Notebookcheck Logo

NVIDIA Quadro FX 1500M vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 1800M vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 1600M

NVIDIA Quadro FX 1500M

► remove from comparison NVIDIA Quadro FX 1500M

NVIDIA Quadro FX 1500M is the version of 7900 GS video card for notebooks, which is optimized for CAD and professional 3D-applications. Technically, it has the same or similar chip (G71 architecture), but with other Bios and support for professional drivers.

The gaming performance is clearly worse than the 7900 GS (because of the application optimizing). Nonetheless, the most modded drivers can be used, so the Quadro FX 1500M is more a 7900 GS (for the operating system).

NVIDIA Quadro FX 1800M

► remove from comparison NVIDIA Quadro FX 1800M

The NVIDIA Quadro FX 1800M is a upper mid-range professional graphics card for mobile workstations with about 15" displays. It is based on the same chip as the GeForce GT 335M but can be also equipped with fast GDDR5 graphics memory. The FX1800M is shipped with professional drivers and a special BIOS that improves the performance and stability in applications like CAD and DCC.

The certified drivers guarantee flawless and fast working with professional applications like Premiere, Photoshop, After Effect, AutoCAD, 3ds Max, trueSpace, Blender, Catia, IronCAD, Cinema 4D, Lightwave 3D, Softimage, Mathematica ... A list of all certified applications can be found on the Nvidia.com homepage. Compared to GeForce products, the Quadro FX cards offer a significantly better performance, especially for OpenGL based apps.

The gaming performance should be similar to the GeForce GT 335M, altough gamers should choose a GeForce graphics card because of the optimized driver support (that leads to a better performance and less problems in games). Still all modern and demanding games of 2009 should at least run in medium detail settings (see the GeForce GT 335M page for more gaming results).

The chip is manufactured in 40nm and offers 72 1-dimensional unified shaders. These can be compared to about 300-400 5-dimensional shaders in graphics cards by AMD. These processing cores can also be accessed with CUDA, OpenCL, and DirectCompute to use the calculation power for other tasks than rendering images (for example transcoding videos). 

The QuadroFX 1800M also supports PureVideo HD with the new VideoProcessor (VP4) to decode HD videos on the graphics card. This helps reducing CPU load and increasing battery runtimes.

The Quadro FX 1800M also supports the automatic switching between the integrated and dedicated graphics card using Optimus. First mobile workstations do not offer Optimus, as the development cycles of these laptops are very long.

NVIDIA Quadro FX 1600M

► remove from comparison

This is a highend workstation graphic chip (for CAD and 3D programs optimized) with DirectX 10 and good OpenGL support - probably based on the GeForce 8700M GT graphic card. It is intended for digital content creators, engineers, earthscientists and other professional 3D applications. Certified drivers grant thecorrect and faster (compared to 8700M) representation of professional programs (CAD, CCD, visualisation software).

