NVIDIA Quadro FX 360M vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 3500M vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 2700M

NVIDIA Quadro FX 360M

For CAD and professional applications certified GPU based on the 8400M GS. The higher power consumption of 17 Watt versus 11 Watt of the 8400M GS indicates a higher performance.

NVIDIA Quadro FX 3500M

► remove from comparison

The NVIDIA Quadro FX 3500M was the top professional graphic solution for the mobile use in 2007. The Quadro FX 3500M is especially suitable for CAD, digital image-, video editing and scientifical visualizations (according NVIDIA). It is based upon the NVIDIA GeForce Go 7950GTX. Therefore also a good gaming performance can be expected (for 2007 and if modded drivers are used). The card is shipped with certified drivers for professional applications, which are not optimized for games (inofficially the manual installation of Forceware drivers should be possible).

The drivers of the Quadro FX series are certified for CAD applications (e.g. AutoCad, Inventor, Solidstation, Solud Edge, ...) and DCC applictions (e.g. Maya, 3DS Max, Lightwave 3D, ...) and offers a 12-Bit precision for Subpixel, full image Antialiasing, hardware accelerated Antialiasing for dots and lines and additional optimized settings, which are optimized for CAD and DCC.

Nvidia describes the 3000 series as a power package for big laptops and data structures.

NVIDIA Quadro FX 2700M

► remove from comparison

The Nvidia Quadro FX 2700M is a professional graphics card for laptops. It features certified drivers that are optimized for CAD (e.g., AutoCad, Inventor, Solidstation, Solid Edge, ..), DCC (e.g., Maya, 3DS Max, Lightwave 3D, ...), and visualization applications. The FX 2700M is based on the G94 core and therefore similar to the GeForce 9700M GTS.

The Quadro FX series of cards are optimized for professional applications like CAD or DCC. Especially the OpenGL performance should be noticeable better than with consumer GeForce cards. The certified drivers, that come with the Quadro cards guarantee a frictionless work with applications like AutoCad, Inventor, Solidstation, Maya, 3DS Max, Lightwave 3d and others. Furthermore they offer 12-Bit precision for subpixels, fullscreen anti-aliasing, hardware accelerated antialiasing for points and lines and other CAD and DCC optimizations.

show full text

NVIDIA Quadro FX 360M

NVIDIA Quadro FX 3500M

NVIDIA Quadro FX 2700M

Quadro FX Series

Quadro FX 3800M	128 @ 0.68 GHz	256 Bit @ 1000 MHz
Quadro FX 3700M	128 @ 0.55 GHz	256 Bit @ 800 MHz
Quadro FX 2800M	96 @ 0.6 GHz	256 Bit @ 1000 MHz
Quadro FX 3600M	96 @ 0.5 GHz	256 Bit @ 800 MHz
Quadro FX 1800M	72 @ 0.56 GHz	128 Bit @ 1100 MHz
Quadro FX 2700M	48 @ 0.53 GHz	256 Bit @ 800 MHz
Quadro FX 880M	48 @ 0.55 GHz	128 Bit @ 790 MHz
Quadro FX 3500M	24/8 cores @ 0.58 GHz	256 Bit @ 700 MHz
Quadro FX 2500M	24/8 cores @ 0.5 GHz	256 Bit @ 600 MHz
Quadro FX 1700M	32 @ 0.63 GHz	128 Bit @ 800 MHz
Quadro FX 1600M	32 @ 0.63 GHz	128 Bit @ 800 MHz
Quadro FX 1500M	20/7 cores @ 0.38 GHz	256 Bit @ 500 MHz
Quadro FX 770M	32 @ 0.5 GHz	128 Bit @ 800 MHz
Quadro FX 570M	32 @ 0.48 GHz	128 Bit @ 700 MHz
Quadro FX 380M	16 @ 0.63 GHz	64 Bit @ 800 MHz
Quadro FX 370M	8 @ 0.58 GHz	64 Bit @ 700 MHz
Quadro FX 360M	16 @ 0.4 GHz	64 Bit @ 600 MHz
Quadro FX 350M	4/3 cores @ 0.45 GHz	64 Bit @ 350 MHz

