, , , , , ,
search relation.
, , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,
 

NVIDIA Quadro FX 1600M vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 770M

NVIDIA Quadro FX 1600M

► remove from comparison

This is a highend workstation graphic chip (for CAD and 3D programs optimized) with DirectX 10 and good OpenGL support - probably based on the GeForce 8700M GT graphic card. It is intended for digital content creators, engineers, earthscientists and other professional 3D applications. Certified drivers grant thecorrect and faster (compared to 8700M) representation of professional programs (CAD, CCD, visualisation software).

NVIDIA Quadro FX 770M

► remove from comparison NVIDIA Quadro FX 770M

The Quadro FX 770M is a professional midrange graphics adapter for laptops / mobile workstations. The GPU is optimized for professional 2D and 3D applications like CAD, DCC, and visualization software. The FX770M solutions contains certified graphics drivers for the most popular applications.

The GPU chip of the Quadro FX770M is based on the GeForce 9600M GT consumer card for notebooks. Therefore, the Quadro has the same features (like the PureVideo HD video-processor) as the 9600M GT.

The performance of the card should be compareable to the 9600M GT. Still some games may run slower, as the drivers are optimized for applications and OpenGL. Especially the OpenGL performance is way better than with an 9600M GT. The Cinebench R10 OpenGL test shows up to twize the performance with a FX 770M compared to a GeForce 9600M GT.

As all cards of the GeForce 9000M series, the 770M support CUDA.

NVIDIA Quadro FX 1600MNVIDIA Quadro FX 770M
ManufacturerNVIDIANVIDIA
Quadro FX Series
Quadro FX 3800M compare 128 @ 0.68 GHz256 Bit @ 1000 MHz
Quadro FX 3700M compare 128 @ 0.55 GHz256 Bit @ 800 MHz
Quadro FX 2800M compare 96 @ 0.6 GHz256 Bit @ 1000 MHz
Quadro FX 3600M compare 96 @ 0.5 GHz256 Bit @ 800 MHz
Quadro FX 1800M compare 72 @ 0.56 GHz128 Bit @ 1100 MHz
Quadro FX 2700M compare 48 @ 0.53 GHz256 Bit @ 800 MHz
Quadro FX 880M compare 48 @ 0.55 GHz128 Bit @ 790 MHz
Quadro FX 3500M compare 24/8 cores @ 0.58 GHz256 Bit @ 700 MHz
Quadro FX 2500M compare 24/8 cores @ 0.5 GHz256 Bit @ 600 MHz
Quadro FX 1700M compare 32 @ 0.63 GHz128 Bit @ 800 MHz
Quadro FX 1600M 32 @ 0.63 GHz128 Bit @ 800 MHz
Quadro FX 1500M compare 20/7 cores @ 0.38 GHz256 Bit @ 500 MHz
Quadro FX 770M 32 @ 0.5 GHz128 Bit @ 800 MHz
Quadro FX 570M compare 32 @ 0.48 GHz128 Bit @ 700 MHz
Quadro FX 380M compare 16 @ 0.63 GHz64 Bit @ 800 MHz
Quadro FX 370M compare 8 @ 0.58 GHz64 Bit @ 700 MHz
Quadro FX 360M compare 16 @ 0.4 GHz64 Bit @ 600 MHz
Quadro FX 350M compare 4/3 cores @ 0.45 GHz64 Bit @ 350 MHz
Quadro FX 3800M compare 128 @ 0.68 GHz256 Bit @ 1000 MHz
Quadro FX 3700M compare 128 @ 0.55 GHz256 Bit @ 800 MHz
Quadro FX 2800M compare 96 @ 0.6 GHz256 Bit @ 1000 MHz
Quadro FX 3600M compare 96 @ 0.5 GHz256 Bit @ 800 MHz
Quadro FX 1800M compare 72 @ 0.56 GHz128 Bit @ 1100 MHz
Quadro FX 2700M compare 48 @ 0.53 GHz256 Bit @ 800 MHz
Quadro FX 880M compare 48 @ 0.55 GHz128 Bit @ 790 MHz
Quadro FX 3500M compare 24/8 cores @ 0.58 GHz256 Bit @ 700 MHz
Quadro FX 2500M compare 24/8 cores @ 0.5 GHz256 Bit @ 600 MHz
Quadro FX 1700M compare 32 @ 0.63 GHz128 Bit @ 800 MHz
Quadro FX 1600M 32 @ 0.63 GHz128 Bit @ 800 MHz
Quadro FX 1500M compare 20/7 cores @ 0.38 GHz256 Bit @ 500 MHz
Quadro FX 770M 32 @ 0.5 GHz128 Bit @ 800 MHz
Quadro FX 570M compare 32 @ 0.48 GHz128 Bit @ 700 MHz
Quadro FX 380M compare 16 @ 0.63 GHz64 Bit @ 800 MHz
Quadro FX 370M compare 8 @ 0.58 GHz64 Bit @ 700 MHz
Quadro FX 360M compare 16 @ 0.4 GHz64 Bit @ 600 MHz
Quadro FX 350M compare 4/3 cores @ 0.45 GHz64 Bit @ 350 MHz
CodenameNB8P-GLMNB9P-GLM
ArchitectureG8xG9x
Pipelines32 - unified32 - unified
Core Speed625 MHz500 MHz
Shader Speed1250 MHz1250 MHz
Memory Speed800 MHz800 MHz
Memory Bus Width128 Bit128 Bit
Memory TypeGDDR3GDDR2 / GDDR3
Max. Amount of Memory256 MB512 MB
Shared Memorynono
DirectXDirectX 10, Shader 4.0DirectX 10, Shader 4.0
Transistors289 Million314 Million
technology80 nm65 nm
FeaturesPureVideo, video scaling, LCDs with 1920x1200 pixel, PCI-Express, connection for ext. graphic card OpenGL 2.1, PowerMizer 8.0, 12-Bit subpixel precision, 128 Bit graphics pipeline precision
Notebook Sizelargemedium sized
Date of Announcement01.06.2007 14.08.2008
InformationCG shading language, 32 bit floating point precision, 12 bit subpixel precision, 128 bit precision of the graphic pipeline, vertex and pixelshader programmability, PCI-E inferface, FSAA with turned grid, nView multidisplay support, high-precision dynamic-range (HPDR) technology, hardware 3D clipping, full screen antialiasing
Link to Manufacturer Pagehttp://www.nvidia.com/page/nb_chipset.htmlhttp://www.nvidia.com/object/product_qua...

