Notebookcheck Logo

NVIDIA Quadro FX 1500M vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 770M vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 2800M

NVIDIA Quadro FX 1500M

► remove from comparison NVIDIA Quadro FX 1500M

NVIDIA Quadro FX 1500M is the version of 7900 GS video card for notebooks, which is optimized for CAD and professional 3D-applications. Technically, it has the same or similar chip (G71 architecture), but with other Bios and support for professional drivers.

The gaming performance is clearly worse than the 7900 GS (because of the application optimizing). Nonetheless, the most modded drivers can be used, so the Quadro FX 1500M is more a 7900 GS (for the operating system).

NVIDIA Quadro FX 770M

► remove from comparison NVIDIA Quadro FX 770M

The Quadro FX 770M is a professional midrange graphics adapter for laptops / mobile workstations. The GPU is optimized for professional 2D and 3D applications like CAD, DCC, and visualization software. The FX770M solutions contains certified graphics drivers for the most popular applications.

The GPU chip of the Quadro FX770M is based on the GeForce 9600M GT consumer card for notebooks. Therefore, the Quadro has the same features (like the PureVideo HD video-processor) as the 9600M GT.

The performance of the card should be compareable to the 9600M GT. Still some games may run slower, as the drivers are optimized for applications and OpenGL. Especially the OpenGL performance is way better than with an 9600M GT. The Cinebench R10 OpenGL test shows up to twize the performance with a FX 770M compared to a GeForce 9600M GT.

As all cards of the GeForce 9000M series, the 770M support CUDA.

NVIDIA Quadro FX 2800M

► remove from comparison NVIDIA Quadro FX 2800M

The NVIDIA Quadro FX 2800M is a mobile workstation graphics card for high-end laptops. It is based on the Geforce 9800M GT / G92 core but features a higher clock rate and is produced in a 55nm fabrication process versus 65nm of the 9800M GT.

The Quadro FX series of cards are optimized for professional applications like CAD or DCC. OpenGL performance especially should be noticeably better compared to consumer GeForce cards.

The Quadro FX2800M is found in mobile workstations like the Dell M6500 and supports DirectX 10.0 and OpenGL 2.1. In the Dell laptops, the card is able to output up to two displays simultaneously (DisplayPort up to 2560x1600, DVI/HDMI up to 1920x1200). Dell claims a thermal power draw of 65 Watts while Nvidia rates the GPU at 75 Watt TDP.

Due to the relatively high power consumption of 65 to 75 Watts (TDP) and a 10 Watt idle mode, the Quadro FX 2800M is normally only foud in medium to large laptops with powerful cooling solutions.

