Notebookcheck Logo

NVIDIA Quadro FX 350M vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 1700M

NVIDIA Quadro FX 350M

► remove from comparison NVIDIA Quadro FX 350M

The NVIDIA Quadro FX 350M is a professional workstation graphics card based on the old entry level NVIDIA GeForce Go 7300. Due to certified drivers, the FX 350M is suited for CAD and DCC applications. Still the 3D performance is not very good (even at the time of launch), therefore the card is better suited for 2D CAD applications.

NVIDIA Quadro FX 1700M

► remove from comparison NVIDIA Quadro FX 1700M

The Nvidia Quadro FX 1700M is a professional graphics adapter for CAD and 3D applications. It is based on the G96 core (GeForce 9650M e.g.) but with different drivers, that are optimized for OpenGL and professional applications. The drivers are zertified to work flawlessly with different applications.

Compared to the Quadro FX 1600M, the FX 1700M GPU supports Powermizer 8.0.

NVIDIA Quadro FX 350MNVIDIA Quadro FX 1700M
Quadro FX Series
Quadro FX 3800M compare 128 @ 0.68 GHz256 Bit @ 1000 MHz
Quadro FX 3700M compare 128 @ 0.55 GHz256 Bit @ 800 MHz
Quadro FX 2800M compare 96 @ 0.6 GHz256 Bit @ 1000 MHz
Quadro FX 3600M compare 96 @ 0.5 GHz256 Bit @ 800 MHz
Quadro FX 1800M compare 72 @ 0.56 GHz128 Bit @ 1100 MHz
Quadro FX 2700M compare 48 @ 0.53 GHz256 Bit @ 800 MHz
Quadro FX 880M compare 48 @ 0.55 GHz128 Bit @ 790 MHz
Quadro FX 3500M compare 24/8 cores @ 0.58 GHz256 Bit @ 700 MHz
Quadro FX 2500M compare 24/8 cores @ 0.5 GHz256 Bit @ 600 MHz
Quadro FX 1700M 32 @ 0.63 GHz128 Bit @ 800 MHz
Quadro FX 1600M compare 32 @ 0.63 GHz128 Bit @ 800 MHz
Quadro FX 1500M compare 20/7 cores @ 0.38 GHz256 Bit @ 500 MHz
Quadro FX 770M compare 32 @ 0.5 GHz128 Bit @ 800 MHz
Quadro FX 570M compare 32 @ 0.48 GHz128 Bit @ 700 MHz
Quadro FX 380M compare 16 @ 0.63 GHz64 Bit @ 800 MHz
Quadro FX 370M compare 8 @ 0.58 GHz64 Bit @ 700 MHz
Quadro FX 360M compare 16 @ 0.4 GHz64 Bit @ 600 MHz
Quadro FX 350M 4/3 cores @ 0.45 GHz64 Bit @ 350 MHz
Quadro FX 3800M compare 128 @ 0.68 GHz256 Bit @ 1000 MHz
Quadro FX 3700M compare 128 @ 0.55 GHz256 Bit @ 800 MHz
Quadro FX 2800M compare 96 @ 0.6 GHz256 Bit @ 1000 MHz
Quadro FX 3600M compare 96 @ 0.5 GHz256 Bit @ 800 MHz
Quadro FX 1800M compare 72 @ 0.56 GHz128 Bit @ 1100 MHz
Quadro FX 2700M compare 48 @ 0.53 GHz256 Bit @ 800 MHz
Quadro FX 880M compare 48 @ 0.55 GHz128 Bit @ 790 MHz
Quadro FX 3500M compare 24/8 cores @ 0.58 GHz256 Bit @ 700 MHz
Quadro FX 2500M compare 24/8 cores @ 0.5 GHz256 Bit @ 600 MHz
Quadro FX 1700M 32 @ 0.63 GHz128 Bit @ 800 MHz
Quadro FX 1600M compare 32 @ 0.63 GHz128 Bit @ 800 MHz
Quadro FX 1500M compare 20/7 cores @ 0.38 GHz256 Bit @ 500 MHz
Quadro FX 770M compare 32 @ 0.5 GHz128 Bit @ 800 MHz
Quadro FX 570M compare 32 @ 0.48 GHz128 Bit @ 700 MHz
Quadro FX 380M compare 16 @ 0.63 GHz64 Bit @ 800 MHz
Quadro FX 370M compare 8 @ 0.58 GHz64 Bit @ 700 MHz
Quadro FX 360M compare 16 @ 0.4 GHz64 Bit @ 600 MHz
Quadro FX 350M 4/3 cores @ 0.45 GHz64 Bit @ 350 MHz
CodenameG72MNB9P-GLM
Pipelines4 / 3 Pixel- / Vertexshader32 - unified
Core Speed450 MHz625 MHz
Memory Speed350 MHz800 MHz
Memory Bus Width64 Bit128 Bit
Memory TypeDDR-3GDDR3
Max. Amount of Memory64 MB256 MB
Shared Memorynono
APIDirectX 9c, Shader 3.0DirectX 10, Shader 4.0
Power Consumption15 Watt50 Watt
Transistors112 Million289 Million
technology90 nm65 nm
FeaturesPureVideo, UltraShadow II, Intellisample 4.0, CineFX 4.0, PowerMizer 6.0, High Dynamic-Range (HDR) LighningOpenGL 2.1, PureVideo HD, Powermizer 8.0, possible interfaces: LVDS, DVI, VGA, HDTV, HDCP, HDMI
Date of Announcement31.03.2006 01.10.2008
Information90nm, 112 Mio Transistoren, PCI-ECG shading language, 32 Bit floating point precision, 12 Bit subpixel precision, 128 Bit precision of the graphics pipeline, FSAA with rotated raster, nView Mutlidisplay Support, High-Precision-Dynamic-Range (HPDR), Hardware 3D Clipping on window recognision, full screen AA
Link to Manufacturer Pagehttp://www.nvidia.de/page/quadrofx_go.htmlhttp://www.nvidia.com/object/product_qua...
ArchitectureG9x
Shader Speed1250 MHz
Notebook Sizelarge

