NVIDIA Quadro M1200 vs NVIDIA Quadro M2200 vs NVIDIA Quadro M3000M
NVIDIA Quadro M1200 ► remove from comparison
The 28 nm Nvidia Quadro M1200 is a mid-range DirectX 12 (FL 11_0) and OpenGL 4.5-compatible graphics card for mobile workstations. It is a (first generation) Maxwell-based GPU built on the GM107 chip with 640 shader cores. Therefore, the GPU is similar to the consumer Nvidia GeForce GTX 960M . The Quadro M1200M is built for the Intel Skylake generation and is the successor to the Quadro M1000M (950M based) .
The Quadro series offers certified drivers that are optimized for stability and performance in professional applications like CAD or DCC. OpenGL performance, for example, should be significantly better compared to GeForce graphics cards of similar specifications.
Performance
The performance of the Quadro M1200 is on a level to the previous generation M2000M which is also based on the 960M. In games it is comparable to the GTX 960M although the driver support is not optimized for gaming.
Using CUDA (Compute Capability 5.0) or OpenCL 1.2 , the cores of the Quadro M2000M can be used for general calculations.
Power Consumption
The power consumption of the Quadro M1200 is rated for the same TGP of 45 Watt (32.5 Watt TDP) and therefore a bit lower than the M2000M with 55 Watt TGP.
NVIDIA Quadro M2200 ► remove from comparison
The Nvidia Quadro M2200 is a mid-range DirectX 12 (FL 12_1) and OpenGL 4.5-compatible graphics card for mobile workstations. It is a Maxwell-based GPU built most likely on the GM206 chip with 1024 shader cores. Therefore, the GPU is similar to the consumer Nvidia GeForce GTX 965M (second generation) . The Quadro M2200M is built for the Intel Kaby Lake generation.
The Quadro series offers certified drivers that are optimized for stability and performance in professional applications like CAD or DCC. OpenGL performance, for example, should be significantly better compared to GeForce graphics cards of similar specifications.
Performance
The maximum core clock of the Quadro M2200 is 1038 MHz. The performance is between the old Quadro M2000M and Quadro M3000M , but generally closer to the latter (sometimes even on par). It is not surprising that the gaming performance is comparable to the Nvidia GeForce GTX 965M (Ti) and it is just behind the new GeForce GTX 1050 (Pascal).
Using CUDA (Compute Capability 5.0) or OpenCL 1.2 , the cores of the Quadro M2200 can be used for general calculations.
Power Consumption
The power consumption of the Quadro M2200 is rated at a TGP of 55 Watt (39.1 Watt TDP) – similar to the previous Quadro M2000M – and therefore best suited for 15-inch laptops and up.
NVIDIA Quadro M3000M ► remove from comparison
The Nvidia Quadro M3000M is a high-end, DirectX 12 (FL_12_1) and OpenGL 4.5-compatible graphics card for mobile workstations. It is a Maxwell-based GPU built on the GM204 chip with 1024 of the 1536 shader cores activated and is manufactured in 28 nm at TSMC. Therefore, the GPU is similar to the consumer Nvidia GeForce GTX 965M . The Quadro M3000M is built for the Intel Skylake generation and is a successor to the Quadro K3100M (Kepler-based). The M3000M usually comes with 4 GB GDDR5 VRAM clocked at 1250 MHz (5000 MHz effective, 160 GB/s opposed to 102.4 GB/s of the K5100M).
The Quadro series offers certified drivers that are optimized for stability and performance in professional applications like CAD or DCC. OpenGL performance, for example, should be significantly better compared to GeForce graphics cards of similar specifications.
Performance
As the exact clock speed of the M3000M is still not known, we can only speculate on the performance of the card. However, it is the mid-range model of the mobile Quadro line in 2015 and based on the same chip as the GeForce GTX 965M. Therefore, it should be clearly faster than the old Quadro K3100M.
Using CUDA (Compute Capability 5.2) or OpenCL 1.2 , the cores of the Quadro M3000M can be used for general calculations.