NVIDIA Quadro FX 1500MNVIDIA Quadro FX 770MNVIDIA Quadro FX 2800M
Quadro FX Series
Quadro FX 3800M 128 @ 0.68 GHz256 Bit @ 1000 MHz
Quadro FX 3700M 128 @ 0.55 GHz256 Bit @ 800 MHz
Quadro FX 2800M 96 @ 0.6 GHz256 Bit @ 1000 MHz
Quadro FX 3600M 96 @ 0.5 GHz256 Bit @ 800 MHz
Quadro FX 1800M 72 @ 0.56 GHz128 Bit @ 1100 MHz
Quadro FX 2700M 48 @ 0.53 GHz256 Bit @ 800 MHz
Quadro FX 880M 48 @ 0.55 GHz128 Bit @ 790 MHz
Quadro FX 3500M 24/8 cores @ 0.58 GHz256 Bit @ 700 MHz
Quadro FX 2500M 24/8 cores @ 0.5 GHz256 Bit @ 600 MHz
Quadro FX 1700M 32 @ 0.63 GHz128 Bit @ 800 MHz
Quadro FX 1600M 32 @ 0.63 GHz128 Bit @ 800 MHz
Quadro FX 1500M 20/7 cores @ 0.38 GHz256 Bit @ 500 MHz
Quadro FX 770M 32 @ 0.5 GHz128 Bit @ 800 MHz
Quadro FX 570M 32 @ 0.48 GHz128 Bit @ 700 MHz
Quadro FX 380M 16 @ 0.63 GHz64 Bit @ 800 MHz
Quadro FX 370M 8 @ 0.58 GHz64 Bit @ 700 MHz
Quadro FX 360M 16 @ 0.4 GHz64 Bit @ 600 MHz
Quadro FX 350M 4/3 cores @ 0.45 GHz64 Bit @ 350 MHz
Quadro FX 3800M 128 @ 0.68 GHz256 Bit @ 1000 MHz
Quadro FX 3700M 128 @ 0.55 GHz256 Bit @ 800 MHz
Quadro FX 2800M 96 @ 0.6 GHz256 Bit @ 1000 MHz
Quadro FX 3600M 96 @ 0.5 GHz256 Bit @ 800 MHz
Quadro FX 1800M 72 @ 0.56 GHz128 Bit @ 1100 MHz
Quadro FX 2700M 48 @ 0.53 GHz256 Bit @ 800 MHz
Quadro FX 880M 48 @ 0.55 GHz128 Bit @ 790 MHz
Quadro FX 3500M 24/8 cores @ 0.58 GHz256 Bit @ 700 MHz
Quadro FX 2500M 24/8 cores @ 0.5 GHz256 Bit @ 600 MHz
Quadro FX 1700M 32 @ 0.63 GHz128 Bit @ 800 MHz
Quadro FX 1600M 32 @ 0.63 GHz128 Bit @ 800 MHz
Quadro FX 1500M 20/7 cores @ 0.38 GHz256 Bit @ 500 MHz
Quadro FX 770M 32 @ 0.5 GHz128 Bit @ 800 MHz
Quadro FX 570M 32 @ 0.48 GHz128 Bit @ 700 MHz
Quadro FX 380M 16 @ 0.63 GHz64 Bit @ 800 MHz
Quadro FX 370M 8 @ 0.58 GHz64 Bit @ 700 MHz
Quadro FX 360M 16 @ 0.4 GHz64 Bit @ 600 MHz
Quadro FX 350M 4/3 cores @ 0.45 GHz64 Bit @ 350 MHz
Quadro FX 3800M 128 @ 0.68 GHz256 Bit @ 1000 MHz
Quadro FX 3700M 128 @ 0.55 GHz256 Bit @ 800 MHz
Quadro FX 2800M 96 @ 0.6 GHz256 Bit @ 1000 MHz
Quadro FX 3600M 96 @ 0.5 GHz256 Bit @ 800 MHz
Quadro FX 1800M 72 @ 0.56 GHz128 Bit @ 1100 MHz
Quadro FX 2700M 48 @ 0.53 GHz256 Bit @ 800 MHz
Quadro FX 880M 48 @ 0.55 GHz128 Bit @ 790 MHz
Quadro FX 3500M 24/8 cores @ 0.58 GHz256 Bit @ 700 MHz
Quadro FX 2500M 24/8 cores @ 0.5 GHz256 Bit @ 600 MHz
Quadro FX 1700M 32 @ 0.63 GHz128 Bit @ 800 MHz
Quadro FX 1600M 32 @ 0.63 GHz128 Bit @ 800 MHz
Quadro FX 1500M 20/7 cores @ 0.38 GHz256 Bit @ 500 MHz
Quadro FX 770M 32 @ 0.5 GHz128 Bit @ 800 MHz
Quadro FX 570M 32 @ 0.48 GHz128 Bit @ 700 MHz
Quadro FX 380M 16 @ 0.63 GHz64 Bit @ 800 MHz
Quadro FX 370M 8 @ 0.58 GHz64 Bit @ 700 MHz
Quadro FX 360M 16 @ 0.4 GHz64 Bit @ 600 MHz
Quadro FX 350M 4/3 cores @ 0.45 GHz64 Bit @ 350 MHz
CodenameG71GLMNB9P-GLMNB10-GLM3
ArchitectureG7xG9xG9x
Pipelines20 / 7 Pixel- / Vertexshader32 - unified96 - unified
Core Speed375 MHz500 MHz600 MHz
Memory Speed500 MHz800 MHz1000 MHz
Memory Bus Width256 Bit128 Bit256 Bit
Memory TypeGDDR3GDDR2 / GDDR3GDDR3
Max. Amount of Memory512 MB512 MB1024 MB
Shared Memorynonono
APIDirectX 9c, Shader 3.0DirectX 10, Shader 4.0DirectX 10, Shader 4.0
Power Consumption20 Watt35 Watt75 Watt
Transistors278 Million314 Million754 Million
technology90 nm65 nm55 nm
Features90nm OpenGL 2.1, PowerMizer 8.0, 12-Bit subpixel precision, 128 Bit graphics pipeline precisionOpenGL 2.1, CUDA, PowerMizer 8.0
Notebook Sizelargemedium sizedlarge
Date of Announcement18.04.2006 14.08.2008 01.12.2009
InformationPCI-E, 90nm
Link to Manufacturer Pagehttp://www.nvidia.de/page/quadrofx_go.htmlhttp://www.nvidia.com/object/product_qua...http://www.nvidia.com/object/product_qua...
Shader Speed1250 MHz1500 MHz

