NVIDIA Quadro FX 880M vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 350M vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 3800M
NVIDIA Quadro FX 880M ► remove from comparison
The NVIDIA Quadro FX 880M is a professional middle class graphics card for mobile workstations (about 15"). It is based on the GeForce GT 330M graphics card with slower clock rates and therefore is a DirectX 10.1 chip that is produced in 40nm.
Due to a special BIOS and professional drivers, the FX 880M should perform noticeably better than a 330M in professional applications (like CAD, DCC, Rendering). Another advantage for professional users are the certified drivers that should ensure a bug free experience with the most common professional applications. Futhermore, the Quadro FX drivers contain profiles for these applications to ensure the best settings (similar to the game profiles in GeForce cards).
The Quadro FX 880M is also based on the GT216 core in 40nm. The shaders are based on the desktop GTX 200 architecture and therefore a bit improved compared to the previous generation cards.
Without load, the Quadro FX 880M is able to downclock to 135 / 270 / 135 MHz (chip / shader / memory clock).
The gaming performance of the FX 880M should be beyond the GT 330M, because of the different drivers. Gamers should choose a GeForce card because of the better game support.
The chip supports Optimus for automatic switching between dedicated and integrated graphics card (e.g. in the new Core i5 CPUs). Still Optimus was for example not integrated in the Lenovo Thinkpad W510.
NVIDIA Quadro FX 350M ► remove from comparison
The NVIDIA Quadro FX 350M is a professional workstation graphics card based on the old entry level NVIDIA GeForce Go 7300. Due to certified drivers, the FX 350M is suited for CAD and DCC applications. Still the 3D performance is not very good (even at the time of launch), therefore the card is better suited for 2D CAD applications.
NVIDIA Quadro FX 3800M ► remove from comparison
The NVIDIA Quadro FX 3800M is a mobile workstation graphics card for high end laptops. It is based on the Geforce GTX 280M core (G92 core) and features 128 CUDA cores (unified shaders).
Compared to the Quadro FX 3700M, the Quadro FX 3800M features a higher clock speed and is manufacturered in 55nm (compared to 65nm of the 3700M). In fact, the FX3800M is clocked even higher than the consumer GeForce GTX 280M and performs notably better as a result.
The Quadro FX series of cards are optimized for professional applications like CAD or DCC. Notably, OpenGL performance should be much improved compared to consumer GeForce cards of similar specifications.
At the time its announcement (December 2009), the FX 3800M was the fastest workstation graphics card for laptops.
