fire Strike + Time Spy - Quadro M520
1.1 pt (3%)
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy Score
1290 Points (4%)
684 Points (2%)
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy Graphics
614 Points (2%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics
240298 Points (27%)
166193 Points (19%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Extreme Graphics
42129 Points (5%)
20741 Points (3%)
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Score
min: 12632     avg: 14705     median: 13600 (15%)     max: 17884 Points
8544 Points (9%)
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Graphics
min: 26860     avg: 27557     median: 27557 (7%)     max: 28254 Points
13394 Points (4%)
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Score
min: 3759     avg: 3846     median: 3878 (7%)     max: 3900 Points
2139 Points (4%)
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Graphics
min: 4118     avg: 4142     median: 4141.5 (5%)     max: 4165 Points
2342 Points (3%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Graphics
63463 Points (8%)
33703 Points (4%)
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Score
min: 5513     avg: 5515     median: 5514.5 (8%)     max: 5516 Points
2884 Points (4%)
14413 Points (20%)
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance GPU
min: 5105     avg: 5310     median: 5310 (5%)     max: 5515 Points
2658 Points (2%)
3DMark Vantage
3DM Vant. Perf. total + NVIDIA Quadro M520
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. total
11278 Points (3%)
3DM Vant. Perf. GPU no PhysX + NVIDIA Quadro M520
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. GPU no PhysX
10861 Points (6%)
3DMark 06 3DMark 06 - Standard 1280x1024 + NVIDIA Quadro M1200
3DMark 06
26109 Points (34%)
3DMark 06 - Standard 1280x1024 + NVIDIA Quadro M520
17305 Points (23%)
Unigine Valley 1.0 - Unigine Valley 1.0 DX
27.7 fps (9%)
11.4 fps (4%)
Unigine Heaven 3.0 - Unigine Heaven 3.0 DX 11
30.1 fps (10%)
27.9 fps (9%)
Unigine Heaven 3.0 - Unigine Heaven 3.0 OpenGL
28.9 fps (13%)
28.8 fps (13%)
Unigine Heaven 2.1 - Heaven 2.1 high
28.1 fps (5%)
39.5 fps (7%)
SPECviewperf 11
specvp11 snx-01 + NVIDIA Quadro M1200
SPECviewperf 11 - specvp11 snx-01
43.9 fps (26%)
specvp11 snx-01 + NVIDIA Quadro M520
31.3 fps (19%)
specvp11 tcvis-02 + NVIDIA Quadro M1200
SPECviewperf 11 - specvp11 tcvis-02
44.2 fps (25%)
specvp11 tcvis-02 + NVIDIA Quadro M520
35.8 fps (20%)
specvp11 sw-02 + NVIDIA Quadro M1200
SPECviewperf 11 - specvp11 sw-02
56.4 fps (43%)
specvp11 sw-02 + NVIDIA Quadro M520
43.7 fps (33%)
specvp11 proe-05 + NVIDIA Quadro M1200
SPECviewperf 11 - specvp11 proe-05
22 fps (26%)
specvp11 proe-05 + NVIDIA Quadro M520
16.8 fps (20%)
specvp11 maya-03 + NVIDIA Quadro M1200
SPECviewperf 11 - specvp11 maya-03
57.2 fps (43%)
specvp11 maya-03 + NVIDIA Quadro M520
50.8 fps (38%)
specvp11 lightwave-01 + NVIDIA Quadro M1200
SPECviewperf 11 - specvp11 lightwave-01
57.8 fps (62%)
specvp11 lightwave-01 + NVIDIA Quadro M520
48.3 fps (52%)
specvp11 ensight-04 + NVIDIA Quadro M1200
SPECviewperf 11 - specvp11 ensight-04
46.7 fps (22%)
specvp11 ensight-04 + NVIDIA Quadro M520
24.8 fps (12%)
specvp11 catia-03 + NVIDIA Quadro M1200
SPECviewperf 11 - specvp11 catia-03
53.3 fps (28%)
specvp11 catia-03 + NVIDIA Quadro M520
40.5 fps (21%)
SPECviewperf 12
specvp12 sw-03 + NVIDIA Quadro M1200
SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 sw-03
min: 69     avg: 72.5     median: 70 (17%)     max: 78.4 fps
specvp12 sw-03 + NVIDIA Quadro M520
45.9 fps (11%)
specvp12 sw-03 + NVIDIA Quadro M5500
144 fps (36%)
specvp12 snx-02 + NVIDIA Quadro M1200
SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 snx-02
min: 34.18     avg: 35     median: 34.7 (5%)     max: 36 fps
specvp12 snx-02 + NVIDIA Quadro M520
24.1 fps (4%)
specvp12 snx-02 + NVIDIA Quadro M5500
120 fps (18%)
specvp12 showcase-01 + NVIDIA Quadro M1200
SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 showcase-01
min: 22.17     avg: 24.8     median: 26 (6%)     max: 26.2 fps