Benchmarks

3DMark Vantage
3DM Vant. Perf. total + NVIDIA Quadro FX 2800M
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. total
min: 5779     avg: 5783     median: 5783 (5%)     max: 5787 Points
3DM Vant. Perf. GPU no PhysX + NVIDIA Quadro FX 2800M
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. GPU no PhysX
min: 5000     avg: 5037     median: 5037 (4%)     max: 5074 Points
3DMark 2001SE - 3DMark 2001 - Standard
26279 Points (27%)
34871 Points (36%)
34844 Points (36%)
3DMark 03 - 3DMark 03 - Standard
min: 14650     avg: 15283     median: 15283 (8%)     max: 15916 Points
17192 Points (9%)
33900 Points (18%)
3DMark 05 - 3DMark 05 - Standard
min: 6386     avg: 6666     median: 6400 (9%)     max: 7212 Points
11161 Points (16%)
min: 16310     avg: 16936     median: 16935.5 (24%)     max: 17561 Points
3DMark 06 3DMark 06 - Score Unknown Settings + NVIDIA Quadro FX 1500M
3DMark 06
min: 3900     avg: 3903     median: 3903 (6%)     max: 3906 Points
3DMark 06 - Standard 1280x1024 + NVIDIA Quadro FX 1500M
3DMark 06
4074 Points (6%)
3DMark 06 - Standard 1280x1024 + NVIDIA Quadro FX 770M
min: 5230     avg: 5297     median: 5296.5 (8%)     max: 5363 Points
3DMark 06 - Standard 1280x1024 + NVIDIA Quadro FX 2800M
min: 11162     avg: 11359     median: 11358.5 (17%)     max: 11555 Points
SPEC Viewperf 10.0 - SPEC Viewperf 10.0 - 3dsmax
33.1 Points (69%)
32.3 Points (67%)
SPEC Viewperf 10.0 - SPEC Viewperf 10.0 - Catia
40.1 Points (84%)
39 Points (82%)
SPEC Viewperf 10.0 - SPEC Viewperf 10.0 - EnSight
31.7 Points (67%)
44 Points (93%)
SPEC Viewperf 10.0 - SPEC Viewperf 10.0 - Maya
85.1 Points (46%)
59.6 Points (32%)
SPEC Viewperf 10.0 - SPEC Viewperf 10.0 - Pro/Engeneer
36.1 Points (71%)
42.6 Points (83%)
SPEC Viewperf 10.0 - SPEC Viewperf 10.0 - SolidWorks
55 Points (81%)
59.5 Points (88%)
SPEC Viewperf 10.0 - SPEC Viewperf 10.0 - UGS Teamcenter
19 Points (49%)
35.2 Points (91%)
SPEC Viewperf 10.0 - SPEC Viewperf 10.0 - UGS NX
17.5 Points (36%)
31.3 Points (64%)
SPECviewperf 11
specvp11 snx-01 + NVIDIA Quadro FX 2800M
SPECviewperf 11 - specvp11 snx-01
min: 13.58     avg: 14.7     median: 13.9 (10%)     max: 16.55 fps
specvp11 tcvis-02 + NVIDIA Quadro FX 2800M
SPECviewperf 11 - specvp11 tcvis-02
min: 15.1     avg: 16     median: 15.3 (26%)     max: 17.4 fps
specvp11 sw-02 + NVIDIA Quadro FX 2800M
SPECviewperf 11 - specvp11 sw-02
min: 6.73     avg: 14.1     median: 7.5 (9%)     max: 28 fps
specvp11 proe-05 + NVIDIA Quadro FX 2800M
SPECviewperf 11 - specvp11 proe-05
min: 4.67     avg: 5.1     median: 4.7 (19%)     max: 5.89 fps
specvp11 maya-03 + NVIDIA Quadro FX 2800M
SPECviewperf 11 - specvp11 maya-03
min: 6.2     avg: 7     median: 7.4 (6%)     max: 7.5 fps
specvp11 lightwave-01 + NVIDIA Quadro FX 2800M
SPECviewperf 11 - specvp11 lightwave-01
min: 7.99     avg: 16.2     median: 8.5 (9%)     max: 32 fps
specvp11 ensight-04 + NVIDIA Quadro FX 2800M
SPECviewperf 11 - specvp11 ensight-04
min: 10.8     avg: 11.9     median: 11.1 (5%)     max: 13.7 fps
specvp11 catia-03 + NVIDIA Quadro FX 2800M
SPECviewperf 11 - specvp11 catia-03
min: 9.53     avg: 13.4     median: 9.7 (12%)     max: 20.92 fps
Windows Vista Experience Index - Windows Vista Leistungsindex - Grafik (Spiele)
6.8 Points (100%)
Windows Vista Experience Index - Windows Vista Leistungsindex - Grafik
6.8 Points (100%)
Cinebench R10 Cinebench R10 Shading (32bit) + NVIDIA Quadro FX 770M
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Shading (32bit)
6180 Points (26%)
Cinebench R11.5 Cinebench R11.5 OpenGL 64 Bit + NVIDIA Quadro FX 2800M
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 OpenGL 64 Bit
min: 28.16     avg: 28.8     median: 28.8 (10%)     max: 29.36 fps

