NVIDIA Quadro FX 2800M vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 3800M vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 3700M
NVIDIA Quadro FX 2800M ► remove from comparison
The NVIDIA Quadro FX 2800M is a mobile workstation graphics card for high-end laptops. It is based on the Geforce 9800M GT / G92 core but features a higher clock rate and is produced in a 55nm fabrication process versus 65nm of the 9800M GT.
The Quadro FX series of cards are optimized for professional applications like CAD or DCC. OpenGL performance especially should be noticeably better compared to consumer GeForce cards.
The Quadro FX2800M is found in mobile workstations like the Dell M6500 and supports DirectX 10.0 and OpenGL 2.1. In the Dell laptops, the card is able to output up to two displays simultaneously (DisplayPort up to 2560x1600, DVI/HDMI up to 1920x1200). Dell claims a thermal power draw of 65 Watts while Nvidia rates the GPU at 75 Watt TDP.
Due to the relatively high power consumption of 65 to 75 Watts (TDP) and a 10 Watt idle mode, the Quadro FX 2800M is normally only foud in medium to large laptops with powerful cooling solutions.
NVIDIA Quadro FX 3800M ► remove from comparison
The NVIDIA Quadro FX 3800M is a mobile workstation graphics card for high end laptops. It is based on the Geforce GTX 280M core (G92 core) and features 128 CUDA cores (unified shaders).
Compared to the Quadro FX 3700M, the Quadro FX 3800M features a higher clock speed and is manufacturered in 55nm (compared to 65nm of the 3700M). In fact, the FX3800M is clocked even higher than the consumer GeForce GTX 280M and performs notably better as a result.
The Quadro FX series of cards are optimized for professional applications like CAD or DCC. Notably, OpenGL performance should be much improved compared to consumer GeForce cards of similar specifications.
At the time its announcement (December 2009), the FX 3800M was the fastest workstation graphics card for laptops.
NVIDIA Quadro FX 3700M ► remove from comparison
The Nvidia GeForce FX 3700M is a professional high-end workstation graphics card for laptops. It is manufactured in 65nm and is based on the G92 core with all 128 shaders enabled. The GPU is most comparable to the consumer GeForce GTX 280M with the largest difference being the manufacturing process (65nm of the 3700M vs 55nm of the 280M). The immediate successor to the 3700M is the Quadro FX 3800M , which is based on the GeForce GTX 285M but with higher clock rates and relatively similar power consumption demands.
NVIDIA Quadro FX 2800M NVIDIA Quadro FX 3800M NVIDIA Quadro FX 3700M Quadro FX Series Codename NB10-GLM3 N10E-GLM4 NB9E-GLM3 Architecture G9x G9x G9x Pipelines 96 - unified 128 - unified 128 - unified Core Speed 600 MHz 675 MHz 550 MHz Shader Speed 1500 MHz 1688 MHz 1375 MHz Memory Speed 1000 MHz 1000 MHz 800 MHz Memory Bus Width 256 Bit 256 Bit 256 Bit Memory Type GDDR3 GDDR3 GDDR3 Max. Amount of Memory 1024 MB 1024 MB 1024 MB Shared Memory no no no API DirectX 10, Shader 4.0 DirectX 10, Shader 4.0 DirectX 10, Shader 4.0 Power Consumption 75 Watt 100 Watt 75 Watt Transistors 754 Million 754 Million 754 Million technology 55 nm 55 nm 65 nm Features OpenGL 2.1, CUDA, PowerMizer 8.0 OpenGL 2.1, CUDA, PowerMizer 8.0 OpenGL 2.1, CUDA, PowerMizer 8.0 Notebook Size large large large Date of Announcement 01.12.2009 20.12.2009 14.08.2008 Link to Manufacturer Page www.nvidia.com www.nvidia.com www.nvidia.com