NVIDIA Quadro FX 880M NVIDIA Quadro FX 350M NVIDIA Quadro FX 3800M Quadro FX Series Codename N10P-GLM G72M N10E-GLM4 Architecture GT2xx G9x Pipelines 48 - unified 4 / 3 Pixel- / Vertexshader 128 - unified Core Speed 550 MHz 450 MHz 675 MHz Shader Speed 1210 MHz 1688 MHz Memory Speed 790 MHz 350 MHz 1000 MHz Memory Bus Width 128 Bit 64 Bit 256 Bit Memory Type GDDR3, DDR3 DDR-3 GDDR3 Max. Amount of Memory 1024 MB 64 MB 1024 MB Shared Memory no no no API DirectX 10.1, Shader 4.1 DirectX 9c, Shader 3.0 DirectX 10, Shader 4.0 Power Consumption 35 Watt 15 Watt 100 Watt technology 40 nm 90 nm 55 nm Notebook Size medium sized large Date of Announcement 07.01.2010 31.03.2006 20.12.2009 Link to Manufacturer Page www.nvidia.com www.nvidia.de www.nvidia.com Transistors 112 Million 754 Million Features PureVideo, UltraShadow II, Intellisample 4.0, CineFX 4.0, PowerMizer 6.0, High Dynamic-Range (HDR) Lighning OpenGL 2.1, CUDA, PowerMizer 8.0 Information 90nm, 112 Mio Transistoren, PCI-E
Benchmarks min: 2558 avg: 2643 median: 2638.5 (1%) max: 2735 Points
3DM Vant. Perf. total + NVIDIA Quadro FX 3800M
min: 6584 avg: 6951 median: 6779 (2%) max: 7491 Points
3DM Vant. Perf. GPU no PhysX + NVIDIA Quadro FX 880M 3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. GPU no PhysX
min: 2128 avg: 2203 median: 2149.5 (1%) max: 2385 Points
3DM Vant. Perf. GPU no PhysX + NVIDIA Quadro FX 3800M
min: 5758 avg: 5926 median: 6002 (3%) max: 6019 Points
3DMark 2001SE - 3DMark 2001 - Standard
min: 28169 avg: 32291 median: 33331 (35%) max: 34331 Points
min: 32886 avg: 34790 median: 34790 (36%) max: 36694 Points
3DMark 03 - 3DMark 03 - Standard
min: 18796 avg: 18980 median: 19002 (10%) max: 19137 Points
3963 Points (2%)
min: 33146 avg: 37082 median: 38191 (20%) max: 39909 Points
3DMark 05 - 3DMark 05 - Standard
min: 13154 avg: 13217 median: 13185 (14%) max: 13298 Points
1954 Points (2%)
min: 16593 avg: 18199 median: 18043 (20%) max: 19960 Points
3DMark 06 3DMark 06 - Standard 1280x1024 + NVIDIA Quadro FX 880M
min: 6366 avg: 6401 median: 6378 (8%) max: 6473 Points
3DMark 06 - Standard 1280x1024 + NVIDIA Quadro FX 3800M
min: 12050 avg: 12765 median: 12923 (17%) max: 13323 Points
Model CPU GPU RAM Value 3DMark 06 - Standard 1280x1024 Lenovo ThinkPad W701ds NTV5FPB164 (3DMark 06 - Standard 1280x1024) 820QM Quadro FX 3800M 675 / 1650 MHz 1 GB 16 GB 12050 HP EliteBook 8740w (WD942EA) (3DMark 06 - Standard 1280x1024) 740QM Quadro FX 3800M 675 / 1000 MHz 1 GB 8 GB 12923 Dell Precision M6500 (3DMark 06 - Standard 1280x1024) 920XM Quadro FX 3800M 675/1688 / 1000 MHz 1 GB 13323
3DMark 06 - Standard 1280x768 + NVIDIA Quadro FX 880M
6392 Points (8%)
3DMark 06 - Score Unknown Settings + NVIDIA Quadro FX 350M
680 Points (1%)
Model CPU GPU RAM Value 3DMark 06 - Score Unknown Settings (3DMark 06 - Score Unknown Settings) T7200 Quadro FX 350M 0.5 GB 2 GB 680
3DMark 06 - Score Unknown Settings + NVIDIA Quadro FX 3800M
13232 Points (17%)
Model CPU GPU RAM Value 3DMark 06 - Score Unknown Settings Dell Precision M6500 (3DMark 06 - Score Unknown Settings) 920XM Quadro FX 3800M 1 GB 4 GB 13232
SPEC Viewperf 10.0 - SPEC Viewperf 10.0 - 3dsmax
47.8 Points (99%)
32.8 Points (68%)
SPEC Viewperf 10.0 - SPEC Viewperf 10.0 - Catia
47.6 Points (100%)
45.8 Points (96%)
SPEC Viewperf 10.0 - SPEC Viewperf 10.0 - Maya
60.1 Points (32%)
59.7 Points (32%)
SPEC Viewperf 10.0 - SPEC Viewperf 10.0 - SolidWorks
58 Points (86%)
59.7 Points (88%)
SPEC Viewperf 10.0 - SPEC Viewperf 10.0 - UGS Teamcenter
