NVIDIA Quadro FX 360M vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 570M vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 880M
NVIDIA Quadro FX 360M ► remove from comparison
For CAD and professional applications certified GPU based on the 8400M GS. The higher power consumption of 17 Watt versus 11 Watt of the 8400M GS indicates a higher performance.
NVIDIA Quadro FX 570M ► remove from comparison
Performance workstation grafic chip with DirectX 10 support and OpenGL 2.1 support. Probaby, it bases upon the NVIDIA GeForce 8600M GT .
It is intended for digital content creators, engineers, geologic scientists and other professional 3D applications.
The drivers of the Quadro FX series are certified for CAD applications (e.g. AutoCad, Inventor, Solidstation, Solid Edge, ...) and DCC applications (e.g. Maya, 3DS Max, Lightwave 3D, ...) and offer a 12-bit precision for subpixel, full image-antialiasing, hardware accelerated antialiasing for dots and lines and additional drivers are for CAD and DCC optimized settings.
NVIDIA Quadro FX 880M ► remove from comparison
The NVIDIA Quadro FX 880M is a professional middle class graphics card for mobile workstations (about 15"). It is based on the GeForce GT 330M graphics card with slower clock rates and therefore is a DirectX 10.1 chip that is produced in 40nm.
Due to a special BIOS and professional drivers, the FX 880M should perform noticeably better than a 330M in professional applications (like CAD, DCC, Rendering). Another advantage for professional users are the certified drivers that should ensure a bug free experience with the most common professional applications. Futhermore, the Quadro FX drivers contain profiles for these applications to ensure the best settings (similar to the game profiles in GeForce cards).
The Quadro FX 880M is also based on the GT216 core in 40nm. The shaders are based on the desktop GTX 200 architecture and therefore a bit improved compared to the previous generation cards.
Without load, the Quadro FX 880M is able to downclock to 135 / 270 / 135 MHz (chip / shader / memory clock).
The gaming performance of the FX 880M should be beyond the GT 330M, because of the different drivers. Gamers should choose a GeForce card because of the better game support.
The chip supports Optimus for automatic switching between dedicated and integrated graphics card (e.g. in the new Core i5 CPUs). Still Optimus was for example not integrated in the Lenovo Thinkpad W510.
NVIDIA Quadro FX 360M NVIDIA Quadro FX 570M NVIDIA Quadro FX 880M Quadro FX Series Codename NB8M-GLM G64GLM N10P-GLM Pipelines 16 - unified 32 - unified 48 - unified Core Speed 400 MHz 475 MHz 550 MHz Shader Speed 800 MHz 950 MHz 1210 MHz Memory Speed 600 MHz 700 MHz 790 MHz Memory Bus Width 64 Bit 128 Bit 128 Bit Memory Type GDDR3 GDDR3 GDDR3, DDR3 Max. Amount of Memory 256 MB 256 MB 1024 MB Shared Memory no no no API DirectX 10, Shader 4.0 DirectX 10, Shader 4.0 DirectX 10.1, Shader 4.1 Power Consumption 17 Watt 35 Watt 35 Watt Transistors 210 Million 289 Million technology 80 nm 80 nm 40 nm Features PowerMizer 7.0, HDR, designed for Vista, 128 Bit HDR, OpenGl 2.1 Date of Announcement 