Quadro FX 3800M	128 @ 0.68 GHz	256 Bit @ 1000 MHz
Quadro FX 3700M	128 @ 0.55 GHz	256 Bit @ 800 MHz
Quadro FX 2800M	96 @ 0.6 GHz	256 Bit @ 1000 MHz
Quadro FX 3600M	96 @ 0.5 GHz	256 Bit @ 800 MHz
Quadro FX 1800M	72 @ 0.56 GHz	128 Bit @ 1100 MHz
Quadro FX 2700M	48 @ 0.53 GHz	256 Bit @ 800 MHz
Quadro FX 880M	48 @ 0.55 GHz	128 Bit @ 790 MHz
Quadro FX 3500M	24/8 cores @ 0.58 GHz	256 Bit @ 700 MHz
Quadro FX 2500M	24/8 cores @ 0.5 GHz	256 Bit @ 600 MHz
Quadro FX 1700M	32 @ 0.63 GHz	128 Bit @ 800 MHz
Quadro FX 1600M	32 @ 0.63 GHz	128 Bit @ 800 MHz
Quadro FX 1500M	20/7 cores @ 0.38 GHz	256 Bit @ 500 MHz
Quadro FX 770M	32 @ 0.5 GHz	128 Bit @ 800 MHz
Quadro FX 570M	32 @ 0.48 GHz	128 Bit @ 700 MHz
Quadro FX 380M	16 @ 0.63 GHz	64 Bit @ 800 MHz
Quadro FX 370M	8 @ 0.58 GHz	64 Bit @ 700 MHz
Quadro FX 360M	16 @ 0.4 GHz	64 Bit @ 600 MHz
Quadro FX 350M	4/3 cores @ 0.45 GHz	64 Bit @ 350 MHz

Quadro FX 3800M	128 @ 0.68 GHz	256 Bit @ 1000 MHz
Quadro FX 3700M	128 @ 0.55 GHz	256 Bit @ 800 MHz
Quadro FX 2800M	96 @ 0.6 GHz	256 Bit @ 1000 MHz
Quadro FX 3600M	96 @ 0.5 GHz	256 Bit @ 800 MHz
Quadro FX 1800M	72 @ 0.56 GHz	128 Bit @ 1100 MHz
Quadro FX 2700M	48 @ 0.53 GHz	256 Bit @ 800 MHz
Quadro FX 880M	48 @ 0.55 GHz	128 Bit @ 790 MHz
Quadro FX 3500M	24/8 cores @ 0.58 GHz	256 Bit @ 700 MHz
Quadro FX 2500M	24/8 cores @ 0.5 GHz	256 Bit @ 600 MHz
Quadro FX 1700M	32 @ 0.63 GHz	128 Bit @ 800 MHz
Quadro FX 1600M	32 @ 0.63 GHz	128 Bit @ 800 MHz
Quadro FX 1500M	20/7 cores @ 0.38 GHz	256 Bit @ 500 MHz
Quadro FX 770M	32 @ 0.5 GHz	128 Bit @ 800 MHz
Quadro FX 570M	32 @ 0.48 GHz	128 Bit @ 700 MHz
Quadro FX 380M	16 @ 0.63 GHz	64 Bit @ 800 MHz
Quadro FX 370M	8 @ 0.58 GHz	64 Bit @ 700 MHz
Quadro FX 360M	16 @ 0.4 GHz	64 Bit @ 600 MHz
Quadro FX 350M	4/3 cores @ 0.45 GHz	64 Bit @ 350 MHz

Codename

NB8M-GLM

G71GLM

NB9E-GLM2

Pipelines

16 - unified

24 / 8 Pixel- / Vertexshader

48 - unified

Core Speed

400 MHz

575 MHz

530 MHz

Shader Speed

800 MHz

1325 MHz

Memory Speed

600 MHz

700 MHz

800 MHz

Memory Bus Width

64 Bit

256 Bit

Memory Type

GDDR3

Max. Amount of Memory

256 MB

512 MB

1024 MB

Shared Memory

API

DirectX 10, Shader 4.0

DirectX 9c, Shader 3.0

DirectX 10, Shader 4.0

Power Consumption

17 Watt

45 Watt

65 Watt

Transistors

210 Million

278 Million

504 Million

technology

80 nm

90 nm

65 nm

Features

PowerMizer 7.0, HDR, designed for Vista, 128 Bit HDR, OpenGl 2.1

12-bit-sub-pixel, 32-bit-floating-point precision, 32-bit floating point precision, 128 bit graphic pipeline, hardware 3D window clipping, high precision dynamic-range (DPDR) technology, unified memory architecture, nView multi-display (for multi-monitor support), PowerMizer options for energy saving, architecture which is optimized for workstations, rotated-grid full-scene antialiasing (RG FSAA), unified driver architecture, NVIDIA PureVideo technology

