NVIDIA Quadro FX 1500M vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 3700M vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 1700M

NVIDIA Quadro FX 1500M

► remove NVIDIA Quadro FX 1500M

NVIDIA Quadro FX 1500M is the version of 7900 GS video card for notebooks, which is optimized for CAD and professional 3D-applications. Technically, it has the same or similar chip (G71 architecture), but with other Bios and support for professional drivers.

The gaming performance is clearly worse than the 7900 GS (because of the application optimizing). Nonetheless, the most modded drivers can be used, so the Quadro FX 1500M is more a 7900 GS (for the operating system).

NVIDIA Quadro FX 3700M

► remove

The Nvidia GeForce FX 3700M is a professional high-end workstation graphics card for laptops. It is manufactured in 65nm and is based on the G92 core with all 128 shaders enabled. The GPU is most comparable to the consumer GeForce GTX 280M with the largest difference being the manufacturing process (65nm of the 3700M vs 55nm of the 280M). The immediate successor to the 3700M is the Quadro FX 3800M, which is based on the GeForce GTX 285M but with higher clock rates and relatively similar power consumption demands.

NVIDIA Quadro FX 1700M

► remove NVIDIA Quadro FX 1700M

The Nvidia Quadro FX 1700M is a professional graphics adapter for CAD and 3D applications. It is based on the G96 core (GeForce 9650M e.g.) but with different drivers, that are optimized for OpenGL and professional applications. The drivers are zertified to work flawlessly with different applications.

Compared to the Quadro FX 1600M, the FX 1700M GPU supports Powermizer 8.0.

