NVIDIA Quadro FX 1700M vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 360M

NVIDIA Quadro FX 1700M

► remove NVIDIA Quadro FX 1700M

The Nvidia Quadro FX 1700M is a professional graphics adapter for CAD and 3D applications. It is based on the G96 core (GeForce 9650M e.g.) but with different drivers, that are optimized for OpenGL and professional applications. The drivers are zertified to work flawlessly with different applications.

Compared to the Quadro FX 1600M, the FX 1700M GPU supports Powermizer 8.0.

NVIDIA Quadro FX 360M

► remove

For CAD and professional applications certified GPU based on the 8400M GS. The higher power consumption of 17 Watt versus 11 Watt of the 8400M GS indicates a higher performance.

NVIDIA Quadro FX 1700MNVIDIA Quadro FX 360M
ManufacturerNVIDIANVIDIA
Quadro FX Series
Quadro FX 3800M compare 128 @ 675 MHz256 Bit @ 1000 MHz
Quadro FX 3700M compare 128 @ 550 MHz256 Bit @ 800 MHz
Quadro FX 2800M compare 96 @ 600 MHz256 Bit @ 1000 MHz
Quadro FX 3600M compare 96 @ 500 MHz256 Bit @ 800 MHz
Quadro FX 1800M compare 72 @ 560 MHz128 Bit @ 1100 MHz
Quadro FX 2700M compare 48 @ 530 MHz256 Bit @ 800 MHz
Quadro FX 880M compare 48 @ 550 MHz128 Bit @ 790 MHz
Quadro FX 3500M compare 24/8 cores @ 575 MHz256 Bit @ 700 MHz
Quadro FX 2500M compare 24/8 cores @ 500 MHz256 Bit @ 600 MHz
Quadro FX 1700M 32 @ 625 MHz128 Bit @ 800 MHz
Quadro FX 1600M compare 32 @ 625 MHz128 Bit @ 800 MHz
Quadro FX 1500M compare 20/7 cores @ 375 MHz256 Bit @ 500 MHz
Quadro FX 770M compare 32 @ 500 MHz128 Bit @ 800 MHz
Quadro FX 570M compare 32 @ 475 MHz128 Bit @ 700 MHz
Quadro FX 380M compare 16 @ 625 MHz64 Bit @ 800 MHz
Quadro FX 370M compare 8 @ 580 MHz64 Bit @ 700 MHz
Quadro FX 360M 16 @ 400 MHz64 Bit @ 600 MHz
Quadro FX 350M compare 4/3 cores @ 450 MHz64 Bit @ 350 MHz
Quadro FX 3800M compare 128 @ 675 MHz256 Bit @ 1000 MHz
Quadro FX 3700M compare 128 @ 550 MHz256 Bit @ 800 MHz
Quadro FX 2800M compare 96 @ 600 MHz256 Bit @ 1000 MHz
Quadro FX 3600M compare 96 @ 500 MHz256 Bit @ 800 MHz
Quadro FX 1800M compare 72 @ 560 MHz128 Bit @ 1100 MHz
Quadro FX 2700M compare 48 @ 530 MHz256 Bit @ 800 MHz
Quadro FX 880M compare 48 @ 550 MHz128 Bit @ 790 MHz
Quadro FX 3500M compare 24/8 cores @ 575 MHz256 Bit @ 700 MHz
Quadro FX 2500M compare 24/8 cores @ 500 MHz256 Bit @ 600 MHz
Quadro FX 1700M 32 @ 625 MHz128 Bit @ 800 MHz
Quadro FX 1600M compare 32 @ 625 MHz128 Bit @ 800 MHz
Quadro FX 1500M compare 20/7 cores @ 375 MHz256 Bit @ 500 MHz
Quadro FX 770M compare 32 @ 500 MHz128 Bit @ 800 MHz
Quadro FX 570M compare 32 @ 475 MHz128 Bit @ 700 MHz
Quadro FX 380M compare 16 @ 625 MHz64 Bit @ 800 MHz
Quadro FX 370M compare 8 @ 580 MHz64 Bit @ 700 MHz
Quadro FX 360M 16 @ 400 MHz64 Bit @ 600 MHz
Quadro FX 350M compare 4/3 cores @ 450 MHz64 Bit @ 350 MHz
CodenameNB9P-GLMNB8M-GLM
ArchitectureG9x
Cores32 - unified16 - unified
Core625 MHz400 MHz
Shader1250 MHz800 MHz
Memory800 MHz600 MHz
Bus128 Bit64 Bit
MemoryGDDR3GDDR3
Max. Memory256 MB256 MB
Shared Memorynono
DirectXDirectX 10, 4.0DirectX 10, 4.0
Transistors289 Million210 Million
Technology65 nm80 nm
FeaturesOpenGL 2.1, PureVideo HD, Powermizer 8.0, possible interfaces: LVDS, DVI, VGA, HDTV, HDCP, HDMIPowerMizer 7.0, HDR, designed for Vista, 128 Bit HDR, OpenGl 2.1
Size2/3
Introduced01.10.2008 09.05.2007
CG shading language, 32 Bit floating point precision, 12 Bit subpixel precision, 128 Bit precision of the graphics pipeline, FSAA with rotated raster, nView Mutlidisplay Support, High-Precision-Dynamic-Range (HPDR), Hardware 3D Clipping on window recognision, full screen AA
Manufacturerhttp://www.nvidia.com/object/product_qua...http://www.nvidia.de/page/geforce_8400M....

