Notebookcheck Logo

NVIDIA Quadro FX 3800M vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 880M vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 1800M

NVIDIA Quadro FX 3800M

► remove from comparison NVIDIA Quadro FX 3800M

The NVIDIA Quadro FX 3800M is a mobile workstation graphics card for high end laptops. It is based on the Geforce GTX 280M core (G92 core) and features 128 CUDA cores (unified shaders).

Compared to the Quadro FX 3700M, the Quadro FX 3800M features a higher clock speed and is manufacturered in 55nm (compared to 65nm of the 3700M). In fact, the FX3800M is clocked even higher than the consumer GeForce GTX 280M and performs notably better as a result.

The Quadro FX series of cards are optimized for professional applications like CAD or DCC. Notably, OpenGL performance should be much improved compared to  consumer GeForce cards of similar specifications.

At the time its announcement (December 2009), the FX 3800M was the fastest workstation graphics card for laptops.

NVIDIA Quadro FX 880M

► remove from comparison NVIDIA Quadro FX 880M

The NVIDIA Quadro FX 880M is a professional middle class graphics card for mobile workstations (about 15"). It is based on the GeForce GT 330M graphics card with slower clock rates and therefore is a DirectX 10.1 chip that is produced in 40nm. 

Due to a special BIOS and professional drivers, the FX 880M should perform noticeably better than a 330M in professional applications (like CAD, DCC, Rendering). Another advantage for professional users are the certified drivers that should ensure a bug free experience with the most common professional applications. Futhermore, the Quadro FX drivers contain profiles for these applications to ensure the best settings (similar to the game profiles in GeForce cards).

The Quadro FX 880M is also based on the GT216 core in 40nm. The shaders are based on the desktop GTX 200 architecture and therefore a bit improved compared to the previous generation cards.

Without load, the Quadro FX 880M is able to downclock to 135 / 270 / 135 MHz (chip / shader / memory clock).

The gaming performance of the FX 880M should be beyond the GT 330M, because of the different drivers. Gamers should choose a GeForce card because of the better game support.

The chip supports Optimus for automatic switching between dedicated and integrated graphics card (e.g. in the new Core i5 CPUs). Still Optimus was for example not integrated in the Lenovo Thinkpad W510.

NVIDIA Quadro FX 1800M

► remove from comparison NVIDIA Quadro FX 1800M

The NVIDIA Quadro FX 1800M is a upper mid-range professional graphics card for mobile workstations with about 15" displays. It is based on the same chip as the GeForce GT 335M but can be also equipped with fast GDDR5 graphics memory. The FX1800M is shipped with professional drivers and a special BIOS that improves the performance and stability in applications like CAD and DCC.

The certified drivers guarantee flawless and fast working with professional applications like Premiere, Photoshop, After Effect, AutoCAD, 3ds Max, trueSpace, Blender, Catia, IronCAD, Cinema 4D, Lightwave 3D, Softimage, Mathematica ... A list of all certified applications can be found on the Nvidia.com homepage. Compared to GeForce products, the Quadro FX cards offer a significantly better performance, especially for OpenGL based apps.

The gaming performance should be similar to the GeForce GT 335M, altough gamers should choose a GeForce graphics card because of the optimized driver support (that leads to a better performance and less problems in games). Still all modern and demanding games of 2009 should at least run in medium detail settings (see the GeForce GT 335M page for more gaming results).

The chip is manufactured in 40nm and offers 72 1-dimensional unified shaders. These can be compared to about 300-400 5-dimensional shaders in graphics cards by AMD. These processing cores can also be accessed with CUDA, OpenCL, and DirectCompute to use the calculation power for other tasks than rendering images (for example transcoding videos). 

The QuadroFX 1800M also supports PureVideo HD with the new VideoProcessor (VP4) to decode HD videos on the graphics card. This helps reducing CPU load and increasing battery runtimes.

The Quadro FX 1800M also supports the automatic switching between the integrated and dedicated graphics card using Optimus. First mobile workstations do not offer Optimus, as the development cycles of these laptops are very long.