specvp12 showcase-01 + NVIDIA Quadro M520
11.8 fps (3%)
specvp12 showcase-01 + NVIDIA Quadro M5500
60.3 fps (13%)
specvp12 mediacal-01 + NVIDIA Quadro M1200
SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 mediacal-01
min: 17.49     avg: 17.8     median: 17.8 (5%)     max: 18 fps
specvp12 mediacal-01 + NVIDIA Quadro M520
8.3 fps (2%)
specvp12 mediacal-01 + NVIDIA Quadro M5500
53.8 fps (14%)
specvp12 maya-04 + NVIDIA Quadro M1200
SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 maya-04
min: 32.07     avg: 34.4     median: 33.7 (9%)     max: 37.29 fps
specvp12 maya-04 + NVIDIA Quadro M520
19.5 fps (5%)
specvp12 maya-04 + NVIDIA Quadro M5500
95 fps (26%)
specvp12 energy-01 + NVIDIA Quadro M1200
SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 energy-01
min: 3.78     avg: 3.8     median: 3.9 (3%)     max: 3.9 fps
specvp12 energy-01 + NVIDIA Quadro M520
0.5 fps (0%)
specvp12 energy-01 + NVIDIA Quadro M5500
12.2 fps (11%)
specvp12 creo-01 + NVIDIA Quadro M1200
SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 creo-01
min: 45     avg: 46     median: 46.1 (18%)     max: 46.97 fps
specvp12 creo-01 + NVIDIA Quadro M520
28 fps (11%)
specvp12 creo-01 + NVIDIA Quadro M5500
110 fps (44%)
specvp12 catia-04 + NVIDIA Quadro M1200
SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 catia-04
min: 45.75     avg: 46.2     median: 45.9 (8%)     max: 47 fps
specvp12 catia-04 + NVIDIA Quadro M520
26.2 fps (4%)
specvp12 catia-04 + NVIDIA Quadro M5500
137 fps (23%)
specvp12 3dsmax-05 + NVIDIA Quadro M1200
SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 3dsmax-05
46 fps (8%)
specvp12 3dsmax-05 + NVIDIA Quadro M520
19.7 fps (3%)
Cinebench R10 Cinebench R10 Shading (32bit) + NVIDIA Quadro M520
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Shading (32bit)
6813 Points (5%)
Cinebench R11.5 Cinebench R11.5 OpenGL 64 Bit + NVIDIA Quadro M1200
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 OpenGL 64 Bit
102.2 fps (35%)
Cinebench R11.5 OpenGL 64 Bit + NVIDIA Quadro M520
70.9 fps (25%)
Cinebench R15
Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64 Bit + NVIDIA Quadro M1200
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64 Bit
min: 102.8     avg: 108.2     median: 108.2 (6%)     max: 113.5 fps
Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64 Bit + NVIDIA Quadro M520
75.5 fps (4%)
Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64 Bit + NVIDIA Quadro M5500
106.7 fps (6%)
Cinebench R15 OpenGL Ref. Match 64 Bit + NVIDIA Quadro M1200
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 OpenGL Ref. Match 64 Bit
99.6 % (100%)
Cinebench R15 OpenGL Ref. Match 64 Bit + NVIDIA Quadro M520
99.6 % (100%)
GFXBench - GFXBench Car Chase Offscreen
53.1 fps (6%)
GFXBench 3.1 - GFXBench Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen
74.3 fps (2%)
GFXBench 3.0 - GFXBench 3.0 Manhattan Offscreen
95.4 fps (6%)
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
GFXBench T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 + NVIDIA Quadro M520
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 - GFXBench T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16
178.5 fps (1%)
LuxMark v2.0 64Bit - LuxMark v2.0 Room GPU
min: 656     avg: 818     median: 817.5 (4%)     max: 979 Samples/s
405 Samples/s (2%)
LuxMark v2.0 64Bit - LuxMark v2.0 Sala GPU
min: 852     avg: 1207     median: 1207 (2%)     max: 1562 Samples/s
708 Samples/s (1%)
ComputeMark v2.1 - ComputeMark v2.1 Result
388 Points (0%)
2045 Points (2%)
Power Consumption - Furmark Stress Test Power Consumption - external Monitor *
34.6 Watt (5%)
Power Consumption - The Witcher 3 Power Consumption - external Monitor *
43.4 Watt (6%)
Power Consumption - Witcher 3 Power Consumption *
min: 74.8     avg: 87.5     median: 87.5 (19%)     max: 100.2 Watt
Power Consumption - Witcher 3 ultra Power Efficiency
0.2 fps per Watt (17%)
Emissions Witcher 3 Fan Noise + NVIDIA Quadro M1200
Emissions - Witcher 3 Fan Noise
min: 42.3     avg: 43.9     median: 43.9 (70%)     max: 45.5 dB(A)