Power Consumption
The power consumption of the Quadro M3000M is rated at the same TGP of 75 Watt as the K3100M (including the board and memory components). Therefore, the card is suited for large notebooks with 17-inch displays or greater and 25 Watt less than the M4000M and M5000M.
NVIDIA Quadro M1200 NVIDIA Quadro M2200 NVIDIA Quadro M3000M Quadro M Series Codename N17P-Q1 N17P-Q3 Architecture Maxwell Maxwell Maxwell Pipelines 640 - unified 1024 - unified 1024 - unified Core Speed 991 - 1150 (Boost) MHz 694 - 1038 (Boost) MHz 1050 MHz Memory Speed 5000 MHz 5508 MHz 5000 MHz Memory Bus Width 128 Bit 128 Bit 256 Bit Memory Type GDDR5 GDDR5 GDDR5 Max. Amount of Memory 4 GB 4 GB 4 GB Shared Memory no no no API DirectX 12 (FL 11_0), Shader 5.0, OpenGL 4.5 DirectX 12_1, Shader 5.0, OpenGL 4.5 DirectX 12_1, Shader 5.0, OpenGL 4.5 Power Consumption 45 Watt 55 Watt 75 Watt Transistors 1.9 Billion 4.9 Billion 5.2 Billion technology 28 nm 28 nm 28 nm Features Optimus,
PhysX, 3D Vision Pro, nView, Optimus Optimus,
PhysX, 3D Vision Pro, nView, Optimus Optimus,
PhysX, 3D Vision Pro, nView, Optimus Notebook Size large large large Date of Announcement 13.01.2017 13.01.2017 02.10.2015 Link to Manufacturer Page www.nvidia.de www.nvidia.de www.nvidia.com
Benchmarks Performance Rating - 3DMark 11 + Fire Strike + Time Spy - Quadro M1200
1.9 pt (6%)
...
...
max:
Performance Rating - 3DMark 11 + Fire Strike + Time Spy - Quadro M2200
2.7 pt (8%)
...
...
max:
Performance Rating - 3DMark 11 + Fire Strike + Time Spy - Quadro M3000M
3 pt (9%)
...
...
max:
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy Score
1290 Points (4%)
min: 1845 avg: 1889 median: 1903 (5%) max: 1920 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy Graphics
min: 1699 avg: 1724 median: 1724 (5%) max: 1750 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics
240298 Points (27%)
min: 280203 avg: 289176 median: 289176 (33%) max: 298148 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Extreme Graphics
42129 Points (5%)
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Score
min: 12632 avg: 14705 median: 13600 (15%) max: 17884 Points
min: 20388 avg: 21012 median: 20644 (22%) max: 22003 Points
min: 19732 avg: 21408 median: 21407.5 (23%) max: 23083 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Graphics
min: 26860 avg: 27557 median: 27557 (7%) max: 28254 Points
min: 36877 avg: 37505 median: 37796 (10%) max: 37841 Points
min: 38539 avg: 44603 median: 44602.5 (12%) max: 50666 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Score
min: 3759 avg: 3846 median: 3878 (7%) max: 3900 Points
min: 5232 avg: 5253 median: 5252 (9%) max: 5275 Points
min: 5835 avg: 5972 median: 5971.5 (11%) max: 6108 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Graphics
min: 4118 avg: 4142 median: 4141.5 (5%) max: 4165 Points