NVIDIA Quadro FX 3800MNVIDIA Quadro FX 880MNVIDIA Quadro FX 1800M
Quadro FX Series
Quadro FX 3800M 128 @ 0.68 GHz256 Bit @ 1000 MHz
Quadro FX 3700M 128 @ 0.55 GHz256 Bit @ 800 MHz
Quadro FX 2800M 96 @ 0.6 GHz256 Bit @ 1000 MHz
Quadro FX 3600M 96 @ 0.5 GHz256 Bit @ 800 MHz
Quadro FX 1800M 72 @ 0.56 GHz128 Bit @ 1100 MHz
Quadro FX 2700M 48 @ 0.53 GHz256 Bit @ 800 MHz
Quadro FX 880M 48 @ 0.55 GHz128 Bit @ 790 MHz
Quadro FX 3500M 24/8 cores @ 0.58 GHz256 Bit @ 700 MHz
Quadro FX 2500M 24/8 cores @ 0.5 GHz256 Bit @ 600 MHz
Quadro FX 1700M 32 @ 0.63 GHz128 Bit @ 800 MHz
Quadro FX 1600M 32 @ 0.63 GHz128 Bit @ 800 MHz
Quadro FX 1500M 20/7 cores @ 0.38 GHz256 Bit @ 500 MHz
Quadro FX 770M 32 @ 0.5 GHz128 Bit @ 800 MHz
Quadro FX 570M 32 @ 0.48 GHz128 Bit @ 700 MHz
Quadro FX 380M 16 @ 0.63 GHz64 Bit @ 800 MHz
Quadro FX 370M 8 @ 0.58 GHz64 Bit @ 700 MHz
Quadro FX 360M 16 @ 0.4 GHz64 Bit @ 600 MHz
Quadro FX 350M 4/3 cores @ 0.45 GHz64 Bit @ 350 MHz
Quadro FX 3800M 128 @ 0.68 GHz256 Bit @ 1000 MHz
Quadro FX 3700M 128 @ 0.55 GHz256 Bit @ 800 MHz
Quadro FX 2800M 96 @ 0.6 GHz256 Bit @ 1000 MHz
Quadro FX 3600M 96 @ 0.5 GHz256 Bit @ 800 MHz
Quadro FX 1800M 72 @ 0.56 GHz128 Bit @ 1100 MHz
Quadro FX 2700M 48 @ 0.53 GHz256 Bit @ 800 MHz
Quadro FX 880M 48 @ 0.55 GHz128 Bit @ 790 MHz
Quadro FX 3500M 24/8 cores @ 0.58 GHz256 Bit @ 700 MHz
Quadro FX 2500M 24/8 cores @ 0.5 GHz256 Bit @ 600 MHz
Quadro FX 1700M 32 @ 0.63 GHz128 Bit @ 800 MHz
Quadro FX 1600M 32 @ 0.63 GHz128 Bit @ 800 MHz
Quadro FX 1500M 20/7 cores @ 0.38 GHz256 Bit @ 500 MHz
Quadro FX 770M 32 @ 0.5 GHz128 Bit @ 800 MHz
Quadro FX 570M 32 @ 0.48 GHz128 Bit @ 700 MHz
Quadro FX 380M 16 @ 0.63 GHz64 Bit @ 800 MHz
Quadro FX 370M 8 @ 0.58 GHz64 Bit @ 700 MHz
Quadro FX 360M 16 @ 0.4 GHz64 Bit @ 600 MHz
Quadro FX 350M 4/3 cores @ 0.45 GHz64 Bit @ 350 MHz
Quadro FX 3800M 128 @ 0.68 GHz256 Bit @ 1000 MHz
Quadro FX 3700M 128 @ 0.55 GHz256 Bit @ 800 MHz
Quadro FX 2800M 96 @ 0.6 GHz256 Bit @ 1000 MHz
Quadro FX 3600M 96 @ 0.5 GHz256 Bit @ 800 MHz
Quadro FX 1800M 72 @ 0.56 GHz128 Bit @ 1100 MHz
Quadro FX 2700M 48 @ 0.53 GHz256 Bit @ 800 MHz
Quadro FX 880M 48 @ 0.55 GHz128 Bit @ 790 MHz
Quadro FX 3500M 24/8 cores @ 0.58 GHz256 Bit @ 700 MHz
Quadro FX 2500M 24/8 cores @ 0.5 GHz256 Bit @ 600 MHz
Quadro FX 1700M 32 @ 0.63 GHz128 Bit @ 800 MHz
Quadro FX 1600M 32 @ 0.63 GHz128 Bit @ 800 MHz
Quadro FX 1500M 20/7 cores @ 0.38 GHz256 Bit @ 500 MHz
Quadro FX 770M 32 @ 0.5 GHz128 Bit @ 800 MHz
Quadro FX 570M 32 @ 0.48 GHz128 Bit @ 700 MHz
Quadro FX 380M 16 @ 0.63 GHz64 Bit @ 800 MHz
Quadro FX 370M 8 @ 0.58 GHz64 Bit @ 700 MHz
Quadro FX 360M 16 @ 0.4 GHz64 Bit @ 600 MHz
Quadro FX 350M 4/3 cores @ 0.45 GHz64 Bit @ 350 MHz
CodenameN10E-GLM4N10P-GLM
ArchitectureG9xGT2xxGT2xx
Pipelines128 - unified48 - unified72 - unified
Core Speed675 MHz550 MHz560 MHz
Shader Speed1688 MHz1210 MHz1125 MHz
Memory Speed1000 MHz790 MHz1100 MHz
Memory Bus Width256 Bit128 Bit128 Bit
Memory TypeGDDR3GDDR3, DDR3DDR3, GDDR5
Max. Amount of Memory1024 MB1024 MB1024 MB
Shared Memorynonono
APIDirectX 10, Shader 4.0DirectX 10.1, Shader 4.1DirectX 10.1, Shader 4.1
Power Consumption100 Watt35 Watt45 Watt
Transistors754 Million
technology55 nm40 nm40 nm
FeaturesOpenGL 2.1, CUDA, PowerMizer 8.0PowerMizer 9.0, EnergyStar (3.8W), 16x FSAA Support, CUDA, NVIEW, OpenGL 3.2
Notebook Sizelargemedium sizedmedium sized
Date of Announcement20.12.2009 07.01.2010 01.02.2010
Link to Manufacturer Pagehttp://www.nvidia.com/object/product_qua...http://www.nvidia.com/object/product_qua...http://www.nvidia.com/object/product_qua...