Average Benchmarks NVIDIA Quadro M1200 → 100% n=10

Average Benchmarks NVIDIA Quadro M520 → 54% n=10

Average Benchmarks NVIDIA Quadro M5500 → 258% n=10

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Game Benchmarks

The following benchmarks stem from our benchmarks of review laptops. The performance depends on the used graphics memory, clock rate, processor, system settings, drivers, and operating systems. So the results don't have to be representative for all laptops with this GPU. For detailed information on the benchmark results, click on the fps number.

Prey

Prey

2017
low 1280x720
Quadro M520:
85.4  fps
med. 1920x1080
Quadro M520:
32.8  fps
high 1920x1080
Quadro M520:
26.7  fps
ultra 1920x1080
Quadro M520:
22  fps
low 1280x720
Quadro M520:
38.1  fps
med. 1920x1080
Quadro M520:
14.3  fps
high 1920x1080
Quadro M520:
12  fps
ultra 1920x1080
Quadro M520:
3.6  fps
For Honor

For Honor

2017
low 1280x720
Quadro M520:
64.6  fps
med. 1920x1080
Quadro M520:
23  fps
high 1920x1080
Quadro M520:
21.9  fps
ultra 1920x1080
Quadro M520:
15.9  fps
low 1280x720
Quadro M520:
84  fps
med. 1920x1080
Quadro M520:
40  fps
high 1920x1080
Quadro M520:
22.1  fps
ultra 1920x1080
Quadro M520:
6.6  fps
low 1280x720
Quadro M520:
72.2  fps
med. 1366x768
Quadro M520:
52.5  fps
high 1920x1080
Quadro M520:
21.3  fps
ultra 1920x1080
Quadro M520:
17.3  fps
low 1280x720
Quadro M520:
183.1  fps
med. 1366x768
Quadro M520:
120.6  fps
high 1920x1080
Quadro M520:
49.8  fps
ultra 1920x1080
Quadro M520:
32.1  fps
4K 3840x2160
Quadro M520:
13.7  fps
low 1280x720
Quadro M520:
56.4  fps
med. 1366x768
Quadro M520:
43.9  fps
high 1920x1080
Quadro M520:
33  fps
ultra 1920x1080
Quadro M520:
28.2  fps
low 1024x768
Quadro M520:
50.8  fps
med. 1366x768
Quadro M520:
30.4  fps
high 1920x1080
Quadro M520:
15.2  fps
ultra 1920x1080
Quadro M520:
11.7  fps
low 1280x720
Quadro M520:
27.2  fps
med. 1366x768
Quadro M520:
21  fps
high 1920x1080
Quadro M520:
11.6  fps
ultra 1920x1080
Quadro M520:
5.3  fps
Doom