min: 5786 avg: 5835 median: 5850 (7%) max: 5869 Points
min: 6415 avg: 6537 median: 6536.5 (7%) max: 6658 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Graphics
63463 Points (8%)
min: 127867 avg: 195445 median: 195444 (23%) max: 263022 Points
min: 42957 avg: 84310 median: 84309.5 (10%) max: 125662 Points
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Score
min: 5513 avg: 5515 median: 5514.5 (8%) max: 5516 Points
min: 7453 avg: 7581 median: 7581 (11%) max: 7709 Points
min: 8493 avg: 8540 median: 8539.5 (12%) max: 8586 Points
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance GPU
min: 5105 avg: 5310 median: 5310 (5%) max: 5515 Points
min: 7319 avg: 7372 median: 7372 (6%) max: 7425 Points
min: 8264 avg: 8289 median: 8288.5 (7%) max: 8313 Points
3DMark Vantage 3DM Vant. Perf. total + NVIDIA Quadro M2200 3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. total
24622 Points (7%)
3DM Vant. Perf. total + NVIDIA Quadro M3000M
27405 Points (8%)
3DM Vant. Perf. GPU no PhysX + NVIDIA Quadro M2200 3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. GPU no PhysX
24915 Points (14%)
3DM Vant. Perf. GPU no PhysX + NVIDIA Quadro M3000M
27921 Points (16%)
3DMark 06 3DMark 06 - Standard 1280x1024 + NVIDIA Quadro M1200
26109 Points (34%)
3DMark 06 - Standard 1280x1024 + NVIDIA Quadro M2200
min: 26834 avg: 28150 median: 28149.5 (37%) max: 29465 Points
3DMark 06 - Standard 1280x1024 + NVIDIA Quadro M3000M
min: 26746 avg: 27321 median: 27320.5 (36%) max: 27895 Points
Unigine Valley 1.0 - Unigine Valley 1.0 DX
27.7 fps (9%)
min: 23.2 avg: 26.4 median: 27.9 (9%) max: 28.1 fps
min: 37.8 avg: 38.2 median: 38.2 (13%) max: 38.5 fps
Unigine Heaven 3.0 - Unigine Heaven 3.0 DX 11
30.1 fps (10%)
min: 79.3 avg: 80 median: 80 (26%) max: 80.6 fps
Unigine Heaven 3.0 - Unigine Heaven 3.0 OpenGL
28.9 fps (13%)
min: 43.4 avg: 59.8 median: 59.8 (27%) max: 76.2 fps
Unigine Heaven 2.1 - Heaven 2.1 high
28.1 fps (5%)
min: 112.7 avg: 114.5 median: 114.5 (22%) max: 116.2 fps
SPECviewperf 11 specvp11 snx-01 + NVIDIA Quadro M1200 SPECviewperf 11 - specvp11 snx-01
43.9 fps (26%)
specvp11 snx-01 + NVIDIA Quadro M2200
min: 48.26 avg: 48.9 median: 48.9 (29%) max: 49.48 fps
specvp11 snx-01 + NVIDIA Quadro M3000M
min: 49.91 avg: 55.8 median: 50 (30%) max: 67.4 fps
specvp11 tcvis-02 + NVIDIA Quadro M1200 SPECviewperf 11 - specvp11 tcvis-02
44.2 fps (25%)
specvp11 tcvis-02 + NVIDIA Quadro M2200
min: 49.11 avg: 51 median: 51 (29%) max: 52.9 fps
specvp11 tcvis-02 + NVIDIA Quadro M3000M
min: 41.16 avg: 50.2 median: 53 (30%) max: 56.3 fps
specvp11 sw-02 + NVIDIA Quadro M1200 SPECviewperf 11 - specvp11 sw-02
56.4 fps (43%)
specvp11 sw-02 + NVIDIA Quadro M2200
min: 42.66 avg: 49.7 median: 49.7 (38%) max: 56.8 fps
specvp11 sw-02 + NVIDIA Quadro M3000M
min: 35.28 avg: 45.1 median: 48 (37%) max: 52 fps