OpenGL 2.1, PowerMizer 8.0, PureVideo HD

Date of Announcement

09.05.2007

01.03.2007

14.08.2008

Link to Manufacturer Page

www.nvidia.de

www.nvidia.com

Architecture

G7x

G9x

Notebook Size

large

Benchmarks

3DMark Vantage
3DM Vant. Perf. total + NVIDIA Quadro FX 2700M

3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. total

100%

¹ Quadro FX 2700M +

2799 Points (1%)

Model	CPU	GPU	RAM	Value
Dell Precision M6400	T9600	Quadro FX 2700M	4 GB	2799

3DM Vant. Perf. GPU no PhysX + NVIDIA Quadro FX 2700M

3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. GPU no PhysX

100%

¹ Quadro FX 2700M +

2392 Points (1%)

Model	CPU	GPU	RAM	Value
Dell Precision M6400	T9600	Quadro FX 2700M	4 GB	2392

3DMark 2001SE - 3DMark 2001 - Standard

100%

¹ Quadro FX 360M +

min: 13650 avg: 15054 median: 15053.5 (16%) max: 16457 Points

Model	CPU	GPU	RAM	Value
	T7500	Quadro FX 360M 400 / 800 MHz 0.3 GB	2 GB	13650
Dell Precision M2300	T7700	Quadro FX 360M 432 / 400 MHz 0.1 GB	1 GB	16457

241%

¹ Quadro FX 2700M +

36280 Points (38%)

Model	CPU	GPU	RAM	Value
	P8600	Quadro FX 2700M 530/1325 / 800 MHz 0.5 GB	2 GB	36280

3DMark 03 - 3DMark 03 - Standard

100%

Quadro FX 360M +

min: 5580 avg: 6010 median: 6010 (3%) max: 6440 Points

Model	CPU	GPU	RAM	Value
	T7500	Quadro FX 360M 400 / 800 MHz 0.3 GB	2 GB	5580
Dell Precision M2300	T7700	Quadro FX 360M 432 / 400 MHz 0.1 GB	1 GB	6440

345%

Quadro FX 3500M +

20736 Points (11%)

Model	CPU	GPU	RAM	Value
	T7600	Quadro FX 3500M		20736

397%

Quadro FX 2700M +

min: 23330 avg: 23842 median: 23841.5 (12%) max: 24353 Points

Model	CPU	GPU	RAM	Value
	P8600	Quadro FX 2700M 530/1325 / 800 MHz 0.5 GB	2 GB	23330
Dell Precision M6400	T9600	Quadro FX 2700M	4 GB	24353

3DMark 05 - 3DMark 05 - Standard

100%

Quadro FX 360M +

min: 3365 avg: 3372 median: 3372 (4%) max: 3379 Points

Model	CPU	GPU	RAM	Value
	T7500	Quadro FX 360M 400 / 800 MHz 0.3 GB	2 GB	3365
Dell Precision M2300	T7700	Quadro FX 360M 432 / 400 MHz 0.1 GB	1 GB	3379

276%

Quadro FX 3500M +

9295 Points (10%)

Model	CPU	GPU	RAM	Value
	T7600	Quadro FX 3500M		9295

422%

Quadro FX 2700M +

min: 13450 avg: 14224 median: 14224 (16%) max: 14998 Points

Model	CPU	GPU	RAM	Value
	P8600	Quadro FX 2700M 530/1325 / 800 MHz 0.5 GB	2 GB	13450
Dell Precision M6400	T9600	Quadro FX 2700M	4 GB	14998

3DMark 06 3DMark 06 - Standard 1280x1024 + NVIDIA Quadro FX 360M

3DMark 06

100%

¹ Quadro FX 360M +

1490 Points (2%)

Model	CPU	GPU	RAM	Value
3DMark 06 - Standard 1280x1024
(3DMark 06 - Standard 1280x1024)	T7500	Quadro FX 360M 400 / 800 MHz 0.3 GB	2 GB	1490

3DMark 06 - Standard 1280x1024 + NVIDIA Quadro FX 2700M

514%

¹ Quadro FX 2700M +

7660 Points (10%)

Model	CPU	GPU	RAM	Value
3DMark 06 - Standard 1280x1024
Dell Precision M6400 (3DMark 06 - Standard 1280x1024)	T9600	Quadro FX 2700M	4 GB	7660

3DMark 06 - Standard 1280x800 + NVIDIA Quadro FX 360M

3DMark 06

100%

¹ Quadro FX 360M +

1572 Points (2%)

Model	CPU	GPU	RAM	Value
3DMark 06 - Standard 1280x800
Dell Precision M2300 (3DMark 06 - Standard 1280x800)	T7700	Quadro FX 360M 432 / 400 MHz 0.1 GB	1 GB	1572