Benchmarks min: 5779 avg: 5783 median: 5783 (2%) max: 5787 Points
3DM Vant. Perf. total + NVIDIA Quadro FX 3800M
min: 6584 avg: 6951 median: 6779 (2%) max: 7491 Points
3DM Vant. Perf. total + NVIDIA Quadro FX 3700M
5053 Points (1%)
3DM Vant. Perf. GPU no PhysX + NVIDIA Quadro FX 2800M 3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. GPU no PhysX
min: 5000 avg: 5037 median: 5037 (3%) max: 5074 Points
3DM Vant. Perf. GPU no PhysX + NVIDIA Quadro FX 3800M
min: 5758 avg: 5926 median: 6002 (3%) max: 6019 Points
3DM Vant. Perf. GPU no PhysX + NVIDIA Quadro FX 3700M
4326 Points (2%)
3DMark 2001SE - 3DMark 2001 - Standard
34844 Points (36%)
min: 32886 avg: 34790 median: 34790 (36%) max: 36694 Points
3DMark 03 - 3DMark 03 - Standard
33900 Points (18%)
min: 33146 avg: 37082 median: 38191 (20%) max: 39909 Points
3DMark 05 - 3DMark 05 - Standard
min: 16310 avg: 16936 median: 16935.5 (19%) max: 17561 Points
min: 16593 avg: 18199 median: 18043 (20%) max: 19960 Points
15759 Points (17%)
3DMark 06 3DMark 06 - Standard 1280x1024 + NVIDIA Quadro FX 2800M
min: 11162 avg: 11359 median: 11358.5 (15%) max: 11555 Points
3DMark 06 - Standard 1280x1024 + NVIDIA Quadro FX 3800M
min: 12050 avg: 12765 median: 12923 (17%) max: 13323 Points
Model CPU GPU RAM Value 3DMark 06 - Standard 1280x1024 Lenovo ThinkPad W701ds NTV5FPB164 (3DMark 06 - Standard 1280x1024) 820QM Quadro FX 3800M 675 / 1650 MHz 1 GB 16 GB 12050 HP EliteBook 8740w (WD942EA) (3DMark 06 - Standard 1280x1024) 740QM Quadro FX 3800M 675 / 1000 MHz 1 GB 8 GB 12923 Dell Precision M6500 (3DMark 06 - Standard 1280x1024) 920XM Quadro FX 3800M 675/1688 / 1000 MHz 1 GB 13323
3DMark 06 - Standard 1280x1024 + NVIDIA Quadro FX 3700M
min: 10430 avg: 10847 median: 11000 (14%) max: 11111 Points
3DMark 06 - Score Unknown Settings + NVIDIA Quadro FX 3800M
13232 Points (17%)
Model CPU GPU RAM Value 3DMark 06 - Score Unknown Settings Dell Precision M6500 (3DMark 06 - Score Unknown Settings) 920XM Quadro FX 3800M 1 GB 4 GB 13232
SPEC Viewperf 10.0 - SPEC Viewperf 10.0 - 3dsmax
32.3 Points (67%)
32.8 Points (68%)
25.5 Points (53%)
SPEC Viewperf 10.0 - SPEC Viewperf 10.0 - Catia
39 Points (82%)
45.8 Points (96%)
32 Points (67%)
SPEC Viewperf 10.0 - SPEC Viewperf 10.0 - EnSight
44 Points (93%)
47.4 Points (100%)
34.6 Points (73%)
SPEC Viewperf 10.0 - SPEC Viewperf 10.0 - Maya
59.6 Points (32%)
59.7 Points (32%)
59.6 Points (32%)
SPEC Viewperf 10.0 - SPEC Viewperf 10.0 - Pro/Engeneer
42.6 Points (83%)
51.1 Points (100%)
29.8 Points (58%)
SPEC Viewperf 10.0 - SPEC Viewperf 10.0 - SolidWorks
59.5 Points (88%)
59.7 Points (88%)
54.6 Points (81%)
SPEC Viewperf 10.0 - SPEC Viewperf 10.0 - UGS Teamcenter
35.2 Points (91%)
38.5 Points (100%)
22 Points (57%)
SPEC Viewperf 10.0 - SPEC Viewperf 10.0 - UGS NX