NVIDIA Quadro FX 1500MNVIDIA Quadro FX 3700MNVIDIA Quadro FX 1700M
ManufacturerNVIDIANVIDIANVIDIA
Quadro FX Series
Quadro FX 3800M 128 @ 675 MHz256 Bit @ 1000 MHz
Quadro FX 3700M 128 @ 550 MHz256 Bit @ 800 MHz
Quadro FX 2800M 96 @ 600 MHz256 Bit @ 1000 MHz
Quadro FX 3600M 96 @ 500 MHz256 Bit @ 800 MHz
Quadro FX 1800M 72 @ 560 MHz128 Bit @ 1100 MHz
Quadro FX 2700M 48 @ 530 MHz256 Bit @ 800 MHz
Quadro FX 880M 48 @ 550 MHz128 Bit @ 790 MHz
Quadro FX 3500M 24/8 cores @ 575 MHz256 Bit @ 700 MHz
Quadro FX 2500M 24/8 cores @ 500 MHz256 Bit @ 600 MHz
Quadro FX 1700M 32 @ 625 MHz128 Bit @ 800 MHz
Quadro FX 1600M 32 @ 625 MHz128 Bit @ 800 MHz
Quadro FX 1500M 20/7 cores @ 375 MHz256 Bit @ 500 MHz
Quadro FX 770M 32 @ 500 MHz128 Bit @ 800 MHz
Quadro FX 570M 32 @ 475 MHz128 Bit @ 700 MHz
Quadro FX 380M 16 @ 625 MHz64 Bit @ 800 MHz
Quadro FX 370M 8 @ 580 MHz64 Bit @ 700 MHz
Quadro FX 360M 16 @ 400 MHz64 Bit @ 600 MHz
Quadro FX 350M 4/3 cores @ 450 MHz64 Bit @ 350 MHz
Quadro FX 3800M 128 @ 675 MHz256 Bit @ 1000 MHz
Quadro FX 3700M 128 @ 550 MHz256 Bit @ 800 MHz
Quadro FX 2800M 96 @ 600 MHz256 Bit @ 1000 MHz
Quadro FX 3600M 96 @ 500 MHz256 Bit @ 800 MHz
Quadro FX 1800M 72 @ 560 MHz128 Bit @ 1100 MHz
Quadro FX 2700M 48 @ 530 MHz256 Bit @ 800 MHz
Quadro FX 880M 48 @ 550 MHz128 Bit @ 790 MHz
Quadro FX 3500M 24/8 cores @ 575 MHz256 Bit @ 700 MHz
Quadro FX 2500M 24/8 cores @ 500 MHz256 Bit @ 600 MHz
Quadro FX 1700M 32 @ 625 MHz128 Bit @ 800 MHz
Quadro FX 1600M 32 @ 625 MHz128 Bit @ 800 MHz
Quadro FX 1500M 20/7 cores @ 375 MHz256 Bit @ 500 MHz
Quadro FX 770M 32 @ 500 MHz128 Bit @ 800 MHz
Quadro FX 570M 32 @ 475 MHz128 Bit @ 700 MHz
Quadro FX 380M 16 @ 625 MHz64 Bit @ 800 MHz
Quadro FX 370M 8 @ 580 MHz64 Bit @ 700 MHz
Quadro FX 360M 16 @ 400 MHz64 Bit @ 600 MHz
Quadro FX 350M 4/3 cores @ 450 MHz64 Bit @ 350 MHz
Quadro FX 3800M 128 @ 675 MHz256 Bit @ 1000 MHz
Quadro FX 3700M 128 @ 550 MHz256 Bit @ 800 MHz
Quadro FX 2800M 96 @ 600 MHz256 Bit @ 1000 MHz
Quadro FX 3600M 96 @ 500 MHz256 Bit @ 800 MHz
Quadro FX 1800M 72 @ 560 MHz128 Bit @ 1100 MHz
Quadro FX 2700M 48 @ 530 MHz256 Bit @ 800 MHz
Quadro FX 880M 48 @ 550 MHz128 Bit @ 790 MHz
Quadro FX 3500M 24/8 cores @ 575 MHz256 Bit @ 700 MHz
Quadro FX 2500M 24/8 cores @ 500 MHz256 Bit @ 600 MHz
Quadro FX 1700M 32 @ 625 MHz128 Bit @ 800 MHz
Quadro FX 1600M 32 @ 625 MHz128 Bit @ 800 MHz
Quadro FX 1500M 20/7 cores @ 375 MHz256 Bit @ 500 MHz
Quadro FX 770M 32 @ 500 MHz128 Bit @ 800 MHz
Quadro FX 570M 32 @ 475 MHz128 Bit @ 700 MHz
Quadro FX 380M 16 @ 625 MHz64 Bit @ 800 MHz
Quadro FX 370M 8 @ 580 MHz64 Bit @ 700 MHz
Quadro FX 360M 16 @ 400 MHz64 Bit @ 600 MHz
Quadro FX 350M 4/3 cores @ 450 MHz64 Bit @ 350 MHz
CodenameG71GLMNB9E-GLM3NB9P-GLM
ArchitectureG7xG9xG9x
20 / 7 128 - 32 -
Core375 MHz550 MHz625 MHz
Memory500 MHz800 MHz800 MHz
Bus256 Bit256 Bit128 Bit
MemoryGDDR3GDDR3GDDR3
Max. Memory512 MB1024 MB256 MB
nonono
DirectXDirectX 9c, 3.0DirectX 10, 4.0DirectX 10, 4.0
Transistors278 Million754 Million289 Million
Technology90 nm65 nm65 nm
Features90nmOpenGL 2.1, CUDA, PowerMizer 8.0OpenGL 2.1, PureVideo HD, Powermizer 8.0, possible interfaces: LVDS, DVI, VGA, HDTV, HDCP, HDMI
Size
Introduced18.04.2006 14.08.2008 01.10.2008
PCI-E, 90nmCG shading language, 32 Bit floating point precision, 12 Bit subpixel precision, 128 Bit precision of the graphics pipeline, FSAA with rotated raster, nView Mutlidisplay Support, High-Precision-Dynamic-Range (HPDR), Hardware 3D Clipping on window recognision, full screen AA
Manufacturerhttp://www.nvidia.de/page/quadrofx_go.htmlhttp://www.nvidia.com/object/product_qua...http://www.nvidia.com/object/product_qua...
Shader1375 MHz1250 MHz

