Notebookcheck Logo

NVIDIA Quadro FX 1500M vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 2700M vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 360M

NVIDIA Quadro FX 1500M

► remove from comparison NVIDIA Quadro FX 1500M

NVIDIA Quadro FX 1500M is the version of 7900 GS video card for notebooks, which is optimized for CAD and professional 3D-applications. Technically, it has the same or similar chip (G71 architecture), but with other Bios and support for professional drivers.

The gaming performance is clearly worse than the 7900 GS (because of the application optimizing). Nonetheless, the most modded drivers can be used, so the Quadro FX 1500M is more a 7900 GS (for the operating system).

NVIDIA Quadro FX 2700M

► remove from comparison NVIDIA Quadro FX 2700M

The Nvidia Quadro FX 2700M is a professional graphics card for laptops. It features certified drivers that are optimized for CAD (e.g., AutoCad, Inventor, Solidstation, Solid Edge, ..), DCC (e.g., Maya, 3DS Max, Lightwave 3D, ...), and visualization applications. The FX 2700M is based on the G94 core and therefore similar to the GeForce 9700M GTS.

The Quadro FX series of cards are optimized for professional applications like CAD or DCC. Especially the OpenGL performance should be noticeable better than with consumer GeForce cards. The certified drivers, that come with the Quadro cards guarantee a frictionless work with applications like AutoCad, Inventor, Solidstation, Maya, 3DS Max, Lightwave 3d and others. Furthermore they offer 12-Bit precision for subpixels, fullscreen anti-aliasing, hardware accelerated antialiasing for points and lines and other CAD and DCC optimizations.

 

NVIDIA Quadro FX 360M

► remove from comparison

For CAD and professional applications certified GPU based on the 8400M GS. The higher power consumption of 17 Watt versus 11 Watt of the 8400M GS indicates a higher performance.