Benchmarks

3DMark Vantage
3DM Vant. Perf. total + NVIDIA Quadro FX 3800M
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. total
min: 6584     avg: 6951     median: 6779 (2%)     max: 7491 Points
3DM Vant. Perf. total + NVIDIA Quadro FX 880M
min: 2558     avg: 2643     median: 2638.5 (1%)     max: 2735 Points
3DM Vant. Perf. total + NVIDIA Quadro FX 1800M
min: 3444     avg: 3452     median: 3451.5 (1%)     max: 3459 Points
3DM Vant. Perf. GPU no PhysX + NVIDIA Quadro FX 3800M
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. GPU no PhysX
min: 5758     avg: 5926     median: 6002 (5%)     max: 6019 Points
3DM Vant. Perf. GPU no PhysX + NVIDIA Quadro FX 880M
min: 2128     avg: 2203     median: 2149.5 (2%)     max: 2385 Points
3DM Vant. Perf. GPU no PhysX + NVIDIA Quadro FX 1800M
min: 2774     avg: 2801     median: 2800.5 (2%)     max: 2827 Points
3DMark 2001SE - 3DMark 2001 - Standard
min: 32886     avg: 34790     median: 34790 (36%)     max: 36694 Points
min: 28169     avg: 32291     median: 33331 (35%)     max: 34331 Points
3DMark 03 - 3DMark 03 - Standard
min: 33146     avg: 37082     median: 38191 (20%)     max: 39909 Points
min: 18796     avg: 18980     median: 19002 (10%)     max: 19137 Points
3DMark 05 - 3DMark 05 - Standard
min: 16593     avg: 18199     median: 18043 (25%)     max: 19960 Points
min: 13154     avg: 13217     median: 13185 (18%)     max: 13298 Points
15249 Points (21%)
3DMark 06 3DMark 06 - Score Unknown Settings + NVIDIA Quadro FX 3800M
3DMark 06
13232 Points (20%)
3DMark 06 - Standard 1280x1024 + NVIDIA Quadro FX 3800M
3DMark 06
min: 12050     avg: 12765     median: 12923 (20%)     max: 13323 Points
3DMark 06 - Standard 1280x1024 + NVIDIA Quadro FX 880M
min: 6366     avg: 6401     median: 6378 (10%)     max: 6473 Points
3DMark 06 - Standard 1280x1024 + NVIDIA Quadro FX 1800M
min: 7416     avg: 7573     median: 7572.5 (11%)     max: 7729 Points
3DMark 06 - Standard 1280x768 + NVIDIA Quadro FX 880M
3DMark 06
6392 Points (10%)
SPEC Viewperf 10.0 - SPEC Viewperf 10.0 - 3dsmax
32.8 Points (68%)
47.8 Points (99%)
SPEC Viewperf 10.0 - SPEC Viewperf 10.0 - Catia
45.8 Points (96%)
47.6 Points (100%)
SPEC Viewperf 10.0 - SPEC Viewperf 10.0 - EnSight
47.4 Points (100%)
SPEC Viewperf 10.0 - SPEC Viewperf 10.0 - Maya
59.7 Points (32%)
60.1 Points (32%)
SPEC Viewperf 10.0 - SPEC Viewperf 10.0 - Pro/Engeneer
51.1 Points (100%)
SPEC Viewperf 10.0 - SPEC Viewperf 10.0 - SolidWorks
59.7 Points (88%)
58 Points (86%)
SPEC Viewperf 10.0 - SPEC Viewperf 10.0 - UGS Teamcenter
38.5 Points (100%)
24.4 Points (63%)
SPEC Viewperf 10.0 - SPEC Viewperf 10.0 - UGS NX
35.3 Points (72%)
SPECviewperf 11
specvp11 snx-01 + NVIDIA Quadro FX 3800M
SPECviewperf 11 - specvp11 snx-01
18.8 fps (13%)
specvp11 snx-01 + NVIDIA Quadro FX 880M
