NVIDIA Quadro FX 880M vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 2800M vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 2500M
NVIDIA Quadro FX 880M ► remove from comparison
The NVIDIA Quadro FX 880M is a professional middle class graphics card for mobile workstations (about 15"). It is based on the GeForce GT 330M graphics card with slower clock rates and therefore is a DirectX 10.1 chip that is produced in 40nm.
Due to a special BIOS and professional drivers, the FX 880M should perform noticeably better than a 330M in professional applications (like CAD, DCC, Rendering). Another advantage for professional users are the certified drivers that should ensure a bug free experience with the most common professional applications. Futhermore, the Quadro FX drivers contain profiles for these applications to ensure the best settings (similar to the game profiles in GeForce cards).
The Quadro FX 880M is also based on the GT216 core in 40nm. The shaders are based on the desktop GTX 200 architecture and therefore a bit improved compared to the previous generation cards.
Without load, the Quadro FX 880M is able to downclock to 135 / 270 / 135 MHz (chip / shader / memory clock).
The gaming performance of the FX 880M should be beyond the GT 330M, because of the different drivers. Gamers should choose a GeForce card because of the better game support.
The chip supports Optimus for automatic switching between dedicated and integrated graphics card (e.g. in the new Core i5 CPUs). Still Optimus was for example not integrated in the Lenovo Thinkpad W510.
NVIDIA Quadro FX 2800M ► remove from comparison
The NVIDIA Quadro FX 2800M is a mobile workstation graphics card for high-end laptops. It is based on the Geforce 9800M GT / G92 core but features a higher clock rate and is produced in a 55nm fabrication process versus 65nm of the 9800M GT.
The Quadro FX series of cards are optimized for professional applications like CAD or DCC. OpenGL performance especially should be noticeably better compared to consumer GeForce cards.
The Quadro FX2800M is found in mobile workstations like the Dell M6500 and supports DirectX 10.0 and OpenGL 2.1. In the Dell laptops, the card is able to output up to two displays simultaneously (DisplayPort up to 2560x1600, DVI/HDMI up to 1920x1200). Dell claims a thermal power draw of 65 Watts while Nvidia rates the GPU at 75 Watt TDP.
Due to the relatively high power consumption of 65 to 75 Watts (TDP) and a 10 Watt idle mode, the Quadro FX 2800M is normally only foud in medium to large laptops with powerful cooling solutions.
NVIDIA Quadro FX 2500M ► remove from comparison
This is a professional video card for notebooks from NVidia It is based on 7900GTX.
The application performance is very good due to special professional drivers (3D rendering, CAD), but the gaming performance is weaker. With modded drivers, it should work like a 7900 GTX .
NVIDIA Quadro FX 880M NVIDIA Quadro FX 2800M NVIDIA Quadro FX 2500M Quadro FX Series Codename N10P-GLM NB10-GLM3 G71glm Architecture GT2xx G9x G7x Pipelines 48 - unified 96 - unified 24 / 8 Pixel- / Vertexshader Core Speed 550 MHz 600 MHz 500 MHz Shader Speed 1210 MHz 1500 MHz Memory Speed 790 MHz 1000 MHz 600 MHz Memory Bus Width 128 Bit 256 Bit 256 Bit Memory Type GDDR3, DDR3 GDDR3 GDDR3 Max. Amount of Memory 1024 MB 1024 MB 512 MB Shared Memory no no no API DirectX 10.1, Shader 4.1 DirectX 10, Shader 4.0 DirectX 9c, Shader 3.0 Power Consumption 35 Watt 75 Watt 45 Watt technology 40 nm 55 nm 90 nm Notebook Size medium sized large large Date of Announcement 07.01.2010 01.12.2009 29.09.2005 Link to Manufacturer Page www.nvidia.com www.nvidia.com www.nvidia.de Transistors 754 Million 278 Million Features OpenGL 2.1, CUDA, PowerMizer 8.0 90nm
