Notebookcheck Logo

NVIDIA Quadro FX 1500M vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 3800M vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 770M

NVIDIA Quadro FX 1500M

► remove from comparison NVIDIA Quadro FX 1500M

NVIDIA Quadro FX 1500M is the version of 7900 GS video card for notebooks, which is optimized for CAD and professional 3D-applications. Technically, it has the same or similar chip (G71 architecture), but with other Bios and support for professional drivers.

The gaming performance is clearly worse than the 7900 GS (because of the application optimizing). Nonetheless, the most modded drivers can be used, so the Quadro FX 1500M is more a 7900 GS (for the operating system).

NVIDIA Quadro FX 3800M

► remove from comparison NVIDIA Quadro FX 3800M

The NVIDIA Quadro FX 3800M is a mobile workstation graphics card for high end laptops. It is based on the Geforce GTX 280M core (G92 core) and features 128 CUDA cores (unified shaders).

Compared to the Quadro FX 3700M, the Quadro FX 3800M features a higher clock speed and is manufacturered in 55nm (compared to 65nm of the 3700M). In fact, the FX3800M is clocked even higher than the consumer GeForce GTX 280M and performs notably better as a result.

The Quadro FX series of cards are optimized for professional applications like CAD or DCC. Notably, OpenGL performance should be much improved compared to  consumer GeForce cards of similar specifications.

At the time its announcement (December 2009), the FX 3800M was the fastest workstation graphics card for laptops.

NVIDIA Quadro FX 770M

► remove from comparison NVIDIA Quadro FX 770M

The Quadro FX 770M is a professional midrange graphics adapter for laptops / mobile workstations. The GPU is optimized for professional 2D and 3D applications like CAD, DCC, and visualization software. The FX770M solutions contains certified graphics drivers for the most popular applications.

The GPU chip of the Quadro FX770M is based on the GeForce 9600M GT consumer card for notebooks. Therefore, the Quadro has the same features (like the PureVideo HD video-processor) as the 9600M GT.

The performance of the card should be compareable to the 9600M GT. Still some games may run slower, as the drivers are optimized for applications and OpenGL. Especially the OpenGL performance is way better than with an 9600M GT. The Cinebench R10 OpenGL test shows up to twize the performance with a FX 770M compared to a GeForce 9600M GT.

As all cards of the GeForce 9000M series, the 770M support CUDA.