31.3 Points (64%)
35.3 Points (72%)
26.4 Points (54%)
SPECviewperf 11 specvp11 snx-01 + NVIDIA Quadro FX 2800M SPECviewperf 11 - specvp11 snx-01
min: 13.58 avg: 14.7 median: 13.9 (8%) max: 16.55 fps
specvp11 snx-01 + NVIDIA Quadro FX 3800M
18.8 fps (11%)
specvp11 tcvis-02 + NVIDIA Quadro FX 2800M SPECviewperf 11 - specvp11 tcvis-02
min: 15.1 avg: 16 median: 15.3 (9%) max: 17.4 fps
specvp11 tcvis-02 + NVIDIA Quadro FX 3800M
18.7 fps (11%)
specvp11 sw-02 + NVIDIA Quadro FX 2800M SPECviewperf 11 - specvp11 sw-02
min: 6.73 avg: 14.1 median: 7.5 (6%) max: 28 fps
specvp11 sw-02 + NVIDIA Quadro FX 3800M
30.6 fps (23%)
specvp11 proe-05 + NVIDIA Quadro FX 2800M SPECviewperf 11 - specvp11 proe-05
min: 4.67 avg: 5.1 median: 4.7 (6%) max: 5.89 fps
specvp11 proe-05 + NVIDIA Quadro FX 3800M
6.9 fps (8%)
specvp11 maya-03 + NVIDIA Quadro FX 2800M SPECviewperf 11 - specvp11 maya-03
min: 6.2 avg: 7 median: 7.4 (6%) max: 7.5 fps
specvp11 maya-03 + NVIDIA Quadro FX 3800M
16.6 fps (12%)
specvp11 lightwave-01 + NVIDIA Quadro FX 2800M SPECviewperf 11 - specvp11 lightwave-01
min: 7.99 avg: 16.2 median: 8.5 (9%) max: 32 fps
specvp11 lightwave-01 + NVIDIA Quadro FX 3800M
38.4 fps (41%)
specvp11 ensight-04 + NVIDIA Quadro FX 2800M SPECviewperf 11 - specvp11 ensight-04
min: 10.8 avg: 11.9 median: 11.1 (5%) max: 13.7 fps
specvp11 ensight-04 + NVIDIA Quadro FX 3800M
16.2 fps (8%)
specvp11 catia-03 + NVIDIA Quadro FX 2800M SPECviewperf 11 - specvp11 catia-03
min: 9.53 avg: 13.4 median: 9.7 (5%) max: 20.92 fps
specvp11 catia-03 + NVIDIA Quadro FX 3800M
23.4 fps (12%)
Windows 7 Experience Index - Win7 Gaming graphics
6.9 Points (87%)
Windows 7 Experience Index - Win7 Graphics
6.9 Points (87%)
Windows Vista Experience Index - Windows Vista Leistungsindex - Grafik (Spiele)
6.8 Points (100%)
Windows Vista Experience Index - Windows Vista Leistungsindex - Grafik
6.8 Points (100%)
Cinebench R10 Cinebench R10 Shading (32bit) + NVIDIA Quadro FX 3800M Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Shading (32bit)
min: 4429 avg: 4928 median: 4928 (4%) max: 5427 Points
Cinebench R10 Shading (32bit) + NVIDIA Quadro FX 3700M
4481 Points (3%)
Cinebench R11.5 Cinebench R11.5 OpenGL 64 Bit + NVIDIA Quadro FX 2800M Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 OpenGL 64 Bit
min: 28.16 avg: 28.8 median: 28.8 (10%) max: 29.36 fps
Cinebench R11.5 OpenGL 64 Bit + NVIDIA Quadro FX 3800M
min: 32.07 avg: 32.7 median: 32.7 (11%) max: 33.29 fps
Cinebench R11.5 OpenGL 64 Bit + NVIDIA Quadro FX 3700M
29.8 fps (10%)
Average Benchmarks NVIDIA Quadro FX 2800M → 100% n=13 Average Benchmarks NVIDIA Quadro FX 3800M → 111% n=13 Average Benchmarks NVIDIA Quadro FX 3700M → 86% n=13
- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation
Game Benchmarks The following benchmarks stem from our benchmarks of review laptops. The performance depends on the used graphics memory, clock rate, processor, system settings, drivers, and operating systems. So the results don't have to be representative for all laptops with this GPU. For detailed information on the benchmark results, click on the fps number.