specvp11 proe-05 + NVIDIA Quadro M1200 SPECviewperf 11 - specvp11 proe-05
22 fps (26%)
specvp11 proe-05 + NVIDIA Quadro M2200
min: 16.23 avg: 19.2 median: 19.2 (23%) max: 22.18 fps
specvp11 proe-05 + NVIDIA Quadro M3000M
min: 16.08 avg: 19.5 median: 20 (24%) max: 22.46 fps
specvp11 maya-03 + NVIDIA Quadro M1200 SPECviewperf 11 - specvp11 maya-03
57.2 fps (43%)
specvp11 maya-03 + NVIDIA Quadro M2200
min: 56.6 avg: 57.2 median: 57.2 (43%) max: 57.7 fps
specvp11 maya-03 + NVIDIA Quadro M3000M
min: 57 avg: 66.9 median: 57.8 (44%) max: 86 fps
specvp11 lightwave-01 + NVIDIA Quadro M1200 SPECviewperf 11 - specvp11 lightwave-01
57.8 fps (62%)
specvp11 lightwave-01 + NVIDIA Quadro M2200
min: 47.95 avg: 52.7 median: 52.7 (57%) max: 57.5 fps
specvp11 lightwave-01 + NVIDIA Quadro M3000M
min: 35.34 avg: 47.4 median: 51.9 (56%) max: 55 fps
specvp11 ensight-04 + NVIDIA Quadro M1200 SPECviewperf 11 - specvp11 ensight-04
46.7 fps (22%)
specvp11 ensight-04 + NVIDIA Quadro M2200
min: 55.7 avg: 57.1 median: 57.1 (27%) max: 58.5 fps
specvp11 ensight-04 + NVIDIA Quadro M3000M
min: 59 avg: 59.2 median: 59.1 (28%) max: 59.5 fps
specvp11 catia-03 + NVIDIA Quadro M1200 SPECviewperf 11 - specvp11 catia-03
53.3 fps (28%)
specvp11 catia-03 + NVIDIA Quadro M2200
min: 48.49 avg: 50.6 median: 50.6 (27%) max: 52.7 fps
specvp11 catia-03 + NVIDIA Quadro M3000M
min: 43.12 avg: 49.5 median: 52 (27%) max: 53.4 fps
SPECviewperf 12 specvp12 sw-03 + NVIDIA Quadro M1200 SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 sw-03
min: 69 avg: 72.5 median: 70 (17%) max: 78.4 fps
specvp12 sw-03 + NVIDIA Quadro M2200
min: 85.3 avg: 90.3 median: 86.2 (21%) max: 99.5 fps
specvp12 sw-03 + NVIDIA Quadro M3000M
min: 52.3 avg: 76.4 median: 84.8 (21%) max: 92 fps
specvp12 snx-02 + NVIDIA Quadro M1200 SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 snx-02
min: 34.18 avg: 35 median: 34.7 (5%) max: 36 fps
specvp12 snx-02 + NVIDIA Quadro M2200
min: 57.7 avg: 58.3 median: 58.1 (9%) max: 59 fps
specvp12 snx-02 + NVIDIA Quadro M3000M
min: 39.84 avg: 52.5 median: 52 (8%) max: 65.8 fps
specvp12 showcase-01 + NVIDIA Quadro M1200 SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 showcase-01
min: 22.17 avg: 24.8 median: 26 (6%) max: 26.2 fps
specvp12 showcase-01 + NVIDIA Quadro M2200
min: 31.14 avg: 32.2 median: 32.8 (7%) max: 32.8 fps
specvp12 showcase-01 + NVIDIA Quadro M3000M
min: 37 avg: 40.2 median: 39.8 (9%) max: 43.81 fps
specvp12 mediacal-01 + NVIDIA Quadro M1200 SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 mediacal-01
min: 17.49 avg: 17.8 median: 17.8 (5%) max: 18 fps
specvp12 mediacal-01 + NVIDIA Quadro M2200
min: 20.34 avg: 23.6 median: 24.6 (6%) max: 25.66 fps
specvp12 mediacal-01 + NVIDIA Quadro M3000M
min: 17.46 avg: 20.6 median: 22 (6%) max: 22.34 fps
specvp12 maya-04 + NVIDIA Quadro M1200 SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 maya-04
