NVIDIA Quadro FX 360M vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 2800M vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 2700M
NVIDIA Quadro FX 360M ► remove
For CAD and professional applications certified GPU based on the 8400M GS. The higher power consumption of 17 Watt versus 11 Watt of the 8400M GS indicates a higher performance.
NVIDIA Quadro FX 2800M ► remove
The NVIDIA Quadro FX 2800M is a mobile workstation graphics card for high-end laptops. It is based on the Geforce 9800M GT / G92 core but features a higher clock rate and is produced in a 55nm fabrication process versus 65nm of the 9800M GT.
The Quadro FX series of cards are optimized for professional applications like CAD or DCC. OpenGL performance especially should be noticeably better compared to consumer GeForce cards.
The Quadro FX2800M is found in mobile workstations like the Dell M6500 and supports DirectX 10.0 and OpenGL 2.1. In the Dell laptops, the card is able to output up to two displays simultaneously (DisplayPort up to 2560x1600, DVI/HDMI up to 1920x1200). Dell claims a thermal power draw of 65 Watts while Nvidia rates the GPU at 75 Watt TDP.
Due to the relatively high power consumption of 65 to 75 Watts (TDP) and a 10 Watt idle mode, the Quadro FX 2800M is normally only foud in medium to large laptops with powerful cooling solutions.
NVIDIA Quadro FX 2700M ► remove
The Nvidia Quadro FX 2700M is a professional graphics card for laptops. It features certified drivers that are optimized for CAD (e.g., AutoCad, Inventor, Solidstation, Solid Edge, ..), DCC (e.g., Maya, 3DS Max, Lightwave 3D, ...), and visualization applications. The FX 2700M is based on the G94 core and therefore similar to the GeForce 9700M GTS.
The Quadro FX series of cards are optimized for professional applications like CAD or DCC. Especially the OpenGL performance should be noticeable better than with consumer GeForce cards. The certified drivers, that come with the Quadro cards guarantee a frictionless work with applications like AutoCad, Inventor, Solidstation, Maya, 3DS Max, Lightwave 3d and others. Furthermore they offer 12-Bit precision for subpixels, fullscreen anti-aliasing, hardware accelerated antialiasing for points and lines and other CAD and DCC optimizations.
NVIDIA Quadro FX 360M NVIDIA Quadro FX 2800M NVIDIA Quadro FX 2700M Manufacturer NVIDIA NVIDIA NVIDIA Quadro FX Series Codename NB8M-GLM NB10-GLM3 NB9E-GLM2 16 - 96 - 48 - Core 400 MHz 600 MHz 530 MHz Shader 800 MHz 1500 MHz 1325 MHz Memory 600 MHz 1000 MHz 800 MHz Bus 64 Bit 256 Bit 256 Bit Memory GDDR3 GDDR3 GDDR3 Max. Memory 256 MB 1024 MB 1024 MB no no no DirectX DirectX 10, 4.0 DirectX 10, 4.0 DirectX 10, 4.0 Transistors 210 Million 754 Million 504 Million Technology 80 nm 55 nm 65 nm Features PowerMizer 7.0, HDR, designed for Vista, 128 Bit HDR, OpenGl 2.1 OpenGL 2.1, CUDA, PowerMizer 8.0 OpenGL 2.1, PowerMizer 8.0, PureVideo HD Introduced 09.05.2007 01.12.2009 14.08.2008 Manufacturer http://www.nvidia.de/page/geforce_8400M.... http://www.nvidia.com/object/product_qua... http://www.nvidia.com/object/product_qua... Architecture G9x G9x Size