NVIDIA Quadro FX 1500MNVIDIA Quadro FX 2700MNVIDIA Quadro FX 360M
Quadro FX Series
Quadro FX 3800M 128 @ 0.68 GHz256 Bit @ 1000 MHz
Quadro FX 3700M 128 @ 0.55 GHz256 Bit @ 800 MHz
Quadro FX 2800M 96 @ 0.6 GHz256 Bit @ 1000 MHz
Quadro FX 3600M 96 @ 0.5 GHz256 Bit @ 800 MHz
Quadro FX 1800M 72 @ 0.56 GHz128 Bit @ 1100 MHz
Quadro FX 2700M 48 @ 0.53 GHz256 Bit @ 800 MHz
Quadro FX 880M 48 @ 0.55 GHz128 Bit @ 790 MHz
Quadro FX 3500M 24/8 cores @ 0.58 GHz256 Bit @ 700 MHz
Quadro FX 2500M 24/8 cores @ 0.5 GHz256 Bit @ 600 MHz
Quadro FX 1700M 32 @ 0.63 GHz128 Bit @ 800 MHz
Quadro FX 1600M 32 @ 0.63 GHz128 Bit @ 800 MHz
Quadro FX 1500M 20/7 cores @ 0.38 GHz256 Bit @ 500 MHz
Quadro FX 770M 32 @ 0.5 GHz128 Bit @ 800 MHz
Quadro FX 570M 32 @ 0.48 GHz128 Bit @ 700 MHz
Quadro FX 380M 16 @ 0.63 GHz64 Bit @ 800 MHz
Quadro FX 370M 8 @ 0.58 GHz64 Bit @ 700 MHz
Quadro FX 360M 16 @ 0.4 GHz64 Bit @ 600 MHz
Quadro FX 350M 4/3 cores @ 0.45 GHz64 Bit @ 350 MHz
Quadro FX 3800M 128 @ 0.68 GHz256 Bit @ 1000 MHz
Quadro FX 3700M 128 @ 0.55 GHz256 Bit @ 800 MHz
Quadro FX 2800M 96 @ 0.6 GHz256 Bit @ 1000 MHz
Quadro FX 3600M 96 @ 0.5 GHz256 Bit @ 800 MHz
Quadro FX 1800M 72 @ 0.56 GHz128 Bit @ 1100 MHz
Quadro FX 2700M 48 @ 0.53 GHz256 Bit @ 800 MHz
Quadro FX 880M 48 @ 0.55 GHz128 Bit @ 790 MHz
Quadro FX 3500M 24/8 cores @ 0.58 GHz256 Bit @ 700 MHz
Quadro FX 2500M 24/8 cores @ 0.5 GHz256 Bit @ 600 MHz
Quadro FX 1700M 32 @ 0.63 GHz128 Bit @ 800 MHz
Quadro FX 1600M 32 @ 0.63 GHz128 Bit @ 800 MHz
Quadro FX 1500M 20/7 cores @ 0.38 GHz256 Bit @ 500 MHz
Quadro FX 770M 32 @ 0.5 GHz128 Bit @ 800 MHz
Quadro FX 570M 32 @ 0.48 GHz128 Bit @ 700 MHz
Quadro FX 380M 16 @ 0.63 GHz64 Bit @ 800 MHz
Quadro FX 370M 8 @ 0.58 GHz64 Bit @ 700 MHz
Quadro FX 360M 16 @ 0.4 GHz64 Bit @ 600 MHz
Quadro FX 350M 4/3 cores @ 0.45 GHz64 Bit @ 350 MHz
Quadro FX 3800M 128 @ 0.68 GHz256 Bit @ 1000 MHz
Quadro FX 3700M 128 @ 0.55 GHz256 Bit @ 800 MHz
Quadro FX 2800M 96 @ 0.6 GHz256 Bit @ 1000 MHz
Quadro FX 3600M 96 @ 0.5 GHz256 Bit @ 800 MHz
Quadro FX 1800M 72 @ 0.56 GHz128 Bit @ 1100 MHz
Quadro FX 2700M 48 @ 0.53 GHz256 Bit @ 800 MHz
Quadro FX 880M 48 @ 0.55 GHz128 Bit @ 790 MHz
Quadro FX 3500M 24/8 cores @ 0.58 GHz256 Bit @ 700 MHz
Quadro FX 2500M 24/8 cores @ 0.5 GHz256 Bit @ 600 MHz
Quadro FX 1700M 32 @ 0.63 GHz128 Bit @ 800 MHz
Quadro FX 1600M 32 @ 0.63 GHz128 Bit @ 800 MHz
Quadro FX 1500M 20/7 cores @ 0.38 GHz256 Bit @ 500 MHz
Quadro FX 770M 32 @ 0.5 GHz128 Bit @ 800 MHz
Quadro FX 570M 32 @ 0.48 GHz128 Bit @ 700 MHz
Quadro FX 380M 16 @ 0.63 GHz64 Bit @ 800 MHz
Quadro FX 370M 8 @ 0.58 GHz64 Bit @ 700 MHz
Quadro FX 360M 16 @ 0.4 GHz64 Bit @ 600 MHz
Quadro FX 350M 4/3 cores @ 0.45 GHz64 Bit @ 350 MHz
CodenameG71GLMNB9E-GLM2NB8M-GLM
ArchitectureG7xG9x
Pipelines20 / 7 Pixel- / Vertexshader48 - unified16 - unified
Core Speed375 MHz530 MHz400 MHz
Memory Speed500 MHz800 MHz600 MHz
Memory Bus Width256 Bit256 Bit64 Bit
Memory TypeGDDR3GDDR3GDDR3
Max. Amount of Memory512 MB1024 MB256 MB
Shared Memorynonono
APIDirectX 9c, Shader 3.0DirectX 10, Shader 4.0DirectX 10, Shader 4.0
Power Consumption20 Watt65 Watt17 Watt
Transistors278 Million504 Million210 Million
technology90 nm65 nm80 nm
Features90nmOpenGL 2.1, PowerMizer 8.0, PureVideo HDPowerMizer 7.0, HDR, designed for Vista, 128 Bit HDR, OpenGl 2.1
Notebook Sizelargelarge
Date of Announcement18.04.2006 14.08.2008 09.05.2007
InformationPCI-E, 90nm
Link to Manufacturer Pagehttp://www.nvidia.de/page/quadrofx_go.htmlhttp://www.nvidia.com/object/product_qua...http://www.nvidia.de/page/geforce_8400M....
Shader Speed1325 MHz800 MHz