3DMark 2001SE - 3DMark 2001 - Standard
35734 Points (37%)
min: 13650     avg: 15054     median: 15053.5 (16%)     max: 16457 Points
3DMark 03 - 3DMark 03 - Standard
18212 Points (10%)
min: 5580     avg: 6010     median: 6010 (3%)     max: 6440 Points
3DMark 05 - 3DMark 05 - Standard
11550 Points (22%)
min: 3365     avg: 3372     median: 3372 (6%)     max: 3379 Points
3DMark 06 3DMark 06 - Standard 1280x800 + NVIDIA Quadro FX 1700M
3DMark 06 - Standard 1280x800 + NVIDIA Quadro FX 360M
Cinebench R10 Cinebench R10 Shading (32bit) + NVIDIA Quadro FX 1700M
Cinebench R10 Shading (32bit) + NVIDIA Quadro FX 360M

Average Benchmarks NVIDIA Quadro FX 1700M → 100% n=5

Average Benchmarks NVIDIA Quadro FX 360M → 36% n=5

-
-
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Crysis - GPU Benchmark

Crysis - GPU Benchmark

2007
med. 1024x768
100%
Quadro FX 1700M:
33.3  fps
30%
Quadro FX 360M:
10.1  fps
high 1024x768
100%
Quadro FX 1700M:
19.1  fps
Crysis - CPU Benchmark

Crysis - CPU Benchmark

2007
med. 1024x768
100%
Quadro FX 1700M:
29.3  fps
25%
Quadro FX 360M:
7.4  fps
high 1024x768
100%
Quadro FX 1700M:
17.1  fps
F.E.A.R.

F.E.A.R.

2005
low 640x480
100%
Quadro FX 1700M:
378  fps
87%
Quadro FX 360M:
328  fps
med. 800x600
100%
Quadro FX 1700M:
152  fps
41%
Quadro FX 360M:
62  fps
high 1024x768
100%
Quadro FX 1700M:
59  fps
29%
Quadro FX 360M:
17  fps
Quake 3 Arena - Timedemo

Quake 3 Arena - Timedemo

1999
high 1024x768
100%
Quadro FX 1700M:
609.6  fps
40%
Quadro FX 360M:
242.7  fps

Average Gaming NVIDIA Quadro FX 1700M → 100%

Average Gaming 30-70 fps → 100%

Average Gaming NVIDIA Quadro FX 360M → 42%

Average Gaming 30-70 fps → 41%

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:

show all (including archived), 2020, 2019
v1.15
Please share our article, every link counts!
> Notebook / Laptop Reviews and News > Benchmarks / Tech > Graphics Card Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2017-09-11)