min: 32.07 avg: 34.4 median: 33.7 (9%) max: 37.29 fps
specvp12 maya-04 + NVIDIA Quadro M2200
min: 46.93 avg: 47.4 median: 46.9 (13%) max: 48.34 fps
specvp12 maya-04 + NVIDIA Quadro M3000M
min: 23.08 avg: 44.8 median: 50.4 (14%) max: 61 fps
specvp12 energy-01 + NVIDIA Quadro M1200 SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 energy-01
min: 3.78 avg: 3.8 median: 3.9 (3%) max: 3.9 fps
specvp12 energy-01 + NVIDIA Quadro M2200
min: 4.28 avg: 4.9 median: 5.2 (5%) max: 5.26 fps
specvp12 energy-01 + NVIDIA Quadro M3000M
min: 4.68 avg: 4.8 median: 4.8 (4%) max: 4.85 fps
specvp12 creo-01 + NVIDIA Quadro M1200 SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 creo-01
min: 45 avg: 46 median: 46.1 (18%) max: 46.97 fps
specvp12 creo-01 + NVIDIA Quadro M2200
min: 68.2 avg: 69.3 median: 68.5 (27%) max: 71.2 fps
specvp12 creo-01 + NVIDIA Quadro M3000M
min: 42.17 avg: 57.7 median: 64.8 (26%) max: 66 fps
specvp12 catia-04 + NVIDIA Quadro M1200 SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 catia-04
min: 45.75 avg: 46.2 median: 45.9 (8%) max: 47 fps
specvp12 catia-04 + NVIDIA Quadro M2200
min: 71.4 avg: 72.2 median: 72 (12%) max: 73.2 fps
specvp12 catia-04 + NVIDIA Quadro M3000M
min: 45.24 avg: 66.7 median: 77 (13%) max: 77.9 fps
specvp12 3dsmax-05 + NVIDIA Quadro M1200 SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 3dsmax-05
46 fps (8%)
Cinebench R10 Cinebench R10 Shading (32bit) + NVIDIA Quadro M2200 Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Shading (32bit)
6833 Points (5%)
Cinebench R10 Shading (32bit) + NVIDIA Quadro M3000M
min: 4455 avg: 5650 median: 5649.5 (4%) max: 6844 Points
Cinebench R11.5 Cinebench R11.5 OpenGL 64 Bit + NVIDIA Quadro M1200 Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 OpenGL 64 Bit
102.2 fps (35%)
Cinebench R11.5 OpenGL 64 Bit + NVIDIA Quadro M2200
88.6 fps (31%)
Cinebench R11.5 OpenGL 64 Bit + NVIDIA Quadro M3000M
min: 42.4 avg: 71.1 median: 71.1 (25%) max: 99.7 fps
Cinebench R15 Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64 Bit + NVIDIA Quadro M1200 Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64 Bit
min: 102.8 avg: 108.2 median: 108.2 (6%) max: 113.5 fps
Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64 Bit + NVIDIA Quadro M2200
min: 102.9 avg: 107.4 median: 103.9 (6%) max: 115.5 fps
Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64 Bit + NVIDIA Quadro M3000M
min: 68 avg: 92.1 median: 92.1 (5%) max: 116.1 fps
Cinebench R15 OpenGL Ref. Match 64 Bit + NVIDIA Quadro M1200 Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 OpenGL Ref. Match 64 Bit
99.6 % (100%)
Cinebench R15 OpenGL Ref. Match 64 Bit + NVIDIA Quadro M2200
99.6 % (100%)
Cinebench R15 OpenGL Ref. Match 64 Bit + NVIDIA Quadro M3000M
99.6 % (100%)
GFXBench - GFXBench Car Chase Offscreen