09.05.2007 01.06.2007 07.01.2010 Link to Manufacturer Page www.nvidia.de www.nvidia.de www.nvidia.com Architecture G8x GT2xx Notebook Size medium sized medium sized Information Powermizer 7.0, CG Shading language, 32 bit floating point precision, 12 bit subpixel precision, 128 bit graphic pipeline, vertex and pixelshader programmability, PureVideo HD, PCI-E interface, FSAA with turned grid, nView multidisplay support, high-precision dynamic-range (HPDR) technology, hardware 3D clipping, full image antialiasing
Benchmarks min: 2558 avg: 2643 median: 2638.5 (1%) max: 2735 Points
3DM Vant. Perf. GPU no PhysX + NVIDIA Quadro FX 880M 3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. GPU no PhysX
min: 2128 avg: 2203 median: 2149.5 (1%) max: 2385 Points
3DMark 2001SE - 3DMark 2001 - Standard
min: 13650 avg: 15054 median: 15053.5 (16%) max: 16457 Points
min: 24479 avg: 26908 median: 26907.5 (28%) max: 29336 Points
min: 28169 avg: 32291 median: 33331 (35%) max: 34331 Points
3DMark 03 - 3DMark 03 - Standard
min: 5580 avg: 6010 median: 6010 (3%) max: 6440 Points
min: 11586 avg: 11958 median: 11957.5 (6%) max: 12329 Points
min: 18796 avg: 18980 median: 19002 (10%) max: 19137 Points
3DMark 05 - 3DMark 05 - Standard
min: 3365 avg: 3372 median: 3372 (4%) max: 3379 Points
min: 7674 avg: 7790 median: 7700 (8%) max: 7997 Points
min: 13154 avg: 13217 median: 13185 (14%) max: 13298 Points
3DMark 06 3DMark 06 - Standard 1280x1024 + NVIDIA Quadro FX 360M
1490 Points (2%)
Model CPU GPU RAM Value 3DMark 06 - Standard 1280x1024 (3DMark 06 - Standard 1280x1024) T7500 Quadro FX 360M 400 / 800 MHz 0.3 GB 2 GB 1490
3DMark 06 - Standard 1280x1024 + NVIDIA Quadro FX 570M
3800 Points (5%)
3DMark 06 - Standard 1280x1024 + NVIDIA Quadro FX 880M
min: 6366 avg: 6401 median: 6378 (8%) max: 6473 Points
3DMark 06 - Standard 1280x800 + NVIDIA Quadro FX 360M
1572 Points (2%)
Model CPU GPU RAM Value 3DMark 06 - Standard 1280x800 Dell Precision M2300 (3DMark 06 - Standard 1280x800) T7700 Quadro FX 360M 432 / 400 MHz 0.1 GB 1 GB 1572
3DMark 06 - Standard 1280x800 + NVIDIA Quadro FX 570M
3904 Points (5%)
3DMark 06 - Score Unknown Settings + NVIDIA Quadro FX 570M
3883 Points (5%)
Model CPU GPU RAM Value 3DMark 06 - Score Unknown Settings (3DMark 06 - Score Unknown Settings) T7500 Quadro FX 570M 2 GB 3883
3DMark 06 - Standard 1280x768 + NVIDIA Quadro FX 880M
6392 Points (8%)
SPEC Viewperf 10.0 - SPEC Viewperf 10.0 - 3dsmax
47.8 Points (99%)
SPEC Viewperf 10.0 - SPEC Viewperf 10.0 - Catia
47.6 Points (100%)
SPEC Viewperf 10.0 - SPEC Viewperf 10.0 - Maya
60.1 Points (32%)
SPEC Viewperf 10.0 - SPEC Viewperf 10.0 - SolidWorks
58 Points (86%)
SPEC Viewperf 10.0 - SPEC Viewperf 10.0 - UGS Teamcenter
24.4 Points (63%)
SPECviewperf 11 specvp11 snx-01 + NVIDIA Quadro FX 880M SPECviewperf 11 - specvp11 snx-01
min: 9.18 avg: 9.7 median: 9.7 (6%) max: 10.27 fps
specvp11 tcvis-02 + NVIDIA Quadro FX 880M SPECviewperf 11 - specvp11 tcvis-02
min: 11.04 avg: 11.2 median: 11.2 (6%) max: 11.32 fps
specvp11 sw-02 + NVIDIA Quadro FX 880M SPECviewperf 11 - specvp11 sw-02
min: 7.56 avg: 16 median: 16 (12%) max: 24.45 fps
specvp11 proe-05 + NVIDIA Quadro FX 880M SPECviewperf 11 - specvp11 proe-05