3DMark Vantage
P Result 1280x1024 + NVIDIA Quadro FX 3700M
P GPU no PhysX 1280x1024 + NVIDIA Quadro FX 3700M
3DMark 2001SE - Standard 1024x768
26279 Points (27%)
35734 Points (37%)
3DMark 03 - Standard 1024x768
min: 14650     avg: 15283     median: 15283 (8%)     max: 15916 Points
18212 Points (10%)
3DMark 05 - Standard 1024x768
min: 6386     avg: 6666     median: 6400 (12%)     max: 7212 Points
15759 Points (30%)
11550 Points (22%)
3DMark 06 + NVIDIA Quadro FX 1500M
Standard 1280x1024 + NVIDIA Quadro FX 3700M
1280x800 + NVIDIA Quadro FX 1700M
SPEC Viewperf 10.0 - 3ds Max 1280x1024
25.5 fps (53%)
SPEC Viewperf 10.0 - Catia 1280x1024
32 fps (68%)
SPEC Viewperf 10.0 - EnSight 1280x1024
34.6 fps (74%)
SPEC Viewperf 10.0 - Maya 1280x1024
59.6 fps (32%)
SPEC Viewperf 10.0 - Pro/Engeneer 1280x1024
29.8 fps (58%)
SPEC Viewperf 10.0 - SolidWorks 1280x1024
54.6 fps (81%)
SPEC Viewperf 10.0 - UGS Teamcenter 1280x1024
22 fps (58%)
SPEC Viewperf 10.0 - UGS NX 1280x1024
26.4 fps (55%)
Cinebench R10 Shading 32Bit + NVIDIA Quadro FX 3700M
Shading 32Bit + NVIDIA Quadro FX 1700M
Cinebench R11.5 OpenGL 64Bit + NVIDIA Quadro FX 3700M

Average Benchmarks NVIDIA Quadro FX 1500M → 100%

Average Benchmarks NVIDIA Quadro FX 3700M → 123%

Average Benchmarks NVIDIA Quadro FX 1700M → 147%

-
-
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

GTA IV - Grand Theft Auto

GTA IV - Grand Theft Auto

2008
low 800x600
Quadro FX 3700M:
55.6  fps
med. 1024x768
Quadro FX 3700M:
39.9  fps
high 1280x1024
Quadro FX 3700M:
19.1  fps
Quadro FX 3700M:
»
Supreme Commander - FA Bench

Supreme Commander - FA Bench

2007
med. 1024x768
Quadro FX 3700M:
39.2  fps
high 1024x768
Quadro FX 3700M:
45.2  fps
Quadro FX 3700M:
»
Crysis - GPU Benchmark

Crysis - GPU Benchmark

2007
med. 1024x768
Quadro FX 1700M:
33.3  fps
high 1024x768
Quadro FX 1700M:
19.1  fps
Quadro FX 1700M:
»
Crysis - CPU Benchmark

Crysis - CPU Benchmark

2007
med. 1024x768
Quadro FX 1700M:
29.3  fps
high 1024x768
Quadro FX 1700M:
17.1  fps
Quadro FX 1700M:
»
F.E.A.R.

F.E.A.R.

2005
low 640x480
100%
Quadro FX 1500M:
259  fps
146%
Quadro FX 1700M:
378  fps
med. 800x600
100%
Quadro FX 1500M:
143  fps
106%
Quadro FX 1700M:
152  fps
high 1024x768
100%
Quadro FX 1500M:
63  fps
94%
Quadro FX 1700M:
59  fps
Quadro FX 1500M:
»
Quadro FX 1700M:
»
Doom 3

Doom 3

2004
low 640x480
100%
Quadro FX 1500M:
114.5  fps
med. 640x480
100%
Quadro FX 1500M:
113.6  fps
high 800x600
100%
Quadro FX 1500M:
113.9  fps
ultra 1024x768
100%
Quadro FX 1500M:
109.3  fps
Quadro FX 1500M:
»
Quake 3 Arena - Timedemo

Quake 3 Arena - Timedemo

1999
high 1024x768
100%
Quadro FX 1500M:
380.7  fps
160%
Quadro FX 1700M:
609.6  fps
Quadro FX 1500M:
»
Quadro FX 1700M:
»

Average Gaming NVIDIA Quadro FX 1500M → 100%

Average Gaming NVIDIA Quadro FX 1700M → 127%

v1.8.1a
Please share our article, every link counts!
> Notebook / Laptop Reviews and News > Benchmarks / Tech > Graphics Card Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2017-09-11)