110.7 fps (12%)
GFXBench 3.1 - GFXBench Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen
163.7 fps (3%)
GFXBench 3.0 - GFXBench 3.0 Manhattan Offscreen
219.1 fps (13%)
249.9 fps (15%)
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 GFXBench T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 + NVIDIA Quadro M2200 GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 - GFXBench T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16
432 fps (3%)
LuxMark v2.0 64Bit - LuxMark v2.0 Room GPU
min: 656 avg: 818 median: 817.5 (4%) max: 979 Samples/s
min: 1204 avg: 1276 median: 1306 (6%) max: 1318 Samples/s
min: 1258 avg: 1273 median: 1273 (6%) max: 1288 Samples/s
LuxMark v2.0 64Bit - LuxMark v2.0 Sala GPU
min: 852 avg: 1207 median: 1207 (2%) max: 1562 Samples/s
min: 2086 avg: 2097 median: 2099 (4%) max: 2107 Samples/s
min: 2234 avg: 2261 median: 2261 (4%) max: 2288 Samples/s
ComputeMark v2.1 - ComputeMark v2.1 Result
388 Points (0%)
4332 Points (5%)
4737 Points (5%)
Power Consumption - Furmark Stress Test Power Consumption - external Monitor *
68.5 Watt (10%)
Power Consumption - The Witcher 3 Power Consumption - external Monitor *
89.2 Watt (12%)
Power Consumption - Witcher 3 Power Consumption *
min: 74.8 avg: 87.5 median: 87.5 (19%) max: 100.2 Watt
87.7 Watt (19%)
Power Consumption - Witcher 3 ultra Power Efficiency
0.2 fps per Watt (17%)
0.2 fps per Watt (20%)
Power Consumption - Witcher 3 ultra Power Efficiency - external Monitor
0.2 fps per Watt (19%)
Emissions Witcher 3 Fan Noise + NVIDIA Quadro M1200 Emissions - Witcher 3 Fan Noise
min: 42.3 avg: 43.9 median: 43.9 (70%) max: 45.5 dB(A)
Witcher 3 Fan Noise + NVIDIA Quadro M2200
39.5 dB(A) (63%)
Average Benchmarks NVIDIA Quadro M1200 → 100% n=31 Average Benchmarks NVIDIA Quadro M2200 → 162% n=31 Average Benchmarks NVIDIA Quadro M3000M → 164% n=31
- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation
Game Benchmarks The following benchmarks stem from our benchmarks of review laptops. The performance depends on the used graphics memory, clock rate, processor, system settings, drivers, and operating systems. So the results don't have to be representative for all laptops with this GPU. For detailed information on the benchmark results, click on the fps number.
100%
Quadro M1200:
88.1 fps
130%
Quadro M3000M:
114.9 fps
100%
Quadro M1200:
49.2 fps
142%
Quadro M3000M:
69.9 fps
100%
Quadro M1200:
28.4 fps
142%
Quadro M3000M:
40.2 fps
100%
Quadro M1200:
23.9 fps
140%
Quadro M3000M:
33.4 fps
100%
Quadro M1200:
9.9 fps
139%
Quadro M2200:
13.7 fps
Quadro M3000M:
179 [X] SCHENKER W706 Intel Core i7-6700 3.4GHz
Quadro M3000M
fps
Quadro M3000M:
123 [X] SCHENKER W706 Intel Core i7-6700 3.4GHz
Quadro M3000M
fps
Quadro M3000M:
58 [X] SCHENKER W706 Intel Core i7-6700 3.4GHz
Quadro M3000M
fps
Quadro M3000M:
21 [X] SCHENKER W706 Intel Core i7-6700 3.4GHz
Quadro M3000M
fps
100%
Quadro M1200:
73.6 fps
167%
Quadro M3000M:
122.7 fps
100%
Quadro M1200:
45.9 fps
100%
Quadro M1200:
26.3 29 ~ 28 fps
Quadro M3000M:
122 [X] SCHENKER W706 Intel Core i7-6700 3.4GHz
Quadro M3000M
fps
Quadro M3000M:
122 [X] SCHENKER W706 Intel Core i7-6700 3.4GHz
Quadro M3000M
fps
Quadro M3000M:
122 [X] SCHENKER W706 Intel Core i7-6700 3.4GHz
Quadro M3000M
fps
Quadro M3000M:
120 [X] SCHENKER W706 Intel Core i7-6700 3.4GHz
Quadro M3000M
fps
Quadro M3000M:
94 [X] SCHENKER W706 Intel Core i7-6700 3.4GHz
Quadro M3000M
fps
Quadro M3000M:
87 [X] SCHENKER W706 Intel Core i7-6700 3.4GHz
Quadro M3000M
fps
Quadro M3000M:
69 [X] SCHENKER W706 Intel Core i7-6700 3.4GHz
Quadro M3000M
fps
Quadro M3000M:
45 [X] SCHENKER W706 Intel Core i7-6700 3.4GHz
Quadro M3000M
fps
Quadro M3000M:
200 [X] SCHENKER W706 Intel Core i7-6700 3.4GHz
Quadro M3000M
fps
Quadro M3000M:
125 [X] SCHENKER W706 Intel Core i7-6700 3.4GHz
Quadro M3000M
fps
Quadro M3000M:
68 [X] SCHENKER W706 Intel Core i7-6700 3.4GHz
Quadro M3000M
fps
Quadro M3000M:
54 [X] SCHENKER W706 Intel Core i7-6700 3.4GHz
Quadro M3000M
fps
Quadro M3000M:
380 [X] SCHENKER W706 Intel Core i7-6700 3.4GHz
Quadro M3000M
fps
Quadro M3000M:
186 [X] SCHENKER W706 Intel Core i7-6700 3.4GHz
Quadro M3000M
fps
Quadro M3000M:
151 [X] SCHENKER W706 Intel Core i7-6700 3.4GHz
Quadro M3000M
fps
Quadro M3000M:
81 [X] SCHENKER W706 Intel Core i7-6700 3.4GHz
Quadro M3000M
fps
100%
Quadro M1200:
93.3 fps
117%
Quadro M2200:
108.8 fps
100%
Quadro M1200:
58.9 fps
150%
Quadro M2200:
88.6 fps
150%
Quadro M3000M:
88.6 fps
100%
Quadro M1200:
50.1 fps
149%
Quadro M2200:
74.8 fps
154%
Quadro M3000M:
77.4 fps
100%
Quadro M1200:
26.2 fps
151%
Quadro M2200:
39.6 fps
165%
Quadro M3000M:
43.1 fps
Quadro M3000M:
349 [X] SCHENKER W706 Intel Core i7-6700 3.4GHz
Quadro M3000M
fps
Quadro M3000M:
271 [X] SCHENKER W706 Intel Core i7-6700 3.4GHz
Quadro M3000M
fps
Quadro M3000M:
217 [X] SCHENKER W706 Intel Core i7-6700 3.4GHz
Quadro M3000M
fps
Quadro M3000M:
40 [X] SCHENKER W706 Intel Core i7-6700 3.4GHz
Quadro M3000M
fps
Quadro M3000M:
66 [X] SCHENKER W706 Intel Core i7-6700 3.4GHz
Quadro M3000M
fps
Quadro M3000M:
66 [X] SCHENKER W706 Intel Core i7-6700 3.4GHz
Quadro M3000M
fps
Quadro M3000M:
57 [X] SCHENKER W706 Intel Core i7-6700 3.4GHz
Quadro M3000M
fps
Quadro M3000M:
25 [X] SCHENKER W706 Intel Core i7-6700 3.4GHz
Quadro M3000M
fps
109%
Quadro M3000M:
226.3 fps
100%
Quadro M1200:
42.6 47 ~ 45 fps
Average Gaming NVIDIA Quadro M1200 → 100% Average Gaming 30-70 fps → 100%
Average Gaming NVIDIA Quadro M2200 → 138% Average Gaming 30-70 fps → 139%
Average Gaming NVIDIA Quadro M3000M → 147% Average Gaming 30-70 fps → 148%