NVIDIA Quadro FX 1500MNVIDIA Quadro FX 1800MNVIDIA Quadro FX 1600M
Quadro FX Series
Quadro FX 3800M 128 @ 0.68 GHz256 Bit @ 1000 MHz
Quadro FX 3700M 128 @ 0.55 GHz256 Bit @ 800 MHz
Quadro FX 2800M 96 @ 0.6 GHz256 Bit @ 1000 MHz
Quadro FX 3600M 96 @ 0.5 GHz256 Bit @ 800 MHz
Quadro FX 1800M 72 @ 0.56 GHz128 Bit @ 1100 MHz
Quadro FX 2700M 48 @ 0.53 GHz256 Bit @ 800 MHz
Quadro FX 880M 48 @ 0.55 GHz128 Bit @ 790 MHz
Quadro FX 3500M 24/8 cores @ 0.58 GHz256 Bit @ 700 MHz
Quadro FX 2500M 24/8 cores @ 0.5 GHz256 Bit @ 600 MHz
Quadro FX 1700M 32 @ 0.63 GHz128 Bit @ 800 MHz
Quadro FX 1600M 32 @ 0.63 GHz128 Bit @ 800 MHz
Quadro FX 1500M 20/7 cores @ 0.38 GHz256 Bit @ 500 MHz
Quadro FX 770M 32 @ 0.5 GHz128 Bit @ 800 MHz
Quadro FX 570M 32 @ 0.48 GHz128 Bit @ 700 MHz
Quadro FX 380M 16 @ 0.63 GHz64 Bit @ 800 MHz
Quadro FX 370M 8 @ 0.58 GHz64 Bit @ 700 MHz
Quadro FX 360M 16 @ 0.4 GHz64 Bit @ 600 MHz
Quadro FX 350M 4/3 cores @ 0.45 GHz64 Bit @ 350 MHz
Quadro FX 3800M 128 @ 0.68 GHz256 Bit @ 1000 MHz
Quadro FX 3700M 128 @ 0.55 GHz256 Bit @ 800 MHz
Quadro FX 2800M 96 @ 0.6 GHz256 Bit @ 1000 MHz
Quadro FX 3600M 96 @ 0.5 GHz256 Bit @ 800 MHz
Quadro FX 1800M 72 @ 0.56 GHz128 Bit @ 1100 MHz
Quadro FX 2700M 48 @ 0.53 GHz256 Bit @ 800 MHz
Quadro FX 880M 48 @ 0.55 GHz128 Bit @ 790 MHz
Quadro FX 3500M 24/8 cores @ 0.58 GHz256 Bit @ 700 MHz
Quadro FX 2500M 24/8 cores @ 0.5 GHz256 Bit @ 600 MHz
Quadro FX 1700M 32 @ 0.63 GHz128 Bit @ 800 MHz
Quadro FX 1600M 32 @ 0.63 GHz128 Bit @ 800 MHz
Quadro FX 1500M 20/7 cores @ 0.38 GHz256 Bit @ 500 MHz
Quadro FX 770M 32 @ 0.5 GHz128 Bit @ 800 MHz
Quadro FX 570M 32 @ 0.48 GHz128 Bit @ 700 MHz
Quadro FX 380M 16 @ 0.63 GHz64 Bit @ 800 MHz
Quadro FX 370M 8 @ 0.58 GHz64 Bit @ 700 MHz
Quadro FX 360M 16 @ 0.4 GHz64 Bit @ 600 MHz
Quadro FX 350M 4/3 cores @ 0.45 GHz64 Bit @ 350 MHz
Quadro FX 3800M 128 @ 0.68 GHz256 Bit @ 1000 MHz
Quadro FX 3700M 128 @ 0.55 GHz256 Bit @ 800 MHz
Quadro FX 2800M 96 @ 0.6 GHz256 Bit @ 1000 MHz
Quadro FX 3600M 96 @ 0.5 GHz256 Bit @ 800 MHz
Quadro FX 1800M 72 @ 0.56 GHz128 Bit @ 1100 MHz
Quadro FX 2700M 48 @ 0.53 GHz256 Bit @ 800 MHz
Quadro FX 880M 48 @ 0.55 GHz128 Bit @ 790 MHz
Quadro FX 3500M 24/8 cores @ 0.58 GHz256 Bit @ 700 MHz
Quadro FX 2500M 24/8 cores @ 0.5 GHz256 Bit @ 600 MHz
Quadro FX 1700M 32 @ 0.63 GHz128 Bit @ 800 MHz
Quadro FX 1600M 32 @ 0.63 GHz128 Bit @ 800 MHz
Quadro FX 1500M 20/7 cores @ 0.38 GHz256 Bit @ 500 MHz
Quadro FX 770M 32 @ 0.5 GHz128 Bit @ 800 MHz
Quadro FX 570M 32 @ 0.48 GHz128 Bit @ 700 MHz
Quadro FX 380M 16 @ 0.63 GHz64 Bit @ 800 MHz
Quadro FX 370M 8 @ 0.58 GHz64 Bit @ 700 MHz
Quadro FX 360M 16 @ 0.4 GHz64 Bit @ 600 MHz
Quadro FX 350M 4/3 cores @ 0.45 GHz64 Bit @ 350 MHz
CodenameG71GLMNB8P-GLM
ArchitectureG7xGT2xxG8x
Pipelines20 / 7 Pixel- / Vertexshader72 - unified32 - unified
Core Speed375 MHz560 MHz625 MHz
Memory Speed500 MHz1100 MHz800 MHz
Memory Bus Width256 Bit128 Bit128 Bit
Memory TypeGDDR3DDR3, GDDR5GDDR3
Max. Amount of Memory512 MB1024 MB512 MB
Shared Memorynonono
APIDirectX 9c, Shader 3.0DirectX 10.1, Shader 4.1DirectX 10, Shader 4.0
Power Consumption20 Watt45 Watt50 Watt
Transistors278 Million289 Million
technology90 nm40 nm80 nm
Features90nmPowerMizer 9.0, EnergyStar (3.8W), 16x FSAA Support, CUDA, NVIEW, OpenGL 3.2PureVideo, video scaling, LCDs with 1920x1200 pixel, PCI-Express, connection for ext. graphic card
Notebook Sizelargemedium sizedlarge
Date of Announcement18.04.2006 01.02.2010 01.06.2007
InformationPCI-E, 90nmCG shading language, 32 bit floating point precision, 12 bit subpixel precision, 128 bit precision of the graphic pipeline, vertex and pixelshader programmability, PCI-E inferface, FSAA with turned grid, nView multidisplay support, high-precision dynamic-range (HPDR) technology, hardware 3D clipping, full screen antialiasing
Link to Manufacturer Pagehttp://www.nvidia.de/page/quadrofx_go.htmlhttp://www.nvidia.com/object/product_qua...http://www.nvidia.com/page/nb_chipset.html
Shader Speed1125 MHz1250 MHz

