NVIDIA Quadro FX 1600M vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 3800M vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 1700M
NVIDIA Quadro FX 1600M ► remove from comparison
This is a highend workstation graphic chip (for CAD and 3D programs optimized) with DirectX 10 and good OpenGL support - probably based on the GeForce 8700M GT graphic card. It is intended for digital content creators, engineers, earthscientists and other professional 3D applications. Certified drivers grant thecorrect and faster (compared to 8700M) representation of professional programs (CAD, CCD, visualisation software).
NVIDIA Quadro FX 3800M ► remove from comparison
The NVIDIA Quadro FX 3800M is a mobile workstation graphics card for high end laptops. It is based on the Geforce GTX 280M core (G92 core) and features 128 CUDA cores (unified shaders).
Compared to the Quadro FX 3700M, the Quadro FX 3800M features a higher clock speed and is manufacturered in 55nm (compared to 65nm of the 3700M). In fact, the FX3800M is clocked even higher than the consumer GeForce GTX 280M and performs notably better as a result.
The Quadro FX series of cards are optimized for professional applications like CAD or DCC. Notably, OpenGL performance should be much improved compared to consumer GeForce cards of similar specifications.
At the time its announcement (December 2009), the FX 3800M was the fastest workstation graphics card for laptops.
NVIDIA Quadro FX 1700M ► remove from comparison
The Nvidia Quadro FX 1700M is a professional graphics adapter for CAD and 3D applications. It is based on the G96 core (GeForce 9650M e.g.) but with different drivers, that are optimized for OpenGL and professional applications. The drivers are zertified to work flawlessly with different applications.
Compared to the Quadro FX 1600M, the FX 1700M GPU supports Powermizer 8.0.
NVIDIA Quadro FX 1600M NVIDIA Quadro FX 3800M NVIDIA Quadro FX 1700M Quadro FX Series Codename NB8P-GLM N10E-GLM4 NB9P-GLM Architecture G8x G9x G9x Pipelines 32 - unified 128 - unified 32 - unified Core Speed 625 MHz 675 MHz 625 MHz Shader Speed 1250 MHz 1688 MHz 1250 MHz Memory Speed 800 MHz 1000 MHz 800 MHz Memory Bus Width 128 Bit 256 Bit 128 Bit Memory Type GDDR3 GDDR3 GDDR3 Max. Amount of Memory 512 MB 1024 MB 256 MB Shared Memory no no no API DirectX 10, Shader 4.0 DirectX 10, Shader 4.0 DirectX 10, Shader 4.0 Power Consumption 50 Watt 100 Watt 50 Watt Transistors 289 Million 754 Million 289 Million technology 80 nm 55 nm 65 nm Features PureVideo, video scaling, LCDs with 1920x1200 pixel, PCI-Express, connection for ext. graphic card OpenGL 2.1, CUDA, PowerMizer 8.0 OpenGL 2.1, PureVideo HD, Powermizer 8.0, possible interfaces: LVDS, DVI, VGA, HDTV, HDCP, HDMI Notebook Size large large large Date of Announcement 01.06.2007 20.12.2009 01.10.2008 Information CG shading language, 32 bit floating point precision, 12 bit subpixel precision, 128 bit precision of the graphic pipeline, vertex and pixelshader programmability, PCI-E inferface, FSAA with turned grid, nView multidisplay support, high-precision dynamic-range (HPDR) technology, hardware 3D clipping, full screen antialiasing CG shading language, 32 Bit floating point precision, 12 Bit subpixel precision, 128 Bit precision of the graphics pipeline, FSAA with rotated raster, nView Mutlidisplay Support, High-Precision-Dynamic-Range (HPDR), Hardware 3D Clipping on window recognision, full screen AA Link to Manufacturer Page http://www.nvidia.com/page/nb_chipset.html http://www.nvidia.com/object/product_qua... http://www.nvidia.com/object/product_qua...