Benchmarks

3DMark 2001SE - 3DMark 2001 - Standard
35734 Points (37%)
3DMark 03 - 3DMark 03 - Standard
3963 Points (2%)
18212 Points (10%)
3DMark 05 - 3DMark 05 - Standard
1954 Points (3%)
11550 Points (16%)
3DMark 06 3DMark 06 - Score Unknown Settings + NVIDIA Quadro FX 350M
3DMark 06
680 Points (1%)
3DMark 06 - Standard 1280x800 + NVIDIA Quadro FX 1700M
3DMark 06
6302 Points (10%)
Cinebench R10 Cinebench R10 Shading (32bit) + NVIDIA Quadro FX 1700M
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Shading (32bit)
6159 Points (4%)

Average Benchmarks NVIDIA Quadro FX 350M → 100% n=2

Average Benchmarks NVIDIA Quadro FX 1700M → 525% n=2

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Game Benchmarks

The following benchmarks stem from our benchmarks of review laptops. The performance depends on the used graphics memory, clock rate, processor, system settings, drivers, and operating systems. So the results don't have to be representative for all laptops with this GPU. For detailed information on the benchmark results, click on the fps number.

Crysis - GPU Benchmark

Crysis - GPU Benchmark

2007
med. 1024x768
Quadro FX 1700M:
33.3  fps
high 1024x768
Quadro FX 1700M:
19.1  fps
Crysis - CPU Benchmark

Crysis - CPU Benchmark

2007
med. 1024x768
Quadro FX 1700M:
29.3  fps
high 1024x768
Quadro FX 1700M:
17.1  fps
F.E.A.R.

F.E.A.R.

2005
low 640x480
Quadro FX 1700M:
378  fps
med. 800x600
Quadro FX 1700M:
152  fps
high 1024x768
Quadro FX 1700M:
59  fps
Quake 3 Arena - Timedemo

Quake 3 Arena - Timedemo

1999
high 1024x768
Quadro FX 1700M:
610  fps

For more games that might be playable and a list of all games and graphics cards visit our Gaming List

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:

show all (including archived), 2022, 2021
v1.17
log 17. 08:54:59

#0 checking url part for id 70 +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 1087 +0s ... 0s

#2 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#3 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Sat, 13 Aug 2022 17:26:33 +0200 +0s ... 0s

#4 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.047s ... 0.048s

#5 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.002s ... 0.05s

#6 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.05s

#7 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.05s

#8 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.05s

#9 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.05s

#10 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.05s

#11 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.05s

#12 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.05s

#13 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.05s

#14 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.05s

#15 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.05s

#16 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.05s

#17 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.05s

#18 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.05s

#19 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.05s

#20 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.05s

#21 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.05s

#22 composed specs +0s ... 0.05s

#23 did output specs +0s ... 0.05s

#24 start showIntegratedCPUs +0s ... 0.05s

#25 getting avg benchmarks for device 70 +0.025s ... 0.076s

#26 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s ... 0.076s

#27 got single benchmarks 70 +0.004s ... 0.08s

#28 getting avg benchmarks for device 1087 +0s ... 0.08s

#29 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s ... 0.081s

#30 got single benchmarks 1087 +0.004s ... 0.085s

#31 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.085s

#32 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.085s

#33 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.086s

#34 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.086s

#35 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.086s

#36 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.087s

#37 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.087s

#38 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.087s

#39 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.088s

#40 min, max, avg, median took s +0s ... 0.088s

#41 before gaming benchmark output +0s ... 0.088s

#42 Got 8 rows for game benchmarks. +0.002s ... 0.09s

#43 composed SQL query for gamebenchmarks +0s ... 0.09s

#44 got data and put it in $dataArray +0.001s ... 0.091s

#45 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.001s ... 0.092s

#46 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.092s

#47 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.001s ... 0.093s

#48 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.093s

#49 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.001s ... 0.094s

#50 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.094s

#51 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.094s

#52 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.001s ... 0.095s

#53 benchmarks composed for output. +0s ... 0.095s

#54 calculated avg scores. +0s ... 0.095s

#55 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.047s ... 0.142s

#56 return log +0.003s ... 0.144s

Please share our article, every link counts!
.170
> Notebook / Laptop Reviews and News > Benchmarks / Tech > Graphics Card Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2017-09-11)