NVIDIA Quadro FX 1500MNVIDIA Quadro FX 3800MNVIDIA Quadro FX 770M
Quadro FX Series
Quadro FX 3800M 128 @ 0.68 GHz256 Bit @ 1000 MHz
Quadro FX 3700M 128 @ 0.55 GHz256 Bit @ 800 MHz
Quadro FX 2800M 96 @ 0.6 GHz256 Bit @ 1000 MHz
Quadro FX 3600M 96 @ 0.5 GHz256 Bit @ 800 MHz
Quadro FX 1800M 72 @ 0.56 GHz128 Bit @ 1100 MHz
Quadro FX 2700M 48 @ 0.53 GHz256 Bit @ 800 MHz
Quadro FX 880M 48 @ 0.55 GHz128 Bit @ 790 MHz
Quadro FX 3500M 24/8 cores @ 0.58 GHz256 Bit @ 700 MHz
Quadro FX 2500M 24/8 cores @ 0.5 GHz256 Bit @ 600 MHz
Quadro FX 1700M 32 @ 0.63 GHz128 Bit @ 800 MHz
Quadro FX 1600M 32 @ 0.63 GHz128 Bit @ 800 MHz
Quadro FX 1500M 20/7 cores @ 0.38 GHz256 Bit @ 500 MHz
Quadro FX 770M 32 @ 0.5 GHz128 Bit @ 800 MHz
Quadro FX 570M 32 @ 0.48 GHz128 Bit @ 700 MHz
Quadro FX 380M 16 @ 0.63 GHz64 Bit @ 800 MHz
Quadro FX 370M 8 @ 0.58 GHz64 Bit @ 700 MHz
Quadro FX 360M 16 @ 0.4 GHz64 Bit @ 600 MHz
Quadro FX 350M 4/3 cores @ 0.45 GHz64 Bit @ 350 MHz
Quadro FX 3800M 128 @ 0.68 GHz256 Bit @ 1000 MHz
Quadro FX 3700M 128 @ 0.55 GHz256 Bit @ 800 MHz
Quadro FX 2800M 96 @ 0.6 GHz256 Bit @ 1000 MHz
Quadro FX 3600M 96 @ 0.5 GHz256 Bit @ 800 MHz
Quadro FX 1800M 72 @ 0.56 GHz128 Bit @ 1100 MHz
Quadro FX 2700M 48 @ 0.53 GHz256 Bit @ 800 MHz
Quadro FX 880M 48 @ 0.55 GHz128 Bit @ 790 MHz
Quadro FX 3500M 24/8 cores @ 0.58 GHz256 Bit @ 700 MHz
Quadro FX 2500M 24/8 cores @ 0.5 GHz256 Bit @ 600 MHz
Quadro FX 1700M 32 @ 0.63 GHz128 Bit @ 800 MHz
Quadro FX 1600M 32 @ 0.63 GHz128 Bit @ 800 MHz
Quadro FX 1500M 20/7 cores @ 0.38 GHz256 Bit @ 500 MHz
Quadro FX 770M 32 @ 0.5 GHz128 Bit @ 800 MHz
Quadro FX 570M 32 @ 0.48 GHz128 Bit @ 700 MHz
Quadro FX 380M 16 @ 0.63 GHz64 Bit @ 800 MHz
Quadro FX 370M 8 @ 0.58 GHz64 Bit @ 700 MHz
Quadro FX 360M 16 @ 0.4 GHz64 Bit @ 600 MHz
Quadro FX 350M 4/3 cores @ 0.45 GHz64 Bit @ 350 MHz
Quadro FX 3800M 128 @ 0.68 GHz256 Bit @ 1000 MHz
Quadro FX 3700M 128 @ 0.55 GHz256 Bit @ 800 MHz
Quadro FX 2800M 96 @ 0.6 GHz256 Bit @ 1000 MHz
Quadro FX 3600M 96 @ 0.5 GHz256 Bit @ 800 MHz
Quadro FX 1800M 72 @ 0.56 GHz128 Bit @ 1100 MHz
Quadro FX 2700M 48 @ 0.53 GHz256 Bit @ 800 MHz
Quadro FX 880M 48 @ 0.55 GHz128 Bit @ 790 MHz
Quadro FX 3500M 24/8 cores @ 0.58 GHz256 Bit @ 700 MHz
Quadro FX 2500M 24/8 cores @ 0.5 GHz256 Bit @ 600 MHz
Quadro FX 1700M 32 @ 0.63 GHz128 Bit @ 800 MHz
Quadro FX 1600M 32 @ 0.63 GHz128 Bit @ 800 MHz
Quadro FX 1500M 20/7 cores @ 0.38 GHz256 Bit @ 500 MHz
Quadro FX 770M 32 @ 0.5 GHz128 Bit @ 800 MHz
Quadro FX 570M 32 @ 0.48 GHz128 Bit @ 700 MHz
Quadro FX 380M 16 @ 0.63 GHz64 Bit @ 800 MHz
Quadro FX 370M 8 @ 0.58 GHz64 Bit @ 700 MHz
Quadro FX 360M 16 @ 0.4 GHz64 Bit @ 600 MHz
Quadro FX 350M 4/3 cores @ 0.45 GHz64 Bit @ 350 MHz
CodenameG71GLMN10E-GLM4NB9P-GLM
ArchitectureG7xG9xG9x
Pipelines20 / 7 Pixel- / Vertexshader128 - unified32 - unified
Core Speed375 MHz675 MHz500 MHz
Memory Speed500 MHz1000 MHz800 MHz
Memory Bus Width256 Bit256 Bit128 Bit
Memory TypeGDDR3GDDR3GDDR2 / GDDR3
Max. Amount of Memory512 MB1024 MB512 MB
Shared Memorynonono
APIDirectX 9c, Shader 3.0DirectX 10, Shader 4.0DirectX 10, Shader 4.0
Power Consumption20 Watt100 Watt35 Watt
Transistors278 Million754 Million314 Million
technology90 nm55 nm65 nm
Features90nmOpenGL 2.1, CUDA, PowerMizer 8.0 OpenGL 2.1, PowerMizer 8.0, 12-Bit subpixel precision, 128 Bit graphics pipeline precision
Notebook Sizelargelargemedium sized
Date of Announcement18.04.2006 20.12.2009 14.08.2008
InformationPCI-E, 90nm
Link to Manufacturer Pagehttp://www.nvidia.de/page/quadrofx_go.htmlhttp://www.nvidia.com/object/product_qua...http://www.nvidia.com/object/product_qua...
Shader Speed1688 MHz1250 MHz