Benchmarks

3DMark Vantage
3DM Vant. Perf. total + NVIDIA Quadro FX 1800M
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. total
min: 3444     avg: 3452     median: 3451.5 (3%)     max: 3459 Points
3DM Vant. Perf. GPU no PhysX + NVIDIA Quadro FX 1800M
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. GPU no PhysX
min: 2774     avg: 2801     median: 2800.5 (2%)     max: 2827 Points
3DMark 2001SE - 3DMark 2001 - Standard
26279 Points (27%)
min: 27822     avg: 32843     median: 35198 (37%)     max: 35509 Points
3DMark 03 - 3DMark 03 - Standard
min: 14650     avg: 15283     median: 15283 (8%)     max: 15916 Points
min: 15060     avg: 16009     median: 15915 (8%)     max: 17144 Points
3DMark 05 - 3DMark 05 - Standard
min: 6386     avg: 6666     median: 6400 (9%)     max: 7212 Points
15249 Points (21%)
min: 9344     avg: 9963     median: 9873 (14%)     max: 10375 Points
3DMark 06 3DMark 06 - Score Unknown Settings + NVIDIA Quadro FX 1500M
3DMark 06
min: 3900     avg: 3903     median: 3903 (6%)     max: 3906 Points
3DMark 06 - Score Unknown Settings + NVIDIA Quadro FX 1600M
min: 4535     avg: 4623     median: 4622.5 (7%)     max: 4710 Points
3DMark 06 - Standard 1280x1024 + NVIDIA Quadro FX 1500M
3DMark 06
4074 Points (6%)
3DMark 06 - Standard 1280x1024 + NVIDIA Quadro FX 1800M
min: 7416     avg: 7573     median: 7572.5 (11%)     max: 7729 Points
3DMark 06 - Standard 1280x1024 + NVIDIA Quadro FX 1600M
min: 4798     avg: 4916     median: 4915.5 (7%)     max: 5033 Points
3DMark 06 - Standard 1280x800 + NVIDIA Quadro FX 1600M
3DMark 06
5608 Points (8%)
SPECviewperf 11
specvp11 snx-01 + NVIDIA Quadro FX 1800M
SPECviewperf 11 - specvp11 snx-01
12.4 fps (9%)
specvp11 tcvis-02 + NVIDIA Quadro FX 1800M
SPECviewperf 11 - specvp11 tcvis-02
13 fps (22%)
specvp11 sw-02 + NVIDIA Quadro FX 1800M
SPECviewperf 11 - specvp11 sw-02
28.1 fps (34%)
specvp11 proe-05 + NVIDIA Quadro FX 1800M
SPECviewperf 11 - specvp11 proe-05
7.5 fps (31%)
specvp11 maya-03 + NVIDIA Quadro FX 1800M
SPECviewperf 11 - specvp11 maya-03
16.6 fps (13%)
specvp11 lightwave-01 + NVIDIA Quadro FX 1800M
SPECviewperf 11 - specvp11 lightwave-01
39 fps (42%)
specvp11 ensight-04 + NVIDIA Quadro FX 1800M
SPECviewperf 11 - specvp11 ensight-04
12.3 fps (6%)
specvp11 catia-03 + NVIDIA Quadro FX 1800M
SPECviewperf 11 - specvp11 catia-03
17.5 fps (21%)
Windows 7 Experience Index - Win7 Gaming graphics
6.6 Points (84%)
Windows 7 Experience Index - Win7 Graphics
5 Points (63%)
Cinebench R10 Cinebench R10 Shading (32bit) + NVIDIA Quadro FX 1600M
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Shading (32bit)
min: 3899     avg: 4670     median: 4885 (21%)     max: 5226 Points
Cinebench R11.5 Cinebench R11.5 OpenGL 64 Bit + NVIDIA Quadro FX 1800M
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 OpenGL 64 Bit
20 fps (7%)