Benchmarks min: 2558 avg: 2643 median: 2638.5 (1%) max: 2735 Points
3DM Vant. Perf. total + NVIDIA Quadro FX 2800M
min: 5779 avg: 5783 median: 5783 (2%) max: 5787 Points
3DM Vant. Perf. GPU no PhysX + NVIDIA Quadro FX 880M 3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. GPU no PhysX
min: 2128 avg: 2203 median: 2149.5 (1%) max: 2385 Points
3DM Vant. Perf. GPU no PhysX + NVIDIA Quadro FX 2800M
min: 5000 avg: 5037 median: 5037 (3%) max: 5074 Points
3DMark 2001SE - 3DMark 2001 - Standard
min: 28169 avg: 32291 median: 33331 (35%) max: 34331 Points
34844 Points (36%)
27600 Points (29%)
3DMark 03 - 3DMark 03 - Standard
min: 18796 avg: 18980 median: 19002 (10%) max: 19137 Points
33900 Points (18%)
min: 18100 avg: 18342 median: 18341.5 (10%) max: 18583 Points
3DMark 05 - 3DMark 05 - Standard
min: 13154 avg: 13217 median: 13185 (14%) max: 13298 Points
min: 16310 avg: 16936 median: 16935.5 (19%) max: 17561 Points
min: 8400 avg: 8450 median: 8450 (9%) max: 8500 Points
3DMark 06 3DMark 06 - Standard 1280x1024 + NVIDIA Quadro FX 880M
min: 6366 avg: 6401 median: 6378 (8%) max: 6473 Points
3DMark 06 - Standard 1280x1024 + NVIDIA Quadro FX 2800M
min: 11162 avg: 11359 median: 11358.5 (15%) max: 11555 Points
3DMark 06 - Standard 1280x768 + NVIDIA Quadro FX 880M
6392 Points (8%)
3DMark 06 - Score Unknown Settings + NVIDIA Quadro FX 2500M
min: 4690 avg: 4695 median: 4695 (6%) max: 4700 Points
Model CPU GPU RAM Value 3DMark 06 - Score Unknown Settings (3DMark 06 - Score Unknown Settings) Quadro FX 2500M 4690 (3DMark 06 - Score Unknown Settings) T2600 Quadro FX 2500M 0.5 GB 4700
SPEC Viewperf 10.0 - SPEC Viewperf 10.0 - 3dsmax
47.8 Points (99%)
32.3 Points (67%)
SPEC Viewperf 10.0 - SPEC Viewperf 10.0 - Catia
47.6 Points (100%)
39 Points (82%)
SPEC Viewperf 10.0 - SPEC Viewperf 10.0 - Maya
60.1 Points (32%)
59.6 Points (32%)
SPEC Viewperf 10.0 - SPEC Viewperf 10.0 - SolidWorks
58 Points (86%)
59.5 Points (88%)
SPEC Viewperf 10.0 - SPEC Viewperf 10.0 - UGS Teamcenter
24.4 Points (63%)
35.2 Points (91%)
SPEC Viewperf 10.0 - SPEC Viewperf 10.0 - EnSight
44 Points (93%)
SPEC Viewperf 10.0 - SPEC Viewperf 10.0 - Pro/Engeneer
42.6 Points (83%)
SPEC Viewperf 10.0 - SPEC Viewperf 10.0 - UGS NX
31.3 Points (64%)
SPECviewperf 11 specvp11 snx-01 + NVIDIA Quadro FX 880M SPECviewperf 11 - specvp11 snx-01
min: 9.18 avg: 9.7 median: 9.7 (6%) max: 10.27 fps
specvp11 snx-01 + NVIDIA Quadro FX 2800M
min: 13.58 avg: 14.7 median: 13.9 (8%) max: 16.55 fps
specvp11 tcvis-02 + NVIDIA Quadro FX 880M SPECviewperf 11 - specvp11 tcvis-02
min: 11.04 avg: 11.2 median: 11.2 (6%) max: 11.32 fps
specvp11 tcvis-02 + NVIDIA Quadro FX 2800M
min: 15.1 avg: 16 median: 15.3 (9%) max: 17.4 fps
specvp11 sw-02 + NVIDIA Quadro FX 880M SPECviewperf 11 - specvp11 sw-02
min: 7.56 avg: 16 median: 16 (12%) max: 24.45 fps
specvp11 sw-02 + NVIDIA Quadro FX 2800M
min: 6.73 avg: 14.1 median: 7.5 (6%) max: 28 fps
specvp11 proe-05 + NVIDIA Quadro FX 880M SPECviewperf 11 - specvp11 proe-05
min: 4.28 avg: 5.2 median: 5.2 (6%) max: 6.21 fps
specvp11 proe-05 + NVIDIA Quadro FX 2800M
min: 4.67 avg: 5.1 median: 4.7 (6%) max: 5.89 fps
specvp11 maya-03 + NVIDIA Quadro FX 880M SPECviewperf 11 - specvp11 maya-03
min: 6.94 avg: 8 median: 8 (6%) max: 9.09 fps