Average Benchmarks NVIDIA Quadro FX 1500M → 100% n=4

Average Benchmarks NVIDIA Quadro FX 770M → 137% n=4

Average Benchmarks NVIDIA Quadro FX 2800M → 224% n=4

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Game Benchmarks

The following benchmarks stem from our benchmarks of review laptops. The performance depends on the used graphics memory, clock rate, processor, system settings, drivers, and operating systems. So the results don't have to be representative for all laptops with this GPU. For detailed information on the benchmark results, click on the fps number.

Mafia 2

Mafia 2

2010
low 800x600
Quadro FX 2800M:
63.2  fps
med. 1024x768
Quadro FX 2800M:
56.1  fps
high 1360x768
Quadro FX 2800M:
48.9  fps
ultra 1920x1080
Quadro FX 2800M:
30.8  fps
low 1024x768
Quadro FX 2800M:
158  fps
med. 1360x768
Quadro FX 2800M:
60  fps
high 1360x768
Quadro FX 2800M:
52  fps
ultra 1920x1080
Quadro FX 2800M:
29.6  fps
med. 1366x768
Quadro FX 2800M:
58.9  fps
high 1366x768
Quadro FX 2800M:
41.5  fps
ultra 1920x1080
Quadro FX 2800M:
23.1  fps
low 800x600
Quadro FX 2800M:
158.1  fps
med. 1024x768
Quadro FX 2800M:
78.9  fps
high 1366x768
Quadro FX 2800M:
66.7  fps
ultra 1920x1080
Quadro FX 2800M:
41.2  fps
Colin McRae: DIRT 2

Colin McRae: DIRT 2

2009
low 800x600
Quadro FX 2800M:
96.3  fps
med. 1024x768
Quadro FX 2800M:
89.5  fps
high 1360x768
Quadro FX 2800M:
62.6  fps
ultra 1920x1080
Quadro FX 2800M:
30.7  fps
Crysis - GPU Benchmark

Crysis - GPU Benchmark

2007
low 1024x768
Quadro FX 770M:
94.2  fps
med. 1024x768
Quadro FX 770M:
39  fps
high 1024x768
Quadro FX 770M:
19.5  fps
Crysis - CPU Benchmark

Crysis - CPU Benchmark

2007
low 1024x768
Quadro FX 770M:
84.7  fps
med. 1024x768
Quadro FX 770M:
35.4  fps
high 1024x768
Quadro FX 770M:
18.1  fps
F.E.A.R.

F.E.A.R.

2005
low 640x480
100%
Quadro FX 1500M:
259  fps
med. 800x600
100%
Quadro FX 1500M:
143  fps
high 1024x768
100%
Quadro FX 1500M:
63  fps
Doom 3

Doom 3

2004
low 640x480
100%
Quadro FX 1500M:
114.5  fps
144%
Quadro FX 770M:
165.2  fps
med. 640x480
100%
Quadro FX 1500M:
113.6  fps
151%
Quadro FX 770M:
171.3  fps
high 800x600
100%
Quadro FX 1500M:
113.9  fps
139%
Quadro FX 770M:
158.7  fps
ultra 1024x768
100%
Quadro FX 1500M:
109.3  fps
115%
Quadro FX 770M:
126.1  fps
Quake 3 Arena - Timedemo

Quake 3 Arena - Timedemo

1999
high 1024x768
100%
Quadro FX 1500M:
380.7  fps

Average Gaming NVIDIA Quadro FX 1500M → 100%

Average Gaming 30-70 fps → 100%

Average Gaming NVIDIA Quadro FX 770M → 137%

For more games that might be playable and a list of all games and graphics cards visit our Gaming List

v1.17
log 25. 01:16:24

#0 checking url part for id 7 +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 884 +0s ... 0s