Benchmarks

3DMark Vantage
3DM Vant. Perf. total + NVIDIA Quadro FX 3800M
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. total
min: 6584     avg: 6951     median: 6779 (6%)     max: 7491 Points
3DM Vant. Perf. GPU no PhysX + NVIDIA Quadro FX 3800M
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. GPU no PhysX
min: 5758     avg: 5926     median: 6002 (5%)     max: 6019 Points
3DMark 2001SE - 3DMark 2001 - Standard
26279 Points (27%)
min: 32886     avg: 34790     median: 34790 (36%)     max: 36694 Points
34871 Points (36%)
3DMark 03 - 3DMark 03 - Standard
min: 14650     avg: 15283     median: 15283 (8%)     max: 15916 Points
min: 33146     avg: 37082     median: 38191 (20%)     max: 39909 Points
17192 Points (9%)
3DMark 05 - 3DMark 05 - Standard
min: 6386     avg: 6666     median: 6400 (9%)     max: 7212 Points
min: 16593     avg: 18199     median: 18043 (25%)     max: 19960 Points
11161 Points (16%)
3DMark 06 3DMark 06 - Score Unknown Settings + NVIDIA Quadro FX 1500M
3DMark 06
min: 3900     avg: 3903     median: 3903 (6%)     max: 3906 Points
3DMark 06 - Score Unknown Settings + NVIDIA Quadro FX 3800M
13232 Points (20%)
3DMark 06 - Standard 1280x1024 + NVIDIA Quadro FX 1500M
3DMark 06
4074 Points (6%)
3DMark 06 - Standard 1280x1024 + NVIDIA Quadro FX 3800M
min: 12050     avg: 12765     median: 12923 (20%)     max: 13323 Points
3DMark 06 - Standard 1280x1024 + NVIDIA Quadro FX 770M
min: 5230     avg: 5297     median: 5296.5 (8%)     max: 5363 Points
SPEC Viewperf 10.0 - SPEC Viewperf 10.0 - 3dsmax
32.8 Points (68%)
33.1 Points (69%)
SPEC Viewperf 10.0 - SPEC Viewperf 10.0 - Catia
45.8 Points (96%)
40.1 Points (84%)
SPEC Viewperf 10.0 - SPEC Viewperf 10.0 - EnSight
min: 47.37     avg: 47.4     median: 47.4 (100%)     max: 47.369998931884766 Points
31.7 Points (67%)
SPEC Viewperf 10.0 - SPEC Viewperf 10.0 - Maya
59.7 Points (32%)
85.1 Points (46%)
SPEC Viewperf 10.0 - SPEC Viewperf 10.0 - Pro/Engeneer
min: 51.1     avg: 51.1     median: 51.1 (100%)     max: 51.099998474121094 Points
36.1 Points (71%)
SPEC Viewperf 10.0 - SPEC Viewperf 10.0 - SolidWorks
59.7 Points (88%)
55 Points (81%)
SPEC Viewperf 10.0 - SPEC Viewperf 10.0 - UGS Teamcenter
38.5 Points (100%)
19 Points (49%)
SPEC Viewperf 10.0 - SPEC Viewperf 10.0 - UGS NX
35.3 Points (72%)
17.5 Points (36%)
SPECviewperf 11
specvp11 snx-01 + NVIDIA Quadro FX 3800M
SPECviewperf 11 - specvp11 snx-01
18.8 fps (13%)
specvp11 tcvis-02 + NVIDIA Quadro FX 3800M
SPECviewperf 11 - specvp11 tcvis-02
18.7 fps (31%)
specvp11 sw-02 + NVIDIA Quadro FX 3800M
SPECviewperf 11 - specvp11 sw-02
30.6 fps (37%)
specvp11 proe-05 + NVIDIA Quadro FX 3800M
SPECviewperf 11 - specvp11 proe-05
6.9 fps (29%)
specvp11 maya-03 + NVIDIA Quadro FX 3800M
SPECviewperf 11 - specvp11 maya-03
16.6 fps (12%)
specvp11 lightwave-01 + NVIDIA Quadro FX 3800M
SPECviewperf 11 - specvp11 lightwave-01
38.4 fps (41%)
specvp11 ensight-04 + NVIDIA Quadro FX 3800M
SPECviewperf 11 - specvp11 ensight-04
16.2 fps (8%)
specvp11 catia-03 + NVIDIA Quadro FX 3800M
SPECviewperf 11 - specvp11 catia-03
23.4 fps (28%)
Windows 7 Experience Index - Win7 Gaming graphics
6.9 Points (87%)
Windows 7 Experience Index - Win7 Graphics
6.9 Points (87%)
Cinebench R10 Cinebench R10 Shading (32bit) + NVIDIA Quadro FX 3800M
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Shading (32bit)
min: 4429     avg: 4928     median: 4928 (21%)     max: 5427 Points
Cinebench R10 Shading (32bit) + NVIDIA Quadro FX 770M
6180 Points (26%)
Cinebench R11.5 Cinebench R11.5 OpenGL 64 Bit + NVIDIA Quadro FX 3800M
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 OpenGL 64 Bit
min: 32.07     avg: 32.7     median: 32.7 (12%)     max: 33.29 fps