Average Benchmarks NVIDIA Quadro FX 1500M → 100% n=2

Average Benchmarks NVIDIA Quadro FX 1800M → 212% n=2

Average Benchmarks NVIDIA Quadro FX 1600M → 137% n=2

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Game Benchmarks

The following benchmarks stem from our benchmarks of review laptops. The performance depends on the used graphics memory, clock rate, processor, system settings, drivers, and operating systems. So the results don't have to be representative for all laptops with this GPU. For detailed information on the benchmark results, click on the fps number.

Crysis - GPU Benchmark

Crysis - GPU Benchmark

2007
low 1024x768
Quadro FX 1600M:
83.2 84.2 ~ 84 fps
med. 1024x768
Quadro FX 1600M:
31.5 33.3 ~ 32 fps
high 1024x768
Quadro FX 1600M:
13.6 14.4 15.9 ~ 15 fps
Crysis - CPU Benchmark

Crysis - CPU Benchmark

2007
low 1024x768
Quadro FX 1600M:
12.7 72.2 73.1 ~ 53 fps
med. 1024x768
Quadro FX 1600M:
23.5 29.6 ~ 27 fps
high 1024x768
Quadro FX 1600M:
13.2 15.6 ~ 14 fps
World in Conflict - Benchmark

World in Conflict - Benchmark

2007
med. 1024x768
Quadro FX 1600M:
36 37 ~ 37 fps
high 1024x768
Quadro FX 1600M:
21 23 ~ 22 fps
F.E.A.R.

F.E.A.R.

2005
low 640x480
100%
Quadro FX 1500M:
259  fps
182%
Quadro FX 1600M:
444 476 493 ~ 471 fps
med. 800x600
100%
Quadro FX 1500M:
143  fps
113%
Quadro FX 1600M:
153 162 167 ~ 161 fps
high 1024x768
100%
Quadro FX 1500M:
63  fps
90%
Quadro FX 1600M:
56 56 59 ~ 57 fps
Doom 3

Doom 3

2004
low 640x480
100%
Quadro FX 1500M:
114.5  fps
146%
Quadro FX 1600M:
160.8 173.6 ~ 167 fps
med. 640x480
100%
Quadro FX 1500M:
113.6  fps
149%
Quadro FX 1600M:
164.3 174 ~ 169 fps
high 800x600
100%
Quadro FX 1500M:
113.9  fps
143%
Quadro FX 1600M:
160.6 165 ~ 163 fps
ultra 1024x768
100%
Quadro FX 1500M:
109.3  fps
118%
Quadro FX 1600M:
129.1 129.2 ~ 129 fps
Quake 3 Arena - Timedemo

Quake 3 Arena - Timedemo

1999
high 1024x768
100%
Quadro FX 1500M:
380.7  fps
144%
Quadro FX 1600M:
549  fps