min: 9.18     avg: 9.7     median: 9.7 (7%)     max: 10.27 fps
specvp11 snx-01 + NVIDIA Quadro FX 1800M
12.4 fps (9%)
specvp11 tcvis-02 + NVIDIA Quadro FX 3800M
SPECviewperf 11 - specvp11 tcvis-02
18.7 fps (31%)
specvp11 tcvis-02 + NVIDIA Quadro FX 880M
min: 11.04     avg: 11.2     median: 11.2 (19%)     max: 11.32 fps
specvp11 tcvis-02 + NVIDIA Quadro FX 1800M
13 fps (22%)
specvp11 sw-02 + NVIDIA Quadro FX 3800M
SPECviewperf 11 - specvp11 sw-02
30.6 fps (37%)
specvp11 sw-02 + NVIDIA Quadro FX 880M
min: 7.56     avg: 16     median: 16 (19%)     max: 24.45 fps
specvp11 sw-02 + NVIDIA Quadro FX 1800M
28.1 fps (34%)
specvp11 proe-05 + NVIDIA Quadro FX 3800M
SPECviewperf 11 - specvp11 proe-05
6.9 fps (29%)
specvp11 proe-05 + NVIDIA Quadro FX 880M
min: 4.28     avg: 5.2     median: 5.2 (22%)     max: 6.21 fps
specvp11 proe-05 + NVIDIA Quadro FX 1800M
7.5 fps (31%)
specvp11 maya-03 + NVIDIA Quadro FX 3800M
SPECviewperf 11 - specvp11 maya-03
16.6 fps (12%)
specvp11 maya-03 + NVIDIA Quadro FX 880M
min: 6.94     avg: 8     median: 8 (6%)     max: 9.09 fps
specvp11 maya-03 + NVIDIA Quadro FX 1800M
16.6 fps (13%)
specvp11 lightwave-01 + NVIDIA Quadro FX 3800M
SPECviewperf 11 - specvp11 lightwave-01
38.4 fps (41%)
specvp11 lightwave-01 + NVIDIA Quadro FX 880M
min: 9.81     avg: 23.8     median: 23.8 (26%)     max: 37.84 fps
specvp11 lightwave-01 + NVIDIA Quadro FX 1800M
39 fps (42%)
specvp11 ensight-04 + NVIDIA Quadro FX 3800M
SPECviewperf 11 - specvp11 ensight-04
16.2 fps (8%)
specvp11 ensight-04 + NVIDIA Quadro FX 880M
min: 10     avg: 10.3     median: 10.3 (5%)     max: 10.59 fps
specvp11 ensight-04 + NVIDIA Quadro FX 1800M
12.3 fps (6%)
specvp11 catia-03 + NVIDIA Quadro FX 3800M
SPECviewperf 11 - specvp11 catia-03
23.4 fps (28%)
specvp11 catia-03 + NVIDIA Quadro FX 880M
min: 8.63     avg: 12.3     median: 12.3 (15%)     max: 15.92 fps
specvp11 catia-03 + NVIDIA Quadro FX 1800M
17.5 fps (21%)
Windows 7 Experience Index - Win7 Gaming graphics
6.9 Points (87%)
6.4 Points (81%)
6.6 Points (84%)
Windows 7 Experience Index - Win7 Graphics
6.9 Points (87%)
6.4 Points (81%)
5 Points (63%)
Cinebench R10 Cinebench R10 Shading (32bit) + NVIDIA Quadro FX 3800M
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Shading (32bit)
min: 4429     avg: 4928     median: 4928 (4%)     max: 5427 Points
Cinebench R10 Shading (32bit) + NVIDIA Quadro FX 880M
min: 4809     avg: 4886     median: 4846 (3%)     max: 5002 Points
Cinebench R11.5 Cinebench R11.5 OpenGL 64 Bit + NVIDIA Quadro FX 3800M
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 OpenGL 64 Bit
min: 32.07     avg: 32.7     median: 32.7 (12%)     max: 33.29 fps
Cinebench R11.5 OpenGL 64 Bit + NVIDIA Quadro FX 880M
min: 15.84     avg: 16     median: 16 (6%)     max: 16.14 fps
Cinebench R11.5 OpenGL 64 Bit + NVIDIA Quadro FX 1800M
20 fps (7%)