#2 checking url part for id 1544 +0s ... 0s

#3 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#4 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Fri, 24 Jun 2022 17:25:51 +0200 +0s ... 0s

#5 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.048s ... 0.048s

#6 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.048s

#7 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.048s

#8 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.048s

#9 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.048s

#10 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.048s

#11 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.048s

#12 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.048s

#13 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.048s

#14 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.048s

#15 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.048s

#16 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.048s

#17 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.048s

#18 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.048s

#19 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.048s

#20 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.048s

#21 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s ... 0.05s

#22 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.05s

#23 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.05s

#24 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.05s

#25 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.05s

#26 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.05s

#27 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.05s

#28 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.05s

#29 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.05s

#30 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.05s

#31 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.05s

#32 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.05s

#33 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.05s

#34 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.05s

#35 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.05s

#36 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.05s

#37 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.05s

#38 composed specs +0s ... 0.05s

#39 did output specs +0s ... 0.05s

#40 start showIntegratedCPUs +0s ... 0.05s

#41 getting avg benchmarks for device 7 +0.042s ... 0.092s

#42 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.093s

#43 got single benchmarks 7 +0.006s ... 0.099s

#44 getting avg benchmarks for device 884 +0s ... 0.099s

#45 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s ... 0.1s

#46 got single benchmarks 884 +0.006s ... 0.105s

#47 getting avg benchmarks for device 1544 +0s ... 0.106s

#48 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s ... 0.106s

#49 got single benchmarks 1544 +0.006s ... 0.113s

#50 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.113s

#51 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s ... 0.114s

#52 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.114s

#53 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s ... 0.115s

#54 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.115s

#55 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.115s

#56 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.115s

#57 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.116s

#58 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.116s

#59 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.116s

#60 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.117s

#61 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.117s

#62 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.117s

#63 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.117s

#64 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.117s

#65 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.117s

#66 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.118s

#67 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.118s

#68 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.118s

#69 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.118s

#70 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.118s

#71 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.119s

#72 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.119s

#73 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.119s

#74 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.12s

#75 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.12s

#76 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.12s

#77 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.12s

#78 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.121s

#79 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.121s

#80 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.121s

#81 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.121s

#82 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.122s

#83 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.122s

#84 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.122s

#85 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.122s

#86 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.123s

#87 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.123s

#88 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.123s

#89 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.123s

#90 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.123s

#91 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.123s

#92 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.124s

#93 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.124s

#94 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.124s

#95 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.124s

#96 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.124s

#97 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.124s

#98 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.124s

#99 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.124s

#100 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.124s

#101 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.125s

#102 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.125s

#103 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.125s

#104 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.125s

#105 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.125s

#106 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.125s

#107 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s ... 0.126s

#108 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.126s

#109 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.126s

#110 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s ... 0.127s

#111 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.127s

#112 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.127s

#113 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.128s

#114 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.128s

#115 min, max, avg, median took s +0s ... 0.128s

#116 before gaming benchmark output +0s ... 0.128s

#117 Got 37 rows for game benchmarks. +0.005s ... 0.133s

#118 composed SQL query for gamebenchmarks +0s ... 0.133s

#119 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.133s

#120 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.133s

#121 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.133s

#122 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.133s

#123 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.133s

#124 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.133s

#125 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.133s

#126 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.133s

#127 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.133s

#128 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.133s

#129 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.133s

#130 got data and put it in $dataArray +0.001s ... 0.134s

#131 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s ... 0.135s

#132 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.135s

#133 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.135s

#134 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.135s

#135 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s ... 0.136s

#136 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.136s

#137 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.136s

#138 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.136s

#139 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s ... 0.137s

#140 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.137s

#141 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.137s

#142 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s ... 0.138s

#143 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.138s

#144 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.138s

#145 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.138s

#146 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s ... 0.138s

#147 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.138s

#148 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.138s

#149 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.138s

#150 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s ... 0.139s

#151 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.139s

#152 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.139s

#153 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s ... 0.14s

#154 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.14s

#155 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.14s

#156 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s ... 0.141s

#157 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.141s

#158 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.141s

#159 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s ... 0.141s

#160 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.141s

#161 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.141s

#162 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.141s

#163 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.141s

#164 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.141s

#165 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.141s

#166 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.141s

#167 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s ... 0.142s

#168 benchmarks composed for output. +0s ... 0.142s

#169 calculated avg scores. +0s ... 0.142s

#170 return log +0.001s ... 0.143s

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Notebook / Laptop Reviews and News > Benchmarks / Tech > Graphics Card Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2017-09-11)