P Result 1280x1024 + NVIDIA Quadro FX 2700M 2799 Points (3%)
Dell Precision M6400 T9600 4096 2799
P GPU no PhysX 1280x1024 + NVIDIA Quadro FX 2800M 3DMark Vantage - P GPU no PhysX 1280x1024
min: 5000 avg: 5037 median: 5037 (6%) max: 5074 Points
P GPU no PhysX 1280x1024 + NVIDIA Quadro FX 2700M 2392 Points (3%)
Dell Precision M6400 T9600 4096 2392
3DMark 2001SE - Standard 1024x768
min: 13650 avg: 15053.5 median: 15053 (16%) max: 16457 Points
T7500 2048 400 / 800 MHz 256MB DDR2 181.71 13650
Dell Precision M2300 T7700 1024 432 / 400 MHz 128MB GDDR3, TurboCache: 256 MB 156.55 16457
34844 Points (36%)
36280 Points (38%)
P8600 2048 530/1325 / 800 MHz 512MB GDDR3 176.06 36280
3DMark 03 - Standard 1024x768
min: 5580 avg: 6010 median: 6010 (3%) max: 6440 Points
T7500 2048 400 / 800 MHz 256MB DDR2 181.71 5580
Dell Precision M2300 T7700 1024 432 / 400 MHz 128MB GDDR3, TurboCache: 256 MB 156.55 6440
33900 Points (18%)
min: 23330 avg: 23841.5 median: 23841 (12%) max: 24353 Points
P8600 2048 530/1325 / 800 MHz 512MB GDDR3 176.06 23330
Dell Precision M6400 T9600 4096 24353
3DMark 05 - Standard 1024x768
min: 3365 avg: 3372 median: 3372 (6%) max: 3379 Points
T7500 2048 400 / 800 MHz 256MB DDR2 181.71 3365
Dell Precision M2300 T7700 1024 432 / 400 MHz 128MB GDDR3, TurboCache: 256 MB 156.55 3379
min: 16310 avg: 16935.5 median: 16935 (32%) max: 17561 Points
min: 13450 avg: 14224 median: 14224 (27%) max: 14998 Points
P8600 2048 530/1325 / 800 MHz 512MB GDDR3 176.06 13450
Dell Precision M6400 T9600 4096 14998
3DMark 06 Standard 1280x1024 + NVIDIA Quadro FX 360M 1572 Points (3%)
Standard 1280x1024
T7500 2048 400 / 800 MHz 256MB DDR2 181.71 1490 1280x800
Dell Precision M2300 T7700 1024 432 / 400 MHz 128MB GDDR3, TurboCache: 256 MB 156.55 1572
Standard 1280x1024 + NVIDIA Quadro FX 2800M min: 11162 avg: 11358.5 median: 11358 (24%) max: 11555 Points
+ NVIDIA Quadro FX 2700M 7660 Points (16%)
P8600 2048 530/1325 / 800 MHz 512MB GDDR3 176.06 7580 Standard 1280x1024
Dell Precision M6400 T9600 4096 7660
SPEC Viewperf 10.0 - 3ds Max 1280x1024
32.3 fps (67%)
SPEC Viewperf 10.0 - Catia 1280x1024
39 fps (83%)
SPEC Viewperf 10.0 - EnSight 1280x1024
44 fps (94%)
SPEC Viewperf 10.0 - Maya 1280x1024
59.6 fps (32%)
SPEC Viewperf 10.0 - Pro/Engeneer 1280x1024
42.6 fps (84%)
SPEC Viewperf 10.0 - SolidWorks 1280x1024
59.5 fps (89%)
SPEC Viewperf 10.0 - UGS Teamcenter 1280x1024
35.2 fps (93%)
SPEC Viewperf 10.0 - UGS NX 1280x1024
31.3 fps (65%)
SPECviewperf 11 Siemens NX 1920x1080 + NVIDIA Quadro FX 2800M SPECviewperf 11 - Siemens NX 1920x1080
min: 13 avg: 14.7 median: 13 (9%) max: 16 fps
Tcvis 1920x1080 + NVIDIA Quadro FX 2800M SPECviewperf 11 - Tcvis 1920x1080
min: 15 avg: 16 median: 15 (25%) max: 17 fps
SolidWorks 1920x1080 + NVIDIA Quadro FX 2800M SPECviewperf 11 - SolidWorks 1920x1080
min: 6 avg: 14.1 median: 7 (9%) max: 28 fps
Pro/ENGINEER 1920x1080 + NVIDIA Quadro FX 2800M SPECviewperf 11 - Pro/ENGINEER 1920x1080
min: 4 avg: 5.1 median: 4 (17%) max: 5 fps
Maya 1920x1080 + NVIDIA Quadro FX 2800M SPECviewperf 11 - Maya 1920x1080