Average Benchmarks NVIDIA Quadro FX 3800M → 100% n=15

Average Benchmarks NVIDIA Quadro FX 880M → 60% n=15

Average Benchmarks NVIDIA Quadro FX 1800M → 77% n=15

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Game Benchmarks

The following benchmarks stem from our benchmarks of review laptops. The performance depends on the used graphics memory, clock rate, processor, system settings, drivers, and operating systems. So the results don't have to be representative for all laptops with this GPU. For detailed information on the benchmark results, click on the fps number.

Fifa 11

Fifa 11

2010
med. 1024x768
100%
Quadro FX 3800M:
230.6  fps
56%
Quadro FX 880M:
129.2  fps
high 1360x768
100%
Quadro FX 3800M:
124.2  fps
73%
Quadro FX 880M:
90.5  fps
ultra 1920x1080
Quadro FX 880M:
50.4  fps
low 1024x768
Quadro FX 880M:
155  fps
med. 1360x768
Quadro FX 880M:
42  fps
high 1360x768
Quadro FX 880M:
29  fps
ultra 1920x1080
Quadro FX 880M:
12  fps
low 1024x768
Quadro FX 880M:
58.8  fps
med. 1366x768
Quadro FX 880M:
30.4  fps
high 1366x768
Quadro FX 880M:
16.1  fps
ultra 1920x1080
Quadro FX 880M:
9.7  fps
low 800x600
Quadro FX 880M:
124.1  fps
med. 1024x768
Quadro FX 880M:
42.2  fps
high 1366x768
Quadro FX 880M:
35.4  fps
ultra 1920x1080
Quadro FX 880M:
21  fps
Risen

Risen

2009
low 800x600
Quadro FX 880M:
75.4  fps
med. 1024x768
100%
Quadro FX 3800M:
64.9  fps
49%
Quadro FX 880M:
29.8 33.4 ~ 32 fps
high 1366x768
Quadro FX 880M:
18.2 20.6 ~ 19 fps
ultra 1920x1080
100%
Quadro FX 3800M:
31.8  fps
40%
Quadro FX 880M:
12.7  fps
Need for Speed Shift

Need for Speed Shift

2009
med. 1024x768
100%
Quadro FX 3800M:
78.5  fps
ultra 1920x1080
100%
Quadro FX 3800M:
40.9  fps
Colin McRae: DIRT 2