Benchmarks

3DMark 2001SE - 3DMark 2001 - Standard
min: 27822     avg: 32843     median: 35198 (37%)     max: 35509 Points
34871 Points (36%)
3DMark 03 - 3DMark 03 - Standard
min: 15060     avg: 16009     median: 15915 (8%)     max: 17144 Points
17192 Points (9%)
3DMark 05 - 3DMark 05 - Standard
min: 9344     avg: 9963     median: 9873 (14%)     max: 10375 Points
11161 Points (16%)
3DMark 06 3DMark 06 - Score Unknown Settings + NVIDIA Quadro FX 1600M
3DMark 06
min: 4535     avg: 4623     median: 4622.5 (9%)     max: 4710
3DMark 06 - Standard 1280x1024 + NVIDIA Quadro FX 1600M
3DMark 06
min: 4798     avg: 4916     median: 4915.5 (9%)     max: 5033 Points
3DMark 06 - Standard 1280x1024 + NVIDIA Quadro FX 770M
min: 5230     avg: 5297     median: 5296.5 (10%)     max: 5363 Points
3DMark 06 - Standard 1280x800 + NVIDIA Quadro FX 1600M
3DMark 06
5608 Points (10%)
SPEC Viewperf 10.0 - SPEC Viewperf 10.0 - 3dsmax
33.1 (69%)
SPEC Viewperf 10.0 - SPEC Viewperf 10.0 - Catia
40.1 (84%)
SPEC Viewperf 10.0 - SPEC Viewperf 10.0 - EnSight
31.7 (67%)
SPEC Viewperf 10.0 - SPEC Viewperf 10.0 - Maya
85.1 (46%)
SPEC Viewperf 10.0 - SPEC Viewperf 10.0 - Pro/Engeneer
36.1 (71%)
SPEC Viewperf 10.0 - SPEC Viewperf 10.0 - SolidWorks
55 (82%)
SPEC Viewperf 10.0 - SPEC Viewperf 10.0 - UGS Teamcenter
19 (49%)
SPEC Viewperf 10.0 - SPEC Viewperf 10.0 - UGS NX
17.5 (36%)
Cinebench R10 Cinebench R10 Shading (32bit) + NVIDIA Quadro FX 1600M
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Shading (32bit)
min: 3899     avg: 4670     median: 4885 (23%)     max: 5226
Cinebench R10 Shading (32bit) + NVIDIA Quadro FX 770M
6180 (29%)

Average Benchmarks NVIDIA Quadro FX 1600M → 100% n=5

Average Benchmarks NVIDIA Quadro FX 770M → 111% n=5

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Game Benchmarks

The following benchmarks stem from our benchmarks of review laptops. The performance depends on the used graphics memory, clock rate, processor, system settings, drivers, and operating systems. So the results don't have to be representative for all laptops with this GPU. For detailed information on the benchmark results, click on the fps number.