NVIDIA Quadro M2200 low med. high ultra QHD 4K Ghost Recon Wildlands 83.4 37.1 33.7 17.6 For Honor 78 54 51 37 14.6 Battlefield 1 139.4 105.3 47.1 42 Rise of the Tomb Raider 126 71 40 34 13.7 Rainbow Six Siege 214.2 131.2 70.4 52.4 Star Wars Battlefront 148.8 119 56.4 48.2 The Witcher 3 111 66 35 19 12.7 Thief 108.8 88.6 74.8 39.6 Battlefield 4 171.5 148.3 115.9 47.8 BioShock Infinite 250 176 152 58 Tomb Raider 381.4 238.8 149.3 70.2 < 30 fps < 60 fps < 120 fps ≥ 120 fps 4 7 2 5 4 6 3 2 2 8 1 3
NVIDIA Quadro M1200 low med. high ultra QHD 4K Doom 79 66 37 34 12 Rise of the Tomb Raider 88.1 49.15 28.36 23.92 9.88 Batman: Arkham Knight 74 63 35 29 11 The Witcher 3 73.6 45.9 28 13 Thief 93.3 58.9 50.1 26.2 BioShock Infinite 207 134 119 45 < 30 fps < 60 fps < 120 fps ≥ 120 fps 5 1 3 2 1 2 3 1 4 2 3
NVIDIA Quadro M3000M low med. high ultra QHD 4K Rise of the Tomb Raider 114.9 69.9 40.2 33.4 Rainbow Six Siege 146.8 76.8 54.5 23.8 Just Cause 3 85.6 50.4 43.7 17.8 Star Wars Battlefront 124.5 59.4 50.9 17.8 Anno 2205 179 123 58 21 The Witcher 3 122.7 74 42 22 14.1 Dirt Rally 108.6 89.6 53.6 39.2 GTA V 136.1 69.1 29.7 35.3 F1 2014 122 122 122 120 Ryse: Son of Rome 94 87 69 45 Middle-earth: Shadow of Mordor 200 125 68 54 GRID: Autosport 380 186 151 81 Thief 88.6 77.4 43.1 Total War: Rome II 349 271 217 40 Company of Heroes 2 66 66 57 25 Metro: Last Light 124.5 82.9 44.6 BioShock Infinite 226.3 179 165 70 Tomb Raider 255.1 185 82.1 < 30 fps < 60 fps < 120 fps ≥ 120 fps 3 7 7 11 6 7 5 4 10 3 1 4 2
For more games that might be playable and a list of all games and graphics cards visit our Gaming List
v1.26
log 19. 13:48:37
#0 checking url part for id 7704 +0s ... 0s
#1 checking url part for id 7706 +0s ... 0s
#2 checking url part for id 6507 +0s ... 0s
#3 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s
#4 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Fri, 19 Apr 2024 05:40:26 +0200 +0.001s ... 0.001s
#5 composed specs +0.149s ... 0.15s
#6 did output specs +0s ... 0.15s
#7 start showIntegratedCPUs +0s ... 0.15s
#8 getting avg benchmarks for device 7704 +0.055s ... 0.205s
#9 got single benchmarks 7704 +0.017s ... 0.222s
#10 getting avg benchmarks for device 7706 +0.021s ... 0.243s
#11 got single benchmarks 7706 +0.02s ... 0.263s
#12 getting avg benchmarks for device 6507 +0.018s ... 0.281s
#13 got single benchmarks 6507 +0.016s ... 0.298s
#14 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.298s
#15 min, max, avg, median took s +0.497s ... 0.795s
#16 before gaming benchmark output +0s ... 0.795s
#17 Got 176 rows for game benchmarks. +0.021s ... 0.816s
#18 composed SQL query for gamebenchmarks +0s ... 0.816s
#19 got data and put it in $dataArray +0.021s ... 0.837s
#20 benchmarks composed for output. +0.06s ... 0.897s
#21 calculated avg scores. +0s ... 0.897s
#22 return log +0.002s ... 0.899s
Please share our article, every link counts!
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)