Benchmarks min: 6584 avg: 6951 median: 6779 (2%) max: 7491 Points
3DM Vant. Perf. GPU no PhysX + NVIDIA Quadro FX 3800M 3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. GPU no PhysX
min: 5758 avg: 5926 median: 6002 (3%) max: 6019 Points
3DMark 2001SE - 3DMark 2001 - Standard
min: 27822 avg: 32843 median: 35198 (37%) max: 35509 Points
min: 32886 avg: 34790 median: 34790 (36%) max: 36694 Points
35734 Points (37%)
3DMark 03 - 3DMark 03 - Standard
min: 15060 avg: 16009 median: 15915 (8%) max: 17144 Points
min: 33146 avg: 37082 median: 38191 (20%) max: 39909 Points
18212 Points (10%)
3DMark 05 - 3DMark 05 - Standard
min: 9344 avg: 9963 median: 9873 (11%) max: 10375 Points
min: 16593 avg: 18199 median: 18043 (20%) max: 19960 Points
11550 Points (13%)
3DMark 06 3DMark 06 - Score Unknown Settings + NVIDIA Quadro FX 1600M
min: 4535 avg: 4623 median: 4622.5 (6%) max: 4710 Points
3DMark 06 - Score Unknown Settings + NVIDIA Quadro FX 3800M
13232 Points (18%)
Model CPU GPU RAM Value 3DMark 06 - Score Unknown Settings Dell Precision M6500 (3DMark 06 - Score Unknown Settings) 920XM Quadro FX 3800M 1 GB 4 GB 13232
3DMark 06 - Standard 1280x1024 + NVIDIA Quadro FX 1600M
min: 4798 avg: 4916 median: 4915.5 (7%) max: 5033 Points
3DMark 06 - Standard 1280x1024 + NVIDIA Quadro FX 3800M
min: 12050 avg: 12765 median: 12923 (18%) max: 13323 Points
Model CPU GPU RAM Value 3DMark 06 - Standard 1280x1024 Lenovo ThinkPad W701ds NTV5FPB164 (3DMark 06 - Standard 1280x1024) 820QM Quadro FX 3800M 675 / 1650 MHz 1 GB 16 GB 12050 HP EliteBook 8740w (WD942EA) (3DMark 06 - Standard 1280x1024) 740QM Quadro FX 3800M 675 / 1000 MHz 1 GB 8 GB 12923 Dell Precision M6500 (3DMark 06 - Standard 1280x1024) 920XM Quadro FX 3800M 675/1688 / 1000 MHz 1 GB 13323
3DMark 06 - Standard 1280x800 + NVIDIA Quadro FX 1600M
5608 Points (8%)
3DMark 06 - Standard 1280x800 + NVIDIA Quadro FX 1700M
6302 Points (9%)
Model CPU GPU RAM Value 3DMark 06 - Standard 1280x800 Dell Precision M4400 (3DMark 06 - Standard 1280x800) T9400 Quadro FX 1700M 0.5 GB 4 GB 6302
SPEC Viewperf 10.0 - SPEC Viewperf 10.0 - 3dsmax
32.8 Points (68%)
SPEC Viewperf 10.0 - SPEC Viewperf 10.0 - Catia
45.8 Points (96%)
SPEC Viewperf 10.0 - SPEC Viewperf 10.0 - EnSight
47.4 Points (100%)
SPEC Viewperf 10.0 - SPEC Viewperf 10.0 - Maya
59.7 Points (32%)
SPEC Viewperf 10.0 - SPEC Viewperf 10.0 - Pro/Engeneer
51.1 Points (100%)
SPEC Viewperf 10.0 - SPEC Viewperf 10.0 - SolidWorks
59.7 Points (88%)
SPEC Viewperf 10.0 - SPEC Viewperf 10.0 - UGS Teamcenter
38.5 Points (100%)
SPEC Viewperf 10.0 - SPEC Viewperf 10.0 - UGS NX
35.3 Points (72%)
SPECviewperf 11 specvp11 snx-01 + NVIDIA Quadro FX 3800M SPECviewperf 11 - specvp11 snx-01
18.8 fps (13%)
specvp11 tcvis-02 + NVIDIA Quadro FX 3800M SPECviewperf 11 - specvp11 tcvis-02
18.7 fps (31%)
specvp11 sw-02 + NVIDIA Quadro FX 3800M SPECviewperf 11 - specvp11 sw-02
30.6 fps (37%)
specvp11 proe-05 + NVIDIA Quadro FX 3800M SPECviewperf 11 - specvp11 proe-05
6.9 fps (29%)