min: 4.28 avg: 5.2 median: 5.2 (6%) max: 6.21 fps
specvp11 maya-03 + NVIDIA Quadro FX 880M SPECviewperf 11 - specvp11 maya-03
min: 6.94 avg: 8 median: 8 (6%) max: 9.09 fps
specvp11 lightwave-01 + NVIDIA Quadro FX 880M SPECviewperf 11 - specvp11 lightwave-01
min: 9.81 avg: 23.8 median: 23.8 (26%) max: 37.84 fps
specvp11 ensight-04 + NVIDIA Quadro FX 880M SPECviewperf 11 - specvp11 ensight-04
min: 10 avg: 10.3 median: 10.3 (5%) max: 10.59 fps
specvp11 catia-03 + NVIDIA Quadro FX 880M SPECviewperf 11 - specvp11 catia-03
min: 8.63 avg: 12.3 median: 12.3 (6%) max: 15.92 fps
Windows 7 Experience Index - Win7 Gaming graphics
6.4 Points (81%)
Windows 7 Experience Index - Win7 Graphics
6.4 Points (81%)
Cinebench R10 Cinebench R10 Shading (32bit) + NVIDIA Quadro FX 360M Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Shading (32bit)
2985 Points (2%)
Cinebench R10 Shading (32bit) + NVIDIA Quadro FX 570M
4534 Points (3%)
Cinebench R10 Shading (32bit) + NVIDIA Quadro FX 880M
min: 4809 avg: 4886 median: 4846 (3%) max: 5002 Points
Cinebench R11.5 Cinebench R11.5 OpenGL 64 Bit + NVIDIA Quadro FX 570M Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 OpenGL 64 Bit
9.3 fps (3%)
Cinebench R11.5 OpenGL 64 Bit + NVIDIA Quadro FX 880M
min: 15.84 avg: 16 median: 16 (6%) max: 16.14 fps
Average Benchmarks NVIDIA Quadro FX 360M → 100% n=5 Average Benchmarks NVIDIA Quadro FX 570M → 203% n=5 Average Benchmarks NVIDIA Quadro FX 880M → 304% n=5
- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation
Game Benchmarks The following benchmarks stem from our benchmarks of review laptops. The performance depends on the used graphics memory, clock rate, processor, system settings, drivers, and operating systems. So the results don't have to be representative for all laptops with this GPU. For detailed information on the benchmark results, click on the fps number.
Quadro FX 880M:
129.2 [X] Fujitsu Celsius H700 LKN:H7000WF011PL Intel Core i7-840QM 1.9GHz
Quadro FX 880M
fps
Quadro FX 880M:
90.5 [X] Fujitsu Celsius H700 LKN:H7000WF011PL Intel Core i7-840QM 1.9GHz
Quadro FX 880M
fps
Quadro FX 880M:
50.4 [X] Fujitsu Celsius H700 LKN:H7000WF011PL Intel Core i7-840QM 1.9GHz
Quadro FX 880M
fps
Quadro FX 880M:
29.8 33.4 [X] Fujitsu Celsius H700 LKN:H7000WF011PL Intel Core i7-840QM 1.9GHz
Quadro FX 880M
~ 32 fps
Quadro FX 880M:
18.2 20.6 [X] Fujitsu Celsius H700 LKN:H7000WF011PL Intel Core i7-840QM 1.9GHz
Quadro FX 880M
~ 19 fps
Quadro FX 880M:
12.7 [X] Fujitsu Celsius H700 LKN:H7000WF011PL Intel Core i7-840QM 1.9GHz
Quadro FX 880M
fps
Quadro FX 880M:
45.7 [X] Fujitsu Celsius H700 LKN:H7000WF011PL Intel Core i7-840QM 1.9GHz
Quadro FX 880M
47.8 ~ 47 fps
Quadro FX 880M:
20 [X] Fujitsu Celsius H700 LKN:H7000WF011PL Intel Core i7-840QM 1.9GHz
Quadro FX 880M
39 ~ 30 fps
Quadro FX 880M:
59.7 60 131 147.3 [X] Fujitsu Celsius H700 LKN:H7000WF011PL Intel Core i7-840QM 1.9GHz
Quadro FX 880M
~ 100 fps
Quadro FX 880M:
19 19.1 20.5 23 [X] Fujitsu Celsius H700 LKN:H7000WF011PL Intel Core i7-840QM 1.9GHz
Quadro FX 880M
~ 20 fps
100%
Quadro FX 360M:
10.1 [X] Dell Precision M2300 Intel Core 2 Duo T7700 2.4GHz
Quadro FX 360M
fps
100%