specvp11 maya-03 + NVIDIA Quadro FX 2800M
min: 6.2 avg: 7 median: 7.4 (6%) max: 7.5 fps
specvp11 lightwave-01 + NVIDIA Quadro FX 880M SPECviewperf 11 - specvp11 lightwave-01
min: 9.81 avg: 23.8 median: 23.8 (26%) max: 37.84 fps
specvp11 lightwave-01 + NVIDIA Quadro FX 2800M
min: 7.99 avg: 16.2 median: 8.5 (9%) max: 32 fps
specvp11 ensight-04 + NVIDIA Quadro FX 880M SPECviewperf 11 - specvp11 ensight-04
min: 10 avg: 10.3 median: 10.3 (5%) max: 10.59 fps
specvp11 ensight-04 + NVIDIA Quadro FX 2800M
min: 10.8 avg: 11.9 median: 11.1 (5%) max: 13.7 fps
specvp11 catia-03 + NVIDIA Quadro FX 880M SPECviewperf 11 - specvp11 catia-03
min: 8.63 avg: 12.3 median: 12.3 (6%) max: 15.92 fps
specvp11 catia-03 + NVIDIA Quadro FX 2800M
min: 9.53 avg: 13.4 median: 9.7 (5%) max: 20.92 fps
Windows 7 Experience Index - Win7 Gaming graphics
6.4 Points (81%)
Windows 7 Experience Index - Win7 Graphics
6.4 Points (81%)
Windows Vista Experience Index - Windows Vista Leistungsindex - Grafik (Spiele)
6.8 Points (100%)
Windows Vista Experience Index - Windows Vista Leistungsindex - Grafik
6.8 Points (100%)
Cinebench R10 Cinebench R10 Shading (32bit) + NVIDIA Quadro FX 880M Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Shading (32bit)
min: 4809 avg: 4886 median: 4846 (3%) max: 5002 Points
Cinebench R11.5 Cinebench R11.5 OpenGL 64 Bit + NVIDIA Quadro FX 880M Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 OpenGL 64 Bit
min: 15.84 avg: 16 median: 16 (6%) max: 16.14 fps
Cinebench R11.5 OpenGL 64 Bit + NVIDIA Quadro FX 2800M
min: 28.16 avg: 28.8 median: 28.8 (10%) max: 29.36 fps
Average Benchmarks NVIDIA Quadro FX 880M → 100% n=3 Average Benchmarks NVIDIA Quadro FX 2800M → 137% n=3 Average Benchmarks NVIDIA Quadro FX 2500M → 81% n=3
- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation
Game Benchmarks The following benchmarks stem from our benchmarks of review laptops. The performance depends on the used graphics memory, clock rate, processor, system settings, drivers, and operating systems. So the results don't have to be representative for all laptops with this GPU. For detailed information on the benchmark results, click on the fps number.
100%
Quadro FX 880M:
129.2 [X] Fujitsu Celsius H700 LKN:H7000WF011PL Intel Core i7-840QM 1.9GHz
Quadro FX 880M
fps
100%
Quadro FX 880M:
90.5 [X] Fujitsu Celsius H700 LKN:H7000WF011PL Intel Core i7-840QM 1.9GHz
Quadro FX 880M
fps
100%
Quadro FX 880M:
50.4 [X] Fujitsu Celsius H700 LKN:H7000WF011PL Intel Core i7-840QM 1.9GHz
Quadro FX 880M
fps
100%
Quadro FX 880M:
155 fps
102%
Quadro FX 2800M:
158 fps
100%
Quadro FX 880M:
42 fps
143%
Quadro FX 2800M:
60 fps
100%
Quadro FX 880M:
29 fps
179%
Quadro FX 2800M:
52 fps
100%
Quadro FX 880M:
12 fps
247%
Quadro FX 2800M:
29.6 fps
100%
Quadro FX 880M:
58.8 fps
100%
Quadro FX 880M:
30.4 fps
194%
Quadro FX 2800M:
58.9 fps
100%
Quadro FX 880M:
16.1 fps
258%
Quadro FX 2800M:
41.5 fps
100%
Quadro FX 880M:
9.7 fps
238%
Quadro FX 2800M:
23.1 fps
100%
Quadro FX 880M:
124.1 fps
127%
Quadro FX 2800M:
158.1 fps
100%
Quadro FX 880M:
42.2 fps
187%
Quadro FX 2800M:
78.9 fps
100%
Quadro FX 880M:
35.4 fps
188%
Quadro FX 2800M:
66.7 fps
100%
Quadro FX 880M:
21 fps
196%
Quadro FX 2800M:
41.2 fps
100%
Quadro FX 880M:
75.4 fps
100%
Quadro FX 880M:
29.8 33.4 [X] Fujitsu Celsius H700 LKN:H7000WF011PL Intel Core i7-840QM 1.9GHz
Quadro FX 880M
~ 32 fps
100%
Quadro FX 880M:
18.2 20.6 [X] Fujitsu Celsius H700 LKN:H7000WF011PL Intel Core i7-840QM 1.9GHz
Quadro FX 880M
~ 19 fps
100%
Quadro FX 880M:
12.7 [X] Fujitsu Celsius H700 LKN:H7000WF011PL Intel Core i7-840QM 1.9GHz
Quadro FX 880M
fps
100%
Quadro FX 880M:
79.3 fps
121%
Quadro FX 2800M:
96.3 fps
100%
Quadro FX 880M:
45.7 [X] Fujitsu Celsius H700 LKN:H7000WF011PL Intel Core i7-840QM 1.9GHz
Quadro FX 880M
47.8 ~ 47 fps
190%
Quadro FX 2800M:
89.5 fps
100%
Quadro FX 880M:
20 [X] Fujitsu Celsius H700 LKN:H7000WF011PL Intel Core i7-840QM 1.9GHz
Quadro FX 880M
39 ~ 30 fps
209%
Quadro FX 2800M:
62.6 fps
100%
Quadro FX 880M:
12.8 fps
240%
Quadro FX 2800M:
30.7 fps
100%
Quadro FX 880M:
59.7 60 131 147.3 [X] Fujitsu Celsius H700 LKN:H7000WF011PL Intel Core i7-840QM 1.9GHz
Quadro FX 880M
~ 100 fps
100%
Quadro FX 880M:
19 19.1 20.5 23 [X] Fujitsu Celsius H700 LKN:H7000WF011PL Intel Core i7-840QM 1.9GHz
Quadro FX 880M
~ 20 fps
100%
Quadro FX 880M:
179.6 fps
100%
Quadro FX 880M:
65.9 fps
100%
Quadro FX 880M:
42.3 fps
100%
Quadro FX 880M:
93.3 fps
100%
Quadro FX 880M:
32.4 fps
100%
Quadro FX 880M:
48.7 fps
100%
Quadro FX 880M:
28.9 fps
100%
Quadro FX 880M:
225.7 fps
100%
Quadro FX 880M:
60 fps
100%
Quadro FX 880M:
59.9 fps
100%
Quadro FX 880M:
29.9 fps
100%
Quadro FX 880M:
28.2 fps
Average Gaming NVIDIA Quadro FX 880M → 100% Average Gaming 30-70 fps → 100%
Average Gaming NVIDIA Quadro FX 2800M → 188% Average Gaming 30-70 fps → 201%
NVIDIA Quadro FX 880M low med. high ultra QHD 4K Fifa 11 129.2 90.5 50.4 StarCraft 2 155 42 29 12 Battlefield: Bad Company 2 58.8 30.4 16.1 9.7 CoD Modern Warfare 2 124.1 42.2 35.4 21 Risen 75.4 32 19 12.7 Colin McRae: DIRT 2 79.3 47 30 12.8 Anno 1404 100 20 F.E.A.R. 2 179.6 65.9 42.3 Far Cry 2 93.3 32.39 Racedriver: GRID 48.7 28.9 Call of Duty 4 - Modern Warfare 225.7 60 59.9 Supreme Commander - FA Bench 29.92 28.18 < 30 fps < 60 fps < 120 fps ≥ 120 fps 1 4 4 1 6 2 1 5 5 1 6 1
NVIDIA Quadro FX 2800M low med. high ultra QHD 4K Mafia 2 63.2 56.1 48.9 30.8 StarCraft 2 158 60 52 29.6 Battlefield: Bad Company 2 58.9 41.53 23.07 CoD Modern Warfare 2 158.1 78.9 66.7 41.2 Colin McRae: DIRT 2 96.3 89.5 62.6 30.7 < 30 fps < 60 fps < 120 fps ≥ 120 fps 2 2 2 3 3 2 2 3
For more games that might be playable and a list of all games and graphics cards visit our Gaming List
v1.26
log 26. 00:26:57
#0 checking url part for id 1621 +0s ... 0s
#1 checking url part for id 1544 +0s ... 0s
#2 checking url part for id 5 +0s ... 0s
#3 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s
#4 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Thu, 25 Apr 2024 05:40:10 +0200 +0.001s ... 0.001s
#5 composed specs +0.156s ... 0.157s
#6 did output specs +0s ... 0.157s
#7 start showIntegratedCPUs +0s ... 0.157s
#8 getting avg benchmarks for device 1621 +0.055s ... 0.212s
#9 got single benchmarks 1621 +0.02s ... 0.232s
#10 getting avg benchmarks for device 1544 +0.002s ... 0.234s
#11 got single benchmarks 1544 +0.009s ... 0.243s
#12 getting avg benchmarks for device 5 +0.002s ... 0.246s
#13 got single benchmarks 5 +0.009s ... 0.255s
#14 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.255s
#15 min, max, avg, median took s +0.352s ... 0.607s
#16 before gaming benchmark output +0s ... 0.607s
#17 Got 66 rows for game benchmarks. +0.011s ... 0.618s
#18 composed SQL query for gamebenchmarks +0s ... 0.618s
#19 got data and put it in $dataArray +0.008s ... 0.626s
#20 benchmarks composed for output. +0.033s ... 0.659s
#21 calculated avg scores. +0s ... 0.659s
#22 return log +0.002s ... 0.662s
Please share our article, every link counts!
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)