Benchmarks

3DMark Vantage
3DM Vant. Perf. total + NVIDIA Quadro FX 2700M
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. total
2799 Points (2%)
3DM Vant. Perf. GPU no PhysX + NVIDIA Quadro FX 2700M
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. GPU no PhysX
2392 Points (2%)
3DMark 2001SE - 3DMark 2001 - Standard
26279 Points (27%)
36280 Points (38%)
min: 13650     avg: 15054     median: 15053.5 (16%)     max: 16457 Points
3DMark 03 - 3DMark 03 - Standard
min: 14650     avg: 15283     median: 15283 (8%)     max: 15916 Points
min: 23330     avg: 23842     median: 23841.5 (12%)     max: 24353 Points
min: 5580     avg: 6010     median: 6010 (3%)     max: 6440 Points
3DMark 05 - 3DMark 05 - Standard
min: 6386     avg: 6666     median: 6400 (9%)     max: 7212 Points
min: 13450     avg: 14224     median: 14224 (20%)     max: 14998 Points
min: 3365     avg: 3372     median: 3372 (5%)     max: 3379 Points
3DMark 06 3DMark 06 - Score Unknown Settings + NVIDIA Quadro FX 1500M
3DMark 06
min: 3900     avg: 3903     median: 3903 (6%)     max: 3906 Points
3DMark 06 - Score Unknown Settings + NVIDIA Quadro FX 2700M
7580 Points (11%)
3DMark 06 - Standard 1280x1024 + NVIDIA Quadro FX 1500M
3DMark 06
4074 Points (6%)
3DMark 06 - Standard 1280x1024 + NVIDIA Quadro FX 2700M
7660 Points (12%)
3DMark 06 - Standard 1280x1024 + NVIDIA Quadro FX 360M
1490 Points (2%)
3DMark 06 - Standard 1280x800 + NVIDIA Quadro FX 360M
3DMark 06
1572 Points (2%)
Cinebench R10 Cinebench R10 Shading (32bit) + NVIDIA Quadro FX 2700M
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Shading (32bit)
4394 Points (19%)
Cinebench R10 Shading (32bit) + NVIDIA Quadro FX 360M
2985 Points (13%)

Average Benchmarks NVIDIA Quadro FX 1500M → 100% n=4

Average Benchmarks NVIDIA Quadro FX 2700M → 176% n=4

Average Benchmarks NVIDIA Quadro FX 360M → 46% n=4

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Game Benchmarks

The following benchmarks stem from our benchmarks of review laptops. The performance depends on the used graphics memory, clock rate, processor, system settings, drivers, and operating systems. So the results don't have to be representative for all laptops with this GPU. For detailed information on the benchmark results, click on the fps number.

Crysis - GPU Benchmark

Crysis - GPU Benchmark

2007
med. 1024x768
Quadro FX 360M:
10.1  fps
Crysis - CPU Benchmark

Crysis - CPU Benchmark

2007
med. 1024x768
Quadro FX 360M:
7.4  fps
F.E.A.R.

F.E.A.R.