specvp11 maya-03 + NVIDIA Quadro FX 3800M SPECviewperf 11 - specvp11 maya-03
16.6 fps (12%)
specvp11 lightwave-01 + NVIDIA Quadro FX 3800M SPECviewperf 11 - specvp11 lightwave-01
38.4 fps (41%)
specvp11 ensight-04 + NVIDIA Quadro FX 3800M SPECviewperf 11 - specvp11 ensight-04
16.2 fps (8%)
specvp11 catia-03 + NVIDIA Quadro FX 3800M SPECviewperf 11 - specvp11 catia-03
23.4 fps (28%)
Windows 7 Experience Index - Win7 Gaming graphics
6.9 Points (87%)
Windows 7 Experience Index - Win7 Graphics
6.9 Points (87%)
Cinebench R10 Cinebench R10 Shading (32bit) + NVIDIA Quadro FX 1600M Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Shading (32bit)
min: 3899 avg: 4670 median: 4885 (3%) max: 5226 Points
Cinebench R10 Shading (32bit) + NVIDIA Quadro FX 3800M
min: 4429 avg: 4928 median: 4928 (4%) max: 5427 Points
Cinebench R10 Shading (32bit) + NVIDIA Quadro FX 1700M
6159 Points (4%)
Cinebench R11.5 Cinebench R11.5 OpenGL 64 Bit + NVIDIA Quadro FX 3800M Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 OpenGL 64 Bit
min: 32.07 avg: 32.7 median: 32.7 (12%) max: 33.29 fps
Average Benchmarks NVIDIA Quadro FX 1600M → 100% n=4 Average Benchmarks NVIDIA Quadro FX 3800M → 156% n=4 Average Benchmarks NVIDIA Quadro FX 1700M → 115% n=4
- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation
Game Benchmarks The following benchmarks stem from our benchmarks of review laptops. The performance depends on the used graphics memory, clock rate, processor, system settings, drivers, and operating systems. So the results don't have to be representative for all laptops with this GPU. For detailed information on the benchmark results, click on the fps number.
Quadro FX 3800M:
230.6 [X] HP EliteBook 8740w (WD942EA) Intel Core i7-740QM 1.7GHz
Quadro FX 3800M
fps
Quadro FX 3800M:
124.2 [X] HP EliteBook 8740w (WD942EA) Intel Core i7-740QM 1.7GHz
Quadro FX 3800M
fps
Quadro FX 3800M:
64.9 [X] HP EliteBook 8740w (WD942EA) Intel Core i7-740QM 1.7GHz
Quadro FX 3800M
fps
Quadro FX 3800M:
31.8 [X] HP EliteBook 8740w (WD942EA) Intel Core i7-740QM 1.7GHz
Quadro FX 3800M
fps
Quadro FX 3800M:
78.5 [X] HP EliteBook 8740w (WD942EA) Intel Core i7-740QM 1.7GHz
Quadro FX 3800M
fps
Quadro FX 3800M:
40.9 [X] HP EliteBook 8740w (WD942EA) Intel Core i7-740QM 1.7GHz
Quadro FX 3800M
fps
Quadro FX 3800M:
97 [X] HP EliteBook 8740w (WD942EA) Intel Core i7-740QM 1.7GHz
Quadro FX 3800M
fps
Quadro FX 3800M:
82 [X] HP EliteBook 8740w (WD942EA) Intel Core i7-740QM 1.7GHz
Quadro FX 3800M
fps
Quadro FX 3800M:
29.9 [X] HP EliteBook 8740w (WD942EA) Intel Core i7-740QM 1.7GHz
Quadro FX 3800M
fps
Quadro FX 3800M:
142.8 [X] HP EliteBook 8740w (WD942EA) Intel Core i7-740QM 1.7GHz
Quadro FX 3800M
fps
Quadro FX 3800M:
61.9 [X] HP EliteBook 8740w (WD942EA) Intel Core i7-740QM 1.7GHz
Quadro FX 3800M
fps
104%
Quadro FX 1700M:
33.3 [X] Dell Precision M4400 Intel Core 2 Duo T9400 2.5GHz
Quadro FX 1700M
fps
100%
Quadro FX 1600M:
13.6 14.4 [X] HP Compaq 8710w Intel Core 2 Duo T7700 2.4GHz
Quadro FX 1600M
15.9 ~ 15 fps
127%