Doom

2016
low 1280x720
100%
Quadro M1200:
79  fps
med. 1366x768
100%
Quadro M1200:
66  fps
high 1920x1080
100%
Quadro M1200:
37  fps
ultra 1920x1080
100%
Quadro M1200:
34  fps
4K 3840x2160
100%
Quadro M1200:
12  fps
low 1280x768
Quadro M520:
23.6  fps
med. 1920x1080
Quadro M520:
14.3  fps
high 1920x1080
Quadro M520:
12  fps
low 1280x720
Quadro M520:
52.2  fps
med. 1366x768
Quadro M520:
31.8  fps
high 1920x1080
Quadro M520:
14.8  fps
ultra 1920x1080
Quadro M520:
11.2  fps
low 1280x720
Quadro M520:
46  fps
med. 1920x1080
Quadro M520:
20  fps
high 1920x1080
Quadro M520:
18  fps
ultra 1920x1080
Quadro M520:
12  fps
low 1024x768
100%
Quadro M1200:
88.1  fps
34%
Quadro M520:
30  fps
med. 1366x768
100%
Quadro M1200:
49.2  fps
44%
Quadro M520:
21.5  fps
high 1920x1080
100%
Quadro M1200:
28.4  fps
47%
Quadro M520:
13.3  fps
ultra 1920x1080
100%
Quadro M1200:
23.9  fps
49%
Quadro M520:
11.7  fps
4K 3840x2160
100%
Quadro M1200:
9.9  fps
low 1024x768
Quadro M520:
94.5  fps
med. 1366x768
Quadro M520:
60.1  fps
high 1920x1080
Quadro M520:
31.8  fps
ultra 1920x1080
Quadro M520:
22.8  fps
4K 3840x2160
Quadro M520:
8.1  fps
low 1024x768
Quadro M520:
78.2  fps
med. 1366x768
Quadro M520:
48.9  fps
high 1920x1080
Quadro M520:
22.3  fps
ultra 1920x1080
Quadro M520:
19.1  fps
Anno 2205

Anno 2205

2015
low 1024x768
Quadro M520:
60.1  fps
med. 1366x768
Quadro M520:
36.2  fps
high 1920x1080
Quadro M520:
17.7  fps
ultra 1920x1080
Quadro M520:
7.4  fps
low 1366x768
Quadro M520:
135.6  fps
med. 1366x768
Quadro M520:
108.1  fps
high 1920x1080
Quadro M520:
54  fps
ultra 1920x1080
Quadro M520:
36.7  fps
4K 3840 x 2160
Quadro M520:
11  fps
low 1280x720
100%
Quadro M1200:
74  fps
med. 1366x768
100%
Quadro M1200:
63  fps
high 1920x1080
100%
Quadro M1200:
35  fps
ultra 1920x1080
100%
Quadro M1200:
29  fps
4K 3840x2160
100%
Quadro M1200:
11  fps
low 1024x768
100%
Quadro M1200:
73.6  fps
med. 1366x768
100%
Quadro M1200:
45.9  fps
high 1920x1080
100%
Quadro M1200:
26.3 29 ~ 28 fps
ultra 1920x1080
100%
Quadro M1200:
13  fps
low 1024x768
Quadro M520:
145.6  fps
med. 1366x768
Quadro M520:
75.1  fps
high 1920x1080
Quadro M520:
40.5  fps
ultra 1920x1080
Quadro M520:
18.7  fps
4K 3840x2160
Quadro M520:
14.7  fps
low 1024x768
Quadro M520:
81.1  fps
med. 1366x768
Quadro M520:
74.2  fps
high 1920x1080
Quadro M520:
30.4  fps
ultra 1920x1080
Quadro M520:
19.6  fps
low 1024x768
Quadro M520:
68.2  fps
med. 1366x768
Quadro M520:
51.7  fps
high 1920x1080
Quadro M520:
18.3  fps
ultra 1920x1080
Quadro M520:
12.2  fps
low 1280x720
Quadro M520:
54.6  fps
med. 1344x756
Quadro M520:
32.9  fps
high 1920x1080
Quadro M520:
22.8  fps
ultra 1920x1080
Quadro M520:
16.2  fps
Thief