Quadro FX 3800M:
230.6 [X] HP EliteBook 8740w (WD942EA) Intel Core i7-740QM 1.7GHz
Quadro FX 3800M
fps
Quadro FX 3800M:
124.2 [X] HP EliteBook 8740w (WD942EA) Intel Core i7-740QM 1.7GHz
Quadro FX 3800M
fps
100%
Quadro FX 2800M:
63.2 fps
100%
Quadro FX 2800M:
56.1 fps
100%
Quadro FX 2800M:
48.9 fps
100%
Quadro FX 2800M:
30.8 fps
100%
Quadro FX 2800M:
158 fps
100%
Quadro FX 2800M:
60 fps
100%
Quadro FX 2800M:
52 fps
100%
Quadro FX 2800M:
29.6 fps
100%
Quadro FX 2800M:
58.9 fps
100%
Quadro FX 2800M:
41.5 fps
100%
Quadro FX 2800M:
23.1 fps
100%
Quadro FX 2800M:
158.1 fps
100%
Quadro FX 2800M:
78.9 fps
100%
Quadro FX 2800M:
66.7 fps
100%
Quadro FX 2800M:
41.2 fps
Quadro FX 3800M:
64.9 [X] HP EliteBook 8740w (WD942EA) Intel Core i7-740QM 1.7GHz
Quadro FX 3800M
fps
Quadro FX 3800M:
31.8 [X] HP EliteBook 8740w (WD942EA) Intel Core i7-740QM 1.7GHz
Quadro FX 3800M
fps
Quadro FX 3800M:
78.5 [X] HP EliteBook 8740w (WD942EA) Intel Core i7-740QM 1.7GHz
Quadro FX 3800M
fps
Quadro FX 3800M:
40.9 [X] HP EliteBook 8740w (WD942EA) Intel Core i7-740QM 1.7GHz
Quadro FX 3800M
fps
100%
Quadro FX 2800M:
96.3 fps
101%
Quadro FX 3800M:
97 [X] HP EliteBook 8740w (WD942EA) Intel Core i7-740QM 1.7GHz
Quadro FX 3800M
fps
100%
Quadro FX 2800M:
89.5 fps
92%
Quadro FX 3800M:
82 [X] HP EliteBook 8740w (WD942EA) Intel Core i7-740QM 1.7GHz
Quadro FX 3800M
fps
100%
Quadro FX 2800M:
62.6 fps
100%
Quadro FX 2800M:
30.7 fps
97%
Quadro FX 3800M:
29.9 [X] HP EliteBook 8740w (WD942EA) Intel Core i7-740QM 1.7GHz
Quadro FX 3800M
fps
Quadro FX 3800M:
142.8 [X] HP EliteBook 8740w (WD942EA) Intel Core i7-740QM 1.7GHz
Quadro FX 3800M
fps
Quadro FX 3800M:
61.9 [X] HP EliteBook 8740w (WD942EA) Intel Core i7-740QM 1.7GHz
Quadro FX 3800M
fps
Average Gaming NVIDIA Quadro FX 2800M → 100% Average Gaming 30-70 fps → 100%
Average Gaming NVIDIA Quadro FX 3800M → 97% NVIDIA Quadro FX 3800M low med. high ultra QHD 4K Fifa 11 230.6 124.2 Risen 64.9 31.8 Need for Speed Shift 78.5 40.9 Colin McRae: DIRT 2 97 82 29.9 Anno 1404 142.8 61.9 < 30 fps < 60 fps < 120 fps ≥ 120 fps 1 1 3 1 1 1 2 1
NVIDIA Quadro FX 2800M low med. high ultra QHD 4K Mafia 2 63.2 56.1 48.9 30.8 StarCraft 2 158 60 52 29.6 Battlefield: Bad Company 2 58.9 41.53 23.07 CoD Modern Warfare 2 158.1 78.9 66.7 41.2 Colin McRae: DIRT 2 96.3 89.5 62.6 30.7 < 30 fps < 60 fps < 120 fps ≥ 120 fps 2 2 2 3 3 2 2 3
NVIDIA Quadro FX 3700M low med. high ultra QHD 4K GTA IV - Grand Theft Auto 55.6 39.9 19.13 Supreme Commander - FA Bench 39.17 45.15 < 30 fps < 60 fps < 120 fps ≥ 120 fps 1 2 1 1
For more games that might be playable and a list of all games and graphics cards visit our Gaming List
v1.26
log 24. 17:42:52
#0 checking url part for id 1544 +0s ... 0s
#1 checking url part for id 1541 +0s ... 0s
#2 checking url part for id 885 +0s ... 0s
#3 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s
#4 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Mon, 22 Apr 2024 05:40:21 +0200 +0.001s ... 0.001s
#5 composed specs +0.196s ... 0.197s
#6 did output specs +0s ... 0.197s
#7 start showIntegratedCPUs +0s ... 0.197s
#8 getting avg benchmarks for device 1544 +0.036s ... 0.233s
#9 got single benchmarks 1544 +0.009s ... 0.241s
#10 getting avg benchmarks for device 1541 +0.001s ... 0.243s
#11 got single benchmarks 1541 +0.014s ... 0.257s
#12 getting avg benchmarks for device 885 +0.002s ... 0.259s
#13 got single benchmarks 885 +0.009s ... 0.268s
#14 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.268s
#15 min, max, avg, median took s +0.268s ... 0.536s
#16 before gaming benchmark output +0s ... 0.536s
#17 Got 35 rows for game benchmarks. +0.004s ... 0.54s
#18 composed SQL query for gamebenchmarks +0s ... 0.54s
#19 got data and put it in $dataArray +0.006s ... 0.547s
#20 benchmarks composed for output. +0.024s ... 0.571s
#21 calculated avg scores. +0s ... 0.571s
#22 return log +0.002s ... 0.572s
Please share our article, every link counts!
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)