Average Gaming NVIDIA Quadro FX 1500M → 100%

Average Gaming 30-70 fps → 100%

Average Gaming NVIDIA Quadro FX 1600M → 136%

Average Gaming 30-70 fps → 90%

For more games that might be playable and a list of all games and graphics cards visit our Gaming List

v1.17
log 27. 07:40:29

#0 checking url part for id 7 +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 1649 +0s ... 0s

#2 checking url part for id 183 +0s ... 0s

#3 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#4 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Fri, 24 Jun 2022 17:25:51 +0200 +0s ... 0s

#5 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.047s ... 0.047s

#6 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.047s

#7 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.048s

#8 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.048s

#9 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.048s

#10 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.048s

#11 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.048s

#12 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.048s

#13 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.048s

#14 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.048s

#15 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.048s

#16 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.048s

#17 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.048s

#18 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.048s

#19 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.048s

#20 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.048s

#21 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.048s

#22 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.048s

#23 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.048s

#24 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.048s

#25 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.048s

#26 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.048s

#27 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.048s

#28 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.048s

#29 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.048s

#30 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.048s

#31 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.048s

#32 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.048s

#33 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.048s

#34 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.048s

#35 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.048s

#36 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.048s

#37 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.048s

#38 composed specs +0s ... 0.048s

#39 did output specs +0s ... 0.048s

#40 start showIntegratedCPUs +0s ... 0.048s

#41 getting avg benchmarks for device 7 +0.042s ... 0.09s

#42 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.091s

#43 got single benchmarks 7 +0.006s ... 0.096s

#44 getting avg benchmarks for device 1649 +0s ... 0.097s

#45 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s ... 0.098s

#46 got single benchmarks 1649 +0.006s ... 0.103s

#47 getting avg benchmarks for device 183 +0s ... 0.104s

#48 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s ... 0.104s

#49 got single benchmarks 183 +0.006s ... 0.111s

#50 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.111s

#51 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.111s

#52 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s ... 0.111s

#53 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.111s

#54 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.001s ... 0.112s

#55 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.112s

#56 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.112s

#57 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.113s

#58 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.113s

#59 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.113s

#60 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.113s

#61 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.113s

#62 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.113s

#63 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.113s

#64 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.113s

#65 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.113s

#66 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.113s

#67 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.113s

#68 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.113s

#69 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.114s

#70 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.114s

#71 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.114s

#72 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.114s

#73 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.114s

#74 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.114s

#75 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.114s

#76 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.115s

#77 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.115s

#78 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.115s

#79 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.115s

#80 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.116s

#81 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.116s

#82 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.116s

#83 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.116s

#84 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.117s

#85 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.117s

#86 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.117s

#87 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.117s

#88 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.118s

#89 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.118s

#90 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.118s

#91 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.118s

#92 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.118s

#93 min, max, avg, median took s +0.001s ... 0.119s

#94 before gaming benchmark output +0s ... 0.119s

#95 Got 44 rows for game benchmarks. +0.004s ... 0.123s

#96 composed SQL query for gamebenchmarks +0s ... 0.123s

#97 got data and put it in $dataArray +0.001s ... 0.124s

#98 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s ... 0.125s

#99 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.125s

#100 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.125s

#101 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.125s

#102 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.125s

#103 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.125s

#104 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.125s

#105 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s ... 0.126s

#106 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.126s

#107 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.126s

#108 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.126s

#109 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.126s

#110 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.126s

#111 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.126s

#112 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s ... 0.127s

#113 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.127s

#114 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.127s

#115 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.127s

#116 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s ... 0.129s

#117 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.129s

#118 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.129s

#119 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.129s

#120 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.129s

#121 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.129s

#122 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.129s

#123 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.129s

#124 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.129s

#125 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.129s

#126 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.129s

#127 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.129s

#128 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s ... 0.13s

#129 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.13s

#130 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.13s

#131 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.13s

#132 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.13s

#133 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.13s

#134 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.13s

#135 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.13s

#136 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.13s

#137 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.13s

#138 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.13s

#139 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.13s

#140 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s ... 0.131s

#141 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.131s

#142 benchmarks composed for output. +0s ... 0.131s

#143 calculated avg scores. +0s ... 0.131s

#144 return log +0.001s ... 0.132s

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Notebook / Laptop Reviews and News > Benchmarks / Tech > Graphics Card Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2017-09-11)