Quadro FX 1700M:
19.1 [X] Dell Precision M4400 Intel Core 2 Duo T9400 2.5GHz
Quadro FX 1700M
fps
109%
Quadro FX 1700M:
29.3 [X] Dell Precision M4400 Intel Core 2 Duo T9400 2.5GHz
Quadro FX 1700M
fps
100%
Quadro FX 1600M:
13.2 [X] HP Compaq 8710w Intel Core 2 Duo T7700 2.4GHz
Quadro FX 1600M
15.6 ~ 14 fps
122%
Quadro FX 1700M:
17.1 [X] Dell Precision M4400 Intel Core 2 Duo T9400 2.5GHz
Quadro FX 1700M
fps
100%
Quadro FX 1600M:
36 37 ~ 37 fps
100%
Quadro FX 1600M:
21 23 ~ 22 fps
100%
Quadro FX 1600M:
444 [X] HP Compaq 8710w Intel Core 2 Duo T7700 2.4GHz
Quadro FX 1600M
476 493 ~ 471 fps
80%
Quadro FX 1700M:
378 [X] Dell Precision M4400 Intel Core 2 Duo T9400 2.5GHz
Quadro FX 1700M
fps
100%
Quadro FX 1600M:
153 162 167 [X] HP Compaq 8710w Intel Core 2 Duo T7700 2.4GHz
Quadro FX 1600M
~ 161 fps
94%
Quadro FX 1700M:
152 [X] Dell Precision M4400 Intel Core 2 Duo T9400 2.5GHz
Quadro FX 1700M
fps
100%
Quadro FX 1600M:
56 56 59 [X] HP Compaq 8710w Intel Core 2 Duo T7700 2.4GHz
Quadro FX 1600M
~ 57 fps
104%
Quadro FX 1700M:
59 [X] Dell Precision M4400 Intel Core 2 Duo T9400 2.5GHz
Quadro FX 1700M
fps
100%
Quadro FX 1600M:
164.3 174 ~ 169 fps
100%
Quadro FX 1600M:
160.6 165 ~ 163 fps
100%
Quadro FX 1600M:
549 [X] HP Compaq 8710w Intel Core 2 Duo T7700 2.4GHz
Quadro FX 1600M
fps
111%
Quadro FX 1700M:
610 [X] Dell Precision M4400 Intel Core 2 Duo T9400 2.5GHz
Quadro FX 1700M
fps
Average Gaming NVIDIA Quadro FX 1600M → 100% Average Gaming 30-70 fps → 100%
Average Gaming NVIDIA Quadro FX 1700M → 106% Average Gaming 30-70 fps → 104%
For more games that might be playable and a list of all games and graphics cards visit our Gaming List
v1.22
log 04. 21:43:25
#0 checking url part for id 183 +0s ... 0s
#1 checking url part for id 1541 +0s ... 0s
#2 checking url part for id 1087 +0s ... 0s
#3 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s
#4 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Fri, 02 Jun 2023 11:14:16 +0200 +0.001s ... 0.001s
#5 composed specs +0.11s ... 0.111s
#6 did output specs +0s ... 0.111s
#7 start showIntegratedCPUs +0s ... 0.111s
#8 getting avg benchmarks for device 183 +0.039s ... 0.15s
#9 got single benchmarks 183 +0.01s ... 0.16s
#10 getting avg benchmarks for device 1541 +0.001s ... 0.161s
#11 got single benchmarks 1541 +0.014s ... 0.175s
#12 getting avg benchmarks for device 1087 +0.001s ... 0.176s
#13 got single benchmarks 1087 +0.006s ... 0.182s
#14 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.182s
#15 min, max, avg, median took s +0.275s ... 0.458s
#16 before gaming benchmark output +0s ... 0.458s
#17 Got 55 rows for game benchmarks. +0.005s ... 0.463s
#18 composed SQL query for gamebenchmarks +0s ... 0.463s
#19 got data and put it in $dataArray +0.005s ... 0.468s
#20 benchmarks composed for output. +0.024s ... 0.492s
#21 calculated avg scores. +0s ... 0.492s
#22 return log +0.002s ... 0.494s
Please share our article, every link counts!
.170
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2017-09-11)