Quadro FX 360M:
7.4 [X] Dell Precision M2300 Intel Core 2 Duo T7700 2.4GHz
Quadro FX 360M
fps
100%
Quadro FX 360M:
328 [X] Dell Precision M2300 Intel Core 2 Duo T7700 2.4GHz
Quadro FX 360M
fps
133%
Quadro FX 570M:
436 fps
100%
Quadro FX 360M:
62 [X] Dell Precision M2300 Intel Core 2 Duo T7700 2.4GHz
Quadro FX 360M
fps
206%
Quadro FX 570M:
128 fps
100%
Quadro FX 360M:
17 [X] Dell Precision M2300 Intel Core 2 Duo T7700 2.4GHz
Quadro FX 360M
fps
200%
Quadro FX 570M:
19 22 24 29 43 [X] no model Intel Core 2 Duo T7700 2.4GHz
Quadro FX 570M
43 45 49 ~ 34 fps
100%
Quadro FX 360M:
242.7 [X] Dell Precision M2300 Intel Core 2 Duo T7700 2.4GHz
Quadro FX 360M
fps
206%
Quadro FX 570M:
501 fps
Average Gaming NVIDIA Quadro FX 360M → 100% Average Gaming 30-70 fps → 100%
Average Gaming NVIDIA Quadro FX 570M → 186% Average Gaming 30-70 fps → 200%
NVIDIA Quadro FX 880M low med. high ultra QHD 4K Fifa 11 129.2 90.5 50.4 StarCraft 2 155 42 29 12 Battlefield: Bad Company 2 58.8 30.4 16.1 9.7 CoD Modern Warfare 2 124.1 42.2 35.4 21 Risen 75.4 32 19 12.7 Colin McRae: DIRT 2 79.3 47 30 12.8 Anno 1404 100 20 F.E.A.R. 2 179.6 65.9 42.3 Far Cry 2 93.3 32.39 Racedriver: GRID 48.7 28.9 Call of Duty 4 - Modern Warfare 225.7 60 59.9 Supreme Commander - FA Bench 29.92 28.18 < 30 fps < 60 fps < 120 fps ≥ 120 fps 1 4 4 1 6 2 1 5 5 1 6 1
NVIDIA Quadro FX 360M low med. high ultra QHD 4K Crysis - GPU Benchmark 10.07 Crysis - CPU Benchmark 7.39 F.E.A.R. 328 62 17 Quake 3 Arena - Timedemo 242.7 < 30 fps < 60 fps < 120 fps ≥ 120 fps 1 2 1 1 1
NVIDIA Quadro FX 570M low med. high ultra QHD 4K F.E.A.R. 436 128 34 Doom 3 118 116.7 111.3 89.7 Quake 3 Arena - Timedemo 501 < 30 fps < 60 fps < 120 fps ≥ 120 fps 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
For more games that might be playable and a list of all games and graphics cards visit our Gaming List
v1.26
log 19. 13:42:39
#0 checking url part for id 513 +0s ... 0s
#1 checking url part for id 182 +0s ... 0s
#2 checking url part for id 1621 +0s ... 0s
#3 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s
#4 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Fri, 19 Apr 2024 05:40:26 +0200 +0.001s ... 0.001s
#5 composed specs +0.123s ... 0.124s
#6 did output specs +0s ... 0.125s
#7 start showIntegratedCPUs +0s ... 0.125s
#8 getting avg benchmarks for device 513 +0.035s ... 0.159s
#9 got single benchmarks 513 +0.011s ... 0.17s
#10 getting avg benchmarks for device 182 +0.002s ... 0.172s
#11 got single benchmarks 182 +0.011s ... 0.184s
#12 getting avg benchmarks for device 1621 +0.002s ... 0.185s
#13 got single benchmarks 1621 +0.023s ... 0.209s
#14 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.209s
#15 min, max, avg, median took s +0.42s ... 0.629s
#16 before gaming benchmark output +0s ... 0.629s
#17 Got 68 rows for game benchmarks. +0.006s ... 0.635s
#18 composed SQL query for gamebenchmarks +0s ... 0.635s
#19 got data and put it in $dataArray +0.009s ... 0.644s
#20 benchmarks composed for output. +0.041s ... 0.685s
#21 calculated avg scores. +0s ... 0.685s
#22 return log +0.002s ... 0.687s
Please share our article, every link counts!
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)