Average Benchmarks NVIDIA Quadro FX 1500M → 100% n=4

Average Benchmarks NVIDIA Quadro FX 3800M → 245% n=4

Average Benchmarks NVIDIA Quadro FX 770M → 137% n=4

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Game Benchmarks

The following benchmarks stem from our benchmarks of review laptops. The performance depends on the used graphics memory, clock rate, processor, system settings, drivers, and operating systems. So the results don't have to be representative for all laptops with this GPU. For detailed information on the benchmark results, click on the fps number.

Fifa 11

Fifa 11

2010
med. 1024x768
Quadro FX 3800M:
230.6  fps
high 1360x768
Quadro FX 3800M:
124.2  fps
Risen

Risen

2009
med. 1024x768
Quadro FX 3800M:
64.9  fps
ultra 1920x1080
Quadro FX 3800M:
31.8  fps
Need for Speed Shift

Need for Speed Shift

2009
med. 1024x768
Quadro FX 3800M:
78.5  fps
ultra 1920x1080
Quadro FX 3800M:
40.9  fps
Colin McRae: DIRT 2

Colin McRae: DIRT 2

2009
low 800x600
Quadro FX 3800M:
97  fps
med. 1024x768
Quadro FX 3800M:
82  fps
ultra 1920x1080
Quadro FX 3800M:
29.9  fps
Anno 1404

Anno 1404

2009
low 1024x768
Quadro FX 3800M:
142.8  fps
ultra 1280x1024
Quadro FX 3800M:
61.9  fps
Crysis - GPU Benchmark

Crysis - GPU Benchmark

2007
low 1024x768
Quadro FX 770M:
94.2  fps
med. 1024x768
Quadro FX 770M:
39  fps
high 1024x768
Quadro FX 770M:
19.5  fps
Crysis - CPU Benchmark

Crysis - CPU Benchmark

2007
low 1024x768
Quadro FX 770M:
84.7  fps
med. 1024x768
Quadro FX 770M:
35.4  fps
high 1024x768
Quadro FX 770M:
18.1  fps
F.E.A.R.

F.E.A.R.

2005
low 640x480
100%
Quadro FX 1500M:
259  fps
med. 800x600
100%
Quadro FX 1500M:
143  fps
high 1024x768
100%
Quadro FX 1500M:
63  fps
Doom 3

Doom 3

2004
low 640x480
100%
Quadro FX 1500M:
114.5  fps
144%
Quadro FX 770M:
165.2  fps
med. 640x480
100%
Quadro FX 1500M:
113.6  fps
151%
Quadro FX 770M:
171.3  fps
high 800x600
100%
Quadro FX 1500M:
113.9  fps
139%
Quadro FX 770M:
158.7  fps
ultra 1024x768
100%
Quadro FX 1500M:
109.3  fps
115%
Quadro FX 770M:
126.1  fps
Quake 3 Arena - Timedemo

Quake 3 Arena - Timedemo

1999
high 1024x768
100%
Quadro FX 1500M:
380.7  fps

Average Gaming NVIDIA Quadro FX 1500M → 100%

Average Gaming 30-70 fps → 100%

Average Gaming NVIDIA Quadro FX 770M → 137%

For more games that might be playable and a list of all games and graphics cards visit our Gaming List

v1.17
log 30. 01:18:58

#0 checking url part for id 7 +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 1541 +0s ... 0s