Crysis - GPU Benchmark

Crysis - GPU Benchmark

2007
low 1024x768
100%
Quadro FX 1600M:
83.2 84.2 ~ 84 fps
112%
Quadro FX 770M:
94.2  fps
med. 1024x768
100%
Quadro FX 1600M:
31.5 33.3 ~ 32 fps
122%
Quadro FX 770M:
39  fps
high 1024x768
100%
Quadro FX 1600M:
13.6 14.4 15.9 ~ 15 fps
130%
Quadro FX 770M:
19.5  fps
Crysis - CPU Benchmark

Crysis - CPU Benchmark

2007
low 1024x768
100%
Quadro FX 1600M:
12.7 72.2 73.1 ~ 53 fps
160%
Quadro FX 770M:
84.7  fps
med. 1024x768
100%
Quadro FX 1600M:
23.5 29.6 ~ 27 fps
131%
Quadro FX 770M:
35.4  fps
high 1024x768
100%
Quadro FX 1600M:
13.2 15.6 ~ 14 fps
129%
Quadro FX 770M:
18.1  fps
World in Conflict - Benchmark

World in Conflict - Benchmark

2007
med. 1024x768
100%
Quadro FX 1600M:
36 37 ~ 37 fps
high 1024x768
100%
Quadro FX 1600M:
21 23 ~ 22 fps
F.E.A.R.

F.E.A.R.

2005
low 640x480
100%
Quadro FX 1600M:
444 476 493 ~ 471 fps
med. 800x600
100%
Quadro FX 1600M:
153 162 167 ~ 161 fps
high 1024x768
100%
Quadro FX 1600M:
56 56 59 ~ 57 fps
Doom 3

Doom 3

2004
low 640x480
100%
Quadro FX 1600M:
160.8 173.6 ~ 167 fps
99%
Quadro FX 770M:
165.2  fps
med. 640x480
100%
Quadro FX 1600M:
164.3 174 ~ 169 fps
101%
Quadro FX 770M:
171.3  fps
high 800x600
100%
Quadro FX 1600M:
160.6 165 ~ 163 fps
97%
Quadro FX 770M:
158.7  fps
ultra 1024x768
100%
Quadro FX 1600M:
129.1 129.2 ~ 129 fps
98%
Quadro FX 770M:
126.1  fps
Quake 3 Arena - Timedemo

Quake 3 Arena - Timedemo

1999
high 1024x768
100%
Quadro FX 1600M:
548.9  fps

Average Gaming NVIDIA Quadro FX 1600M → 100%

Average Gaming 30-70 fps → 100%

Average Gaming NVIDIA Quadro FX 770M → 118%

Average Gaming 30-70 fps → 126%

For more games that might be playable and a list of all games and graphics cards visit our Gaming List

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:

show all (including archived), 2021, 2020
v1.16
log 16. 18:26:24

#0 checking url part for id 183 +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 884 +0s ... 0s

#2 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#3 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Mon, 14 Jun 2021 17:20:49 +0200 +0s ... 0s

#4 composed specs +0.042s ... 0.042s

#5 did output specs +0s ... 0.042s

#6 start showIntegratedCPUs +0s ... 0.042s

#7 getting avg benchmarks for device 183 +0.023s ... 0.065s

#8 got single benchmarks 183 +0.007s ... 0.072s

#9 getting avg benchmarks for device 884 +0s ... 0.072s

#10 got single benchmarks 884 +0.005s ... 0.077s

#11 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.077s

#12 min, max, avg, median took s +0.005s ... 0.083s

#13 before gaming benchmark output +0s ... 0.083s

#14 Got 46 rows for game benchmarks. +0.004s ... 0.086s

#15 composed SQL query for gamebenchmarks +0s ... 0.086s

#16 got data and put it in $dataArray +0.001s ... 0.088s

#17 benchmarks composed for output. +0.005s ... 0.092s

#18 calculated avg scores. +0s ... 0.092s

#19 return log +0.003s ... 0.095s

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Notebook / Laptop Reviews and News > Benchmarks / Tech > Graphics Card Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2017-09-11)