24.4 Points (63%)
38.5 Points (100%)
SPEC Viewperf 10.0 - SPEC Viewperf 10.0 - EnSight
47.4 Points (100%)
SPEC Viewperf 10.0 - SPEC Viewperf 10.0 - Pro/Engeneer
51.1 Points (100%)
SPEC Viewperf 10.0 - SPEC Viewperf 10.0 - UGS NX
35.3 Points (72%)
SPECviewperf 11 specvp11 snx-01 + NVIDIA Quadro FX 880M SPECviewperf 11 - specvp11 snx-01
min: 9.18 avg: 9.7 median: 9.7 (6%) max: 10.27 fps
specvp11 snx-01 + NVIDIA Quadro FX 3800M
18.8 fps (11%)
specvp11 tcvis-02 + NVIDIA Quadro FX 880M SPECviewperf 11 - specvp11 tcvis-02
min: 11.04 avg: 11.2 median: 11.2 (6%) max: 11.32 fps
specvp11 tcvis-02 + NVIDIA Quadro FX 3800M
18.7 fps (11%)
specvp11 sw-02 + NVIDIA Quadro FX 880M SPECviewperf 11 - specvp11 sw-02
min: 7.56 avg: 16 median: 16 (12%) max: 24.45 fps
specvp11 sw-02 + NVIDIA Quadro FX 3800M
30.6 fps (23%)
specvp11 proe-05 + NVIDIA Quadro FX 880M SPECviewperf 11 - specvp11 proe-05
min: 4.28 avg: 5.2 median: 5.2 (6%) max: 6.21 fps
specvp11 proe-05 + NVIDIA Quadro FX 3800M
6.9 fps (8%)
specvp11 maya-03 + NVIDIA Quadro FX 880M SPECviewperf 11 - specvp11 maya-03
min: 6.94 avg: 8 median: 8 (6%) max: 9.09 fps
specvp11 maya-03 + NVIDIA Quadro FX 3800M
16.6 fps (12%)
specvp11 lightwave-01 + NVIDIA Quadro FX 880M SPECviewperf 11 - specvp11 lightwave-01
min: 9.81 avg: 23.8 median: 23.8 (26%) max: 37.84 fps
specvp11 lightwave-01 + NVIDIA Quadro FX 3800M
38.4 fps (41%)
specvp11 ensight-04 + NVIDIA Quadro FX 880M SPECviewperf 11 - specvp11 ensight-04
min: 10 avg: 10.3 median: 10.3 (5%) max: 10.59 fps
specvp11 ensight-04 + NVIDIA Quadro FX 3800M
16.2 fps (8%)
specvp11 catia-03 + NVIDIA Quadro FX 880M SPECviewperf 11 - specvp11 catia-03
min: 8.63 avg: 12.3 median: 12.3 (6%) max: 15.92 fps
specvp11 catia-03 + NVIDIA Quadro FX 3800M
23.4 fps (12%)
Windows 7 Experience Index - Win7 Gaming graphics
6.4 Points (81%)
6.9 Points (87%)
Windows 7 Experience Index - Win7 Graphics
6.4 Points (81%)
6.9 Points (87%)
Cinebench R10 Cinebench R10 Shading (32bit) + NVIDIA Quadro FX 880M Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Shading (32bit)
min: 4809 avg: 4886 median: 4846 (3%) max: 5002 Points
Cinebench R10 Shading (32bit) + NVIDIA Quadro FX 3800M
min: 4429 avg: 4928 median: 4928 (4%) max: 5427 Points
Cinebench R11.5 Cinebench R11.5 OpenGL 64 Bit + NVIDIA Quadro FX 880M Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 OpenGL 64 Bit
min: 15.84 avg: 16 median: 16 (6%) max: 16.14 fps
Cinebench R11.5 OpenGL 64 Bit + NVIDIA Quadro FX 3800M
min: 32.07 avg: 32.7 median: 32.7 (11%) max: 33.29 fps
Average Benchmarks NVIDIA Quadro FX 880M → 100% n=2 Average Benchmarks NVIDIA Quadro FX 350M → 18% n=2 Average Benchmarks NVIDIA Quadro FX 3800M → 169% n=2
- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation
Game Benchmarks The following benchmarks stem from our benchmarks of review laptops. The performance depends on the used graphics memory, clock rate, processor, system settings, drivers, and operating systems. So the results don't have to be representative for all laptops with this GPU. For detailed information on the benchmark results, click on the fps number.