#2 checking url part for id 884 +0s ... 0s

#3 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#4 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Wed, 29 Jun 2022 17:25:55 +0200 +0s ... 0s

#5 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.054s ... 0.054s

#6 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.054s

#7 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.054s

#8 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.054s

#9 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.054s

#10 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.054s

#11 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.054s

#12 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.054s

#13 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.054s

#14 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.054s

#15 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.054s

#16 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.054s

#17 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.054s

#18 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.054s

#19 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.054s

#20 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.054s

#21 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.002s ... 0.056s

#22 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.056s

#23 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.056s

#24 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.056s

#25 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.056s

#26 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.056s

#27 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.056s

#28 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.056s

#29 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.056s

#30 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.056s

#31 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.056s

#32 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.056s

#33 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.056s

#34 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.056s

#35 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.056s

#36 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.056s

#37 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.056s

#38 composed specs +0s ... 0.056s

#39 did output specs +0s ... 0.056s

#40 start showIntegratedCPUs +0s ... 0.056s

#41 getting avg benchmarks for device 7 +0.047s ... 0.103s

#42 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.103s

#43 got single benchmarks 7 +0.006s ... 0.11s

#44 getting avg benchmarks for device 1541 +0s ... 0.11s

#45 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s ... 0.111s

#46 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.003s ... 0.114s

#47 got single benchmarks 1541 +0.004s ... 0.118s

#48 getting avg benchmarks for device 884 +0s ... 0.118s

#49 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s ... 0.119s

#50 got single benchmarks 884 +0.005s ... 0.124s

#51 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.124s

#52 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.124s

#53 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.124s

#54 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.124s

#55 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.125s

#56 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.125s

#57 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.125s

#58 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.001s ... 0.125s

#59 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.125s

#60 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.001s ... 0.126s

#61 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.126s

#62 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.126s

#63 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.126s

#64 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.126s

#65 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.126s

#66 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.127s

#67 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.127s

#68 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.127s

#69 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.127s

#70 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.127s

#71 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.127s

#72 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.127s

#73 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.127s

#74 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.127s

#75 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.128s

#76 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.001s ... 0.128s

#77 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.128s

#78 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.128s

#79 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.129s

#80 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.129s

#81 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.001s ... 0.129s

#82 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.129s

#83 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.13s

#84 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.13s

#85 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.13s

#86 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.131s

#87 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.131s

#88 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.131s

#89 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.132s

#90 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.132s

#91 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.132s

#92 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.132s

#93 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.133s

#94 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.133s

#95 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.133s

#96 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.134s

#97 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.134s

#98 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.134s

#99 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.134s

#100 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.135s

#101 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.135s

#102 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.135s

#103 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.136s

#104 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.136s

#105 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.136s

#106 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.136s

#107 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.137s

#108 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.137s

#109 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.137s

#110 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.137s

#111 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.137s

#112 min, max, avg, median took s +0s ... 0.138s

#113 before gaming benchmark output +0s ... 0.138s

#114 Got 29 rows for game benchmarks. +0.004s ... 0.142s

#115 composed SQL query for gamebenchmarks +0s ... 0.142s

#116 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.142s

#117 got data and put it in $dataArray +0.001s ... 0.142s

#118 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.001s ... 0.143s

#119 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.143s

#120 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.001s ... 0.144s

#121 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.144s

#122 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.001s ... 0.144s

#123 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.144s

#124 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.001s ... 0.145s

#125 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.145s

#126 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.145s

#127 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.001s ... 0.146s

#128 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.146s

#129 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s ... 0.146s

#130 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.146s

#131 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.146s

#132 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s ... 0.147s

#133 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.147s

#134 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.147s

#135 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s ... 0.148s

#136 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.148s

#137 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.148s

#138 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s ... 0.148s

#139 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.148s

#140 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.148s

#141 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.148s

#142 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.148s

#143 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.148s

#144 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.148s

#145 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.148s

#146 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s ... 0.149s

#147 benchmarks composed for output. +0s ... 0.149s

#148 calculated avg scores. +0s ... 0.149s

#149 return log +0s ... 0.149s

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Notebook / Laptop Reviews and News > Benchmarks / Tech > Graphics Card Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2017-09-11)