Thief

2014
low 1024x768
100%
Quadro M1200:
93.3  fps
med. 1366x768
100%
Quadro M1200:
58.9  fps
high 1366x768
100%
Quadro M1200:
50.1  fps
ultra 1920x1080
100%
Quadro M1200:
26.2  fps
low 1280x720
100%
Quadro M1200:
189 224.7 ~ 207 fps
67%
Quadro M520:
138.2  fps
med. 1366x768
100%
Quadro M1200:
130.8 137 ~ 134 fps
57%
Quadro M520:
76.9  fps
high 1366x768
100%
Quadro M1200:
113.1 125 ~ 119 fps
54%
Quadro M520:
64.1  fps
ultra 1920x1080
100%
Quadro M1200:
42.6 47 ~ 45 fps
54%
Quadro M520:
24.2  fps
low 1024x768
Quadro M520:
188.1  fps
med. 1366x768
Quadro M520:
97.9  fps
high 1366x768
Quadro M520:
59.5  fps
ultra 1920x1080
Quadro M520:
28.8  fps

Average Gaming NVIDIA Quadro M1200 → 100%

Average Gaming 30-70 fps → 100%

Average Gaming NVIDIA Quadro M520 → 51%

Average Gaming 30-70 fps → 54%

NVIDIA Quadro M520lowmed.highultraQHD4K
Prey85.432.826.722
Ghost Recon Wildlands38.114.3123.6
For Honor64.62321.915.9
Resident Evil 7844022.16.6
Titanfall 272.252.521.317.3
Farming Simulator 17183.1120.649.832.113.7
Battlefield 156.443.93328.2
Civilization VI50.830.415.211.7
Deus Ex Mankind Divided27.22111.65.3
Ashes of the Singularity23.614.312
The Division52.231.814.811.2
Far Cry Primal46201812
Rise of the Tomb Raider3021.513.311.7
Rainbow Six Siege94.560.131.822.88.1
Star Wars Battlefront78.248.922.319.1
Anno 220560.136.217.77.4
World of Warships135.6108.15436.711
Dirt Rally145.675.140.518.714.7
Battlefield Hardline81.174.230.419.6
Dragon Age: Inquisition68.251.718.312.2
Middle-earth: Shadow of Mordor54.632.922.816.2
BioShock Infinite138.276.964.124.2
Tomb Raider188.197.959.528.8
< 30 fps
< 60 fps
< 120 fps
≥ 120 fps
2
7
9
5
6
10
6
1
15
7
1
20
2




4


NVIDIA Quadro M1200lowmed.highultraQHD4K
Doom7966373412
Rise of the Tomb Raider88.149.1528.3623.929.88
Batman: Arkham Knight7463352911
The Witcher 373.645.92813
Thief93.358.950.126.2
BioShock Infinite20713411945
< 30 fps
< 60 fps
< 120 fps
≥ 120 fps


5
1

3
2
1
2
3
1
4
2




3


For more games that might be playable and a list of all games and graphics cards visit our Gaming List

v1.26
log 19. 00:12:45

#0 checking url part for id 7704 +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 7710 +0s ... 0s

#2 checking url part for id 7282 +0s ... 0s

#3 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#4 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Tue, 16 Apr 2024 05:39:00 +0200 +0.001s ... 0.001s

#5 composed specs +0.134s ... 0.135s

#6 did output specs +0s ... 0.135s

#7 start showIntegratedCPUs +0s ... 0.135s

#8 getting avg benchmarks for device 7704 +0.047s ... 0.182s

#9 got single benchmarks 7704 +0.016s ... 0.199s

#10 getting avg benchmarks for device 7710 +0.015s ... 0.213s

#11 got single benchmarks 7710 +0.007s ... 0.221s

#12 getting avg benchmarks for device 7282 +0.002s ... 0.222s

#13 got single benchmarks 7282 +0.007s ... 0.229s

#14 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.229s

#15 min, max, avg, median took s +0.272s ... 0.501s

#16 before gaming benchmark output +0s ... 0.501s

#17 Got 127 rows for game benchmarks. +0.013s ... 0.514s

#18 composed SQL query for gamebenchmarks +0s ... 0.514s

#19 got data and put it in $dataArray +0.019s ... 0.533s

#20 benchmarks composed for output. +0.061s ... 0.594s

#21 calculated avg scores. +0s ... 0.594s

#22 return log +0.002s ... 0.596s

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Graphics Card Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)