3DMark 06 - Score Unknown Settings + NVIDIA Quadro FX 3500M

3DMark 06

100%

¹ Quadro FX 3500M +

5254 Points (7%)

Model	CPU	GPU	RAM	Value
3DMark 06 - Score Unknown Settings
(3DMark 06 - Score Unknown Settings)	T7600	Quadro FX 3500M		5254

3DMark 06 - Score Unknown Settings + NVIDIA Quadro FX 2700M

144%

¹ Quadro FX 2700M +

7580 Points (10%)

Model	CPU	GPU	RAM	Value
3DMark 06 - Score Unknown Settings
(3DMark 06 - Score Unknown Settings)	P8600	Quadro FX 2700M 530/1325 / 800 MHz 0.5 GB	2 GB	7580

Cinebench R10 Cinebench R10 Shading (32bit) + NVIDIA Quadro FX 360M

Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Shading (32bit)

100%

¹ Quadro FX 360M +

2985 Points (2%)

Model	CPU	GPU	RAM	Value
Dell Precision M2300	T7700	Quadro FX 360M 432 / 400 MHz 0.1 GB	1 GB	2985

Cinebench R10 Shading (32bit) + NVIDIA Quadro FX 2700M

147%

¹ Quadro FX 2700M +

4394 Points (3%)

Model	CPU	GPU	RAM	Value
Dell Precision M6400	T9600	Quadro FX 2700M	4 GB	4394

Average Benchmarks NVIDIA Quadro FX 360M → 100% ⁿ⁼²

Average Benchmarks NVIDIA Quadro FX 3500M → 310% ⁿ⁼²

Average Benchmarks NVIDIA Quadro FX 2700M → 409% ⁿ⁼²

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card

- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
¹ This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Game Benchmarks

The following benchmarks stem from our benchmarks of review laptops. The performance depends on the used graphics memory, clock rate, processor, system settings, drivers, and operating systems. So the results don't have to be representative for all laptops with this GPU. For detailed information on the benchmark results, click on the fps number.

Crysis - GPU Benchmark

2007

100%

Quadro FX 360M:

10.1 fps

Crysis - CPU Benchmark

2007

100%

Quadro FX 360M:

7.4 fps

F.E.A.R.

2005

100%

Quadro FX 360M:

328 fps

100%

Quadro FX 360M:

62 fps

100%

Quadro FX 360M:

17 fps

Quake 3 Arena - Timedemo

1999

100%

Quadro FX 360M:

242.7 fps

Average Gaming NVIDIA Quadro FX 360M → 100%

Average Gaming 30-70 fps → 100%

NVIDIA Quadro FX 360M	low	med.	high
Crysis - GPU Benchmark		10.07
Crysis - CPU Benchmark		7.39
F.E.A.R.	328	62	17
Quake 3 Arena - Timedemo			242.7
< 30 fps < 60 fps < 120 fps ≥ 120 fps	1	2 1	1 1

For more games that might be playable and a list of all games and graphics cards visit our Gaming List

v1.28

log 22. 03:15:16

#0 ran 0s before starting gpusingle class +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 513 +0s ... 0s

#2 checking url part for id 61 +0s ... 0s

#3 checking url part for id 883 +0s ... 0s

#4 redirected to Ajax server, took 1737512116s time from redirect:0 +0s ... 0s

#5 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Sun, 19 Jan 2025 05:19:26 +0100 +0s ... 0s

#6 composed specs +0.004s ... 0.004s

#7 did output specs +0s ... 0.004s

#8 start showIntegratedCPUs +0s ... 0.004s

#9 getting avg benchmarks for device 513 +0.017s ... 0.022s

#10 got single benchmarks 513 +0.004s ... 0.026s

#11 getting avg benchmarks for device 61 +0s ... 0.026s

#12 got single benchmarks 61 +0.002s ... 0.029s

#13 getting avg benchmarks for device 883 +0s ... 0.029s

#14 got single benchmarks 883 +0.003s ... 0.032s

#15 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.032s

#16 min, max, avg, median took s +0.006s ... 0.038s

#17 before gaming benchmark output +0s ... 0.038s

#18 Got 6 rows for game benchmarks. +0.001s ... 0.039s

#19 composed SQL query for gamebenchmarks +0s ... 0.039s

#20 got data and put it in $dataArray +0s ... 0.039s

#21 benchmarks composed for output. +0.001s ... 0.04s

#22 calculated avg scores. +0s ... 0.04s

#23 return log +0s ... 0.041s

Please share our article, every link counts!

> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Graphics Card Comparison - Head 2 Head

Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)

NVIDIA Quadro FX 360M vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 3500M vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 2700M