2005
low 640x480
100%
Quadro FX 1500M:
259  fps
127%
Quadro FX 360M:
328  fps
med. 800x600
100%
Quadro FX 1500M:
143  fps
43%
Quadro FX 360M:
62  fps
high 1024x768
100%
Quadro FX 1500M:
63  fps
27%
Quadro FX 360M:
17  fps
Doom 3

Doom 3

2004
low 640x480
100%
Quadro FX 1500M:
114.5  fps
med. 640x480
100%
Quadro FX 1500M:
113.6  fps
high 800x600
100%
Quadro FX 1500M:
113.9  fps
ultra 1024x768
100%
Quadro FX 1500M:
109.3  fps
Quake 3 Arena - Timedemo

Quake 3 Arena - Timedemo

1999
high 1024x768
100%
Quadro FX 1500M:
380.7  fps
64%
Quadro FX 360M:
242.7  fps

Average Gaming NVIDIA Quadro FX 1500M → 100%

Average Gaming 30-70 fps → 100%

Average Gaming NVIDIA Quadro FX 360M → 65%

Average Gaming 30-70 fps → 43%

For more games that might be playable and a list of all games and graphics cards visit our Gaming List

v1.17
log 26. 20:00:54

#0 checking url part for id 7 +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 883 +0s ... 0s

#2 checking url part for id 513 +0s ... 0s

#3 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#4 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Fri, 24 Jun 2022 17:25:51 +0200 +0s ... 0s

#5 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.056s ... 0.056s

#6 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.056s

#7 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.056s

#8 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.056s

#9 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.056s

#10 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.056s

#11 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.056s

#12 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.056s

#13 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.056s

#14 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.056s

#15 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.056s

#16 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.056s

#17 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.056s

#18 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.056s

#19 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.056s

#20 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.056s

#21 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.057s

#22 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.057s

#23 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.057s

#24 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.057s

#25 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.057s

#26 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.057s

#27 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.057s

#28 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.057s

#29 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.057s

#30 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.057s

#31 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.057s

#32 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.057s

#33 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.057s

#34 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.057s

#35 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.057s

#36 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.057s

#37 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.057s

#38 composed specs +0s ... 0.057s

#39 did output specs +0s ... 0.057s

#40 start showIntegratedCPUs +0s ... 0.057s

#41 getting avg benchmarks for device 7 +0.044s ... 0.101s

#42 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.101s

#43 got single benchmarks 7 +0.007s ... 0.108s

#44 getting avg benchmarks for device 883 +0s ... 0.108s

#45 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s ... 0.109s

#46 got single benchmarks 883 +0.005s ... 0.114s

#47 getting avg benchmarks for device 513 +0s ... 0.114s

#48 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s ... 0.115s

#49 got single benchmarks 513 +0.005s ... 0.12s

#50 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.12s

#51 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.12s

#52 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.12s

#53 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.001s ... 0.121s

#54 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.121s

#55 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.121s

#56 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.122s

#57 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.122s

#58 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.122s

#59 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.122s

#60 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.122s

#61 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.122s

#62 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.123s

#63 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.123s

#64 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.123s

#65 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.123s

#66 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.123s

#67 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.123s

#68 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.123s

#69 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.123s

#70 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.124s

#71 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.124s

#72 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.124s

#73 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.124s

#74 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.125s

#75 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.125s

#76 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.125s

#77 min, max, avg, median took s +0s ... 0.126s

#78 before gaming benchmark output +0s ... 0.126s

#79 Got 14 rows for game benchmarks. +0.003s ... 0.128s

#80 composed SQL query for gamebenchmarks +0s ... 0.128s

#81 got data and put it in $dataArray +0.001s ... 0.129s

#82 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.001s ... 0.13s

#83 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.001s ... 0.13s

#84 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s ... 0.131s

#85 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.131s

#86 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.131s

#87 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.132s

#88 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.132s

#89 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.132s

#90 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s ... 0.132s

#91 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.132s

#92 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.132s

#93 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.132s

#94 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s ... 0.133s

#95 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.133s

#96 benchmarks composed for output. +0s ... 0.133s

#97 calculated avg scores. +0s ... 0.133s

#98 return log +0.001s ... 0.134s

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Notebook / Laptop Reviews and News > Benchmarks / Tech > Graphics Card Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2017-09-11)