Colin McRae: DIRT 2

2009
low 800x600
100%
Quadro FX 3800M:
97  fps
82%
Quadro FX 880M:
79.3  fps
med. 1024x768
100%
Quadro FX 3800M:
82  fps
57%
Quadro FX 880M:
45.7 47.8 ~ 47 fps
high 1360x768
Quadro FX 880M:
20 39 ~ 30 fps
ultra 1920x1080
100%
Quadro FX 3800M:
29.9  fps
43%
Quadro FX 880M:
12.8  fps
Anno 1404

Anno 1404

2009
low 1024x768
100%
Quadro FX 3800M:
142.8  fps
70%
Quadro FX 880M:
59.7 60 131 147.3 ~ 100 fps
ultra 1280x1024
100%
Quadro FX 3800M:
61.9  fps
32%
Quadro FX 880M:
19 19.1 20.5 23 ~ 20 fps
F.E.A.R. 2

F.E.A.R. 2

2009
low 800x600
Quadro FX 880M:
179.6  fps
med. 1024x768
Quadro FX 880M:
65.9  fps
high 1280x1024
Quadro FX 880M:
42.3  fps
Far Cry 2

Far Cry 2

2008
low 640x480
Quadro FX 880M:
93.3  fps
high 1024x768
Quadro FX 880M:
32.4  fps
Racedriver: GRID

Racedriver: GRID

2008
med. 1024x768
Quadro FX 880M:
48.7  fps
high 1280x1024
Quadro FX 880M:
28.9  fps
Call of Duty 4 - Modern Warfare

Call of Duty 4 - Modern Warfare

2007
low 800x600
Quadro FX 880M:
225.7  fps
med. 1024x768
Quadro FX 880M:
60  fps
high 1280x1024
Quadro FX 880M:
59.9  fps
Supreme Commander - FA Bench

Supreme Commander - FA Bench

2007
med. 1024x768
Quadro FX 880M:
29.9  fps
high 1024x768
Quadro FX 880M:
28.2  fps

Average Gaming NVIDIA Quadro FX 3800M → 100%

Average Gaming 30-70 fps → 100%

Average Gaming NVIDIA Quadro FX 880M → 56%

Average Gaming 30-70 fps → 53%

For more games that might be playable and a list of all games and graphics cards visit our Gaming List

v1.18
log 26. 02:25:30

#0 checking url part for id 1541 +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 1621 +0s ... 0s

#2 checking url part for id 1649 +0s ... 0s

#3 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#4 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Thu, 22 Sep 2022 17:27:05 +0200 +0s ... 0s