100%
Quadro FX 880M:
129.2 [X] Fujitsu Celsius H700 LKN:H7000WF011PL Intel Core i7-840QM 1.9GHz
Quadro FX 880M
fps
178%
Quadro FX 3800M:
230.6 [X] HP EliteBook 8740w (WD942EA) Intel Core i7-740QM 1.7GHz
Quadro FX 3800M
fps
100%
Quadro FX 880M:
90.5 [X] Fujitsu Celsius H700 LKN:H7000WF011PL Intel Core i7-840QM 1.9GHz
Quadro FX 880M
fps
137%
Quadro FX 3800M:
124.2 [X] HP EliteBook 8740w (WD942EA) Intel Core i7-740QM 1.7GHz
Quadro FX 3800M
fps
100%
Quadro FX 880M:
50.4 [X] Fujitsu Celsius H700 LKN:H7000WF011PL Intel Core i7-840QM 1.9GHz
Quadro FX 880M
fps
100%
Quadro FX 880M:
155 fps
100%
Quadro FX 880M:
42 fps
100%
Quadro FX 880M:
29 fps
100%
Quadro FX 880M:
12 fps
100%
Quadro FX 880M:
58.8 fps
100%
Quadro FX 880M:
30.4 fps
100%
Quadro FX 880M:
16.1 fps
100%
Quadro FX 880M:
9.7 fps
100%
Quadro FX 880M:
124.1 fps
100%
Quadro FX 880M:
42.2 fps
100%
Quadro FX 880M:
35.4 fps
100%
Quadro FX 880M:
21 fps
100%
Quadro FX 880M:
75.4 fps
100%
Quadro FX 880M:
29.8 33.4 [X] Fujitsu Celsius H700 LKN:H7000WF011PL Intel Core i7-840QM 1.9GHz
Quadro FX 880M
~ 32 fps
203%
Quadro FX 3800M:
64.9 [X] HP EliteBook 8740w (WD942EA) Intel Core i7-740QM 1.7GHz
Quadro FX 3800M
fps
100%
Quadro FX 880M:
18.2 20.6 [X] Fujitsu Celsius H700 LKN:H7000WF011PL Intel Core i7-840QM 1.9GHz
Quadro FX 880M
~ 19 fps
100%
Quadro FX 880M:
12.7 [X] Fujitsu Celsius H700 LKN:H7000WF011PL Intel Core i7-840QM 1.9GHz
Quadro FX 880M
fps
250%
Quadro FX 3800M:
31.8 [X] HP EliteBook 8740w (WD942EA) Intel Core i7-740QM 1.7GHz
Quadro FX 3800M
fps
Quadro FX 3800M:
78.5 [X] HP EliteBook 8740w (WD942EA) Intel Core i7-740QM 1.7GHz
Quadro FX 3800M
fps
Quadro FX 3800M:
40.9 [X] HP EliteBook 8740w (WD942EA) Intel Core i7-740QM 1.7GHz
Quadro FX 3800M
fps
100%
Quadro FX 880M:
79.3 fps
122%
Quadro FX 3800M:
97 [X] HP EliteBook 8740w (WD942EA) Intel Core i7-740QM 1.7GHz
Quadro FX 3800M
fps
100%
Quadro FX 880M:
45.7 [X] Fujitsu Celsius H700 LKN:H7000WF011PL Intel Core i7-840QM 1.9GHz
Quadro FX 880M
47.8 ~ 47 fps
174%
Quadro FX 3800M:
82 [X] HP EliteBook 8740w (WD942EA) Intel Core i7-740QM 1.7GHz
Quadro FX 3800M
fps
100%
Quadro FX 880M:
20 [X] Fujitsu Celsius H700 LKN:H7000WF011PL Intel Core i7-840QM 1.9GHz
Quadro FX 880M
39 ~ 30 fps
100%
Quadro FX 880M:
12.8 fps
234%
Quadro FX 3800M:
29.9 [X] HP EliteBook 8740w (WD942EA) Intel Core i7-740QM 1.7GHz
Quadro FX 3800M
fps
100%
Quadro FX 880M:
59.7 60 131 147.3 [X] Fujitsu Celsius H700 LKN:H7000WF011PL Intel Core i7-840QM 1.9GHz
Quadro FX 880M
~ 100 fps
143%
Quadro FX 3800M:
142.8 [X] HP EliteBook 8740w (WD942EA) Intel Core i7-740QM 1.7GHz
Quadro FX 3800M
fps
100%
Quadro FX 880M:
19 19.1 20.5 23 [X] Fujitsu Celsius H700 LKN:H7000WF011PL Intel Core i7-840QM 1.9GHz
Quadro FX 880M
~ 20 fps
310%
Quadro FX 3800M:
61.9 [X] HP EliteBook 8740w (WD942EA) Intel Core i7-740QM 1.7GHz
Quadro FX 3800M
fps
100%
Quadro FX 880M:
179.6 fps
100%
Quadro FX 880M:
65.9 fps
100%
Quadro FX 880M:
42.3 fps
100%
Quadro FX 880M:
93.3 fps
100%
Quadro FX 880M:
32.4 fps
100%
Quadro FX 880M:
48.7 fps
100%
Quadro FX 880M:
28.9 fps
100%
Quadro FX 880M:
225.7 fps
100%
Quadro FX 880M:
60 fps
100%
Quadro FX 880M:
59.9 fps
100%
Quadro FX 880M:
29.9 fps
100%
Quadro FX 880M:
28.2 fps
Average Gaming NVIDIA Quadro FX 880M → 100% Average Gaming 30-70 fps → 100%
Average Gaming NVIDIA Quadro FX 3800M → 195% Average Gaming 30-70 fps → 254%
NVIDIA Quadro FX 880M low med. high ultra QHD 4K Fifa 11 129.2 90.5 50.4 StarCraft 2 155 42 29 12 Battlefield: Bad Company 2 58.8 30.4 16.1 9.7 CoD Modern Warfare 2 124.1 42.2 35.4 21 Risen 75.4 32 19 12.7 Colin McRae: DIRT 2 79.3 47 30 12.8 Anno 1404 100 20 F.E.A.R. 2 179.6 65.9 42.3 Far Cry 2 93.3 32.39 Racedriver: GRID 48.7 28.9 Call of Duty 4 - Modern Warfare 225.7 60 59.9 Supreme Commander - FA Bench 29.92 28.18 < 30 fps < 60 fps < 120 fps ≥ 120 fps 1 4 4 1 6 2 1 5 5 1 6 1
NVIDIA Quadro FX 3800M low med. high ultra QHD 4K Fifa 11 230.6 124.2 Risen 64.9 31.8 Need for Speed Shift 78.5 40.9 Colin McRae: DIRT 2 97 82 29.9 Anno 1404 142.8 61.9 < 30 fps < 60 fps < 120 fps ≥ 120 fps 1 1 3 1 1 1 2 1
For more games that might be playable and a list of all games and graphics cards visit our Gaming List
v1.26
log 18. 06:31:56
#0 checking url part for id 1621 +0s ... 0s
#1 checking url part for id 70 +0s ... 0s
#2 checking url part for id 1541 +0s ... 0s
#3 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s
#4 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Tue, 16 Apr 2024 05:39:00 +0200 +0.001s ... 0.001s
#5 composed specs +0.21s ... 0.212s
#6 did output specs +0s ... 0.212s
#7 start showIntegratedCPUs +0s ... 0.212s
#8 getting avg benchmarks for device 1621 +0.055s ... 0.267s
#9 got single benchmarks 1621 +0.027s ... 0.294s
#10 getting avg benchmarks for device 70 +0.002s ... 0.296s
#11 got single benchmarks 70 +0.007s ... 0.303s
#12 getting avg benchmarks for device 1541 +0.002s ... 0.305s
#13 got single benchmarks 1541 +0.019s ... 0.324s
#14 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.324s
#15 min, max, avg, median took s +0.455s ... 0.78s
#16 before gaming benchmark output +0s ... 0.78s
#17 Got 58 rows for game benchmarks. +0.015s ... 0.794s
#18 composed SQL query for gamebenchmarks +0s ... 0.794s
#19 got data and put it in $dataArray +0.008s ... 0.803s
#20 benchmarks composed for output. +0.034s ... 0.837s
#21 calculated avg scores. +0s ... 0.837s
#22 return log +0.002s ... 0.839s
Please share our article, every link counts!
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)