min: 6 avg: 7 median: 7 (5%) max: 7 fps
Lightwave 1920x1080 + NVIDIA Quadro FX 2800M SPECviewperf 11 - Lightwave 1920x1080
min: 7 avg: 16.2 median: 8 (9%) max: 32 fps
Ensight 1920x1080 + NVIDIA Quadro FX 2800M SPECviewperf 11 - Ensight 1920x1080
min: 10 avg: 11.9 median: 11 (5%) max: 13 fps
Catia 1920x1080 + NVIDIA Quadro FX 2800M SPECviewperf 11 - Catia 1920x1080
min: 9 avg: 13.4 median: 9 (11%) max: 20 fps
Windows Vista Experience Index - GPU Games
6.8 Points (113%)
Windows Vista Experience Index - GPU
6.8 Points (113%)
Cinebench R10 Shading 32Bit + NVIDIA Quadro FX 360M Cinebench R10 - Shading 32Bit
2985 Points (15%)
Dell Precision M2300 T7700 1024 432 / 400 MHz 128MB GDDR3, TurboCache: 256 MB 156.55 2985
Shading 32Bit + NVIDIA Quadro FX 2700M 4394 Points (22%)
Dell Precision M6400 T9600 4096 4394
Cinebench R11.5 OpenGL 64Bit + NVIDIA Quadro FX 2800M Cinebench R11.5 - OpenGL 64Bit
min: 28 avg: 28.8 median: 28 (16%) max: 29 Points
Average Benchmarks NVIDIA Quadro FX 360M → 100% Average Benchmarks NVIDIA Quadro FX 2800M → 165% Average Benchmarks NVIDIA Quadro FX 2700M → 256%
-
-
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation
Quadro FX 2800M:
158.1 fps
Quadro FX 2800M:
»
100%
Quadro FX 360M:
10.1 [X] Dell Precision M2300 Intel Core 2 Duo T7700 2.4GHz
Quadro FX 360M
fps
Quadro FX 360M:
»
100%
Quadro FX 360M:
7.4 [X] Dell Precision M2300 Intel Core 2 Duo T7700 2.4GHz
Quadro FX 360M
fps
Quadro FX 360M:
»
100%
Quadro FX 360M:
328 [X] Dell Precision M2300 Intel Core 2 Duo T7700 2.4GHz
Quadro FX 360M
fps
100%
Quadro FX 360M:
62 [X] Dell Precision M2300 Intel Core 2 Duo T7700 2.4GHz
Quadro FX 360M
fps
100%
Quadro FX 360M:
17 [X] Dell Precision M2300 Intel Core 2 Duo T7700 2.4GHz
Quadro FX 360M
fps
Quadro FX 360M:
»
100%
Quadro FX 360M:
242.7 [X] Dell Precision M2300 Intel Core 2 Duo T7700 2.4GHz
Quadro FX 360M
fps
Quadro FX 360M:
»
Average Gaming NVIDIA Quadro FX 360M → 100%
v1.8.1a
#0 checking url part for id 513 +0s ... 0s
#1 checking url part for id 1544 +0s ... 0s
#2 checking url part for id 883 +0s ... 0s
#3 Did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Fri, 06 Dec 2019 16:06:51 +0100 +0.001s ... 0.001s
#4 start showIntegratedCPUs +0.023s ... 0.024s
#5 got avg benchmarks for devices +0.03s ... 0.053s
#6 min, max, avg, median took s +0.033s ... 0.087s
#7 Before gaming benchmark output +0s ... 0.087s
#8 Got 25 rows for game benchmarks. +0.01s ... 0.097s
#9 composed SQL query for gamebenchmarks +0s ... 0.097s
#10 got data and put it in $dataArray +0.006s ... 0.103s
#11 return log +0.019s ... 0.122s
Please share our article, every link counts!
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2017-09-11)
Top 10 Laptops Multimedia , Budget Multimedia , Gaming , Budget Gaming , Lightweight Gaming , Business , Budget Office , Workstation , Subnotebooks , Ultrabooks , Chromebooks
under 300 USD/Euros , under 500 USD/Euros , 1.000 USD/Euros
Best Displays , for University Students
Top 10 Smartphones Smartphones , Phablets , ≤5-inch , Camera Smartphones Notebookcheck's Top 10 Smartphones under 160 Euros