#5 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.05s ... 0.05s

#6 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.05s

#7 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.05s

#8 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.05s

#9 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.05s

#10 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.05s

#11 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.05s

#12 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.05s

#13 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.05s

#14 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.05s

#15 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.05s

#16 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.05s

#17 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.05s

#18 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.05s

#19 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.05s

#20 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.05s

#21 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.002s ... 0.052s

#22 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.052s

#23 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.052s

#24 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.052s

#25 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.052s

#26 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.052s

#27 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.052s

#28 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.052s

#29 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.052s

#30 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.052s

#31 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.052s

#32 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.052s

#33 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.052s

#34 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.052s

#35 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.052s

#36 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.052s

#37 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.052s

#38 composed specs +0s ... 0.052s

#39 did output specs +0s ... 0.052s

#40 start showIntegratedCPUs +0s ... 0.052s

#41 getting avg benchmarks for device 1541 +0.04s ... 0.092s

#42 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s ... 0.093s

#43 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.004s ... 0.097s

#44 got single benchmarks 1541 +0.006s ... 0.103s

#45 getting avg benchmarks for device 1621 +0s ... 0.103s

#46 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.104s

#47 got single benchmarks 1621 +0.011s ... 0.115s

#48 getting avg benchmarks for device 1649 +0s ... 0.115s

#49 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.116s

#50 got single benchmarks 1649 +0.006s ... 0.121s

#51 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.121s

#52 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.121s

#53 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.121s

#54 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.121s

#55 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.001s ... 0.122s

#56 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.122s

#57 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.123s

#58 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.123s

#59 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.123s

#60 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.123s

#61 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.123s

#62 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.123s

#63 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.123s

#64 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.124s

#65 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.124s

#66 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.001s ... 0.125s

#67 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.125s

#68 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.125s

#69 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.125s

#70 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.125s

#71 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.125s

#72 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.125s

#73 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.125s

#74 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.125s

#75 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.126s

#76 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.126s

#77 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.126s

#78 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.126s

#79 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.126s

#80 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.126s

#81 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.126s

#82 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.126s

#83 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.126s

#84 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.126s

#85 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.126s

#86 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.126s

#87 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.126s

#88 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.127s

#89 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.127s

#90 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.127s

#91 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.127s

#92 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.127s

#93 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.128s

#94 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.128s

#95 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.128s

#96 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.128s

#97 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.128s

#98 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.128s

#99 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.128s

#100 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.128s

#101 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.129s

#102 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.129s

#103 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.129s

#104 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.13s

#105 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.13s

#106 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.131s

#107 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.131s

#108 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.131s

#109 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.132s

#110 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.132s

#111 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.133s

#112 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.133s

#113 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.001s ... 0.133s

#114 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.134s

#115 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.134s

#116 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.134s

#117 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.134s

#118 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.134s

#119 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.135s

#120 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.135s

#121 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.135s

#122 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.135s

#123 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.136s

#124 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.136s

#125 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.136s

#126 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.136s

#127 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.136s

#128 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.136s

#129 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.137s

#130 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.137s

#131 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.137s

#132 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.137s

#133 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.138s

#134 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.138s

#135 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.138s

#136 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.138s

#137 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.138s

#138 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.139s

#139 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.139s

#140 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.139s

#141 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.139s

#142 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.14s

#143 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.14s

#144 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.14s

#145 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.14s

#146 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.002s ... 0.142s

#147 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.142s

#148 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.142s

#149 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.143s

#150 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.001s ... 0.144s

#151 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.144s

#152 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.144s

#153 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.144s

#154 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.145s

#155 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.145s

#156 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.145s

#157 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.145s

#158 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.145s

#159 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.146s

#160 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.146s

#161 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.146s

#162 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.146s

#163 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.146s

#164 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.146s

#165 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.146s

#166 min, max, avg, median took s +0s ... 0.147s

#167 before gaming benchmark output +0s ... 0.147s

#168 Got 58 rows for game benchmarks. +0.009s ... 0.155s

#169 composed SQL query for gamebenchmarks +0s ... 0.155s

#170 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.155s

#171 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.155s

#172 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.155s

#173 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.155s

#174 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.155s

#175 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.155s

#176 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.155s

#177 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.156s

#178 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.156s

#179 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.156s

#180 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.156s

#181 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.156s

#182 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.156s

#183 got data and put it in $dataArray +0.002s ... 0.158s

#184 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.001s ... 0.159s

#185 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.159s

#186 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.159s

#187 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.159s

#188 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.159s

#189 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s ... 0.159s

#190 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.16s

#191 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.16s

#192 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.16s

#193 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s ... 0.161s

#194 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.161s

#195 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.161s

#196 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.161s

#197 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s ... 0.162s

#198 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.162s

#199 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.162s

#200 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.162s

#201 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s ... 0.163s

#202 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.163s

#203 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.163s

#204 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.163s

#205 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.163s

#206 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.163s

#207 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.163s

#208 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.163s

#209 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.001s ... 0.163s

#210 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.163s

#211 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.001s ... 0.164s

#212 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.164s

#213 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.164s

#214 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.164s

#215 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.164s

#216 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.164s

#217 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.164s

#218 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.164s

#219 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.164s

#220 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.001s ... 0.165s

#221 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.165s

#222 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.165s

#223 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.165s

#224 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.165s

#225 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.165s

#226 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.165s

#227 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.165s

#228 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.165s

#229 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.165s

#230 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s ... 0.166s

#231 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.166s

#232 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.166s

#233 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s ... 0.167s

#234 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.167s

#235 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s ... 0.168s

#236 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.168s

#237 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s ... 0.169s

#238 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.169s

#239 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.169s

#240 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s ... 0.17s

#241 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.17s

#242 benchmarks composed for output. +0s ... 0.17s

#243 calculated avg scores. +0s ... 0.17s

#244 return log +0.001s ... 0.171s

Please share our article, every link counts!
.170
> Notebook / Laptop Reviews and News > Benchmarks / Tech > Graphics Card Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2017-09-11)